2005132 227~238 Advances in Psychological Science 1 2 1 430079 2 430081 3 PLS B849:C93 1 [1] 45~65 Hofstede [2] Chemers Hofstede [4,5] Chemers idiographic approach [6] Hofstede 40 IBM nomothetic 4 approach HouseWright [3] 2004-10-05 * 70171046 E-mail: asulong@yahoo.com; 027-62532443 40 1 2 227
-228-2005 Hofstede Bond [7] R. Silin 60 Silin 1976 [8] Silin [6] [8] Silin [9] 2.2 Redding Redding 70 80 72 20 ese capitalismpaterna [10] Redding 2 2.1 Silin
13 2 [9] Redding 20 Redding [1 3] Silin Redding 2.4 CPM Redding 1987 [14] PM Pperformance Mmaintenance Redding CPM 1991 [11] CPM [15] 2.3 Westwood 2.5 Westwood1992,1997 [12,13] model of paternalistic headship 2004 [16] Westwood 11 9 9 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 3 (6) (7) (8) (9) Westwood 3.1
-230-2005 20 80 1 2 SilinRedding 1993 1994 18 3 24 [17] [18] (1995) [17] CPM [14,15,19] 4 [6] 2000 3 1981 [18] 1987 1991 [14,15,19] 1997 [20] 3
13 2 1 2 3 3 8 [21,22] [23] 1 follower [6] 1 1 2000
-232-2005 3.2 1 2000 PLS 1995 [17] 3.3 16 1991 [24] [6] [9,25] 2 000 [6] 3.3.1 1981 [18] CPM [14] C paternali stic leader ship PLS scale 20 PLS 11 9 13 3
13 2 [25] pan-familism [9] [24] 3.3.3 mutuality 3.3.2 2 2000
-234-2005 3 [26] 2002 [34] 2002 [35] (2002) [36] 20 03 [28] 2 [33] 2001 4 LM 2002 [29] 2002 [30] 2002 [37] 4.1 2001 [38] 2003 [27] 2002 [39] [28 2003 ] 2002 [29] 2002 [30] 2002 [31] 2001 [32] [33] 2001 2000 [40] 3 4.2 3 [41] 3 [9]
13 2 3 5 [27~39,42] 3 [27~39,42] 3 [27] 2003 PLS [32,33,37,38,42,43] [9] 1 2 3 4 3 [27] 2003 3
-236-2005 2004 [44] [37] [1] Northouse P G. Leadership: Theory and practice. 2nd Edition. London: Sage, 2001. 2~4 [2] Bass B M. Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial application. New York: Free Press, 1990. 760~830 [3] House R J, Wright N S, Aditya R N. Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory. In: Earley P C, Erze M ed. New Perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass / Pfeiffer, 1997. 535~625 [4] Hofstede G H. Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?. Organization Dynamics, 1980, 9(1): 42~63 [5] Hofstede G H. Cultural constraints in management theories. In: Hussey D ed. International Review of Strategic Management. Volume 5. New York: Wiley,1994. 27~48 [6],,. :.,2000,14: ~64 3 [7] Hofstede G H, Bond M H. The confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 1988, 16(4): 4~21 [8] Silin R H. Leadership and value: The organization of
13 2 large-scale Taiwan enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976. 66~128 [22].,1995,3: 237 219~ [9],. : [23]..,2000,13: ~180 127 [10] Redding S G. The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1990. 122~136 [11] Redding G, Wong G Y Y. The psychology of Chinese organizational behavior. In: Bond M H ed. The psychology of Chinese people, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1986. 267~295 [12] Westwood R I, Chan A. Headship and leadership. In: Westwood R I ed. Organizational behavior: A Southeast Asian perspective. Hong Kong: Longman Group, 1992. 123~139 [13] Westwood R. Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 1997, 18(3): 445~480. 2002 [24]... -. :,1991. 365~ 407 [25],..,2000,8(4): ~617 583 [26].. :..,1988.386~ 388 [27],,. :.,2003,20: 209~252 [28].. 2003 [14],,.CPM. [29].,1987,2: ~207 199. 2002 [15],,. [30]..,1991,3: ~241 236. 2002 [16],.. [31].,2004,36(1): 110~ 115.2002 [17]. : [32]..,1995,79:.2001 119~173 [33]. [18],.. 2001. [34] Cheng B S, Huang M P, Chou L F. Paternalistic leadership,1981,4: ~41 2 and its effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese [19 ].. :. organizational teams(in Chinese). Journal of Psychology in -. :,1991. Chinese Societies(Hong Kong), 2002, 3(1): 85~ 112 409~445 [20] Farh J L, Earley P C, Lin S C. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behaviour in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 421~444 [35],,. :.,2002,17: 105~161 [36],,. [21]..,2002,18: 50 13~,1995,3: 214~ 219 [37].
-238-2005 2002,2000,13: 219~ 227 [38]. :. [42].. 2001 2002 [39]. [43]. 2002. 2001 [40]. [44],.,2000,13: 195~ 202.,2004,27(3): 676 674~ [41].. A Review of Paternalistic Leadership Research Zhou Hao 1, Long Lirong ( 1 Department of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China) ( 2 College of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China) 2 Abstract: Paternalistic leadership (PL) was based on Chinese traditional culture and different from western leadership theories. It was a basic character of organizations in Chinese culture, and had been found to be prevalent in kinds of Chinese organizations. Authoritarianism, benevolence, and moral leadership were regarded as three elements of paternalistic leadership. In this paper, a review of paternalistic leadership research was given and the deep cultural roots of PL were analyzed, the three-elements theory of paternalistic leadership and PLS (paternalistic leadership scale) were introduced. At last, the problems of PL research and research orientation are provided, for example, effectiveness of PL in specific fields and the relationships between the three elements of PL should be given more attention in the future. Key words: paternalistic leadership, authoritarian leadership, benevolent leadership, moral leadership.