II
ABSTRACT Keyword: Turnkey Project, Design Phase An increase number of domestic public projects have adopted the turnkey system. The successfulness in completion of the whole project is determined base on the detail design. The imperceptible understanding of the management process in detail design and the unclear procedures occurred from the beginning design proposal to the actual design stage cause design contradictions. Conflicts between parties then occur and induce delays on the whole project. Appropriate strategy is needed to prevent failure in completion of the project. This study focuses primarily on the management process of detail design in turnkey projects. Through reading literature and interviewing experts, possible problems and failures are explored and discussed, as well as appropriate strategies. It is anticipated that the conclusion of this study provides a demonstration of appropriate management strategies during detail design stage for future turnkey projects. III
1.1... 1 1.2... 2 1.3... 2 1.4... 3 1.5... 5 2.1... 7 2.1.1... 7 2.1.2...10 2.1.3...12 2.1.4...15 2.1.5...16 2.1.6...18 2.2...19 2.2.1...19 2.2.2...20 2.3...24 2.4...29 2.4.1...29 2.4.2...29 IV
3.1...31 3.1.1...31 3.1.2...32 3.1.3...36 3.1.4...37 3.2...40 3.2.1...40 3.2.2...44 3.2.3...45 3.2.4...45 3.2.5...46 3.3...47 3.3.1...47 3.3.2...47 3.3.3...50 3.3.4...51 3.3.5...53 3.3.6...54 4.1 AHP...55 4.1.1...55 4.1.2...57 4.2...62 4.2.1...65 4.2.2...66 V
4.3...70 4.4 AHP...75 4.4.1...75 4.4.2...77 4.4.3...79 5.1...81 5.2...90 6.1...94 6.2...96 VI
2. 1...15 2. 2...22 3. 1...36 3. 2...41 3. 3...42 3. 4...42 3. 5...47 4. 1...60 4. 2...61 4. 3...62 4. 4...64 4. 5...65 4. 6...66 4. 7...67 4. 8...68 4. 9...75 4. 10...76 4. 11...77 VII
4. 12...78 4. 13...78 4. 14...79 4. 15 値...80 5. 1...89 5. 2...90 5. 3...92 VIII
1-1... 4 2-1... 9 2-2 2000 2004...10 2-3... 11 2-4...18 2-5...23 3-1...33 3-2...34 3-3...35 3-4...37 3-5...49 3-6 PCM...52 4-1 AHP...58 4-2 AHP...59 4-3...65 4-4...69 5-1...91 IX
1.1 1
1.2 1. 2. 3. AHP 1.3 2
Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP AHP 1.4 1.1 3
1. 1 4
1.5 1. 2. 3. 4. AHP 5. 4 12 6. 5
6
2.1 40 60 3 2.1.1 1913 1968 1980 6 7
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1987 1993 6 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Design Build Institute of AmericaDBIA 1985 1997 82 55 7 1980 19861997 400 1996 Federal Acquisition Act FARA Two Phase Selection Procedure 8
DBIA 2004 90% 80% 2-1 2-215 1997 Engineer New Record (ENR) 1996 395 25 9.7 8.10 20.25 6.7 1998 420 1999 2,860 24 2002 I-50 L26KMW6 14 17 20% 20% 10% 10% 50% 50% 30% 30% 25% 25% 15% 15% 9
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2.1.2 1982 Joint Contracts TribunalJCT 10
16 1981 JCT 1984 1995 2-3 RIBA 18~35 18 Joint VentureJV 1992 11
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 40 Private Finance InitiativePFI 1994 - - - DesignBuildFinance and OperateDBFO 1997 13 15 DBFO 20 2.1.3 Takenaka Komuten 12
1912 70 1989 67 5.15 22 1000 Architectural Institute of Japan Architectural Association of Japan Japan Architects Association The Associated General Contractor of Japan 1995 1 17 7.2 13
9 5 14 24 15 20 14 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1999 2-1 14
