カテゴリー Ⅰ 日本建築学会計画系論文集第 81 巻第 722 号, ,2016 年 4 月 J. Archit. Plann., AIJ, Vol. 81 No. 722, , Apr., 2016 DOI

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "カテゴリー Ⅰ 日本建築学会計画系論文集第 81 巻第 722 号, ,2016 年 4 月 J. Archit. Plann., AIJ, Vol. 81 No. 722, , Apr., 2016 DOI"

缨俭科齐
4 years ago
Views:

1 カテゴリー Ⅰ 日本建築学会計画系論文集第 81 巻第 722 号, ,2016 年 4 月 J. Archit. Plann., AIJ, Vol. 81 No. 722, , Apr., 2016 DOI 戸建住宅地における家庭ごみ集積所の実態と利用者の評価美しく住みよい戸建住宅地を実現するための基礎研究 ACTUAL CONDITIONS OF GARBAGE COLLECTION SITES AND EVALUATION BY USERS IN DETACHED HOUSE AREA Basic study to realize the beautiful and comfortable detached house area * 岡本浩一 Koichi OKAMOTO The garbage collection sites influence on the residential scenery of detached house area. However, there are no laws and rules written about how to regard the garbage collection sites on process of detached house area planning. The purpose of this study is to clarify points of detached house area planning through the actual conditions of garbage containers, garbage collection sites and those maintenance. The main results are summarized as follows; It is important in first planning process of the detached house area to consider the condition of landform for garbage collection sites. In case of present detached house area, it is necessary to think garbage collection sites and public space as related to each other. It is important for the site of garbage container that ground is hard to get dirty, easy to clean up and easy to clear the snow off. Portable garbage container is better choice to decrease harmful effect on the scenery of detached house area but maintenance of the garbage collection sites needs the residents understanding and cooperation. Keywords : Garbage collection sites, Garbage collection containers, How to use, Evaluation by users, Residential scenery, Detached house area planning 本論文は, 文献 8) および 9) で発表公表した内容に追加分析修正を加え, 発展させたものである * 北海学園大学工学部建築学科教授博士 ( 工学 ) Prof., Dept. of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkai-Gakuen University, Dr.Eng. 1019

