The Effect of Different Training Method on Quick Coordination ability in High School Female Soccer Players
18 A B S 17.44±1() 161.39±6.26( ) 54.23±5.5( ) 6.42±1.51() 15 60-90 30m 30m t α =.05 ( )AB 1 5 (p>.05)( )AB 1 5 (p<.05)( )A (p>.05)( )B (p<.05)( )A B (p>.05)( )AB (p>.05) B S A I
The Effect of Different Training Method on Quick Coordination ability in High School Female Soccer Players. Abstract The Purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different training type on quick coordination and speed abilities. Eighteen high school female soccer players were recruited in this study (17.44±1 years old, 161.39±6.26 cm, 54.23±5.5 kg, soccer experience 6.42±1.51 years). Subjects were distributed randomly to group A (quick rope ladder training) and group B ( S shuttle running). Five weeks training period were included; each subject finished fifteen runs with 60-90 seconds interval between times per day and three times per week. All data of two groups on 30m speed and 30m quick coordination ability tests were recorded every week. To compared statistically by applying the dependent even student s t-test and Pearson s correlation. Significant at P <0.05 were reported. The results of this study were as followed: (1) Compare the first week and fifth week on 30m basic running velocity between group A and B; they were no significant difference (P >.05). (2) Compare the first week and fifth week on 30m quick coordination test between group A and B; they were significantly different (P <.05). (3) In group A, there was no significant correlation (P >.05) II
between post-test of 30m basic running velocity and 30m quick coordination test. (4) In group B, there was significant correlation (P <.05) between post-test of 30m basic running velocity and 30m quick coordination test (5) The post-test of 30m basic running velocity between group A and B were no significant correlation (P >.05). (6) The post-test of 30m quick coordination test between group A and B were no significant correlation (P >.05). Base on these results we indicated that both training method could increase the ability of quick coordination. However, the training effect of group B was better than group A. Key word: soccer, rope ladder training, quick coordination ability III
IV
---------------------------------------------- 1 ----------------------------------------------- 1 ------------------------------------------ 2 ------------------------------------------ 4 ---------------------------------- 4 ------------------------------------------ 5 ------------------------------------------ 6 --------------------------- 6 ------------------- 8 --------------------------- 10 ----------------------------------------- 12 --------------------------------- 13 ----------------------------------------- 13 --------------------------------- 14 --------------------------------- 14 --------------------------------- 19 --------------------------------- 26 ----------------------------------------27 30 --------------------------- 27 30 --------------------------- 34 -------------- 40 ------------------------------------------------ 46 AB ------------ 46 V
