208 9 * 200083 D80 A 006-9550 208 09-009-9 * KX6056 00 207DHC002 09
WTO IMF G20 996 0
208 9 40 207 229 998
Pew Research Center 207 206 4.9% 30 200 950 2580 2050 4.9% 7.4% 2.6%.6% 2003 20 6 2 3 2 3 2 208 8 80 7 8 203 5 206 6 03
208 9 0% 0 G20 G20 992 492 648 20 202 3 3
Dante 2 3 2006 8 2 2000 0 3 4 205 25
208 9 2 Rabindranath Tagore 3 3 2005 25 26 Akira Iriye Cultural Internationalism and World Order Baltimore The John Hopkins University Press 997 2 Akira Iriye Cultural Internationalism and World Order 997 204 54 5
. 2 3 6 2007
208 9 2. Akira Iriye 3. Akira Iriye Cultural Internationalism and World Order p.2. 7
. 2 35 2 8 20 995 77 202 32
208 9 2. Edward Carl 7 8 2 79 2 20 99 939 2005 999 38 57 9
3. 2 9 5 3 2 20 2008 2003 309
208 9 2000 Michael Hardt Antonio Negri 2. 9 20 Herbert Spencer 876 Leonard Woolf 96 3 2003 20 43 2 208 466 3 Akira Iriye Cultural Internationalism and World Order p.26 p.27 p.29. 2
2. 3. 2003 54 22
208 9 2 23
2 3 2 3 207 24 205 55 208 2009 3 69 86 204 5 02 30 205 203 204
208 9 2 3 500 4 887 Ludwik Zamenhof 905 949 2 3 4 490 25 998 47 934 80 20 25
. 400 870 2 2. 85 94 42 200 208. 9 20 2 985 53 63 8 24 Francis S.L. Lyons Internationalism in Europe 85-94 Leiden A.W. Sythoff 963 p.4 pp.25-26. 26
208 9 893 2. 2004 34 500 000 2 208 4 2 206 5 7 22 207 2 02 27
No.9 208 World Economics and Politics with Chinese characteristics. Key Words interconnection diplomacy eco-institutionalism theory Southeast Asia Authors Zhao Kejin Professor and Associate Dean of the Institute of International Relations Tsinghua University Zhai Dayu Ph.D. Candidate of the Department of International Relations Tsinghua University. A Study of Cultural Internationalism Guo Shuyong 09 Abstract Cultural Internationalism should draw much more attention than before in the process of constructing Chinese School of international relations theories because of three kinds of cultural crises. The first kind of crisis relates to the bad coordination a- mong the political economic and cultural world orders. The second one deals with the impacts of clash of civilizations and the unfavorable return of geopolitics. The third one has something to do with the externally connecting crisis that China faces in the era of reforming the system of globalization governance. In reality cultural internationalism can be classified into cultural globalism cultural regionalism and cultural openness. It agrees with idealism in believing progressiveness optimism and constructivism in the evolution of world order with realism in that powers still play role in international politics and with Marxism in that they all value internationalism and its role in the emancipation of mankind. In history it took many forms in the sequence of Tian- Xiaism cultural imperialism cultural relativism and cultural dialogism and so on in accordance with the birth and evolution of international society. In the future all the forms should be upgraded into new types of cultural internationalism through such differently interrelated paths of cultural interaction as universal languages institutional platforms and cultural dialogues. Key Words Chinese School of IRT cultural crisis world order going out culturally internationalism Author Guo Shuyong Professor and Dean of School of International Relations and Public Affairs Shanghai International Studies University. 59