canbecompatibleornot.zhouli-anandcaozhenghanarguethatthetwo objectivesarecompatibleinspecificgovernancestructurewhichisnotshared byzhou Xueguang who a

Similar documents
Abstract:In Chinesehistory thepowerrelationshipbetweenthecentraland localgovernmenthasundergoneperennialandcriticalchanges.thesechanges havegiv

responsibilitysystemintheinstitutionalcontextofthetwo-trackregime.inthe aspectofgovernancetheyfusediferent mechanismsoftheinstitutional knowled

Microsoft Word Local government organization and finance in China.doc

越南政經改革與憲政制度之演變

引言

political-legal Max Weber Essays in Sociology



49 Schroeder & Aoki 2009 Li Bird & Ebel SSCI Journal of Public Economics Zhang & Zou DC cbe = + 2 DC be =

劳 工 宿 舍 的 另 一 种 可 能 : 作 为 现 代 文 明 教 化 空 间 的 民 国 模 范 劳 工 宿 舍 犮 狅 狀 犮 犲 狆 狋 狅 犳 犱 狅 狉 犿 犻 狋 狅 狉 狔 犾 犪 犫 狅 狉 狉 犲 犵 犻 犿 犲 狋 狅 犱 犲 狊 犮 狉 犻 犫 犲 犪 狀 犻 犿 狆 狅

untitled

GDP % % 10 43

WTO GDP 9.4% GDP 8.1% , , % 15.7% ( 1999) (GATT)

2001 2,, (Devine & Kiefer, 1991), :, ;,,,,?, 300, 57 % ( Granovetter, 1974),, ( Fernan2 dez & Weinberg, 1997) :,, ( Granovetter, 1973),,,,,,,, (Lin, 1

:, ( ),, :,60,, 1962,, ( ),,,,, 1986,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ), C,,,,,,,,,,,,, X,,,;,,, ; ( ),,, Mirrless (1976) : (1), (2),,, 60 (1996),:

<4D F736F F D20ACE3B051BDD7A4E5A874A D3520BB4FC657A4F4AA47A57EBE50A46AB3B0AABAB2A3BE50BEF7A8EE2E646F63>

1994 ~ % % 49% 2 GDP 1 2 Rawski GDP 1978 GDP 1978 =

4第四章.doc

标题

股权结构对董事会结构的影响

Microsoft Word - 马奇文集序言.docx

50 :, :,,,,, 1959,,,,, 1962 (, 1993 ;, 1999), ( ) (Lin, 1990), 1959 (,1995) (food availability decline,fad) , (,1988) (Chang & Wen,1997 ; Yan

有 什 么 差 别, 实 际 上, 也 没 有 必 要 对 国 家 机 关 企 业 和 事 业 单 位 作 区 别 长 期 以 来, 我 们 习 惯 把 国 家 工 作 人 员 笼 统 地 称 为 " 国 家 干 部 ", 将 党 政 机 关 国 家 权 力 机 关 和 司 法 机 关 的 工 作

,,,???,,?,, 1, ( ),,, (),,, (),,:,,,,,, (),,,,,,,, 2,,, 3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1, [] :,,1997,13 2 :, ,,, See Edward L. Glaeser and Andrei Shlei

壹 重 要 試 題 題 庫 003 壹 重 要 試 題 題 庫 1 官 等 與 職 等 有 何 區 別? 試 比 較 說 明 之 建 議 擬 答 我 國 自 民 國 七 十 六 年 一 月 十 六 日 起 實 施 新 人 事 制 度, 即 採 官 職 併 立 制, 公 務 人 員 依 官 等 及 職

:,; ;, ( ) 25,, 80 90, 90,,,,,,, ( ), ( ), %,, , ,, ( ),,, ;,,,,,,,,,, ( ) , , 3395,3400, 20 % 30 %,

Chen et al. 0 0 Xu0 008 GDP Li and Zhou005 Blanchard and Shleifer00 Enikolopov and Zhuravshaya007 GDP GDP

,,,,,,,,,, :, , ;,, 111 :,, ;,1997,,(2004), , , 82 % ( GDP 411 %614 %), ( ),, 43 %, 53 %, 111, ( ) 23 %, 25 %, 91

Schumpeter Mensch Freeman Clark Schumpeter Mensch 1975 technological stalemate 2000 Van Dujin 1977 OECD 1992 Freeman 1982 Van

n._

28 () ( 3) % % % :1 1:2 ( ) % 13.6% 16.2% 14.9% 15.3% () 2 () 3 (%)


臺灣農會政治自主性角色之變遷

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

中國的經濟改革模式與金融體制

N

1262 ( ) 13,, (Qianetal.,1997;Jinetal.,2005) :,,, GDP, (, ;, ;, ;, ),,, (, ),, ( ),, ( ),,, ( ), (, ) 2002,,,,,,,

,,,,,Modigliani - Miller Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist 1996,, Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist ( ) ( ),,,, Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist (1999),,, RBC, Bernank

