上傳檔

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "上傳檔"

升王
7 years ago
Views:

3 I

5 III

6 IV

7 The P. R. C. has frequently reformed the national military service since the late 90s of last century, and promulgated executive orders for all kinds of national military service reform. This purpose of this study is aimed at exploring the impact of the new transformation of military affairs in the United States since the 1990s on the P.R.C. military service system in terms of realist theories and the military transformation approach. Since the First Persian Gulf War in 1990, the United States has shown preliminary results of its new transformation in military affairs to reveal the war formula of information technology to the world, and the advanced countries in the world have followed suit. This wave of changes originated in information technology integrated into the war as various weapons and military equipment and combat approaches, to improve the technological content. The implementation of military transformation needs more well-trained personnel to carry out the high standard of professional requirements of military operations than before, and these troops will also try to extend the service term for well-trained staffs to stay in the military service in order to reduce repeated implementation of same training courses. Based on this situation, most countries implemented the military transformation to the enlistment system to meet the requirement for primary proportion increases of highly trained personnel and extension of service term of the aforementioned personnel to stay. Based on the considerations of national security, the P. R. C. has declared to carry out transformation in military affairs in 1993, and to achieve this goal the P. R. C. has actively implemented military personnel training; while in the process of implementing military transformation, the P. R. C. has revealed difficulties in its annual military new personnel recruitment work for recruiting high-quality personnel. The current system can hardly let the troops pass on important experiences and therefore interferes with the implementation of the transformation in military affairs; however, why did the P. R.C., unlike most other countries, not conduct military transformation to change to the enlistment system, but insisted on the conscription reform of the existing system of military service? In this study, it argues that although the P. R. C. military transformation was learned from the United States, and just like all other advanced countries that implemented the new military transformation, the P. R. C. required more highly educated young people to enter service; however, the concept of the existing military service system in the P. R. C. does not require the implementation of the volunteer military service, mainly because the P. R. C. military service system is designed according to their national conditions and characteristics. Although different from other countries, this system has the characteristics of a volunteer military service, which is conducive to the formation of high-quality troops. The proposition of the above assumptions can be analyzed into sub-propositions for the following logic: V

8 1. The new U.S. military transformation has led the P. R. C. to understand that if they do not step up military modernization and keep its pace of military power with other countries, they will be unable to stand their international status; additionally, since the collapse of the Soviet Union, United States has stated multiple times that the P. R. C. is its potential competitor, and this has put pressure on the national security of the P. R. C., and therefore stimulates the P. R. C. in the implementation of new military transformation. 2. The main content of this wave of new military transformation is information technology. The science and technology content of the troops professional duties have increased after new transformation in military affairs, and need more highly educated young people to join the service to receive professional training and proceed with technical heritage. The impact of this change on the original system of military service has forced the P. R. C. to modify its military service system, in order to attract more high-quality young people into service to retain the experiences of technical frameworks. 3. The P. R. C. conscripts soldiers in a way different from the conscripted military service system of our country. Their soldiers are selected with a rigorous elimination system to help the People's Liberation Army choose personnel that meet their demands; and the noncommissioned officer selection system is favorable to keep skilled conscripted soldiers to remain longer in the army. Therefore, it can be said that the P. R. C. s military service system in fact has characteristics of a volunteer force for the troops to both select the best people to enter the forces, and the function to keep talented personnel stay in the service for long-term development. VI

9 VII

10 VIII

11 () () G20 62 IX

13 (1997), p.124 1

14 John Dombrell, Unilateralism and America First? President George W. Bush s Foreign Policy Political Quarterly, 73: 3 (2002), pp Sep 2002,

15 (2002), p (2007), p

16 () () () W (Military Transformation) 1 Jan 2008, 8 (2004), pp

17 () () () 9 9 (2009), p

18 () ()

19 (2009 ), pp (1997), p

20 () () ()