2 ㄪᰝᴫせ ఫᏯᆅ㹉㸪ᖹᡂ ᖺ ᖺ㛫 ࡅ Ẹ㛫 ᴗ ࡀ㛤チ ไ ㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ 㑅ᐃ ᚩ ᗘ 㐀ᡂࡋࡓ㸦ᅗ 㸧ࠋᆅ ኸ ᖜ P 㧗పᕪ ㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ 㸪ᡞ 㞟 ࡃࢦ 㞟 ᡤ ࡍ 㞟 P ᆅࡀ 㧗 ᅵᆅ ప ᅵᆅ ศ ࡀ㺂ࡑ ࡒ ᖹᆠ ࡇ 㸪ᡞᘓఫᏯᆅ ࡇ ๓ᥦ 㸪㐨 ᵓᡂ ࡌ ఫᏯᆅ 㺃 ࡋࡓ㐨 ࡉ ࠋ ᬒほ ᚩ ࡅ ᆅᙧ 㐪㸦㝠ᆅ㸪ᖹᆠᆅ㸧㸪 ᆅ ᘓ ㄪᰝ ᵓᡂ ᪉ἲ ไ㝈㐪㸦ᆅ ィ㸪ᘓ ༠ᐃ㸪 ࡕ 㓄 ᆺ ᘓ ศㆡ㸪 ࡌ 㺂ㄪᰝᑐ 㑅ᐃࡋࡓఫᏯᆅ ࡍ య ᐙᗞࡈ ࡋ㸧 ὀ ࡋ㸲 ᡤ 㑅ᐃࡋࡓ㸦㸧ࠋ 㛵㐃 ᴗᢸᙜ ㄪᰝ ᐇ ࡋࡓࠋࢦ 㞟 ᡤ 㛵ࡍ ㅖ ఫᏯᆅ㹆㝠ᆅ ᗈࡀ 㸦ᅗ 㸧ࠋ㧗ᗘ ᡂ㛗ᮇ 㔜ᕤᴗ ἣ ㄆࡋ㺂ㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ ᅗ ᥦ౪㢪ࡗࡓࠋࡇ ࡓ ࡕ ࡍ ࠋ ቑ ᛂࡌࡓఫᏯ౪ 㸪 ሗ యゼၥ ᐇ ࡋࡓ ๓ほᐹㄪᰝ ᇶ ࡁ㺂 ࢣ ᖺ ᖺ ࡅ᪂ఫᏯᕷ ᆅ㛤 ᴗ యࡀ㛤 ࡋࡓࠋ ㄪᰝ ᆅㄪᰝ సᡂ ㄪᰝ ᐇ ࡋࡓ ᆅᇦෆ 㧗పᕪ P ࠋ 㧗㐨 ቨࡀ㐃 ࡋ㺂 ࠋ ࢣ ㄪᰝ 㸪ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ ἣ ᗘ ᅇ ቨ ᗜᇙタ㛵㝵ẁ ᆅࡀ㐃 ࠋ ᒓᛶ ࡓ ࠋゼၥ ᡭΏࡋ 㓄ᕸࡋ㺂 ᡶ 㒑 ఫᏯᆅ㹑㺂 ᖺ௦ 㐍 ࡓ ᾏ㐨ᗇ ᅜ㝿 ᅇ ࡋࡓࠋ㓄ᕸ 㝿ࡋᑐ ఫᏯᆅ ᛶ ᛂࡌ ḟ Ⅼ ព 㺃 ᬒ 㺂㠃 KD 㛤 ࡀィ ࡉ 㺂ࡑ ࡋࡓࠋఫᏯᆅ㹆㠃 ࡀᗈ ࡓ 㸪㐀ᡂ ᮇ ೫ ࡀ 㓄 ࡕ 㝠ᆅ KD ᘓタࡉ ࡓ㸦ᅗ 㸧ࠋᡤ ᘓ ༠ᐃ㐠Ⴀ 㒊 ᅇ ᶆ 㒊㓄ᕸࡋࡓࠋఫᏯᆅ㹑 ᴗ ጤဨ ຍධࡀ ࡅ 㺂 ᆅෆ ᘓ 㓄㸪ᶞᮌ 㺀 Ⲯ ఫᏯ ࡀΰᅾࡋ ࡀ ࡃ 㜵 ၥ㢟㺁 ᣢ 㸪ᘓ Ⰽᙬ ヲ ᘓ ༠ᐃࡀ ࠋ㟁 ᇙタ ฟ ࡅ㺂 ᴗ ఫᏯ 㓄ᕸ ጤクࡋࡓࠋᚑࡗ 㓄ᕸ Ꮡᶞᮌ ṧᏑά 