untitled

Similar documents
untitled

(156) / Spurious Regression Unit Root Test Cointergration TestVector Error Correction Model Granger / /

untitled

untitled

untitled

52 expiration effect (2303) (2330) (1301) (1303) (1216) % (SIMEX) (Morgan Stan

untitled

untitled

PDFᅲᆰᄏ커￷

1970 Roulac (1996) (shock) (structure change) Barras and Ferguson (1985) Barras (1994) (1990) (1996) (1997) 1

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

育 達 科 大 學 報. 第 27 期. 民 國 100 年 6 月 An Empirical Note on Testing the Cointegration Relationship between the Construction Stocks and Real Estate Markets

<4D F736F F D20B5DAC8FDBDECB2A2B9BAC2DBCCB3C8D5B3CC2E646F63>

Alexander & Wyeth Dercon 1995 ECM - Johansen Goodwin 1992 VEC Asche 1999 Gonzalez 2001 ECM Goodwin

elections. In addition, the positive CARs exist during the full event date that indicates the election bull run do happen in Taiwan. When incumbent go

% 5 CPI CPI PPI Benjamin et al Taylor 1993 Cukierman and Gerlach 2003 Ikeda 2013 Jonas and Mishkin

untitled

untitled

22 Journal of Taiwan Land Research Vol. 10, No.2 pp. 1~22 * ** 摘 要 ARCH GARCH Markov-Switch-ARCH SWARCH ARCH-M *

,,,,,,,,,,, ( 2006 (2007 (2007,,,, /, :,,,, /,, ;, DF NDF,, ;, DF,,, / :, /, / ;, ; / /,, / ( /, : G t = S t e ( r d - r f ( T - t (1 S t t, G t t, T,

untitled

Microsoft Word - A _ doc

CPI Krugman 1986 Dornbush 1987 Mark - up Pricing - to - Market Obstfeld and Rogoff 1995 Dornbush 1987 Redux NOEM 2008 NOEM CPI Tayl

涨跌幅限制与股价变动研究

MRS-GARCH MRS-GARCH Bernanke and Gertler (1999) ; ; Cecchetti (2000) ( ) Gray (1996) MRS-GARCH (2001) 500 t- Gray t- S t S t S t =1 ; 90 S t =2 Hamilt

;,, ( ),,,,, ;,,,, (2006) 6, :,,,, OPEC, 10,, 30 %, 9 Π,,12 Π 20 80,, ( 5 Π ), Π, 10 Π, (2003),,, ( ) 100,, (, ) 5,, 10,,, (, 2005), (

untitled

Hemler Longstaff Hemler Longstaff Gay Jung 1999 Brailsford Cusack B - S 2011 Helmer Longstaff 300 一 股 指 期 货 的 一 般 均 衡 定

untitled

Taiwan Fuures Exchange, TAIFEX TAIFEX Taiwan Sock Index Fuures 00 4 expiraion eec S&P 500 ( ). Kawaller, Koch and Koch 987 S&P

Pair Copula - GARCH - t 5 Domowitz and Hakkio 1985 ARCH GARCH Nieuwland et al GARCH BF / DM DG /DM FF /DM IL /DM SP /DM Torben

标题

Markowitz 1952 DOT(designated order turnaround) ESP(exchange stock portfolio) ( ) , side car ETFExchange Traded Fund ETF ETF ETF ETF ETF ETF

World Economic Papers October, 2012 * Zeldes 1989 Shea 1995 Drakos Campbell and Mankiw 1989 LC-PIH 2007 Deng and Jin 2008 λ

31 3 Vol. 31 No Research of Finance and Education May ,,, BS,,,,, ; ; ; ; : F : A : ( 2018)

<4D F736F F D DB5DA32C6DA2DD6D0B4F3B9DCC0EDD1D0BEBF2DC4DACEC42D6F6B2DD2BBD0A32E646F63>

,, :, ;,,?, : (1), ; (2),,,, ; (3),,, :,;; ;,,,,(Markowitz,1952) 1959 (,,2000),,, 20 60, ( Evans and Archer,1968) ,,,


中国科技论文在线

Girton Roper (1977),,,,,, ( ),,,,,,, ( Exchange Market Pressure) 30 EMP, EMP EMP,Girton Roper (1977), ,,, Kim(1985) ,,, T

经 济 与 管 理 耿 庆 峰 : 我 国 创 业 板 市 场 与 中 小 板 市 场 动 态 相 关 性 实 证 研 究 基 于 方 法 比 较 视 角 87 Copula 模 型 均 能 较 好 地 刻 画 金 融 市 场 间 的 动 态 关 系, 但 Copula 模 型 效 果 要 好 于


