: 2008 :100 : : : I

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download ": 2008 :100 : : : I"

缺溥
5 years ago
Views:

1 National Taiwan Sport University THE STUDY OF THE ATTACK TECHNICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE 2008 BEIJING OLYMPIC GAMES LIGHT WEIGHT BOXING

2 : 2008 :100 : : : I

3 II

4 LAI, Chung-Chieh The Study of the Attack Technical Analysis for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games Light weight Boxing. Unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan Sport University, Taichung. Abstract This study focuses on the Beijing Olympics Lightweight Boxing Final, in It analyzes, attack types, offensive times, defensive times and scoring points in four matches which are total 16 rounds. In order to understand how to attack and win the games for those players, we offer our coaches references of player training and competitions. Data analysis were through watching video, then using statics for one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (LSD Test), Pearson product- moment correlation coefficient), Regression and Chi Square to compare those gourp different between attack and win. the results of this study were: 1. The average age of the lightweights who are winning the medals are 25 years old. The period for they practice box is 10 years old. Most athlete dominant is right-hand. 2. For lightweights, Using single blow is more than combination punches when they attack. 3. Withing 12 types of attacks, there were siginifice different between pnches ( = P<.05). The most type for attack type is Jab, Straight and combination pnches were second and third separately. 4. For all rounds, players attack in the second and third round were the most score point. The hightest frequency attack were forth grade in Lightweights boxing. 6. In all types attack punches, the nineth attack punches (Jab, Straight, and Jab) were significant diferent between attack punches. The more attack were more the winning rate the result for this III

5 study were approaching 80%. 7. There were siginificant correlation between attack times and points (r=.710). 8. All offensive-defensive punhes and points were positive correlation. When the boxing players using Fient (r =.633, p <.05) and backward step(r =.649, p <.05) to defend and their winning probability is almost 70. Keywords: Combination punchs, Single blow, Defense, dominant, Technical Analysis IV

6 V

7 ... I VI

8 VII

9 VIII

10 AIBA IX

11 X

12 6.10 AIB AIBA

13 : 2

14 Rocky Lin

15 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

17 LIGHT FLY WEIGHT FLY WEIGHT BANTAM WEIGHT FEATHER WEIGHT LIGHT WEIGHT LIGHT WELTER WEIGHT WELTER WEIGHT MIDDLE WEIGHT LIGHT HEAVY WEIGHT HEAVY WEIGHT SUPER HEAVY WEIGHT 48KG 51KG 54KG 57KG 60KG 64KG 69KG 75KG 81KG 91KG 91+K win on points win by retirement win by referee stopping 6

18 win by disqualification win by knock-out 10 no contest win by walk-over (Points) (Combinations 1. Jab On-guard position Sagittal Plane 2. Straight 7

19 3. Left hook International r o t a t i o n (Medial) 4. Right Hook Medial 5. Left cut Flexion 6. Right cut Flexion 8

20 Jab 1. Jab

21 1-1 (Straight

22 Left hook 1. 撃 1-3 Right hook Medial 1. 11

23 1-4 Left cut 撃 1-12

24 Right cut

25 撃 5 撃 ( ) 11( ) 12( ) 13( ) 14( ) 23( ) 25( ) ( ) 14

26 112 ( ) 121 ( ) 123 ) 143 ( ) 232 ) 163( ) 15

27 16

32 21

33 2-1 AIBA 1924 AIBA 22

34 2-2 AIBA

37 : Ryan1998 Cantu1995 Professional Boxing Stewart Gordon1995 TimmWallachStone Ryan 1993 JakKonya, Sule1986 HaglunEriksso

38 : :() ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

39 ( ) Jab Straight ( ) ( ) ( ) 22 Correlation 2008 : 28

40 紥 29

41 ATP-PC 30

42 3-1 31

43 32

45 34

46 (RED CORNER) (BLUE CORNER) (48) ( ) Barnes Paddy( ) (51) Somjit Jongjohor ( ) Laffita Hernandez ( ) (54) Badar-Uugan Enkhbak(Yankiel Leon Alarcon( ) (57) Vasy Lomachenko ) Kilig Yakup( ) ( ) ( ) independent variables dependent variables ( ) 35