㺂ఫᏯᆅᬒほ ᗈࡃ㓄 ࡀ ࠋ ヲ ࠋఫᏯᆅ㹎 ෆ 㛗 ༠ຊ ᚓ ᅇぴᯈ ࡌ ఫᏯᆅ㹎㺂ᖹᆠᆅ 㐨㺃 ࡋ Ꮿᆅ ࡕ Ꮿᆅ ୡᖏ ๓ ༠ຊ ౫㢗ࡋࡓࠋ๓ Ꮿᆅ ෆ 㸦 ୡᖏ㸧 ࡀ ࡋ ᐙ୪ 㸦ᅗ 㸧ࠋ ᾏ㐨ఫᏯ౪ බ 㸦௨ බ 㸧 ࡕ ୡᖏ 㓄ᕸ ࡁࡓࠋఫᏯᆅ㹉 ఫᏯᆅ㹆 ᵝ 㒊 ᅇ ࡀᆅඖ ᘓタᴗ ᚰ ཧຍ ᚓ ᘓタࡋࡓᘓ ศㆡఫ ᶆ ࡋᆅ ෆ ఫᏯ ࢲ ゼ㒊㓄ᕸࡋࡓࠋ Ꮿ ࠋබ 㺂ఫᏯ㒔ᕷ ഛබᅋ ᘓタᣦ㔪㸪እᵓ ᵝ ᘓ ᆅㄪᰝ 㺂 య ᥦ౪ ࡓࡔ ࡓࢦ 㞟 ᡤ ᅗ ቃᛶ ᪉㔪 ࡋ ಟ㺃 ཧ 㺂 ࢣ 㓄ᕸ ᅖෆ ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ ᑐ ࡋ ᐇ ࡀタィ ᕤࡋࡓࠋణࡋ㺂ᘓ ༠ᐃ ᢸಖ ࡋࡓࠋ㸯 ᡤ ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ 㞟 ᐜჾࡀタ ࡉ ᵝ ࡃ㺂ቑᨵ ᘓ ḟ ఫᏯᆅᬒほ ప ᠱᛕࡉ ࠋ Ꮚ ࡗࡓࠋ㞟 ᐜჾ ᇶࡎࡘタ ἣ ᖏഛရ㢮ㄆ㸪 ᐜ㔞 ᐇ ㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ 㑅ᐃࡋࡓ㸲ࡘ ᡞᘓఫᏯᆅ ᴫせ ఫᏯᆅ㹆 ఫᏯᆅ㹑 ఫᏯᆅ㹎ㄪᰝᑐ ᡤᅾᆅ᪉ ᆅᙧ ᾏ㐨 ᆅ᪉ 㝠ᆅ 㐨㓄㧗 ἢ ᆅ ィ ᕤస 㛵 ไ㝈 ࡋ ࡋ ᘓ ༠ᐃ ࡋ 㸦㐠Ⴀ㸸ᘓ ༠ᐃ㐠Ⴀጤဨ 㸧 ᾏ㐨 ᆅ᪉ 㝠ᆅ 㧗 ἢ 㸪 Ṇ ࢱ పᒙఫᒃᑓ 㸪 ᆅᇦ 㧗ᒙఫᒃᑓ ᆅ 㸪㞄 ᴗ 㹼 ᖺ 㹼 ᖺ 㛤 ᮇ 㛤チ㛤 ᡭἲ ᪂ఫᏯᕷ ᆅ㛤 ᴗ 㛤 య ᆅ 㠃ィ Ꮿᆅ ィ ୡᖏ ᐦᗘ య ࢦ 㞟 ᡤタ Ᏻ ᚩ ᾏ㐨 ᆅ᪉ ᖹᆠᆅ ఫᏯᆅ㹉 ᾏ㐨 ᕝᆅ᪉ ᖹᆠᆅ ࡋ ࡋ ࡋ㸪 ᚋ ㄆ ࡓ ᙳ ࢱ ࡋࡓࠋ ㄪᰝ ࢣ ㄪᰝ ᆅㄪᰝ ᐇ ᴫせ ఫᏯᆅ㹆 ఫᏯᆅ㹑 ఫᏯᆅ㹎 ఫᏯᆅ㹉 ᖺ ᖺ ᖺ ᖺ ᐙᗞࡈ 㞟 ᡤ 㛵ࡍ 㸪ᅇ 㸪 ෆᐜ ⱞ せᮃෆᐜ㸪㸦 ᗜ㸪㢮ཬ ᗈ 㺃 ᯈ ቨ㠃ᚋ 㺃 ࡁ ࢣ ᖺ ᖺ ᖺ ᖺ ࡉ㺃Ⰽᙬ ไ㝈㸪ሟ ࡓ ࡉࡃ ᵓ㐀 ไ㝈ࠋ ㄪᰝ ᆅෆ༨ ࡀᑐ ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ グ㸧 ᅇ 㓄ᕸ 㒊㒊ヲ㒊㒊 పᒙఫᒃᑓ 㸪 పᒙఫᒃᑓ 㸪㧗ᒙఫᒃᑓ ఫᒃ య ࡁ ㄪᰝ ᅇ 㸫 ᪉ἲ ゼၥ㓄ᕸ㸪㒑 ᅇ ᡶ ᖺ ᖺ ᖺ ᆅほᐹ ᖺ ㄪᰝ ㄪᰝᑐ ࢣ 㓄ᕸ ᅖෆ ᐙᗞࡈ 㞟 ᡤ ᡤ 㞟 ᡤ ᡤ ᡤ ᡤ 㞟 ᐜჾ ᡤ ᡤ ᡤ ᡤ タ ᖺ 㹼 ᖺ ᅵᆅ ᴗ 㛤チ ఫᏯ㒔ᕷ ഛබᅋ Ẹ㛫 ᴗ Ẹ㛫 ᴗ య ㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ ಟ㸸 ᾏ㐨ఫᏯ౪ බ ᇶ ᇶ 㞟 ᐜჾ ᇶ ᇶ KD KD KD KD ㄪᰝ㡯㸪㞄᥋ᆅ 㸪ἢ㐨ᖜဨ㸪ᙧ ᐜ㔞㸪㸦㠃 KD㸧㸦㠃 KD㸧 ഛရ 㢮㸪ởᦆ ἣ㸪㸶᪉ ᙳ Ꮿᆅ Ꮿᆅ ヲ Ꮿᆅ ヲヲ ࢣ ㄪᰝ タၥᵓᡂ ᴫせ ୡᖏ㸦㸧 ୡᖏ㸦㸧 ୡᖏ㸦㸧 ୡᖏ㸦㸧 ၥ ၥ ၥ ᴫせ㸦 Ꮿᆅ ෆ 㸧 ᅾ ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ ࡘ ࠚ 㸦㸧タ ᡤせ㛫ࠉࠉ ࡇ ࡃ ࡇ 㸦㸧㸦㸧㸦㸧 ᮲ ฟ 㛫ࠉ ල ୡᖏ ㄆ ୡᖏ ᥎ィ ἣ ෆᐜࠊ㛵 ᗘ KD KD KD KD ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ 㛵ࡍ ࠚ ୡᖏ Ᏻタᐃ ࡋ ᡤ ୡᖏ௨ ᡤ 㹼 ୡᖏ ᡤ ୡᖏ௨ ᮃ ࡋ ᪉ࠉࠉࠉࠉ ษ ࡇ ᮲ 㸪㐃㉎ධ ࡋ ㉎ධ ㉎ධ ࡋ 㓄㡯ࠉࠉࠉ ᬒほᛶ ౽ᛶ ẚ ㉎ධ ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ 㛵ࡍ ᗘࠚ බᅋ ᘓタᣦ㔪 ༡ ᖿ 㐨㸪す ࡍࡉࠉ ᬒほㄪ ࠉ ᐜ㔞タィ ᣓ㸪 බ ᪉㔪 ᘓ 㕲㐨 ᆅ㸪ᆅ ᚰ 㞄ఫ ᪉㸪 ᛶ Ⲩ ࡉ ࡍࡉࠉࠉࠉ ἣ 㟁 ᆅ ᇙタ㸪 ศㆡ㸦 Ꮿᆅ㸧 ༡ ᪉ すపᮾ㧗 බႠఫᏯ ᶵ ᅇ ᒓᛶ ㄆࠚ Ⲯᖖఫΰᅾ㸪 ᘓ 㓄㺃ᙧ 㺃ఫᏯᛶ ᅵᡭࡀ 㸪ప ᆅᇦ ᚰ㒊㓄 Ꮡᶞᮌ ṧᏑ 㸪㠃㸪 ᱂ 㠃ࡀබ 㛫 ఫᒃᙧ ࠉࠉ ᒃఫᖺ ࠉ ࠉࠉ ᛶ 㸭ᖺ㱋ᒙ ୡᖏᵓᡂࠉࠉ ᡤࡘࡁ ᗘ 㺃ᶞ ᇶ ᅖ 1020