2. 1 (1) (1) (1) (2) (2) (3) (2) (4) (3) (5) (3) (4) (5) (6) (4) (7) (8) (5) (6) (7) 2.1.4 1997 7 15
1980 22 Architectural Service Department 2.1.5 1970 1980 16
Port of Singapore AuthorityPSA1975 Palau Sebarok Public Work DepartmentPWD Keppel 1982 South Bridge Center Urban Redevelopment AuthorityURA 1983 Mass Rapid Transit CooperationMRTC 17 19701990 1990 1. 2. 3. 4. 1991 HDBHousing Development Board 1992 1 1998 23 8 2-4 95 30 17
( CIDB) 2.1.6 87.1 18
2.2 Turnkey Design & Build 2.2.1 1. AIA (1) / / / 8 (2) / 7 2. ASCE 6 19
3. United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations / 8 4. FIDIC 1993 (1) / (2) / 2.2.2 1. 1994 2. 1996 20
3. 1997 4. 1994 / / 2-2 21
2. 2 22
turnkey Design and Build 8 1. / 2. / 2.5 23
2.3 1. 2002 7000 24
2. 2003 3. 2001 25
(0.4) (0.25) (0.22) (0.13) (0.27) (0.47) (0.49) (0.25) 4. 2002 26
(1) (2) (3) (4) 5. 2002 27
6. 2003 AHP 7. 29 28
2.4 2.4.1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2.4.2 1. (1) 29
(2) (3) (4) 2. (1) (2) (3) 3. (1) (2) (3) (4) 30
3.1 3.1.1 Palaneeswaran, 31
Kumaraswamy(2000) Potter, Sanvido(1995) RFP(Request For Proposal) (Design/Build Prequalification System, DBPS) Molenaar,Gransberg(2001) (1) (2) (3) Sanvido(1999) 3.1.2 32
1. 3-1 33
2. (3-2) 34
3-3 35
3.1.3 Design-Build Institute of America, DBIA 35 Housing Development Board, HDB 60 Public Works Department, PWD 20 35 20~30 100 30 40~60 3-1 3. 1 36
3.1.4 ( ) 3-4 1. 2. 3. 37
4. 5. 6. ( 10 ) 10~30 30 38
1. (1) (2) (3) MM2 2. (1) (2) (3) MM2 3. (1) 39
(2) (3) M 3.2 3.2.1 40
41 3. 2 ( )
3. 3 3. 4 42
43
3.2.2 1. 2. (WBS) 3. 4. () () 44
3.2.3 ( ) 1. 2. ( ) 3. 4. 5. 3.2.4 45
3.2.5 ( ) 46
3. 5 3.3 3.3.1 3.3.2 47
3.4 48
49
3.3.3 ( ) 2 2 1. 2. 3. 4. (OEM) 5. 6. 50
25 24 20 8.5 3.3.4 51
52
3.3.5 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 53
3.3.6 / 54
Delphi Method Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP 4.1 AHP 4.1.1 AHP Thomas L. Saaty 1971 Uncertainty [2023] 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 55
13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. AHP [20-22] 1. Classes Components 2. Independence 3. 4. Ratio Scale 5. Postive Reciprocal Matrix 6. Transitivity 7. Consistency 0.1 56
8. Weighting Principle 9. 4.1.2 3.1 [20-25] 57
1. 2. Criteria Sub-Criteria Alternative 7 [21-25] 58
3. 3.2 4. 1~9 3.1 59
4. 1 1 Equal Importance 3 Weak Importance 5 Essential Importance 7 Very Strong Importance 9 Absolute Importance 2. 4 6. 8 Intermediate Value 値 [23-28] 5. AHP 値 値 1 4.2 値 AHP 60
4. 2 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C1 1 2 3 3 5 C2 1/2 1 2 3 5 C3 1/3 1/2 1 2 3 C4 1/3 1/3 1/2 1 5 C5 1/5 1/5 1/3 1/5 1 6. Satty C.R. 0.1 C.R. C.I. Random IndexR.I. 値 4-1 4-2 CI. CR.. = --------------------------------4-1 R.. I C.R. C.I. R.I. λ.. max n CI = n 1 --------------------------------4-2 max. 値 n. C.I. 値 0 C.I.0 61
Satty C.I. 0.1 3.3 4. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 R.I. 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.90 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 R.I. 1.45 1.49 1.51 1.48 1.56 1.57 1.59 [2123] 7. 8. 4.2 1. 2. AHP 3. AHP 62
15~30 [2930] 30 3-6 4-3 63
4-4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 64
