16 1 ( ) Vol.16No.1 2016 1 JournalofChinaUniversityofGeosciences(SocialSciencesEdition) Jan.2016 19-3 : ; ; : ; ; ; :D912.64 DOI:10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.2016.01.010 :A :1671-0169(2016)01-0102-11 [1] [2] : (13CSH039); (2015B10814) : ( 210098); ( 266100) 102
: 19-3 [3] [2](P11-12) 1 19-3 2 3 4 2011 2011 7 2012 1 ( 2006 ) ( 2013 ) : : : 2010 ; : 2010 ; : 2011 ; : : 2014 2 3 4 2011 6 ( ) ( ) 19-3 6200 : : : 2006 4 ; : : 2008 10 ; : : 2014 1 ; : 2014 4 103
( ) : ; ; : ( ) 2005 2011 6 19-3 2011 6 4 17 39 2012 2 21 204 ( ) : 7 2012 (2011 ) 30 204 6 6 1 2 1 5 ) 2 20092011 204 3 20122042 30 204 3 6 ( 104
: 19-3 ( ) [4] [4] 19-3 ( ) 19-3 ( ) ( ) : 2011 9 8 200 90% 2012 ( ) 2013 [5] 2012 105
( ) ( ) [6] [7] 19-3 : [8] 2014 4 [8] ( ) [9] ( ) : 2011 11 2012 7 2013 7 2011 106
: 19-3 ; ( :LYD2014041701) ( : LYD2014041603) ( :LYD2014041606) [10](P21-54) ( ) [11] ; ( :LYD2014041605) 107
( ) ( ) [12] [13] ( :LYD2014041602) ; ( :LYD2014041605) ( :LYD2014041602) ( ) [14] [15] : : 6200 2011 19-3 6200 30 39 204 108
: 19-3 ( ) [16] [17] [18] ( ) [19] 19-3 ( ) [20] [21] [22] 2011 7 2012 2 2012 7 10 109
( ) ( :LYD2014041706) ( ) [23] ( :SD2014041605) [11] 110
: 19-3 ; ; ( 1 ) 1 111
( ) [1]. DH [J]. 2014(1). [2]. [M]. : 2011. [3]. [J]. 2014(1). [4]. [J]. 2011(8). [5]. [J]. 2010(2). [6]. [J]. 2009(1). [7]. [J]. 2011(6). [8]. [J]. 2012(5). [9]. [J]. 2007(10). [10]. : [C].. ( )[M]. : 2005. [11]. [J]. ( ) 2015(4). [12]. : [J]. 2009(6). [13]. : [J]. 2007(1). [14]. [J]. 2011(6). [15]. [J]. 2009(10). [16]. [J]. ( )2015(2). [17]. [J]. ( )2012(9). [18]. [J]. 2007(6). [19]. [J]. 2004(3). [20]. [J]. 2009(1). [21]. [J]. 2012(2). [22]. [J]. 2010(5). [23]. : [J]. 1993(3). ( ) 112
16 1 MAIN ABSTRACTS ronmentinphysicschemistryandbiology.theconceptofpolutionincriminallaw hasafunctionto giveexpressiontopolicyincriminateandvalueorientationbuttherangeissmalerthanadministra- tionlaw.thepolutionincriminallaw wouldcausedamagetolandwaterairandotherbiologicalre- sourcesinfringepersonalrightpropertyrightandecologicalenvironmentright.thepolutionsourceof criminallawregulationonlycontainswastestoxicsubstancesandotherharmfulsubstances.constitu- tionofpolutioncrimeisdeterminedbythedegreeofdangerorharmfulresultcausedbythepolution. TechnicalSafetyFrameorEnvironmentalJusticeFrame AnApproachtotheProblemsofGovernment RiskCommunicationinanAnti-PXEvent QIU Hong-feng Whilethepublicinthedestinationsofindustrialrelocationusualyadoptedenvironmentaljustice frametointerpretenvironmentalrisksinputfromdevelopedregionsthelocalgovernmentsofthosedes- tinationsoftenappliedtechnicalsafetyframetoriskcommunicationwhichconsequentlyledtocommu- nicationbreakdown.basedonasurveyandin-depthinterviewsconductedintonglingatowncloseto GuleiPXproject(originalyXiamenPX)thepaperexploreshowthelocalresidents awarenessofenvi- ronmentaljusticecanpredicttheirreactionstotheriskofpxinordertounderstandwhyanenviron- mentalmassincidenthasnotbeenpreventedbygovernmentriskcommunication.thestudyshowsthat theawarenessofproceduraljusticehassalientpredictiveefectsontheacceptabilityofrisktheatitude towardnimbyandtheparticipationinmassincidentswhichimpliesthatthelocalgovernmentshould givethepriorityofitsriskcommunicationstrategytothevalueofenvironmentaljustice. siveanalysisbasedonpenglai19-3oilspilincident CHEN TaoYANG Yue StudyontheSocialMentalityofSubalternGroupinEnvironmentalContention InterpretationandExten- A large number of achievements have been made in the field of environmental contention study.howeverthedeepinvestigationofsubalterngroup ssocialmentalityhasbeenignored.there- searchoflouisislandfishermen senvironmentalcontentionindicatesthatthe mentalityofsubaltern group senvironmentalcontentionpresentscomplicatedfeatures.judgingfrom contentionprocessthe mentalityexperiencedfour-stagechangesnamely seekingsocialjustice-imbalance-weakidentity-recti- ficationofname.theirmentalitytowardsthelocalgovernmentvariesfromdependencefearresent- mentandunderstanding.fromtheviewofstrategychoicetherearetwokindsofmentality making big and playingedgebal.intheacceleratingperiodofsocialtransformationthecomplexmentality isthenormofenvironmentalcontention.thelackofcontentionresourcesunderthebackgroundofinter- estdiferentiationandtheexistenceofpunitive measuresaredeepreasonsleadingtothecomplicated mentality.thegovernmentdepartmentsaresupposedtofurtherstudysocialmentalityestablishandim- provethedisputeresolvingmechanismofrightsinaccordancewiththelaw. 171