2015 2 141 1674-5205 2015 02-0141- 011 300071 2013-08 - 20 Abstract The essence of the principle of shareholder s equality is stock equality i. e. the same shares have the same rights different shares different rights and the issuance of preferred stock does not conflict with this principle. The issuance of preferred stock may influence shareholders interest deeply therefore it should be authorized by the company. More attention should be paid to the terms of preferred stock. In order to satisfy the corporate finance the conditions quantity period purpose and provisions of the issuance of preferred stock should not be restricted by mandatory legislation. Key Words preferred stock stock equality nature of contract restriction of issuance autonomy of private law DF411. 91 A DOI:10.16290/j.cnki.1674-5205.2015.02.014 1 2005 132 1 248 2014 3 21 CLS 2012 C49 2012 985 1981 1
142 2 330 3 105 4 87 5 115 6 322 7 168 8 34 42 166 4 186 2 103 1 1 9 63 10 59 7 1. 2. 3. 4. 11 126 7 12 126 1 2013 309
2015 2 143 1955 48 2 13 4 151 a class series 19 156 1 501 6. 01 14 41-647 15 151 a A B 16 486 133 Jacobs J Young J 17 443 37 1 7 99 10 37 2 2 2 34 200 2 / 3 37 1 344 2 130 1 4 1 2009 14 2010 1 http / /delcode. delaware. gov /title8 /c001 / sc05 /index. shtml 2015 1 9 2 see C. Stephen Bigler and Jennifer Veet Barrett WORDS THAT MATTER CON- SIDERATIONS IN DRAFTING PREFERRED STOCK PROVISIONS 2014 18 23 - JAN Bus. L. Today 1 4.
144 1991-1995 81 2006 1 1 1 1993 28 + + 40 41 2015 1 9 50% 24 1 1 1 1 1 1. 151 a A B A B 20 80 1 2006 2007 4 30 http / /app. finance. ifeng. com /data / stock /ggzw. php id = 13142668&symbol = 600671 2014 8 7
2015 2 145 2. 157 1 7% 2 7% 6% 8% 18 232-233 21 177 1% 3 1995 344 2 1 22 208 3 22 208 7% 10% 2002 11 28 09102272830 2 Wyoming Compiled Statutes of 1945 44-122. 2006 1 47-58
146 1. 6 1992 23 2. 3. 33 28 1 1 1 2 3 4 2 1 28 < > http / / news. xinhuanet. com /fortune /2014-03 /21 /c_119890032. htm 2014 2 7 12 2 3 2 5 1 1996 2-4
2015 2 147 24 54 26 12 19 7 16 1 269 5 115 21 217 25 129 19 1 1 2 27 3 1 2 2 see Roman Tomasic Stephen Bottomley &Rob McQueen Corporations Law in Australia second edition The Federation Press 2002 p. 442. 2005 3 54
148 139 2 31 71 32 185 32 173 1 / 4 33 80 34 131 7 176 35 65-66 28 268 25% 36 16 23 50% 50% 1938 1 /4 27 45 32 100 28 267 1990 1 /3 2001 2002 1 /2 370 2 9 1 /2 29 6 2005 1 /2 115 1 /2 1 /2 30 203 223
2015 2 149 38 131 132 2 157 419 2001 18 233 21 178 37 60 5 114 2004 6 24 L228-11 32 173 13 30 8 1 26 211 30 1 1 66
150 50 80 / 39 50 66 1 opt - out 40 126 7 1 2006 3 57-62 1. M. 2008. 2. M. 1982.
2015 2 151 3. M. 2004. 4. M. 2006. 5. M. 2006. 6. M. 2006. 7. M.. 2011. 8. J. 1996 11 187-198. 9. M. 2005. 10. M. 2005. 11. 109 1 J. 2007 06 400-448. 12. J. 1981 98 10 1296-1367. 13. J. 1955 7 2 1-26. 14 Jeffrey D. Bauman. Corporations and Other Business Associations Statutes Rules and Forms M. St. Paul MN Thomson / West 2008. 15 C. Stephen Bigler & Jennifer Veet Barrett. WORDS THAT MATTER CONSIDERATIONS IN DRAFTING PREFERRED STOCK PROVISIONS J. Business Law Today 2014 - JAN 1-5. 16 William W. Bratton. Corporate Finance Cases and Materials M. New York Foundation Press St. Paul Minn. Thomson / West 2008. 2002. 17 Roman Tomasic Stephen Bottomley & Rob McQueen. Corporations Law in Australia M. Sydney The Federation Press 18. M. 2005. 19 Robert W. Hamilton. The Law of Corporations in a Nutshell M. Beijing Law Publishing House 1999. 20. J. 2000 09 70-76. 21. M. 2004. 22. M.. 2000. 23. J. 2012 12 159-163. 24. D. 2008. 25. M. 1991. 26. J. 2004 07 132-137. 27. 3 M. 1992. 28. M. 1980. 29. D. 2006. 30. J. 1998 73 3 201-231. 31 Z.. 2000. 32 Mads Andenas and Frank Wooldridge. European Comparative Company Law M. Cambridge UK New York Cambridge University Press 2009. 33 Z.. 1999. 34. 2 M. 2008. 35 Steven R. Schuit. Corporate Law and Practice of the Netherlands Legal and Taxation M. The Hague Boston Kluwer Law International 1998. 36. J. 2014 03 10-16. 37. M. 2007. 38. M. 1957. 39 EB /OL. 2014-08 - 07. http / /business. sohu. com /stock _ individual /com _ doc /zgsms / 000001. html. 40. J. 2014 05 22-36.