JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY 2012 /02 10 DOI 10. 3969 /j. issn. 1674-9391. 2012. 02. 009 1 20 / 20 D819 A 1674 9391 2012 02 0068 10 Prem Lal Mehra 1937-610041 312000 2 P. 169-73 9 2 3 P. 13-19 1 3 68
20 1903 1904 7 5 P. 24-25 6 P. 21 7 P. 62 1900 1901 8 P. 129-130 11 4 30 8 P. 129-130 1899 9 P. 37 5 19 6 8 10 P. 37 19 4 no. 158 P. 306 69
JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY 2012 /02 10 11 P. 156-158 1899 3-9 瑏 瑢 瑏 瑣 瑏 瑤 10 12 P. 206-207 7 P. 61-62 1885 瑏 瑥 zhids 10 P. 42 1896 4 瑏 瑡 70
瑏 瑦 瑏 瑩 7 P. 62 1900 10 5 4 no. 35 P. 116 瑏 瑧 瑏 瑨 瑐 瑠 4 39 P. 124 4 no. 33 P. 113-14 no. 34 P. 114-15 4 no. 34 P. 115 9 P. 207 9 P. 208 4 no. 35 P. 116 1902 8 C 71
JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY 2012 /02 10 瑐 瑤 瑐 瑡 4 no. 52 P. 141 no. 55 P. 143 200 - 瑐 瑢 40 20 55 200 瑐 瑣 1902 11 13 P. 364-365 1890 1893 瑐 瑥 4 P. 15 13 P. 360 瑐 瑦 瑐 瑧 瑐 瑨 4 no. 77 P. 26 no. 80 P. 27 no. 82 P. 28 1900 1 6 72
16 000 瑑 瑢 瑑 瑣 1906 瑐 瑩 7 P. 68 1907 8 1910 7 5-6 7 18 瑑 瑠 瑑 瑤 瑑 瑥 1913 1 瑑 瑦 1901 12 1 200 瑑 瑡 300 瑑 瑧 19 14 P. 505-506 15 P. 156 20 4 no. 49 P. 15 16 P. 102 1900 1901 73
JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY 2012 /02 10 瑑 瑨 1903-1904 1878 1905 2370 1905 16 P. 102 2054 no. 37 pp. 186-19 Guru 35 7 no. 66 p. 309 1 P. L. Mehra Tibet and Russian intrigue Journal of The Royal Central Asian Society Volume 45 Issue 1 1958 2J 1948 p. 149 K M 1953 9 pp. 151-53 p. 59 - pp. 16-17 10 N M 3 1902 1871 1888 7-8 170 1902 1904 no. 48-49 pp. 140-41 4 1951 pp. 236-37 1876-1877 1883 1883 1889 W. H. 1865 1892 5 R 1920 1904 2054 74 6 8 1899-1901 P. K. 1872 1874-1875 1897 H. H. P.
1954 3 25 1866 1874 1900 1901 1868 1871 1874 1878 pp. 113-118 1891-1892 瑏 瑥 H. 瑏 瑡 P. 37 XV 1928 pp. 89-103 J. 瑏 瑦 1899-1900 p. 43 瑏 瑢 1894-1902 V. I. 1939 no. 41-42 p. 125 p. 5 瑏 瑧 瑏 瑣 1900 10 17 Transit Hamba Tsa Nyi Kenpo 瑏 瑨 no. 31 p. 113 P. 53 瑏 瑤 125 1921 1900 1901 瑐 瑠 no. 36 p. 117 pp. 61-2 1926 A. 18 1927 pp. 101-19 p. 162 JRCAS XIV 1927 pp. 359-363 no. 31 p. 113 C. 瑏 瑩 36 43 pp. 117 1905 pp. 12-3 瑐 瑡 E. 1902 8 2 1902 7 no. 48 - W. A. 49 pp. 140-41 瑐 瑢 no. 51 53 pp. 141-42 Nag - dhan Dorje 1890 75
JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY 2012 /02 10 1893 瑐 瑧 1904 5 5 2370 5 6 pp. 282-84 瑐 瑤 p. 363 150 5 6 1900 10 瑑 瑠 2370 no. 99 p. 40 no. 221 pp. 192-93 L. A. Pousse CaiJJoux no. 71 p. 130 no. 6 p. 3 瑐 瑣 瑐 瑨 2500 no. 11 pp. 5-6 no. 75-76 pp. 131-132 瑐 瑩 500 42 5 6 1929 2 瑐 瑥 pp. 147-76 19 90 瑑 瑡 1909 pp. 505-6 1902 11 1928 p. 156 瑐 瑦 3 31 瑑 瑢 A. p. 116 700 p. 67 瑑 瑣 1905 p. 109 2504 no. 10-11 25 pp. 5-6 p. 10 76
