ISM AHP VMI emily.1-777@yahoo.com.tw yowmow@mail.thu.edu.tw VMI ISM VMI VMI VMI VMI satty 1980 Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP VMI ISM Abstract This research wants to study the electronic industry mainly need adoption the VMI mechanism. And there are thirteen factors affect electronic industry to adopt the VMI. We use ISM access the electronic industry and draw the hierarchy process chart. When corporations adopt the VMI, there are some problems to solve. Corporations really need a framework to help them to well implement. So this research adopts the framework in order to help electronic industry to well implement VMI. From the hierarchy process chart, we can use the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessAHP.It is a powerful tool to assist managers in selecting winning what VMI process when the company belongs the buyer material market and the material belongs large demand amounthigh use to share and small size. - 132 -
(2002) Gartner Group 2005 8 Toelle and Tersine(1989) VMI (1998) (VMI,Vender-Managed Inventory) (2003) (VMI,Vender-Managed Inventory) VMI AHP VMI - 133 -
VMI AHP VMI J.N.Warfield ISM AHP ISM (VMI,Vender-Managed Inventory) AHP VMI ISM VMI ISM VMI Interpretive Structural Modeling ISM ISM 5-10 Algorithm ISM Iacovou et al.chwelos et al. VMI i j 1-134 -
0 AHP VMI ISM AHP VMI VMI VMI VMI (Analysis Hierarchy Process, AHP) VMI AHP AHP Criteria Sub-criteria ISM HAS - 135 -
19 ISM M M EXCEL M M K 1 M K M K + 1 M * Iacovou et al.chwelos et al. VMI 1 VMI 1.VMI / VMI / - 136 -
2. 3. VMI / 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9./ 10. 11. 12. 13. VMI ISM VMI / 1 1 VMI / 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 / - 137 -
10 11 12 13 D Iacovou et al.chwelos et al. VMI / 1 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 2 5,6,7,8 3 9 4 10,11,12,13 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-138 -
M D D I M M = D + I..1 3 M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 EXCEL M M * M K M K 1 4 1 D+I M k 1 k D M K 1 M K M K + 1 D reachability matrix M * 1 0 EXCEL M K 1 M K M K + 1 M 3 M 4 M 5-139 -
4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ti ( ) { m 1} t = t R i j = ij A ( ) ={ t m = 1 } t i j ij 2.3 ( ) R t i 1 A t i 1 5 ( ) - 140 -
T i 5 R t i At i R t i At i 1 1 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 1 2 1,2 2,5,6,7,8 2 3 1,3 3,9 3 4 1,4 4,10,11,12,13 4 5 1,2,5 5 5 6 1,2,6 6 6 7 1,2,7 7 7 8 1,3,8 8 8 9 1,4,9 9 9 10 1,4,10 10 10 11 1,4,11 11 11 12 1,4,12 12 12 13 1,4,13 13 13 R A ( ) t i ( ) t i ( t ) A( t ) R t ) R = i i ( i.4 4 5 1 L 1 = { 1 } 5 1 5 2-141 -
L 2 = { 2 3 4 } { } 2 3 4 6 6 t i R t i At i R t i At i 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 4 3 L 3 = { 5 6 7 8 910111213 } 3 4 7-142 -
7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1-143 -
1 VMI / 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 VMI ISM AHP VMI VMI VMI 2003 VMI 1. VMI 2. - 144 -
3. VMI Satty AHP VMI 2 2 AHP Satty - 145 -
1 9 8 8 AHP 1 3 5 7 9 2,4,6,8 Delphi method 9 Satty 0.1 9 C.I 0.1 9 9 0.637 0.258 10 12 0.64 0.20 0.09 0.08 10 1.00 11 0.56 0.26 0.14 0.05 12-146 -
9 1 3 1/3 1 0.258 1/5 1 1/3 0.405 0.105 3 5 1 2.466 0.637 λ max = 3.04 C.I.=0.02 0.637 0.105 10 1 7 5 5 3.637 0.64 1/5 1 3 3 1.158 0.20 1/5 1/3 1 1 0.508 0.09 1/7 1/3 1 1 0.467 0.08 λ max = 4.12 C.I.=0.04 0.64 0.08-147 -
11 1 1 1 λ max = 1.00 C.I.=0 12 1 5 3 1/3 1.495 0.26 1/5 1 1/5 1/7 0.275 0.05 7 5 1 3 3.200 0.56 5 1/3 1/5 1 0.760 0.14 λ max = 4.24 C.I.=0.08 0.56 0.05 13 0.79379.3 14-148 -
13 0.258 0.64 0.165 3 0.20 0.052 6 0.09 0.023 8 0.08 0.021 9 0.105 1 0.105 4 0.637 0.26 0.166 2 0.05 0.032 7 0.56 0.357 1 0.14 0.089 5 13 14 1 0.357 0.357 0.450 2 0.166 0.523 0.209 3 0.165 0.688 0.208 4 0.105 0.793 0.132-149 -
15 18 15 1 1/3 1/7 0.362 0.081 3 1 1/5 0.843 0.188 7 5 1 3.271 0.731 λ max = 3.065 C.I.=0.03 16 1 1/3 1/5 0.405 0.105 3 1 1/3 1.000 0.258 5 3 1 2.500 0.637 λ max = 3.039 C.I.=0.02 0.637 0.105-150 -
17 1 1/3 1/5 0.405 0.105 3 1 1/3 1.000 0.258 5 3 1 2.500 0.637 λ max = 3.039 C.I.=0.02 0.637 0.105 18 1 1/2 1/5 0.464 0.122 1/3 1 2 0.874 0.230 5 3 1 2.466 0.648 λ max = 3.003 C.I.=0.00 0.648 0.122 19 AHP VMI - 151 -
19 0.450 0.209 0.208 0.132 0.081 0.105 0.105 0.122 0.096 0.188 0.258 0.258 0.230 0.223 0.731 0.637 0.637 0.648 0.681 VMI VMI / / VMI AHP VMI AHP ISM ISM AHP - 152 -
1. 2003 2. - DEAAHP 2004 3. VMI pp. 52-5520032 4. AHP 20046 5. AHP 27 1989 13707-13786 6. VMI 2000 7. 1998 8. -VMI 5 1997 9. Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., and Dexter A.S.2001, Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model, Information Systems Research, pp.304-321. 10. Iacovou, C. L., I. Benbasat and A. S. Dexter1995, Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology, MIS Quarterly,, pp.465-485. 11. Satty T.L.,The Analytic Hierarchy Process1980,McGrew-Hill. 12. Toelle Richard A. and Tersine Richard J.1989, "Excess Inventory: Financial Asset OrOperational Liability?," Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol.30(4), pp. 32-35. - 153 -