D771.2 A (2013)

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "D771.2 A (2013)"

雾蔡
5 years ago
Views:

1 D771.2 A (2013)

2 Robert Cox <> Max Weber, Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy, in Max Weber, The Methodology of the Social Science, Edward Shils and Henry Finch trans. and ed., New York: Free Press, Cited in Ido Oren, Our Enemies and US: America s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2003, p. 15. Robert Cox, Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory, in Robert Keohane ed., Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986, p

3 Stanley HoffmannJ. David SingerKenneth Waltz Stanley Hoffmann, Theory and International Relations, in James N. Rosenau ed., International Politics and Foreign Policy, New York: Free Press, 1969, p. 30; Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979, pp. 1-17; J. David Singer, Inter-Nations Influence: A Formal Model, in Rosenau, International Politics and Foreign Policy, p Kenneth Waltz, Interview with Ken Waltz, Conducted by Fred Halliday and Justin Rosenberg, Review of International Studies, Vol.24, 1998, pp

5 embedded liberalism GATT IMF John G. Ruggie, International Regimes, Transaction and Change Embedded Liberalism in the Post-war Economic Order, International Organization, Vol.36, No.2, Spring 1995, pp Samuel P. Huntington, The Lonely Superpower, Foreign Affairs, March/April 1999, pp

7 politics 19 political science Crick Bernard, The American Science of Politics, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, J

9 Anne-Marie Burley, Regulating the World: Multilateralism, International Law, and the Projection of the New Deal Regulatory State, In John Ruggie ed., Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993, pp

10 Graham Allison, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston: Little, Brown and Company,

11 G. John Ikenberry, Why Export Democracy?: The Hidden Grand Strategy of American Foreign Policy, The Wilson Quarterly, Vol. 23, No.2, Spring Rebert Cooper See Robert Cooper, The Post-Modern State and the World Order, London: Demos,

12 Diane Stone and Andrew Denham eds., Think Tanks Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press,

13 David M. Ricci, The Transformation of American Politics: A New Washington and the Rise of Think-tanks, CT: Yale University Press, 1993, p

14 Aaron Wildavsky, Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, Andrew Rich and R. Kent Weaver, Think Tanks in the U.S. Media, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol.5, Issue 4, Fall 2000, p Donald E. Abelson, From Policy Research to Political Advocacy: The Role of Think Tanks in American Politics, Canadian Review of American Studies, Vol.25, Issue 1, Winter 1995, pp James Allen Smith, The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite, New York: Free Press, Michael G. Bark, Independent Think Tanks and Patronage: Interest Representation in the Policy Process, Ph.D Dissertation, Kansas University, December 1996, p

15 Christopher Andrew, American Presidents and Their Intelligence Communities, Intelligence and National Security, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1995, pp

16 National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, The 9/11 Commission Report, Bradley H. Patterson, Jr., The White House Staff: Inside the West Wing and Beyond, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2000, p

17 63

18 [ ] [ ] [] 64

19 Global Review Driving of Theory and the Rise of Power The U.S. Experience ZHAO Kejin The rise of a nation is the rise of ideas to the final analysis, and especially, the extent to which theories improve, will determine whether a nation can really rise or not. In the case of the United States, both the drive of ideas and the intelligent support are indispensable to its rise. The U.S. theoretical preparation for its rise was first unraveled around the realistic policy issues confronting America. To answer the issue how to handle the U.S. relations with the world, the U.S. had put forward the international political philosophy in consistency with its domestic political philosophy, which established the diplomatic grand strategy of the new American empire that pushed for the principle of freedom and democracy, and formed the American system of IR theories full of competition within and organically unified without. Especially, the U.S. strategists community had designed the realist theory about a model of international regulation: a bunch of international strategists headed by Hans Mogenthau, George Kennan, Henry Kissinger, and Zbigniew Brzezinski were encouraged to face up to the U.S. international political reality and planned for the future of America on the height of the American grand strategy that provided the rise of America with a powerful intelligent support. At the same time, the U.S. had institutionalized the theoretic research by having established the public think tanks, intelligence agencies, and policy advisers, which provided the U.S. strategic theory and policy transformation with a reliable pivot. Therefore, the American experience tells a truth that the rise of a power must be prepared with a grand strategic theory and institutional system that are coherent with its inherent values and its outer system concerning domestic and international issues, and become the theoretical pillar of a world power. After the Global Financial Crisis On the Features and Causes of American Economic Recovery WANG Guoxing and YING Xiangshuo After the breakout of the global financial crisis in 2008, the U.S. economy began to recover since the third quarter of 2009 with new features. The most important feature is the continuation of the recovery though not robust enough throughout the period. In macroeconomic terms, the growth rate is not high and the employment rate grows modestly; the recovery is unbalanced among industries, i.e., the recovery of service industries is faster than commodities though almost all industries have recovered; in microeconomic terms, enterprises are in a good shape 152

西方三大霸权的战略比较——兼论美国制度霸权的启示意义•

西方三大霸权的战略比较——兼论美国制度霸权的启示意义• - 1 Pax Americana Pax Romana Pax Britannica 2 3 20 60 4 1 1998 4 2 Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power, New York: Basic Books, 1990, p.50. 3 Immanuel Wallerstein, Three