ᢡ ᯟ 㸸ᣑ ᅗ ᅖෆ ヱᙜ ࡋ ࠉࠉ㸸ࡈ ධ 㝿 ࡁ P 㞄᥋ᑠᏛ ࢢ P ᅗ ఫᏯᆅ㹎ㄪᰝᑐ ᅖ ࢦ 㞟 ᐜჾ ศᕸ㸦㒊ศ㸧 P ᆅ

3 ᣑ ᅗ ᅖ බ ᅬ බᅬ P P ᅗ ఫᏯᆅ㹆 యᆅᅗ ㄪᰝᑐ ᅖ ࢦ 㞟 ᐜჾ ศᕸ㸦㒊ศ㸧 ซ 㸦ᅗ 㹼 ὀ㸵㸧ඹ 㸧 ᕥ ᣑ ᅗ ᅖ ࢣ 㓄ᕸ ᆅㄪᰝ ᑐ ᅖ ᅖ グ ᣑ ᅗ ᅖ ࢦ 㞟 ᐜჾ ᙧ 㓄 ἣ グ Ṍ㐨 ฟ ฟ 㐨 ࡋ ࡋ ࡋ ᆺ ᣑ ᅗ ᅖ ࡋ ᐙ୪ Ꮿᆅ P ᢡ ᯟ 㸸ᣑ ᅗ ᅖෆ ヱᙜ ࡋ ࠉࠉ㸸ࡈ ධ 㝿 ࡁ P 㞄᥋ᑠᏛ ࢢ P ᅗ ఫᏯᆅ㹎ㄪᰝᑐ ᅖ ࢦ 㞟 ᐜჾ ศᕸ㸦㒊ศ㸧 P ᆅ බᅬ ᣑ ᅗ ᅖ P ᅗ ఫᏯᆅ㹑 యᆅᅗ ࢦ 㞟 ᐜჾ ศᕸ㸦㒊ศ㸧 P ᅗ ఫᏯᆅ㹉 యᆅᅗ ㄪᰝᑐ ᅖ ࢦ 㞟 ᐜჾ ศᕸ㸦㒊ศ㸧 1021

㸦㸧 ࢣ ᅇ ᒓᛶ 㞟 ᡤ㸦 ᡤ㸧 ᑐ ࡋ 㺂タ ࡉ ࢦ 㞟 ࠉ ࢣ ㄪᰝ 㸲ࡘ ఫᏯᆅ ࡏ 㒊 ᅇ ࡁ ࡓࠋᅇ య

ࡀ ࠋᒃఫᖺ ศᕸ㸦㸧㸪 య 㸣㸦 ᇶ㸧ࡀ ᆺ 㞟 ᐜჾ㸦௨ ᆺ㸧㹼 ᖺ 㸣ࡀ ከ 㸪๓ᚋ ᖺ ࡏ 㸣 ࡋ 㸦

ṓ௦௨ ࡀ 㸣㸪ᒃఫᖺ 㹼 ᡬ ධ ᙧ㸦㸧㸪㠃 ᡬ ධ ᙧ㸦㸧ࡀ ࠋ ᖺࡀ 㸣 ࡗࡓࠋㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ 㛤 ࡇ 㹼 ᗘ

ṓ௦௨ 㸪 ṓ௦㸪 ṓ௦ ࠎ 㸣 ࡇ ᡬ 㒊 ࡃ ࡀ ࡏ ࠋ ᗘ ࠋᒃఫᖺ ศᕸ 㹼 ᖺ㛫 ศ 㸣ࡎࡘ ࡗ 㸪ᢡ 㸦㸧

ゎᾘࡀᐇ ࡋ ࠋఫᏯᆅ㹎 ఫᏯᆅ㹆㸪㸣㸦 ᇶ㸧ࡀ ᆺ ࡀ㸪㸣㸪 ṓ௦ࡀ 㸣 ከ㸪 ṓ௦ࡀ 㸣 ࡃ㸪ᒃఫᖺ 㸦

ṓ௦ࡀከ ࡇ 㸪ぶ Ꮚ ୡ௦ ௦ࡀ ࡉ そ㸦㸧㸪ᮍ ᛶࡀ ࠋఫᏯᆅ㹉㸪 ṓ௦௨ ࡀ 㸣㸪ᒃఫᖺ ᯟ 㛢ࡌ 㸦㸧

ᛮ ࠋ 〇ရ ᆺ ࡁ ᵝᏊࡀ ㄆὀ㸷㸧 ࡁࡓࠋ ఫᏯᆅ㹑㹉㸪㞟 ᐜჾࡀ ᆺ ࠋఫᏯᆅ㹑ㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ ࢦ 㞟 ᐜჾ

