Babbitt 20 Bauman Ghosh Pohland COD 14 37% ~ 62% ph % ~ 1. 5% 20

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Babbitt 20 Bauman Ghosh Pohland COD 14 37% ~ 62% ph % ~ 1. 5% 20"

诏望郁
7 years ago
Views:

1 ENERGY CONSERVATION TECHNOLOGY Vol. 32 Sum. No. 184 March No ( 1. 东北林业大学材料科学与工程学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 ; 2. 东北林业大学生物质能技术工程中心, 黑龙江哈尔滨 ) : 我国餐厨垃圾产量日益增加, 其资源化处理越来越受到人们重视两相厌氧消化工艺中水解酸化阶段和产甲烷阶段相对独立, 具有更多的优势本文介绍了两相厌氧消化工艺的发展过程和餐厨垃圾的特性, 研究了国内外餐厨垃圾两相厌氧消化制沼气技术的进展情况, 以期为我国餐厨垃圾的快速高效处理提供参考 : 餐厨垃圾 ; 两相厌氧消化 ; 沼气 ; 研究进展 TK6 A Review of Biogas Production by Two - phase Anaerobic Digestion of Kitchen Waste TAN Wen - ying 1 2 XU Yong 1 2 WANG Shu - yang 2 1. Material Science and Engineering of Northeast Forestry UniversityHarbin China 2. Engineering Centre for Biomass Energy Technology of Northeast Forestry University Harbin China Abstract With the increasing production of kitchen waste in our country its resource treatment gets more and more attention. In two phase anaerobic digestion technologyhydrolysis acidification phase and methanogenic phase are relatively independent which have more advantages. In order to provide reference for the fast and efficient treatment of kitchen waste in our country the development process of two phase anaerobic digestion process and the characteristics of kitchen waste were introduced in this papermeanwhile the progress of biogas made from two phase anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste are relearched in home and abroad. Key words kitchen waste two - phase anaerobic digestion biogas research progress! 0 CH 4 CO RFXXN002 CC06Z ~ 128

2 Babbitt 20 Bauman Ghosh Pohland COD 14 37% ~ 62% ph % ~ 1. 5% 20% ~ 30% 65% ~ 95% ± 2 129

3 Myungyeol Lee d VFA 4. 2 ph 37 VFA g /L 50 82% VFA ph 37 ph 6. 5 ~ ph ph ph ph Park Yong Jin 26 Sandhya 35 SRT > 2 d OLR < 146 g COD / Nimmrichter 27 7 d L d ph 6 ~ 7 VFA % Ghosh ph % 29 ph VFA ph 7 9 d 86% 82% VFA 4 d 30 Lim Seong Jin g /L - 1 VFA ph 2 35 HRT 8 d OLR 9 gts / L d ph 6. 0 ph IOWA 33 1 ~ 6. 8 kgvs / m 3 d 37 Pavan 38 Kaiser kg / 34 m 3 d 7. 0 kg / m 3 d Carneiro T Forster d d 130 / d 14 d ph ph VFA VFA TS 20% 30%

4 m 3 m LabVIEW H. Boual- LabVIEW lagui 7 ASBR COD 96% COD mg /L SCOD 400 mg /L 320 L /kg- COD Raynali COD 4 g / L d 17 d Komatsu % 80% 87% 5 J Y Wang 41 VS L L 3 d 1 97 g VS 530 ml /g 351 ml /g TS VS 12 d ml 12 d 78% 82% ph m

5 phase and two - phase systems for kitchen garbage treatment 1. J. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering Nimmrichter RKuebler H. Biogas yield of thermoph- J ilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of 3. municipal solid wastec. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion of Solid wastes. Barce- 4. lona J Ghosh SHenry M PSajjad Aet al. Pilot - scale 5. gasification of municipal solidiste by high - rate and two - phase J anaerobic digestion TPAD J. Water Science and Technology A E Ghaly. A comparative study of anaerobic digestion of acid cheese whey and dairy manure in a two - stage reactor J. Bioresource Technology H BouallaguiY TouhamiM Hamdi. Two - phase s J an - aerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes bioreactors 31Lim S J Kim B J Jeong C M et al. Anaerobic organic performance J. Biochemical Engineering Journal acid production of food waste in once - a - day feeding and drawing - off bioreactorj. Bioresource Technology Yu YS Lee C S Kim J et al. Group - specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quanti- 32Song Y C Kwon S JWoo J H. Mesophilic and thermophi - lic temperature cophase anaerobic digestion compared tative real - time polymerase chain reactionj. Biotechnology and Bioengineering with single stage mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of sewage 9. sludge J. Wat Res J. 33. M G. / J J. 11Mtz Viturtia J Mata - Alvarez F Cecchi et al. Two phase continuous anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable 35Sandhya Babel Kensuke Fukushi Bunpot Sitanrassamee et al. Effect of acid speciation on solid waste liquefaction in wastes J. Resources Conservation and Recycling an anaerobic acid digesterj. Water Research M ph 13. J J De Laclos H FDesbois SSaint - Joly Cet al. An- 14. aerobic digestion of municipal solid organiciste Valorga full scale plant in Tilburg J. Water Science and Technology Pavan PBattistoni PCecchi Fet al. Two - phase 16. J. anaerobic digestion of source - sorted OFMSW performance and kinetic study J. Water Science and Technology J Carnerio T F Perez M Romero L I. Influence of total 18. solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors J treating food waste J. Bioresource Technology Raynali JDeigenes J PMolette R. Two - phase an- 20. aerobic digestion of solid wastes by a multiple liquefaction reac tors process J. Bioresource Technology J Y Wang H Zhang O Stabnikova et al. Comparison J of lab - scale and pilot - scale hybrid anaerobic solid - liquid 22. systems operated in batch and semi - continuous modesj Process Biochemistry D J. 24Myungyeol Lee Taira Hidaka Hiroshi Tsunoet al Two - phased hyperthermophilic anaerobic co - digestion of 43. waste activated sludge with kitchen garbage J. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering J J J M. 26Park Y Hong F Cheon J et al. Comparison of thermophilic anaerobic digestion characteristics between single

03台塑麥寮六輕廚餘回收機制之研究探討.doc

03台塑麥寮六輕廚餘回收機制之研究探討.doc 41 38 93 41 59 food waste 20~30 composting 2000 27.76 3.36 31.12 2002 2000 54.07 38.70 5.72 0.04 2002 42 2001 2002 2002 2000 1 43 1 food waste biomass 2001 44 1998 Rynk, 2000 2001 2000 1 45 1 1,500 1,800