21 ( 2007), p

23 (1999) 11

24 F * FF< F * F> F * 担 ( 2004) 14 1 (2001): : 8 (Feb 1991): (2002) 12

25 17 18 () 17 2: 4 (Apr 2004): (2005):

26 Jan 2009, , %9B%E8%B5%B7 21 (2009), p Feb 2005, Dec 2005, (1996), p

27 Hans J. Morgenthau 2. international anarchy 3. security dilemma (Art, J. Robert) (Jervis, Rober)() ( 2007), p (Art, J. Robert) (Jervis, Rober)() ( 2007), pp (2006), p

28 () 16

29 Revolution in Military AffairsRMA Огарков Николай Васильевич; Nikolai V.Ogarkov Military Technical RevolutionMTR 28 48: 4 (1 Oct 2005): 32 17

30 29 Willian Perry 30 Richard O. Hundley)Past, Revolutions Future Transformation (Hundley, Richard O.)(Past, Revolutions Future Transformationa) (2001), pp Tomes, Robert. A History Journal article. Military Review 80: 5 (Sep 2000): Tilford, Earl Jr.. The Revolution in Military Affairs: Prospects and Cautions. Defense Technical Information Center, 23 June 1995, 31 (Hundley, Richard O.) (Past Revolutions Future Transformationa) (2001), pp

31 (2-2) ( 2-3) 1945 寛 32 BE%B9&pieceLen=50&fld=1&cat=&imgFont=1 19

32 2-2 a b c d ( ) (1945 ) ()a. (Alvin & Heidi Toffler) (War & Anti-War) (1994), pp b. Огарков Николай Васильевич; Nikolai V.Ogarkov (1987), pp c. (2004), pp d. (2004), pp

33 (2007), p

34 33 19Salisbury 34 (2-1) : 2 (Feb 1999): (Robert J. Art) (Rober Jervis) () ( 2007), pp

35 E = mc James Chadwichl ~ Conduct of the Persian Gulf War: Final Report to Congress F : 6 (Dec 1996): : 11 (Nov 1998): Aug (2007), p (1992), pp. 12, (1992), pp (1992), pp

36 Огарков Николай Васильевич; Nikolai V.Ogarkov () () 45 C 4 ISR 踪 (2008), p (2007), p : 11 (Nov 1998): (2007), p (2007), p. 5 24

37 () () (1992), pp E6%88%98%E4%BA%89 49 (2004) 25

38 1. C 3 I () (1992), p (1992), pp

39 4. 5. (2-4) F (1992), p ()

40 () B-2 3. C 4 I 53 (2004), pp

41 () Link F-4G F-16CJ ( 2000), pp

42 () () AD_(2001%E5%B9%B4) 57 (2004), pp

43 1. 2. 踪 3. RQ-1B F-15E MQ-9 () Link Link (2004), pp

44 3. 担担 () Axis of Evil , (stability operations) 60 ( 2008), pp

45 () GPSU2RC -135 E-8CRQ-1B 3. C 4 ISR 6 () (2004), pp (2004), p (2004), pp (Comprehensive National Power) 33

46 (14 July 2006), pp. 321, 323,

47 Philip A1 Odeen (National Defense PenalNDP) 21 Transforming DefenseNational Security in the 21 st Century Report of the National Defense Panel December Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2001:Strategy-Driven Choices for America s Security (2002), p

48 National Defense StrategyNDS National Defense Strategy (2004): Quadrennial Defense Review Report ( 2007), pp (2007): 47 36

49 China is one ascendant state with the potential for competing with the United States National Military Strategy The United States Department of Defense. National Defense Strategy. Washington D.C.: The United States Department of Defense, June pp The United States Department of Defense. National Military Strategy. Washington D.C.: The United States Department of Defense, Feb pp Mar 2001, 73 (2006), pp

50 1973 -Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1 October

51 (2-5) () ( ) Jul 2009, Jun 2004, 896&categoryNum=020&siteid= (Sep 2007): Oct 2007, 78 () () ( 2007), pp. 284, () () ( 2007), pp (2005), p

