2017 4 D80 A 1005-4812(2017)04-0072-86 [] 72
http://www.pacilution.com/showarticle.asp?articleid=1231 2006 8 1 []P. []F. 2009 1 Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler, Bringing Religion into International Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, p.2. []P. []F. 1-2 73
2017 4 []P. []F. 34 Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler, Bringing Religion into International Relations, p.3. Daniel Philpott, into International Relations, Relationsnalin World Politics, Vol.55, No.1, 2002, pp.78-81. Jonathan Fox, 2002ional Relationsnal Relations, International Studied Review, Vol.3,No.3, 2001, p.53. Charles W. Kegley and Robert W. Bretall, eds., Reinhold Niebuhry and Robert W. Bretall, eds., New York: The Macmillan Company, 1956; Harry R. Davis and Robert C. Good, Reinhold Niebuhr on Politics, New York: Charles Scribnerert C. [] 2010 []P. []F. 151-162 Samuel Huntington, Scribnerert C. Good, eds., in Foreign Affairs, Vol.72, No.3, 1993; Gilles Kepel, The Revenge of God: The Resurgence of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in the Modern World, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994. 74
Mark Jurgensmeyer, The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism Confront the Secular State, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993; Ted Robert Curr, Minorities, Nationalist, and Ethnopolitical Conflict, in Chester A. Crocher, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, eds., Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Response to International Conflict, Washington D. C.: United State Institute of Peace Press, 1996. R. Scott Appleby, The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation, Lanham: Rowan and Littlefield, 2000. []P. []F. 2003 Pavlos Hatzopoulos and Fabio Petito, eds., Religion in International Relations: The Return from Exile, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler, Brining Religion into International Relations, NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 75
2017 4 Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler, Brining Religion into International Relations, NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.163-166, 176-178. Ibid., p.176. Scott M. Thomas, The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: Struggle for Soul of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp.21-118. Ibid., pp.121-250. 76
Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler, Brining Religion into International Relations, pp.35-61. Ibid., pp.167-169. 77
2017 4 Scott M. Thomas, The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: Struggle for Soul of the Twenty-First Century, pp.121-250. Douglas Johnston and Brain Cox, and the Transformation of International Relations: Struggle for Soul of the Faith-Based Diplomacy: Trumping Realpolitik, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp.11-32. 2007 26 78
2009 2 52 [] 2006 103107 12/345 6789 John P. Lovell, The United States as Ally and Adversary in East Asia: Reflections on Culture and Foreign Policy, in Jongsuk Shay, ed., Culture and International Relations, New York, 1990, p.89. 79
2017 4 1989 130 Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler, Brining Religion into International Relations, pp.176-177. Farouk A. Sankari, o International Relations.11-32.tion of International Relations: StrugIslamic Resurgence in the Arab World, New York: Praeger Publishers, 1982, p.178. R. Stephen Humphreys, ishers, 1982, p.178.ns.11-32.tion of International Relations: in Middle East Journal, Vol.33, No.2, 1979. 1994 122-123 Farhang Rajaee, Islamic Values and World View: Khomeini on Man, the State and International Politics, Lanham: University of America Press, p.77. 80
2007 348 54 1989 273 2005 1-2 53 [] 1988 108 [] 37 2005 3 1-2 http://carnegieendowment.org/files/chosennation.pdf 81
2017 4 2008 70-77 2014 27-78 Cecil V. Grabb, Jr., The Doctrines of American Policy: Their Meaning, Role, and Future, Louisiana University Press, 1982, p.67. 82
2009 2 34 52-56 83
2017 4 53 2004 447 54-55 84
200083 2017 5 John A. Siewert and Edna G. Valdez, ed.s, Mission Handbook: U. S. and Canadian Ministries Overseas, 1998-2000, Monrovia, California: MARC, 1998, p.74, pp.481-502. 464 [] 105 85
2017 4 Religions and Diplomacies from the Perspective of Theoretical Changes in International Relations Liu Zhongmin Abstract: Based on analyzing the transformation of religions role from exile to return in international relations, this paper reviews the academic research outcomes on the relationship between religions and diplomacies at home and abroad, and further analyzes the impact of the religions on diplomacy from three perspectives, which respectively are diplomatic concept, diplomatic decision and diplomatic operating mechanism. Viewing from diplomatic concepts, religions have constituted the deep-rooted structure of cultural traditions and values of states. As the kernel of cultural values, religious values have deeply impacted the basis and judgment of the values of states diplomacy. Viewing from diplomatic decisions, the roles of religions are various in countries due to huge differences in their diplomatic decision-making mechanisms. In countries with the unification of the state and the religion, religions impact on diplomatic decision-making mechanisms is dominant and direct, while in countries with the separation of the state and the religion, especially countries with modern democratic institutions is indirect. The impact of religions on diplomatic operation mechanism is even more complex. In this regard, religions unique role is especially highlighted in dynamic processes of goals and topics setting, social mobilization and organizational operation of diplomacies. Key words: Religion; International Relations; Diplomatic Concept; Diplomatic Decision; Diplomatic Mechanism 86