Ξ :,,,,,,,, : X 1 X 2 Y,2002 9 9,X Y ( ), IVF ( ) ICSI( ), Y X,, ICSI 9 25,X 1 5400, Y X 1 X 2 X 2, IVF,IVF,, Y 6072 ( 5400 ),,5362. 05, 11434. 05 () ( ) ( ), Y 2. 5 1392. 50 1,,, Ξ 89
2005 6,,, Y,, Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ICSI IVF ICSI, IVF,,,,,, 107 :,,,,,,,, 107 113 1,,,,,,,, 10 1 44 1 60 107 113 1 64 1,2003 7 18 : () Y 5 X 1 X 2 11434. 05 ; () X 1 X 2, Y,, :, X 1 X 2 ISCI,, X 1 X 2 Y ISCI, Y,,,, 107, Y X 1 X 2,, X 1 X 2,Y,,,,, Y 90
,, 1 2000 ( ) 38,, (),,,,, 2,,, 3,, ( 18 4 ) ( ) () (),,,,,,, 1., ( 396 ),,,,,( 405 ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?, ;,,: (1),, (2),,,,,,,, 1, 2004 8 2 : (),1986,285 3,286 91
2005 6 4,,, 5,,,,,( ),,,,,,,,,, 6,, 7, 8,,, 2.,,( ),,,,,,;,,,,, 9,,,, 10,,,, ;,,,,, 3., ( 356 2 ),,?,,, 4 :,,1996,291 5 :,2001,33 6,,, []:,,2003,343 7,, 8 ( ), ( ) 9 :,2004,249 10 []:,,2004,350 92 :,2001 ; [ ] :,1997
,: (1) ; (2) ; (3) ; (4) 11,,,, (),, 49, ( 2 ), 12,, :, ( ),, 13 (),,,,, ;, 2 14,,,,,,,,, (),, Y, 15, Y,, 11 :,1999,553 122002,,,2001 7 2002 7,, 58,2003,,,:,44 ;,6 6000 ;,7,: :, 2004 2 27 13 14:, 2002 2 15,,:;,,,,, 93
2005 6,,, 16,,, 17,, 18,,,,,,, 19,,,( ),, 20,:, 21,,,,, ( 2000 21 ),,,,,, (, ),,?,, 22,,,??, :1993 4 5 (93/ 13/ EEC) 2 3 : (), 23,, :2000 4 28 2001 4 1,2 2,,,, 16 :,2002,214,2 17 13, 18 16,,234 19 :,2001,146 20:,1997,97 212000 7 1, 22 23 :,2004,69 94,,,,,,,,.
,,,,2 2, 24,,, 25,,,,, (1 ) : 14 () 1 :, 2000 6 27 2 1 13 (),,, :, ;,, ( ) 26, 1994 1 1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (),49,,49,,,,,, 27 2,,, 49, () 1.,,,,, 24:, : 7,2004,365 25[] :,2001,55 26 :,2004,5 27 13, 95
2005 6,, 406 1,,,,,,, 28,,,, ICSI, ;,,,, 2.,,,,,,,, 60,,,,, (),, Y,,?, Y,,,,,, 107?,?,,,,,,,,,,,, 29,,,, ( 107 111 ),,, ( 60 2 ) 28Demogue ( Trait des Obligations (1925), vol. 5, s. 1237, vol. 1986,216 29 7,,44 96 6, s. 599. ),,,, Demogue 1137 1147 See Barry Nicholas, The French L aw of Cont ract, 2 nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford 1992, pp. 51-52. [] :,
,, 30,,,,,, 31,,,,,,,, 32,,,,,,,,, () 2. 5 1392. 50 1,, :?,(),,, 1., : (1), ; (2), ; (3) ; (4),, : (1) ; (2) ; (3) ; (4),,,,,:,, ;,,,,,,,, ( 108 3 ),,,, 33,,,,,,, 34 30 :, :,2002,183 ; :,2004,420 31 7,,40 32[] :, 100 ( NBL no. 51),,216 33:,1999,594 34 2004 1 1,,, 97
2005 6,,,,, :,,,,,,,,, :,,,;,,, 2.,,,,,, 35 ( ),,, 36 37,,,,, 120 38 3. (1),,?,,,,,, (2),,,,,,111,,,,, 35:,1990,565 36,565 ;:,1988,419 ;:, 2003,599 37,?,, [] :,2000,87 38 36,,419 98,,