52 () ( ) () (2002) Dec 2007, Dec 2007, 84 (2005), p Mar 2011, Mar 2011, 40

54 Mar 2010, 89 (2005), p Mar 2010, 42

55 92 93 () () () (2008) (1996), pp Dec 2007, 95 (2008), p

56 96 () () () () (2006), pp (2005), pp. 99, (2008), p Aut (2007):

57 () () Sep (2008), p , ttp://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/mil/ /29/content_ _5.htm 45

58 () 寛 4. Unmanned Vehicle SystemsUVS () % 50% 103 (2010), pp (2007), p

59 M (2008), pp

60 %18%7%30%23% The United States Department of Defense. National Defense Strategy. Washington D.C.: The United States Department of Defense, June pp (2008), p (New challenges, new tools for defense decisionmaking) (), p

61 QDR (2007), p Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2010:Strategy-Driven Choices for America s Security (Nov 2010), p (2008), p

63 % %23.41% (2008), p , _(2011) 51

64 (3-1) () () (2006), pp ,

65 () (2006), pp ,

66 () (2006), pp , 85 54

67 116 () %6%1 10.5%19.9%17.2% () (2006), pp , (2006), pp ,

68 8 118 () () (2006), pp. 192, , , (2006), pp. 317, 370, Dec 2008, 56

69 (13 ) (19 ) 3 (20 ) 4 (20 ) ( 2006) (1997) 121 (2009), pp (1997), pp , 61-62, 110, 169, 231, 314, 325,

70 () (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 123 (2009), pp

71 (6) (7) 3. (1) (2) 135 (3) (4) (5) () (1) (2) 124 (2009), pp

72 (3) (4) 3. (1) (2) 15 (3) (4) () (3-2) (2008), 60

73 G (3-3) (2009), pp p (Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank GovernorsG20) GDP 8540GDP

74 3-3 G (2009), pp G20 62

75 () () (1) (Apr 2002): (Jan 2001):

76 (2) 2 (3)

78 (Apr 2009): ), p : 3 (Mar 2010): Apr 1955, (1991), p.3 66

79 () () () () (1955), pp (2006), p , _(1955) 67

80 () May 2011, (2009), p Nov 2011, 68

81 () () () () () May 2011, (2004), p May 2011, , _(1984) 69

82 () () 1984 () 1984 () () () , , _(2011) 70

83 24 () () () ,

84 18 2. () () () () ) () (Nov 2001): , 72

85 2. 15% (1) (2) (3) 5. (1) (2) () () , , 73

86 () (1) (2) (3) 1979Огарков Николай Васильевич; Nikolai V.Ogarkov Military Technical Revolution, MTR Creating a new civilization Jul 2010, 74

87 (2004), pp (2007), pp (2008), pp

88 (2008), pp (2008), p

89 () (2008), p (1997), pp (2003), pp

90 / % %40% %19804% % (1997), p (1997), p : 3 (May 1995): (1997), p (1992), pp L W (1992), p

91 12 4 () Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2010:Strategy-Driven Choices for America s Security (Nov. 2010), pp ,

92 (1) % % % (2) % % (3) (2008), pp , ,

93 (2008), pp (Sep. 2007): (Oct 2006): 17 81

94 (Apr. 2005):

96 % Jun 2011, Sep 2011, 84

97 () (2011), pp.61, 63-64, Nov 1999, Oct 2001, 85

98 () Sep 2009, Sep 2002, Oct 2002, : 3 (Mar 2010): Oct 2008, Nov 2009, 86

99 寛 23 寛 () Oct 2009, May 2009, Jun 2007, : 3 (Mar 2010), Jul 2009, 87

100 / Sep 2011, 88

101 Jul 2009, 89

102 (1) (2)24 (3)

103

104

105

106 National Defense Strategy National Military Strategy Andre Beaufre

107 寛 24 寛 95

108 96

109 97

110

111 () 1984() 1998() 2011() (1) 3 (2) 4 (3) ()

