杨 登 峰 * 91 * PAPD
2014 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 瑏 瑠 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 瑏 瑠 2004 72 2002 183 2 183-185 1999 51-56 2 178 See H. W. R. Wade Administrative Law Oxford Oxford University Press 10th ed. 2009 p. 17 Stephen G. Breyer Richard B. Stewart Cass R. Sunstein Matthew L. Spitzer Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy Problems Text and Cases. Beijing Citic pulishing House 2003 p. 37. 1996 3 1999 3 2004 5 45 1998 48 2010 69 8 48 7 50-51 8-11 2000 3 2003 3 92
瑏 瑡 瑏 瑢 9 瑏 瑣 瑏 瑡 瑏 瑢 瑏 瑣 89 100 116 56 64 66 71 73 Staupe Parlamentsvorbehalt und Delegtionsbefugnis Berlin 1986 S. 42 ff. 158. Rengeling Vorbehalt und Bestimmtheit des Atomgesetzes NJW 1978 S. 2218. 2006 121-122 17 10 4 93
瑏 瑤 94 2014 3 瑏 瑤 2000 104 瑏 瑢 15-25
瑏 瑥 瑏 瑦 瑏 瑥 瑏 瑦 2002 19 2 20 21 22 2002 15 2005 158 95
2014 3 2010 8 27 瑏 瑧 3 9-12 3 4 9 10 瑏 瑨 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 3 瑏 瑧 瑏 瑨 3-4 14 10 96
1 4 2 5 6 25 2008 300 90 1000 瑏 瑩 2011 瑐 瑠 19 瑐 瑡 瑏 瑩 瑐 瑠 瑐 瑡 2008 23 2009 10 2009 18 2008 83 2010 3 2011 4 70 2011 1 26 6 瑏 瑤 109 97
2014 3 瑐 瑢 瑐 瑣 1789 4 瑐 瑤 13 33 35 36 37 38 39 47 瑐 瑢 瑐 瑣 瑐 瑤 2006 73 瑐 瑢 72 4 2001 355 98
瑐 瑥 瑐 瑦 瑐 瑧 4 14 15 17 3 2011 10 26 160 680 3 瑐 瑥 瑐 瑦 瑐 瑧 瑏 瑤 8 2009 6 2013 2 瑐 瑦 830-831 99
2014 3 瑐 瑨 瑐 瑩 瑑 瑠 瑑 瑡 瑑 瑢 瑑 瑣 瑐 瑨 瑐 瑩 瑑 瑠 瑑 瑡 瑑 瑢 瑑 瑣 2005 1 2011 2 BverfGE 34 165 192 40 237 248 f. 41 251 260 f. 47 46 79. BverfGE 49 89 126 f. Roellecke Die Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit im Grenzbereich zur Gesetzgebung NJW 1978 S. 1778. 瑏 瑢 60 Kloeper JZ 1984 S. 692. 瑏 瑢 59 E. Pieske Der Weg des deutschen Schulrechts nach dem 51. Deutschen Juristentag in Stuttgart im September 1976 DVBI. 1977 S. 677. 瑏 瑢 59 100
1. 保 障 性 给 付 行 为 的 非 法 定 化 瑑 瑤 42 49 瑑 瑥 瑑 瑤 瑑 瑥 瑐 瑢 73-74 1 74 101
2014 3 2. 干 预 性 给 付 行 为 的 法 定 化 瑑 瑦 瑑 瑦 瑐 瑦 834 102
13 2 48 74 76 77 2 4 58 57 27 31 103
2014 3 瑑 瑧 50 51 37 瑑 瑨 瑑 瑧 瑑 瑨 54 40 瑐 瑢 73 104
2 3 4 3 瑑 瑩 瑒 瑠 瑑 瑩 瑒 瑠 2010 http / /www. lawyee. net /Case /Case_Hot_Display. asp RID = 199541. 2013 10 15 105
2014 3 瑒 瑡 瑒 瑡 2012 59 1996 6 15 http / /www. lawyee. net /Case / Case_Display. asp ChannelID = 2010100&keyword = % B3% C2% CB% D5% D2% C7% D3% EB% BA% FE% C4% CF% CA% A1% C1% B0% D4% B4% CA% D0% B9% AB% B0% B2% BE% D6&RID = 14558#2014 2 25 106
86 3 95 2 3 8 2 8 64 107
2014 3 瑒 瑢 20 90 瑒 瑣 7 10 19 瑒 瑤 瑒 瑥 27 6 13 瑒 瑦 瑒 瑧 瑒 瑨 瑒 瑢 瑒 瑣 瑒 瑤 瑒 瑥 瑒 瑦 瑒 瑧 瑒 瑨 65 19 http / /news. sina. com. cn /c /sd /2012-03-28 /102424187298. shtml. 2013 4 8 2013 1 17 AA21 瑏 瑤 118 BVerfGE 40 237 247 83 130 152 D V 1980 258 瑏 瑤 118 DVBl 1992 1154 J. 2002 345 1998 4 19 2001 2 9 108
瑒 瑩 109 瑒 瑩 瑒 瑨 19
2014 3 Abstract The principle of legally prescribed administration and the principle of statute reservation are related each other but different. The former extends the latter. The former comprehensively considers the relationship between law and administration and puts forward the reservation of law such as the reservation of laws and regulations on the basis of legal reservation. The key issued of the principle of legally prescribed administration is the scope of legality. The negativity of status libertatis and the positivity of social rights can be the constitutional basis of defining the legal scope of administration. Generally speaking the external infringement on the status libertatis and the interventional activities of payment the internal infringement and the special activities of payments the procedure of adding the liabilities to counterparties and organizational behaviors should be brought into the legal scope and other administrative behaviors should be excluded. 110