一 國 兩 制 研 究 2013 年 第 2 期 ( 總 第 16 期 ) 將 通 過 談 判 解 決 澳 門 問 題 談 判 在 1986 年 6 月 至 1987 年 3 月 進 行,1987 年 4 月 雙 方 在 北 京 簽 署 了 中 葡 中 葡 聯 合 聲 明, 規 定 中 國 政 府

MACRO ECONOMY AND MICRO OPERATION 2016 ( 30%~50% ; 1 ) ; : ? 80 : 1993 ; ; ( ) ; 1. ;2014 ( 1 ) ( ) 105

Lewis

10 ( ) ( ) [5] 1978 : [1] (P13) [6] [1] (P217) [7] [1] (P19) : : [1] [4] (P1347) (P18) 1985 : [1] (P343) 1300 : [1] (P12) 1984 :

Microsoft Word newsletter.doc

国 国 国

J. D. 17 Daniel J. Elazar, American Federalism: A View From the States (New York: Happer & Row, Publishers, 1984), p

二等奖(10名)

: : : :1996,??,,,,,,,, :,,,,, Goldsmith (1969) 35,, Shaw(1973) Gurley Shaw(1960), Demirg c2 Kunt Levin (2001) 150 (1992)

行政院人事行政局95年度各國人事制度資料委託蒐集編譯


M 2 ΠGDP (1996) M2ΠGDP (2000) (2000) (2001) (2001) (2001) (2002) (2002) (2002) (2003) (2001) (2005) (2005) (2006) (2004) M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠG

<4D F736F F D AB652DB6B0A55ABD73A965ADB6A4CEA4A4A4E5A5D8BFFD2EB065BC74AAA9>

Rawski Nolanand Ash Caiand Li 2002 Stiglitz , 2 [1]


法律教育及培训常设委员会周年报告 2013

2005 3,? :; ;, ;,,,,,,1 % %,,,,, 1 %,,,, : () ;, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,, (2004) ( GBΠT ) 16 (2004), (2004) 47

语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

untitled

Review

M M. 20

統計名詞0925

Transcription:

2014 6 CJS 34 曹正汉 : : ; : ; ( ) ( ) : PoliticalRisksand Decentralization:TheComparisonof ThreeModelsonChineseGovernance CAO Zhenghan Abstract:TherearethreemodelsonthestructureofChinesegovernanceal taking account ofthe centralgovernment s objectives about governance eficiencyandpoliticalstabilityatthesametime.theyarethe administrative subcontractsystem modelbyzhouli-anthemodelof centralizedpersonal controlsat the nationalleveland decentralized ruling over the people regionaly bycaozhenghanandthe empire sgovernancelogic modelby ZhouXueguang.Althree modelshavesignificantdivergencesintermsof whetherthetwoobjectivesofeficiencyandstabilityofthecentralgovernment * : (Author:CAOZhenghanColegeofEconomicsZhejiang University)E-mail:caozhenghan@aliyun.com 52

canbecompatibleornot.zhouli-anandcaozhenghanarguethatthetwo objectivesarecompatibleinspecificgovernancestructurewhichisnotshared byzhou Xueguang who arguesthatthe co-existence ofcentralization and decentralizationcannotleadtoastablestructureandthetwoprocessesare subjecttocyclicaladjustmentandcyclicfluctuation.andalsotheanalysesof thethree modelsfocusondiferentlevels.the administrativesubcontract system modelandthe empire sgovernancelogic modelmainlydiscussthe governancestructureand mechanism ofthediferentlevelsofgovernments withinthe bureaucraticsystemwhilethe modelof centralized personal controlsat the nationalleveland decentralized ruling over the people regionaly focusesonhowthe wayofcentralgovernmentdealing withthe publicshapesthe basicstructure ofdecentralization.the divergencesare causedbytworeasons.firstthesethree modelsholddiferentassumptions aboutwhethertheruleoverthe militaryandthepeoplecanbeseparated. Secondthereexiststhedisagreementaboutwhichoneisthecriticalsourceof politicalrisksbetweendecentralizationitself (e.g.thelocalgovernments behaviorsasdeviationoutofcontroletc.)andthepublic(e.g.thepublic s behaviorsasprotestoppositionconfrontationetc.). Keywords:authoritarianregimespoliticalrisksdecentralizationgovernance structure (winningcoalition) (Mesguitaetal.20032011;Northet al.2009) ( ) (Gandhi2009;Levitskyand Way2010;Svolik2012) 53

2014 6 : : ; ( 2011) (market-preserving federalismchinesestyle) (Weingast1995; MontinolaQianand Weingast1995;Qianand Weingast1996 1997;JinQianand Weingast2005;Xu2011) (Qianand Weingast1996) ( 2011; 2014) 54

(RoddenandRose-Akerman1997; 2008) : ( 20082014; 2012) ( 2011; 2013; 2013) (20112012 20132014a) 1 1. ( 2011; 2012; 2012) 55

2014 6 : ; ( ) ( ) : ( 一 ) 行政发包制 模型 ( 20082014; 2012) ( 2014) (2008) : (2014) : ; ; (2014) 56

(2014) : ( ) ( ) ( ) : ; ( 2014) ( ) ( 2012; 2014) 57

2014 6 ( 二 ) 中央治官 地方治民 模型 (2011) ( 2011;Cai2008) ; ( 2011; 2013) : ( ) ( )( 2011; 2013) ;2 ;3 ( 2003:29) (2011) 2. : 3. : 58

: ; ; ; ( ) ( 2014b) ( 2014b) 59

2014 6 : (20112013) (Huang1996; 2014) ( 2013) ( 三 ) 帝国的治理逻辑 (2011) ( ) (2011201220132014a) 60

: ; (20112013) ; ( 2011) ; ; ( 2013) (2013) ; ( ) ( ) (2013) ( ) 61

2014 6 (2011) : ( 2011; 2011) ( 2011) ( ) ( ) : ( ) ( ); ( ) ( 20082014) (2003:29) ( 2008:58-59) 62

( ) ( 一 ) 兵民能否分治? ( ) (Hintze1975) : 63

2014 6 ; ( 2005:250-253) (20112013) : (2014a:125) : 64

( 2005:250) 4 (20112013) 5 ( 二 ) 何种统治风险? (20112013) (2014) 4. ( ) ( 2005: 73) ; ( ) 5. ( 2005:168-177) 65

2014 6 (2011) ; ( 2013; 2014) (2014) (20112013) (2011) 66

; 6 7 : ( ) 21.62% (39.61%) (14.76%)( 2010:225-226) 1994 44.3% 30 ; 2012 52% ( ) 8 30 1984 2000 6. 7. (2014b) 8. 2012 ( ) 5128.04 ( ) ( ) 2012 56% : 2013 67

2014 6 (2005:251-252) : 60 ( 2011; 2013) (References).2011. [J]. (1):1-40..2013. [J]. (2):1-11..2014. [J]. (3):30-55..2013. [J]. (1):182-205..2010. [M]. :..2011. : [J]. (1):73-97..2013. [M]. :..2011. [M]. :..2012. : [J]. (5):113-130..2003. [M].. :..2008. [J]. (3):99-114..2011. [J]. (4):126-148..2012. : [J]. 32(1):1-37..2008. : [M]. :..2014. [J]. 34(6):1-38. 68

.2012. : [G]//.. : :97-178..2011. : [J]. (10):67-85..2012. : [J]. (9):100-120..2013. : [J]. (3):5-28..2014a. : [J]. (4):108-132..2014b. :...2005. [M].. CaiYongshun.2008. PowerStructureandRegimeResilience:ContentiousPoliticsin China. BritishJournalofPoliticalScience38(3):411-432. GandhiJennifer. 2009. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress. HintzeOto.1975. The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze. New York: Oxford UniversityPress. HuangYasheng.1996.Inflation andinvestmentcontrolsin China:ThePolitical Economy of Central-Local Relations during the Reform Era. New York: CambridgeUniversityPress. JinHehuiYingyiQianand Barry Weingast.2005. RegionalDecentralizationand FiscalIncentives:FederalismChineseStyle. JournalofPublicEconomics 89 (9-10):1719-1742. LevitskySteven and Lucan Way.2010.Competitive Authoritarianism : Hybrid RegimesaftertheCold War.NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress. MesquitaBruce Bueno dealastair SmithRandolph M.Siversonand James D. Morrow.2003.TheLogicofPoliticalSurvival.Massachusets:TheMITPress. MesquitaBruceBuenodeandAlastairSmith.2011.The Dictator s Handbook.New York:PublicAfairs. MontinolaGabrielaYingyiQianandBery Weingast.1995. FederalismChineseStyle: ThePoliticalBasisforEconomicSuccesinChina. World Politics48(1):50-81. NorthDouglassC.JohnJoseph WalisandBarryR.Weingast.2009.Violenceand SocialOrders.NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress. QianYingyiand Barry Weingast.1996. China s Transitionto Markets: Market- PreservingFederalismChineseStyle. JournalofPolicy Reform 1(2):149-185. QianYingyiandBarry Weingast.1997. Federalism asacommitmenttopreserving MarketIncentives. JournalofEconomicPerspectives11(4):83-92. RoddenJonathan and Susan Rose-Ackerman. 1997. Does Federalism Preserve Markets Virginia Law Review 83(7):1521-1572. SvolikMilan W.2012.ThePoliticsof Authoritarian Rule.New York:Cambridge UniversityPress. WeingastBarry.1995. TheEconomicRoleofPoliticalInstitutions:Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Performance. Journal of Law Economics and Organization1(1):1-31. XuChenggang.2011. The Fundamental Institutions of China s Reforms and Development. JournalofEconomicLiterature49(4):1076-1151. : 69