AB 5 ------------------ 48 AB 5 ------------------ 49 --------------------------------------- 50 ---------------------------------------------- 50 ---------------------------------------------- 51 ------------------------------------------------------ 52 ---------------------------------------------- 52 ---------------------------------------------- 53 ---------------------------------------------- 55 ------------------------------------------------------------ 56 ----------------------------------- 56 ----------------- 57 --------------------------- 58 VI
3-1 --------- 13 4-1A 1~5 28 4-2B 1~5 30 4-3A 1~5 34 4-4B 1~5 37 VII
3-1 14 3-2 15 3-3 15 3-4 16 3-5 16 3-6 17 3-7 17 3-830 20 3-930 21 3-1030 22 3-1130 S 23 3-12 24 4-1A 1~5 28 4-2A 1 5 29 4-3B 1~5 31 4-4B 1 5 32 4-5AB 33 4-6A 1~5 35 4-7A 1 5 36 4-8B 1~5 38 4-9B 1 5 39 4-10A 40 4-11A 41 4-12B 42 4-13B 43 4-14AB 44 4-15AB 45 VIII
1
2 FIFA(2006) ( ) 25
3
AB Neumann(1991) 4-6 18 4
30 ( ) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 圏 圏 S 5
( ) 10 1 ( ) 110 100 75 64 ( 2005) 90 6
10 8~18% (Ekblom B., 1986) 10~11 10% (Ekblom B., 1994) Dal Monte (1983) ( 10%) ( 20%) ( 60~80%) 7 8 mmol / L 7
8 ( ) Bompa (1999) (1991) 30 (2004) (2001) 30 (2004) 30 (2002)
30 Little Williams (2005) 10 20 (2005) 30 卧 Z S 12 30 (Ekblom B., 1986) ( 1999) 30 30 9
Neumann, G.; Hottenrott, K. (2002) ( ) ( ) ( ) (2005) Mitra Mogos (1980) Brown (2001) S 12 12 Little (2005)106 Z Gleim (1996) Z 8 (3 5 ) (2003) 10
( ) ( ) (1994) (2005) 11
12
敍 18 A B S ( ) ( ) 3-1 (n=18) ( ) M±SD ( ) ( ) ( ) M±SD M±SD M±SD (A) 17.21±1.5 162.89±7.0 55.13±4.5 6.27±1.8 (n=9) (B)S 17.67±0.5 159.89±5.5 53.33±6.5 6.56±1.2 (n=9) 13
95 3 6 95 3 6 4 5 95 4 7 SEIKO 3-1 3-1 14
KDS ( ) 50m 3-2 3-2 MOITEN 3-3 3-3 15
180cm 3-4 3-4 70cm 17.5cm 3-5 3-5 16
偒 ( ) 38*50cm 50.8cm 35cm 3-6 3-6 550*45cm 50cm3-7 3-7 17
18
( )30 1. 2. 圏 3. (1) (2) ( ) 圏 ( 3-8) ( 3-5)S (3) 4. (1) (2) 3 5. 19
5m 5m 5m 5m 10m 3-8 30 20
( )30 1. 2. 3. (1) (2) ( ) ( 3-9) (3) 4. (1) (2) 3 5. 30m 3-9 30 21
( )30 1. 2. 3. (1) (2) ( ) ( 3-10) (3) 4. 30 5 3 15 60-90 5. ( ) 5m 6.5m 18.5 3-10 30 22
( )30 S 1. 2. 3. (1) (2) ( ) S ( 3-11) (3) 4. 30 S 5 3 15 60-90 5. ( ) 5m 5m 5m 15m 3-11 30 23
( 1 ) ( 5 ) 3-12 24
( ) ( ) ( ) (3-83-93-103-11) ( ) 15 ( ) 25
SPSS for Windows 10.0 Sigma8.0 ( ) 30 30 t =.05 26
A B S 敍 30 30 30 30 30 A 30 4-1 A 30 1 5 30 1 5.84 0.25(m/s) 2 5.57 0.19(m/s) 3 5.70 0.24(m/s) 4 5.66 0.27(m/s) 5 5.76 0.23(m/s) 4-1 A 30 1~5 234 1 (p<0.05) 4-2 A 30 1 5 27
4-1 A 1~5 (n=9) 1 2 3 4 5 30 (m/s) 5.84 0.25 6.19 5.48 5.57 0.19 5.88 5.33 5.70 0.24 6.12 5.33 5.66 0.27 6.20 5.30 5.76 0.23 6.06 5.38 6.4 6.2 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 4-1 A 1~5 * 1 (p<0.05) 28
6.4 6.2 6.0 30m (m/s) 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 4-2 A 1 5 29