( ) t ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) t-

穨溪南-5.PDF

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

Ρ Τ Π Υ 8 ). /0+ 1, 234) ς Ω! Ω! # Ω Ξ %& Π 8 Δ, + 8 ),. Ψ4) (. / 0+ 1, > + 1, / : ( 2 : / < Α : / %& %& Ζ Θ Π Π 4 Π Τ > [ [ Ζ ] ] %& Τ Τ Ζ Ζ Π

《金融评论》投稿 封面

De Roon Veld (1998) 0116 %, %,,,, 180,,, Burlacu (2000) 141,,, Abhyankar Dunning (1999), %,, %, %, %, % (2

% %! # % & ( ) % # + # # % # # & & % ( #,. %

,,,. : Granger ;, CCF Hong (2001), ( ECM), Granger, Hong(2001) ;. 1. 2, Granger,. Brunetti & Gilbert (2000) FIGARCH IPE COMEX, NYMEX IPE,

Microsoft Word - A doc

untitled


08陈会广

( (3) 2009) (70% ) ; ; ; (2007) ; ; (2005) ; (2010) ; (2009) MacDonald & Taylor ; (1989) Ito (1990) Chinn et al. (1994) (2009) Verschoor et al.

<4D F736F F D20B2C4A447B2D5B14DC344B4C1A4A4AED1ADB1B8EAAEC62E646F63>

)

2009 2,,, 1 : (1), ; (2) ( DNR GKN),, ; (3),, ; (4) ( DNR GH VAR), ; (5),,, ; (6) ( ), VAR 1 GH DNR MRR GKN VAR LSB Glosten and Harris, 1988 De Jong e

中国沪深股票市场流动性研究

中国金融体系运行效率分析(提纲)

( 413 1), (2003) ,,,,

Engel rer = ner + p * - p = ner α * p * T + α * p * N α p T + αp N = ner + p * T - p T + α * p * N - p *


untitled

untitled

Probabilities of Default RMI PDs CVI 7-8 KMV 9 KMV KMV KMV 1. KMV KMV DPT DD DD DD DPT Step 1 V E = V A N d 1 - e rt DN d 2 1 d 1 = ln V A

普通高等学校本科专业设置管理规定

24郭瑞敏z

摘 要 本 篇 文 章 主 要 是 利 用 1979 年 至 2014 年 台 灣 年 數 據 的 資 料, 檢 視 油 價 對 於 匯 率 的 影 響, 所 採 用 的 檢 定 模 型 為 : 單 根 Johansen 共 整 合 及 VECM 向 量 誤 差 修 正 模 型 而 共 整 合 模

涨跌停版的磁吸效应:来自中国股市的实证发现

<4D F736F F D203134A1A1B3C2CFDCA1A1A1A1A3A8BBC6A3A92E646F63>

, 7 DCC-MVGARCH GARCH 90 Peters Sukpitak 13 DFA Ma 14 DCCA Zhou 15 MF-DCCA Shi 16 MF-DCCA MM-DCCA MM-DCCA MM-DCCA Shi 16 MF-DCC

: ; ; ; (Gardner1975) (2009) (Hayenga 1999) (Zhang et al.1995) (Willett et al.1997) Apergis Rezitis (2003) 1% (Izquierdo et al.2007; Mackowiak 0.75% 2

Microsoft Word - mei.doc

软科学 2014 年 1 月 第 28 卷 第 1 期 ( 总第 169 期 ) U β 2 > 0 β 3 < 0 N 4 BOD COD 2 ARDL 5 ~ EKC 7 Johansen Yang EKC 8 β 1 12 ARDL EKC ARDL EKC ΔE t = b 0 + Σ p1

untitled

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

untitled

IPO Baron 1982 [2] Rock 1986 [1] Allen Faulhaber 1989 [3] [9] IPO IPO 2010 IPO % 2011 IPO IPO 27.4% 2012 IPO

.., + +, +, +, +, +, +,! # # % ( % ( / 0!% ( %! %! % # (!) %!%! # (!!# % ) # (!! # )! % +,! ) ) &.. 1. # % 1 ) 2 % 2 1 #% %! ( & # +! %, %. #( # ( 1 (

# % & ) ) & + %,!# & + #. / / & ) 0 / 1! 2

~ 10 2 P Y i t = my i t W Y i t 1000 PY i t Y t i W Y i t t i m Y i t t i 15 ~ 49 1 Y Y Y 15 ~ j j t j t = j P i t i = 15 P n i t n Y

!! # % & ( )!!! # + %!!! &!!, # ( + #. ) % )/ # & /.