112 , _(1955)1984, , , 100

113 1988 () 1993 () () (1) 16 (1) 15 (1) 16 (1) (1) 16 (1) (2) (3) 2010 () (1) 16 (1) (2) (3) 1988, , , Jul 2010, 101

114 () () 102

115 () % 1993 ()

116 ( ) 爲

117 2011 ( ) 1955, , , _(2011)1985, Sep 2005, , , , Jul 2010, 105

118

119

120

121 (Огарков Николай Васильевич; Nikolai V.Ogarkov) (2009 (Alvin & Heidi Toffler) War & Anti-War 北 2006 (Hundley, Richard O.) Past, Revolutions Future Transformationa (Art, J. Robert) (Jervis, Rober) Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2001:Strategy-Driven Choices for America s Security Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2006: Strategy-Driven Choices for America s Security

122 Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2010:Strategy-Driven Choices for America s Security (Nov 2010) New challenges, new tools for defense decisionmaking (2008)

123 (Nov 2001): : 3 (May 1995): (Oct. 2006): (Apr 2005): (Apr 2002): (Jan 2001): (Apr. 2009): : 4 (Apr 2004): Aut (Sep 2007): : 3 (Mar 2010): (2005): (2004): , 8 (Feb 1991): (2001): (Oct 2006): (Sep 2007): : 11 (Nov 1998): : 6 (Dec 1996): : 2 (Feb 1999): : 4 (1 Oct 2005): (2007): The United States Department of Defense, National Defense Strategy. Washington 111

124 D.C.: The United States Department of Defense, Jun The United States Department of Defense. National Military Strategy. Washington D.C.: The United States Department of Defense, Feb Dombrell, John, Unilateralism and America First? President George W. Bush s Foreign Policy Political Quarterly 73: 3 (2002): Tomes, Robert. A History Journal article. Military Review 80: 5 (Sep 2000): Dec 2007, nt_ htm Dec 2006, nt_ _5.htm Jul 2009, Oct 2002, May 2005, Dec 2006, Jan 2009, Oct 2008, May 2009, Mar 2011, htm 20 %9B%86%E5%9B%A2 25 Feb 2007, 112

125 11 Nov 2011, 1 Nov 2009, nt_ htm 1988, , , Jul 2010, 29 Jun 2007, nt_ htm E5%B9%B3%E5%B4%9B%E8%B5%B7 1 Jan 2008, m 27 Jun 2011, , _(1955) 1984, _(1984) 1998, , _(2011) 18 Apr 1955, , Sep 2005, 4 Feb 2005, 9 Sep 2002, 113

126 Sep 2009, %88%98%E4%BA% Sep 2003, 21 Mar 2010, 1 Jun 2004, d82-d914557f8896&categoryNum=020&siteid=16 13 Jul 2009, 13 Jul 2009, 9 May 2011, %B7%E6%B9%BE% E6%88%98%E4%BA%89 6%88%B0%E7%88%AD_2001%E5%B9%B4 %88%98%E4%BA%89 2 Nov 1999, 锦 24 Oct 2007, %60%B3W%AAZ%BE%B9&pieceLen=50&fld=1&cat=&imgFont=1 14 Sep 2002, Oct 2001, 114

127 21 Dec 2005, , 21 Oct 2009, Sep. 2001, 26 Sep 2009, Tilford, Earl Jr.. The Revolution in Military Affairs: Prospects and Cautions. Defense Technical Information Center, 23 June 1995, GetTRDoc.pdf. 5 Mar. 2001, htm Aug 2000, Dec 2008, 7 Aug Sep 2011, 10 Oct 2006, 115

第一章緒論

第一章緒論歩 1 See Donold E. Nuechterlein, United States National Interests World (Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 1973), 172. 2 1992 6 178 3 5 9 1991 1 4-7 25 4 2001 12 27-8 5 2000 5 205 6 5 9 1991 1