,,,,,,,, 349 () : 347,,,,, ;,, 39 40,, ( ),,, 41 :2002 284 ( ) :,,,,, 42,,,,? 107,? 107,, ( 112 ),,,,,, 43,, (3),,, 44,?,, 349 284,,,,,,,,, 39See E. Allan Farnsworth, Cont racts, 2 nd ed., Little, Brown and Company 1990, p. 928. 40See G. H. Treitel, The L aw of Cont ract, 9 td ed., Sweet & Maxwell 1995, p. 847. 41Anglia Television v. Reed [ 1971 ] 1 QB60, [ 1971 ] 3 All ER 690. See M. P. Furmston, Cheshire, Fif oot and Furmston s L aw of Cont ract, 14 th ed., Butterworths 2001, p. 661. 42:,1999, :, 116,,, 43 :, 1991,238 ;:, 2001,44 ;[]:,,2001,139 44,,, (applying the objective test),, (a reasonable person), Alasdair Maclean, B rief case on Medical L aw (),2004,37 99
2005 6,,,,,,,,,, 80 % 45 20 % 50129. 76 4.,, ( ) ;, 107 113 1, (1),,,,, ( 122 ),,,, 46 ( 113 1 ),112,,,,,,,,, 47,, 1986 120, 48 49 50,,,, 45 2005 7 13 :: :, 1998,160 46 ( ),, 47[] :,,1957,215 481991 ( ) 36 491993 42 1994 27 2000 44 2001 29 501993 41 1994 27 2000 44 2001 100 ( Wrongful Birth),,,, :,,,,,,,:, 1991,76 80 ;:,, 2004,273 ;:,2004,291, :,2003,69 9 2003 9 2003 17
, 51 52,,,,,,,:,, (2) 1,, 107 113 1,, 113 1,!,,!,,,,,,,,,,,,?,112 1,,,,, 53,, 54, 55,1999 4 2 227 ( ) :,,192 195 197,:,, 512001 9 ; :,1998,283 ;:,2002,252 52,, (,),,,,, :,2004,438 ( [ 2001 ]7 ) 9 ( [ 2003 ]20 ) 36 2,,,,,,,,:,2005,358,,, 532005 4 23, 2005 3 14, 5800 54 :, 1998 6 55 :, :25, ( ) 2002 ;:, 2003 6 101
2005 6,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,? 112 1 112,?,,,,,,?, 113 1 112,,,,,,, (),,, 107, ( ), 56,,,,,, 406 1 (),,,,;,? 1. 10 1 () 44 1 () 60 () 107 () 113 1 ( ) 64 1,,,,, 2.?,,,,,,,,, 56 : (),1999,154 102
,,,,,? 410,,,,,,, 94 4,,,,,,,,,,??, () 1.,110, ( ),,,?,?? 112,,,, ;,,, 107,,,,,, 2.,,, ICSI?,?,( 8 )?,,,,, 57,,,,,,, 8,,, (),,,,, 57 2,,287 103
2005 6 1.,,, 2.,,,,,49 3.,,,,, 4.,,,,,,,,,,, 5.,,, Abstract : Medical service cont ract is a kind of cont ract for commission. The Leist ungspflicht of a medical contract is a kind of obligation de moyens, so the positive breaches of it cannot be judged by the result of performance, rather by the process of the performance. And a breach of ancillary obligations may also constitute a kind of positive breach of Leistungspflicht. If the contract is breached, the loss recoverable for which includes both pecuniary loss and non - pecuniary loss. Damages for non - pecuniary loss may t urn out to be compensation for deat h or deformity or solatium in case of inf ringement of personal right s. As an alternative to the measure of damages for pecuniary loss, the injured party has a right to damages based on his reliance interest where his expectation interest is uncertain. Key words : medical service contract, positive breach of contract, duty to inform, loss 104