&! +! # ## % & #( ) % % % () ) ( %

1 2 3 GARCH GARCH α > 0 α i > 0 p α i + q β j < 1 i = 1 j = 1 α < 0 β < 0 p α i + q β j < 1 i = 1 j = 1 1. GARCH α + β > 1 α β α > 0 β < 1 α + β > 1 4

Microsoft Word - 971管理學院工作報告2

1

., /,, 0!, + & )!. + + (, &, & 1 & ) ) 2 2 ) 1! 2 2

! # % & # % & ( ) % % %# # %+ %% % & + %, ( % % &, & #!.,/, % &, ) ) ( % %/ ) %# / + & + (! ) &, & % & ( ) % % (% 2 & % ( & 3 % /, 4 ) %+ %( %!

HP Hodrick and Prescott 980 BK Baxter and King 999 CF Christiano and Fitzgerald 2003 Harvey 989 Harvey and Shephard Chen et

<4D F736F F D20BDD7A4E5B6B0A455A555A658A8D6AAA95FA477A752B0A3A5BCB56FAAEDA4E5B3B E30372E30355F2E646F63>

ⅠⅡⅢ Ⅳ

2005 9,,, (1998), (M 2 ),, Greenwood Jovanovic (1990),,, U Galor Zeira Banerjee Newman (1993),,, Clark,Xu Zou (2003),,,,,,,, Greenwood Jovanovic U, Vi

J2n21

ARCH 系 列 模 型 介 绍 与 应 用 目 录 一 波 动 率 基 本 概 念... 3 二 Black-Scholes 期 权 定 价 公 式 中 的 波 动 率... 4 三 GARCH 类 模 型 简 述... 5 四 基 于 沪 深 300 指 数 样 本 的 GARCH 类 模 型

C02.doc

, ( 6 7 8! 9! (, 4 : : ; 0.<. = (>!? Α% ), Β 0< Χ 0< Χ 2 Δ Ε Φ( 7 Γ Β Δ Η7 (7 Ι + ) ϑ!, 4 0 / / 2 / / < 5 02

untitled

: 29 : n ( ),,. T, T +,. y ij i =, 2,, n, j =, 2,, T, y ij y ij = β + jβ 2 + α i + ɛ ij i =, 2,, n, j =, 2,, T, (.) β, β 2,. jβ 2,. β, β 2, α i i, ɛ i

4= 8 4 < 4 ϑ = 4 ϑ ; 4 4= = 8 : 4 < : 4 < Κ : 4 ϑ ; : = 4 4 : ;

Transcription:

300 (ADF) (VEM) 300 2006 9 5 A50 2006 9 8 CFFEX 10 30 300 300 2007 1 19 6 3 300

300 Kawaller Koch(1987) S&P 500 S&P 500 20~45 1

Stoll Whaley(1990) ARMA 2 3 S&P 500 MMI S&P 500 MMI 5 Abhyankar(1995) FTSE 100 FTSE 100 1 Arshanapalli Doukas(1997) S&P 500 S&P 500 Gwilym Buckle(2001) FTSE 100 Zhong Darrat (2004) EGARCH Nam Oh (2006) KOSPI 200 KOSPI 200 KOSPI 200 Manaster Rendleman(1982) Bhattacharya(1987) Anthony(1988) (2002) (2006)

(2006) Garbade-Silber (2006) (2005) (2005) (2005) ADF Johansen- Juselius 1 3 300 2006 11 1 2007 1 19 Eviews 5.0 SPSS 11.0

2 300 1 19 6 IF0611 IF0612 IF0701 IF0702 IF0703 IF0706 IF0611 IF0612 IF0701 55 1 1 1 300

Descriptive Statistics FUTURE S SPOT N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation 55 1491.00 2937.00 1921.864 370.03374 55 1475.78 2396.09 1823.703 270.44213 2937.00 1491.00 1921.56 370.03374 2396.09 1475.78 1823.703 270.44213 1 300 3200 2800 2400 2000 1600 1200 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 FUTURES SPOT 20 10 1

300 2 300 0.978 2 300 FUTURES Pearson Correlation FUTURES SPOT 1 0.978 ** SPOT Pearson Correlation 0.978 ** 1 **. 1%. LnFt LnSt 1. DF ADF DF t ADF 300

LnF t LnS t 3 3 300 C T K ADF 1% 5% 10% LnF t C 0 2 1.982990-3.565430-2.919952-2.597905 LnS t C 0 1 0.703456-3.557472-2.916566-2.596116 LnF t C 0 2-8.491264-3.562669-2.918778-2.597285 LnS t C 0 1-6.772074-3.562669-2.918778-2.597285 : 1 c t k ; 2 k AIC SC 3 1 300 I 1 2. 300 300

Co-integration 300 LnF t LnS Johansen Juselius 1990 JJ JJ VAR VAR P 1 y = Ay + + A y + ε t 1 2 T t 1 t 1 p t p t y t k y 1t y 2t y kt I d ε t k 1 t 2 p 1 y =Π y + Γ y + ε t t 1 i t i t i= 1 p Ai I i= 1 Π= p Γ i = j=+ i 1 A j 3 y t t i (i=1 2 p) Πy t 1 I 0 y t Πy t 1 Π rank( Π ) = r 0 r k y