B 30 4-2 B 30 1 5 30 1 5.84 0.24(m/s) 2 5.55 0.28(m/s) 3 5.74 0.20(m/s) 4 5.69 0.24(m/s) 5 5.86 0.32(m/s) 4-3 B 30 1~5 2 1 (p<0.05) 4-4 B 30 1 5 4-2 B 1~5 (n=9) 1 2 3 4 5 30m(m/s) 5.84 0.24 6.29 5.57 5.55 0.28 6.07 5.31 5.74 0.20 6.00 5.50 5.69 0.24 5.96 5.32 5.86 0.32 6.38 5.51 30
6.6 6.4 6.2 30m (m/s) 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 4-3 B 1~5 * 1 (p<0.05) 31
6.6 6.4 6.2 30m (m/s) 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 4-4 B 1 5 32
7 6 5 30m (m/s) 4 3 2 1 0 Group 4-5 AB 凖 33
30 A 30 4-3 A 30 1 3.66 0.12(m/s) 2 3.77 0.12(m/s) 3 3.80 0.12(m/s) 4 3.83 0.14(m/s) 5 3.87 0.12(m/s) 4-6 A 1~5 2 3 4 5 1 p<0.05 4-7 A 1 5 4-3 A 1~5 (n=9) 1 2 3 4 5 30m(m/s) 3.66 0.12 3.91 3.55 3.77 0.12 3.99 3.60 3.80 0.12 3.99 3.60 3.83 0.14 3.97 3.62 3.87 0.12 4.03 3.69 34
4.1 4.0 30m (m/s) 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 4-6 A 1~5 * 1 (p<0.05) 35
4.1 4.0 30m (m/s) 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 4-7 A 1 5 * 1 (p<0.05) 36
B 30m 4-4 B 1 3.67 0.13(m/s) 2 3.83 0.17(m/s) 3 3.85 0.16(m/s) 4 3.88 0.19(m/s) 5 3.97 0.19(m/s) 4-8 B 1~5 2 3 4 5 1 (p<0.05) 5 2 3 4 (p<0.05) 4-9 B 1 5 (p<0.05) 4-4 B 1~5 (n=9) 1 2 3 4 5 30m(m/s) 3.67 0.13 3.92 3.47 3.83 0.17 4.13 3.63 3.85 0.16 4.15 3.63 3.88 0.19 4.20 3.62 3.97 0.19 4.34 3.79 37
4.4 30m (m/s) 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 4-8 B 1~5 * 1 (p<0.05) ** 5 2 3 4 (p<0.05) 38
4.4 4.2 30m (m/s) 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 4-9 B 1 5 * 5 1 (p<0.05) 39
A ( )A 0.71 (p<0.05) 4-10 4.0 3.9 30m (m/s) 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 30m(m/s) 4-10 A (p<0.05) 40
A 0.46 4-11 4.05 4.00 3.95 30m (m/s) 3.90 3.85 3.80 3.75 3.70 3.65 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 30m (m/s) 4-11 A 41
B ( )B 0.78 (p<0.05) 4-12 4.0 3.9 30m (m/s) 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 30m (m/s) 4-12 B (p<0.05) 42
B 0.85 (p<0.05) 4-13 4.4 4.3 30m (m/s) 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 30m (m/s) 4-13 B (p<0.05) 43
A B ( )AB AB AB 0.3 4-14 6.1 6.0 5.9 A-Group (m/s) 5.8 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 B-Group (m/s) 4-14 A B 44
( ) A B Coordination AB AB 0.1 4-15 30m Coordination 4.05 4.00 3.95 3.90 A (m/s) 3.85 3.80 3.75 3.70 3.65 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 B (m/s) 4-15 A B 45
A B S A B A B 5 A B 5 A B S 5 30 ( 4-2 4-4) 30 5 ( 4-7 4-9) A 5 Zatzyorski (1980) 30 B ( ) ( ) A ( ) B S 46
( ) 啓 Grosser (1981) 4-104-11A 4-124-13B A 0.71 0.46B 0.78 0.85A B 5 B B Neumann (2002) 47
AB 5 ( ) A B 5 ( 4-14)A 5.76 0.23(m/s)(4-1)B 5.86 0.32(m/s)( 4-2) 5 B A A 1 5.84 0.25(m/s) 5 5.76 0.23(m/s) 8%B 1 5.84 0.24(m/s) 5 5.86 0.32(m/s) 2% B A A B Letzelter (1978) 48
AB 5 AB 5 ( 4-15) A 3.87±0.12(m/s)(4-3)B 3.97±0.19(m/s)(4-4) 5 B A A 1 3.66±0.12(m/s) 5 3.87±0.12(m/s) 21%B 1 3.67±0.13(m/s) 5 3.97±0.19(m/s) 30% B A B 5 S Mitra (1980) A B Neumann (2002) 49
18 30 30 S A B ( )A 5 (p<0.05) ( )B 5 S (p<0.05) ( )A 5 (p>0.05) ( )B 5 S (p>0.05) 50
30 30 S 30 51
(2004) 164-171 (2001) 52 2 102-107 (2005) (2005) 3 88-91 (2005) 3 44-52 (1991) (1999) 12 4 105-110 (2004) 52