44 2016 7 4 Vol. 44 No. 4 Journal of Liaoning University Philosophy and Social Sciences Jul. 2016!"!!!!!"!!!!!"!" 1 2 1. 100720 2. 200092 D917 A 1002-3291 2016 04-0001-09 DOI:10.16197/j.cnki.lnupse.2016.04.001 6:4 1998 8:2 1 1978 2008 0.916333 2 2016-07-10
2 2016 3 4 5 6
4 3 GPS GIS 21 GIS 7 GIS GIS 8 PGIS 2004 Weisburd Bushway lum 1989 2002 14 50% 4.5% 9 10 1 S 2009 2012 730 S S 24 14.8% 50% S 5.45% 50.34% S 1 X X 2007 2012 806 435 GIS
辽宁大学学报 哲学社会科学版 4 盗窃点图及网格色温图 盗窃点图及核密度图 2016 年 宾馆缓冲区图 图 1 盗窃犯罪网格色温图 密度图及宾馆缓冲区图 聚集程度 在散点图基础上 探测未成年人盗窃犯罪和 两抢 犯罪热点 并进行热点对比分析 11 如图 2 3及 表1 发现未成年人盗窃与 两抢 犯罪在网格层面存在共同的热点 但也存在各自独立的热点通过热点 对比发现 不同犯罪的空间防控应有不同的侧重点 对不同犯罪的热点重叠区域更应投注警力重点治理 不同群体在犯罪地点选择上也有不同的主观偏好这对立体化社会治安防控具有参考价值 图例 未成年盗窃 未成年两抢 国道省道 萧山道路 萧山边界 未成年盗窃标准差椭圆 未成年两抢标准差椭圆 图 2 X 区未成年人盗窃及 两抢 犯罪散点图
4 5 254 31.44% 28 6.44% 33 3.17% 52 6.44% 125 28.74% 29 2.79% 216 26.73% 132 30.34% 22 2.12% 808 100.00% 435 100.00% 1040 100.00% S X 12
6 2016 13 Sherman1995 14 2005 2016 15 2010 50 2020 16
4 7 1972 Newman 17 2000 CPTED 15% ~100% CPTED 18
8 2016 19 1. M. 2000.17. 2. M. 2012.35-39. 3. M.. 1988.92-114. 4 6. M. 2012.111 77-328. 5. A.. 2 C. 2012.6-7. 7. J. 2008 2. 8. J. 2014 6.
4 9 9 Weisburd,D., Bushway,S.,Lum,C.,&Yang,S-M. Trajectories of crime at places:a longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle J. Criminology, 2004, 42 2 : 283-321. 10 Keith Harries, PH.D. Mapping crime: principle and practice M.Washington: Crime Mapping Research Center, 1999.112. 11. GIS J. 2015 3. 12. J. 2016 2. 13. M. 2010.914-916. 14 Sherman,L.W. Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places.inj.e.eck&d.weisburd,crime and place,crimepreuention Studies M. NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1995 4 : 35-52. 15 EB/OL. http://www.mnw.cn/news/shehui/1111699.html 2016-05-20. 16 2015 7 2016 1 7 EB/OL. http://bj.people.com.cn/n2/2016/0107/c233088-27490517.html, 2016-05-20. 17. J. 2013 2. 18 Timothy D.Crowe. 3 M.. 2015.8-15. 19. J.,2014 2. LIU Renwen 1 SHAN Yong 2 1. Institute of Law of Chinese Academy of Social Scicnce, Beijing 100720, China; 2. Law School of Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China Abstract: With the continuous of urban renewal, many spatial blind spots of crime have emerged. Therefore, how to understand spatial blind spots of crime from a scientific perspective and then effectively manage these blind spots have become a vital issue when it comes to the system construction of three dimensional social securityprevention and control of crime. The GIS -based crime mapping technology has proved to be an applicable tool to help conduct researches on spatial blind spot. Crime hotspots can be accurately detected and analyzed in urban space through crime mapping, and crime mapping can also have a clear grasp on the basic characteristic of spatial blind spot, which makes it possible for spatial blind spot management which sets crime hotspots as its target. Specifically, the spatial blind management ranges from bringing the concept of crime prevention into urban planning, restructuring crime hotspots space, encouraging multiple community governance to further improving the solution for CPTED Environmental Design), etc. (Crime Prevention Through key Words: urban renewal crime mapping crime hotspots; spatial blind spot crime control