Π : Π= αβ α β K r r y t Johansen Trace Test y t r r = 0 r = 0 r 1 r 2 r r * yt r * 1 y t 300 JJ 4 4 300 JJ H 0 H 1 5% r 0 * * r 1 0.260292 16.55276 12.32090 r 1 r 2 0.016682 0.874763 4.129906 5 4 LnFt 0.945756 LnSt ε t

0.01472 4 ECM LnF = 0.01748Ecm + 0.352063 LnF 1.34387 LnS + ε t t 1 t-1 t-1 5 0.00538 0.19322 0.46487 LnS = 0.009213Ecm + 0.214481 LnF 0.449186 LnS + ε t t 1 t-1 t-1 6 0.00224 0.08032 0.19324 5 LnS t-1 1.34387 t t Ecm t -0.01748 1.748% 6

0.9213% 3. 300 VAR 2 2 300 Response to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations.05 Response of FUTURES to FUTURES.05 Response of FUTURES to SPOT.04.04.03.03.02.02.01.01.00.00 -.01 -.01 -.02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -.02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

300 2~4 4 Sims 1980 Mean Square Error VAR 1 VAR p VMA 6 y = ψ I + ψ L+ ψ L +L ε t 2 ( 0 1 2 ) t i yit k y = ( ψ ε + ψ ε + ψ ε + ψ ε +LL ) it 0, ij jt 1, ij jt 1 2, ij jt 2 3, ij jt 3 j= 1 7 { ε jt }

8 2 2 2 0, ij jt + 1, ij jt 1 + 2, ij jt 2 + = q, ij jj q= 0 E[( ψ ε ψ ε ψ ε L ) ] ( ψ ) σ j = 1,2,...,k y var( y ) k it it k 2 2 var( yit ) = { ( ψ q, ij ) σ jj} j= 1 q= 0 9 10 ij ij 2 2 2 2 ( ψq, ij ) σ jj ( ψq, ij ) σ jj q= 0 q= 0 k var( yit ) 2 2 ψ qij, σ jj j= 1 q= 0 RVC ( ) = = { ( ) } RVC Relative Variance Contribution RVC ij j i 300 5 5 300 (%) (%) (%) (%) 1 47.943 52.057 0 100 2 32.185 67.815 7.170 92.830

3 27.897 72.102 9.240 90.760 4 26.572 73.428 9.543 90.457 5 25.815 74.185 9.762 90.238 6 25.394 74.606 9.943 90.057 7 25.263 74.737 10.032 89.967 8 25.312 74.688 10.070 89.930 9 25.480 74.520 10.078 89.921 10 25.736 74.264 10.065 89.935 5 300 1 47.943% 25.736% 5 74.264% 1 7 10.065% 89.935% 300 71.240% 8.590%

300 1 300 300 2 300 3 : [1] Abhyankar A. H.. Return and volatility dynamics in the FTSE 100 stock index and stock index futures markets. The Journal of Futures Markets, 1995(15):457 488. [2] Anthony J. H.. The interrelation of stock and options market trading

volume data. The Journal of Finance, 1988(43):949 963. [3] Bhattacharya M.. Price changes of related securities: The case of call options and stocks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1987(22):1 15. [4] Gwilym O., Buckle M.. The lead lag relationship between the FTSE 100 stock index and its derivative contracts. Applied Financial Economics, 2001(11): 385 393. [5] Johansen, Soren. Estimation and hypothesis testing of co integration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 1991(59):1551-1580. [6] Kawaller I., Koch P., Koch T.. The temporal price relationship between S&P 500 futures and S&P 500 index. The Journal of Finance, 1987(42):1309-1329. [7] Manaster S., Rendleman J. R.. Option prices as predictors of equilibrium stock prices. The Journal of Finance, 1982(37): 1043 1057. [8] Nam S. O., Oh S. Y., Kim H. K.. An empirical analysis of the price discovery and the pricing bias in the KOSPI 200 stock index derivatives markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2006(15):398-414. [9] Stoll H. R., Whaley R. E.. The dynamics of stock index and stock index futures returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1990(45): 191-220. [10] Zhong M., Darrat A. F., Otero R.. Price discovery and volatility

spillovers in index futures market: Some evidence from Mexico. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2004(28):3037-3054. [11]... 2006 [12].. 2005(8) 32-39 [13].. 2002(5) 57-61 [14].. 2006(8) 77-81 [15].. 2006(4) 44-51 [16].. 2006(6) 52-71 [17].. 2005(1) 43-49 1 4