1 N. The Statesman 1955-3 - 15. p. 68 2 P. B. Huntz. The Strategic Significance of Events Newly - Affairs Happened in 1910 p. 878 Tibet 瑑 瑤 p. 941912 3 J. Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society 1953 40 4. P. B.. 1904 J. 1953 40 4. 3 Edmond Crabbe. The Strategic Status of 1932 p. 98 Tibet J. Eastern world 1956 10 12.. J. 1904 Eastern World 1956 10 12. 4 M. 1920 1904 2054 1905 2370 1905. 5 A.. 瑑 瑥 M. 1905. 6. M. 1905. 7. p. 117 M. 1946. 瑑 瑦 pp. 304-5 8. 1913 1774-1922 M. 1931. 9. 瑑 瑧 M. 1927. 10 J.. M. 1948. p. 62 11 M.. 瑑 瑨 M. 1950. 1878-1879 12. -. M. 1951. 13. M. 1926. 14. M. 1909. 15. M. 1928. 16 A. Popovich. Russia and Tibet J. New Oriental 1927 18. A.. J. Новый востоk 1927 18. 2011-06 - 20 77
an. The Dmu - Skas and Jianmu reflect the early times of Jueditiantong in Chinese pinyin philosophy in the ancient Tibetan and Chinese culture. In the ancient Tibetan and Chinese culture the Jueditiantong philosophy has experienced the period of Witch stage all people for the Witch stage and a combination stage of State and Religion as well as a mixture the above three periods. However there were a slight differences in the area of each period and expressions between the two ancient cultures. Key Words ancient Tibetan and Chinese cultures ancient Tibetan ancient Chinese Jueditiantong dmu - skas Jianmu RUSSIAN INTRIGUE IN TIBET AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY Britain Prem Lal Mehra History Department Panjab University Chandigarh Panjab India Translated by YANG Ming Southwest University for Nationalities Chengdu Sichuan 610041 China ZHAO Xiaoyi Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages Shaoxing Zhejiang 312000 China JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY VOL. 3 NO. 2 68-77 2011 CN51-1731 /C in Chinese DOI 10. 3969 /j. issn. 1674-9391. 2011. 02. 009 Abstract With the introduction of ample archives and magazines the article studied some mysterious incidents happened around the British army invasion of Tibet at the beginning of the 20th. While there were two Mongolians of the Russian Buryats state involved in the political conspiracy. One of them is Agvan Dorjiev the thirteenth Dalai Lama s Lama teacher. Another one is Zelbu who was employed by the Russian foreign ministry and trained in the Russian s general staff of central Asia adventure and information group. Their secret missions were to conduct under the cover of nationality and religious identity that they could influence Dalai Lama to fight against Britain so as to keep and enlarge Russia s influence on the Tibet affairs. Key Words Prem Lal Mehra Tsarist Russia Tibetan history modern history the British expeditionary force Dalai Lama RESEARCH AND REFLECTION OF THE TIBETAN CLASSIC LITERATURE HERITAGE TYPES IN YUSHU AREA SHABO Klurgyl Southwest University for Nationalities Chengdu Sichuan 610041 China JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY VOL. 3 NO. 2 78-85 2011 CN51-1731 /C in Chinese DOI 10. 3969 /j. issn. 1674-9391. 2011. 02. 010 Abstract In this paper we briefly review the survey of research of the arrangement from ancient books and literatures historical archives modern books published and Tangka s literatures then put for- 95