4.2.1 4.2 4.3 4. 5 6 65
4. 6 1 93.3 0.7 2 83.3 16.7 3 87 13 4 86.7 13.3 5 50.3 49.7 43.3 56.7 2/3 4.2.2 4.7 AHP 4.8 66
4. 7 67
4. 8 90 10 100 0 44.5 55.5 94 6 86.7 13.3 94 6 100 0 94 6 90 10 53.4 46.6 76.7 23.3 83.4 16.6 90 10 43.5 56.5 86.7 13.3 4.2 68
69
4.3 3~4 70
71
5 72
73
74
4.4 AHP 4.4.1 C.R. 値 4.9~4.11 値 34.67% 28.65% 18.23% 19.45% 4. 9 1 34.67% 1 2 28.65% 2 3 18.23% 4 4 19.45% 3 75
33.81% 24.22% 22.24% 14.99% 4. 10 1 38.55% 1 2 14.99% 4 3 22.24% 3 4 24.22% 2 35.23% 31.86% 19.22% 13.70% 76
4. 11 1 32.44% 1 2 30.99% 2 3 22.24% 3 4 14.33% 4 4.9 32.44% 29.22% 18.88% 19.46% 4.4.2 4.12 ~4.14 29.64 17.89 77
4. 12-1 32.24 30.22 33.25 32.48 1-2 -3-4 26.22 22.24 22.25 23.22 13.25 20.20 18.25 17.89 4 28.29 27.34 26.15 26.41 2 17.94 14.22 4. 13 78 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 2-5 %
% 4. 14 3-1 3-2 4.4.3 値 4.13 値 値 79
4. 15 値 1-1 30.22% 10.05% 1-2 22.24% 7.40% 33.26% 1-3 20.20% 6.72% 1-4 27.34% 9.09% 2-1 22.23% 6.31% 2-2 23.91% 6.79% 2-3 15.18% 4.31% 28.39% 2-4 21.05% 5.98% 2-5 17.63% 5.01% 3-1 48.39% 9.49% 19.61% 3-2 51.64% 10.13% 18.74% 4-1 100% 18.74% 80
5.1 1. 2. 81
1. 2. 1 2 82
1. 2. 1. 2. PCM PCM 83
1. 2. 1. 2. 84
1. 2. 1. 2. 85
1. 2. 1. 86
2. 1. 2. 1. 2. 87
5.1 88
89 5. 1
90 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.1 5-2
91
5. 3 1 0.83 0.88 0.83 0.75 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.88 0.75 0.50 76.00% 2 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.75 0.50 0.88 0.75 0.50 79.00% 3 0.90 0.88 0.75 0.67 0.90 0.88 0.83 0.88 0.67 0.90 0.50 0.50 77.17% 4 0.86 0.83 0.89 0.88 0.83 0.89 0.88 0.83 0.50 0.89 0.67 0.50 78.75% 5 0.88 0.80 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.75 0.83 0.50 0.67 0.67 0.75 0.67 70.17% 6 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.88 0.50 85.17% 7 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.75 0.86 0.50 0.67 80.83% 8 0.83 0.86 0.88 0.67 0.88 0.86 0.90 0.88 0.67 0.88 0.83 0.75 82.42% 9 0.90 0.89 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.80 0.50 0.50 81.58% 10 0.88 0.86 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.75 0.80 0.83 0.83 0.88 0.83 0.50 82.08% 11 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.80 0.86 0.89 0.80 0.75 0.83 0.90 0.50 0.50 78.75% 12 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.80 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.67 0.89 0.50 0.67 80.58% 13 0.83 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.88 0.80 0.75 0.67 0.80 0.83 0.75 81.67% 14.71 14.97 14.82 14.73 14.48 13.33 14.64 14.74 14.70 12.60 11.51 14.55 1034.17% 87% 87% 84% 80% 86% 86% 86% 78% 69% 86% 68% 58% 80% ( ) 13% 13% 16% 20% 14% 14% 14% 22% 31% 14% 32% 42% 20% 92
80 87 84 69 58 93
6.1 1. 2. 3. 4. 1. 2. 3. 94
4. 5. 1. 2. AHP 値 5.1 80 値 95
6.2 96
97
98
99
100
101 9116017@chu.edu.tw Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP AHP
1. 2. 1 2 3 102
103
104 9116017@chu.edu.tw Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP AHP
105
106 値 AHP A B A A C A
107
108
109
110 9116017@chu.edu.tw Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP
111
112 値 AHP A B A A C C A
113
114 1~5 1.
115 2.
116 3.
117 4.
118 6~20 6. 7.
119..
120 10. 11.
121 12. 13.
122 14. 15.
123 16. 17.
124