ㄪᰝᅇ ᖺ㱋ᒙศᕸ ༢ ᅇ 㸦Q ᅇ 㸧㸵㸮ṓ௦௨ 㸴㸮ṓ௦ 㸳㸮ṓ௦ 㸲㸮ṓ௦ 㸱㸮ṓ௦ 㸰㸮ṓ௦ య Q ఫᏯᆅ㹆

㸰㸯㹼㸱㸮ᖺ 㸯㸴㹼㸰㸮ᖺ 㸯㸯㹼㸯㸳ᖺ 㸴㹼㸯㸮ᖺ 㸯㹼㸳ᖺ 㸯ᖺᮍ య Q ఫᏯᆅ㹆 Q ఫᏯᆅ㹑 Q ఫᏯᆅ㹎 Q

ࡀタィ ᣓࡋ㸪 ୡᖏ ቃ ᣢ 㸦㸧 ఫᏯᆅ ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ タ ࡉ ࡓ㞟 ᐜჾᙧ ᆅほᐹ㞟ィ ఫᏯᆅ㹆 ఫᏯᆅ㹑 ఫᏯᆅ㹎

4 㸦㸧 ࢣ ᅇ ᒓᛶ 㞟 ᡤ㸦 ᡤ㸧 ᑐ ࡋ 㺂タ ࡉ ࢦ 㞟 ࠉ ࢣ ㄪᰝ 㸲ࡘ ఫᏯᆅ ࡏ 㒊 ᅇ ࡁ ࡓࠋᅇ య ᖺ㱋ᒙศᕸ㸦㸧㸪 ṓ௦௨ ࡀ 㸣 ᐜჾ㸦 ᇶ㸪௨ 㞟 ᐜჾ㸧 ᙧ ࡋ ࡍ ࠋ ࡉ 㞟 ᐜჾ ᙧ ࡑ ᚩ ᒃఫ 㧗㱋 ࡀ ࠋᒃఫᖺ ศᕸ㸦㸧㸪 య 㸣㸦 ᇶ㸧ࡀ ᆺ 㞟 ᐜჾ㸦௨ ᆺ㸧㹼 ᖺ 㸣ࡀ ከ 㸪๓ᚋ ᖺ ࡏ 㸣 ࡋ 㸦㸧ࠋほᐹ ࡁࡓ ᆺ ࡕ㸪㔠ᒓᯟ ෆ 㔠 ẚ 㛗ࡃ ࡉ ᵝᏊࡀ ࠋ ࡀ ࡅ ࡓ 㸪 ᡬ ධ ᙧ㸦㸧㸪ṇ㠃 ఫᏯᆅ㹆㸪 ṓ௦௨ ࡀ 㸣㸪ᒃఫᖺ 㹼 ᡬ ධ ᙧ㸦㸧㸪㠃 ᡬ ධ ᙧ㸦㸧ࡀ ࠋ ᖺࡀ 㸣 ࡗࡓࠋㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ 㛤 ࡇ 㹼 ᗘ ࡉ 㸪 ࢭ ࢱ ㉎ධ ᮇࡀ ࡇ ࡀ ࠋఫᏯᆅ㹑㸪 ṓ௦ࡀ 㸣 ࡁ ࠋゅ ᵓ㐀 ᯈ ᡭస ࡉ ࡓ 㸦㸧 ࡀ㸪 ከ ࡀ㸪 ṓ௦௨ 㸪 ṓ௦㸪 ṓ௦ ࠎ 㸣 ࡇ ᡬ 㒊 ࡃ ࡀ ࡏ ࠋ ᗘ ࠋᒃఫᖺ ศᕸ 㹼 ᖺ㛫 ศ 㸣ࡎࡘ ࡗ 㸪ᢡ 㸦㸧 ᕳࡁ 㸦㸧 ࡀ㸪 ࠋ㛤 ᙜ ศㆡ ࡏࡎ㸪 ᖺ 㹼 Ꮿᆅࡎࡘ ᅇ ㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ ࡀぢ ࡗࡓࠋ ࡍ ᪉ἲ 㸪ୡ௦ ೫ ゎᾘࡀᐇ ࡋ ࠋఫᏯᆅ㹎 ఫᏯᆅ㹆㸪㸣㸦 ᇶ㸧ࡀ ᆺ ࡀ㸪㸣㸪 ṓ௦ࡀ 㸣 ከ㸪 ṓ௦ࡀ 㸣 ࡃ㸪ᒃఫᖺ 㸦 ᇶ㸧 ᚩ 㞟 ᐜჾࡀ ࠋᶞ そ㔠ᒓ 㹼 ᖺ㛫㹼 ᖺ㛫 ศ ࡎࡘ ࡗࡓࠋ స ࡓ㸱ࡘ ᯟ ᡪ ࡅ㸪ࡈ ධ 㝿 ᗈࡆ ṓ௦ࡀከ ࡇ 㸪ぶ Ꮚ ୡ௦ ௦ࡀ ࡉ そ㸦㸧㸪ᮍ ᛶࡀ ࠋఫᏯᆅ㹉㸪 ṓ௦௨ ࡀ 㸣㸪ᒃఫᖺ ᯟ 㛢ࡌ 㸦㸧 ࡅ ࡗ ࠋ ᕳ 㹼 ᖺ㛫㹼 ᖺ㛫 ศ 㸣 ࡗࡓࠋ ᚋ㸪 ࡁࡘࡅ 㡻ࡍ 㸦㸧ぢ ࡀ㸪㡰ḟ㸪 ෆ 㧗㱋 ࡀ 㐍 ࡋ ࡃ ᛮ ࠋ 〇ရ ᆺ ࡁ ᵝᏊࡀ ㄆὀ㸷㸧 ࡁࡓࠋ ఫᏯᆅ㹑㹉㸪㞟 ᐜჾࡀ ᆺ ࠋఫᏯᆅ㹑ㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ ࢦ 㞟 ᐜჾ 㞟 ᐜჾ ᚩ 㸪〇ရ ᆺ㸦㸧 ࡉ ㄪᰝᑐ ᆅ ࢣ 㓄ᕸᑐ ᅖෆ ㄆ ࡁࡓ ࢦ ࢫ ࡈ ࡘ ᘬࡗ ฟࡋ ᐖ 㜵ࡄ ࢣ ㄪᰝᅇ ᖺ㱋ᒙศᕸ ༢ ᅇ 㸦Q ᅇ 㸧㸵㸮ṓ௦௨ 㸴㸮ṓ௦ 㸳㸮ṓ௦ 㸲㸮ṓ௦ 㸱㸮ṓ௦ 㸰㸮ṓ௦ య Q ఫᏯᆅ㹆 Q ఫᏯᆅ㹑 Q ఫᏯᆅ㹎 Q ఫᏯᆅ㹉 Q ࢣ ㄪᰝᅇ ᒃఫᖺ ศᕸ ༢ ᅇ 㸦Q ᅇ 㸧 ࡑ ௨ 㸱㸯㹼㸲㸮ᖺ 㸰㸯㹼㸱㸮ᖺ 㸯㸴㹼㸰㸮ᖺ 㸯㸯㹼㸯㸳ᖺ 㸴㹼㸯㸮ᖺ 㸯㹼㸳ᖺ 㸯ᖺᮍ య Q ఫᏯᆅ㹆 Q ఫᏯᆅ㹑 Q ఫᏯᆅ㹎 Q ᆺ ᡬ 㹑ὀ㸶㸧 ᆺ ṇ㠃ᡬ 㹉 ࡇ ࠋ㞟 ᐜჾ 㔠 ࡀ ࡓ 㸣㸦 ᇶ㸧㸪 ఫᏯᆅ㹉 Q 㸪ෆ ࡀ ࠋẸ㛫 ᴗ 㸯 ࡀタィ ᣓࡋ㸪 ୡᖏ ቃ ᣢ 㸦㸧 ఫᏯᆅ ࢦ 㞟 ᡤ タ ࡉ ࡓ㞟 ᐜჾᙧ ᆅほᐹ㞟ィ ఫᏯᆅ㹆 ఫᏯᆅ㹑 ఫᏯᆅ㹎 ఫᏯᆅ㹉 య ᐇ ᐇ ᐇ ᐇ ᐇ ఱ ࡋ ᢡ ᯟ ᆺ ࡏ ෆ ィ㞟 ᐜჾᙧ ᆺ 㠃ᡬ 㹆 ᡭస 㹆 ᆺ ᢡ ᢡ ᯟ ᅇ ᚋ 㹆 ᕳࡃ 㹆㹎 ᕳࡁ 1022