47 SONY BVP-500 BVP-550 Cramp (Scoring Points) AIBA Judge : ( ) : ( ) : MicroSoft Excel CASIO fx-3600pv

48 97 爲

49 : 38

50 ) : ) 3-5 SONY BVP-500 BVP-550 Cramp Pearson correlation 39

51 3-5 SPSS for Windows LSD.0 4 (.10) 40

52 3-3 41

55 SPSS

57 AIBA Boxing New 2nd Edition 2008 April-Man-June 46

58 47

59 AIBA Boxing New 2nd Edition 2008 April-Man-June 48

60 圖 4-5 拳擊攻擊得分技術分析架構圖註組合拳之說明如 11 為左刺拳 12 為右直拳 121 為左刺拳右直拳左刺拳 123 為左刺拳右直拳左勾拳 14 為左刺拳左上擊拳 15 為左刺拳右勾拳一攻擊次數與得分數原始統計分析一 8 位選手之總攻擊次數為次各單拳及組合拳的攻擊次數 49

63 kg kg kg kg

2 216 1 2 3 135 1 3 112 1 4 82 121 11 12 123 13 14

67 >3>2> P LSD , ,

68 57

70 ANOVA p.000p ANOVA F 20.93,p.000 p (1) >2>9>4> 59

71 (2) >7>8>3>1 (3) >11>12 (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)

72 61

73 62

74 63

75 t 5.5P.000p.05 64

76 4-18 t p P r.13p.05 r.64p.05 65

77 66

78 Ali Rcky Marciano 67

80 69

82 71

83 P.05 72

84 r.001P P< F 5.712P

85 74

86 75

87 76

88 77

90 79

91 : 80

92 ( ) ( ) : ( ) ( ) 81

93 ( (

95 Association Internationale de Boxe AmateurAIBA(1997). Association Internationale de Boxe AmateurAIBA(2008). Haglund,Y., Eriksson, E.(1993). Does amateur boxing lead to chronic brain damage? : A review of some retentive situations. American Journal of Sports Medicine,21(1), pp Ryan, A. J. (1998). Intracranial injuries resulting from boxing. Clinics in sports medicine (Philadelphia) 17(1), pp Stewart, W. F. (1995). Gordon B. Amateur boxing: is there a risk of brain injury? In, Cantu, R. C. (ed.), Boxing and medicine, Champaign, IL., Human Kinetics, pp Timm, K. E., Wallach, J. M., Stone, J. A. & Ryan III. (1993). Fifteen years of amateur boxing injuries/illnesses at the United States Olympic Training Center. Journal of athletic training. 28(4), pp

100

101

102

103

104 2008 SCORING PAPER 93

105 SCORING PAPER 94

106

107 Wight Category Country Rounc Total WINNER Country Onpoint Retirement R.S.C.H R.S.C.I R.S.C.o R.S.C.ccl D.I.S.Q K.O Walkover NO coterst 96

108 97

109 98

110 99

111 100

18 A B S 17.44±1() ±6.26( ) 54.23±5.5( ) 6.42±1.51() m 30m t α =.05 ( )AB 1 5 (p>.05)( )AB 1 5 (p<.05)( )A (p>.05)( )B (p<.05)( )A B

18 A B S 17.44±1() ±6.26( ) 54.23±5.5( ) 6.42±1.51() m 30m t α =.05 ( )AB 1 5 (p>.05)( )AB 1 5 (p<.05)( )A (p>.05)( )B (p<.05)( )A B The Effect of Different Training Method on Quick Coordination ability in High School Female Soccer Players 18 A B S 17.44±1() 161.39±6.26( ) 54.23±5.5( ) 6.42±1.51() 15 60-90 30m 30m t α =.05 ( )AB 1 5