5 1023

6 1024

7 1025

8 1026

9 1027

10 ACTUAL CONDITIONS OF GARBAGE COLLECTION SITES AND EVALUATION BY USERS IN DETACHED HOUSE AREA Basic study to realize the beautiful and comfortable detached house area Koichi OKAMOTO * * Prof., Dept. of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkai-Gakuen University, Dr.Eng. Garbage collection sites are necessities of hygienic life but we place them on gaps of detached house area. This situation has a harmful effect on the landscape of detached house area. However, consideration to the garbage collection sites is being forgotten in the planning process of detached house area. There are no laws and rules written about how to regard garbage collection sites on process of detached house area planning. The purpose of this study is to clarify points of detached house area planning through the actual conditions of garbage containers, garbage collection sites and those maintenance. In this study, four detached house areas, H, S, P and K, of investigation was selected with consideration to the difference of developed period, configuration of the ground and regulation of townscape. Investigation of this study is composed by local government interviews, fieldwork and resident questionnaire. Through local government interviews, it was made sure that the garbage collection sites are placed under their guidance. In fieldwork on all detached house areas of investigation, there are 213 containers on 188 garbage collection sites. The number of collected questionnaire is 615. Average of return rate on questionnaire, H, S and K, is 81.3 percent. The return rate on questionnaire at S is unclear because area maintenance company carried out questionnaire distribution with consideration to security. There are several types of garbage container. The rate of box type garbage container usage is 75.6 percent. The mainly reason is that the faculty of box type garbage container against wind and animal harm is better than other types. But the box type garbage container often made in steel, and consequently those are difficult to harmonize with the surrounding scene. Furthermore, 56 percent of garbage container is placed on walkway / road, the rate of garbage containers placed outside of walkway / road is 33 percent. 67 percent of garbage container including containers that jut out onto the walkway / road obstruct walk safety to some degree. In front of the site where a person lives in, there are 94 percent of garbage containers on walkway / road. Portable garbage container is better choice to decrease harmful effect on the scenery of detached house area but compels residents to set it, put it away and clear snow around it. From the result of questionnaire, residents think it is important to prepare the place for garbage collection sites at detached house area planning and to place garbage containers outside walkway / road. And, residents need the garbage container form that is invisible inside directly and is harmonized with surrounding scene. The results are summarized as follows; 1) It is important in first planning process of the detached house area to consider the condition of landform for garbage collection sites. 2) In case of present detached house area, it is necessary to think garbage collection sites and public space as related to each other. 3) It is important for the site of garbage container that ground is hard to get dirty, easy to clean up and easy to clear the snow off. 4) Portable garbage container is better choice to decrease harmful effect on the scenery of detached house area but maintenance of the garbage collection sites needs the residents understanding and cooperation. 5) Because box type garbage container is functional, we need to look for the container design that match to the scenery of detached house area. (2015 年 9 月 3 日原稿受理,2016 年 1 月 13 日採用決定 ) 1028

カテゴリー Ⅰ 日本建築学会計画系論文集第 81 巻第 721 号, ,2016 年 3 月 J. Archit. Plann., AIJ, Vol. 81 No. 721, , Mar., 2016 DOI

カテゴリー Ⅰ 日本建築学会計画系論文集第 81 巻第 721 号,667-674,2016 年 3 月 J. Archit. Plann., AIJ, Vol. 81 No. 721, 667-674, Mar., 2016 DOI http://doi.org/10.3130/aija.81.667 東日本大震災の被災市街地における新規着工建物による市街地空間形成と空間的特徴岩手県および宮城県の沿岸