J.L.A. 1021-2116(2007)16PP.79-112 16 96 12 79 陳麗文 * 摘 要 關鍵詞 Narrative research Fracture of culture Metaphor of others
80 Fracture and continuity of culture: Take society of Taiwan as an example Chen, Li-Wen Abstract The culture approving of a lot of different historical linguistic context, surround about modernity, lofty subject and country's mythical question. This kind history symbolize metaphor with fracture emerging in striking on individual inherent to admit, it is a kind of the wound experience. In the course of historical development, this kind of fracture (the awareness of a kind of estranged or alienation), separated the consciousness and knowledge, because the thought of each culture is unique, have a nature position of life orbit too, influence individual take back the memory to historical cognition of part. The text research by story which tell one's own, on life face what rupture. Discuss how to let life exhibition approve the aspiration of continuity, a kind of reveal to prolong. Catch the feeling in succession, at stereotyped life every day, the ones who rupture with the thought, annotate between language and the texts. This text is via the description of five research objects, with interview and narration method, look over the fracture or continuity of culture. Through researcher's attitude and possibility that tells stories, carry on research and look over the field of vision in annotation explanatory note. Key word: Narrative research, Fracture of culture, Metaphor of others
81 Becker 1997 Mrs. Zabor 1997 1-4 Becker 1997 2 Mrs. Zabor Mrs. Zabor 2001
82 2001 11 Said 1996
83 Said, 1996 49 Dilthey Rudolf A. Makreel, 1975 Husserl 1970 103-185 Gadamer 1994 290-387 participating Gadamer,1994 290 Selbverständnis
84
85 Becker 1997 5-7 Bhabha 1990 160Locations of Culture will to nationhood syntax of forgetting being obliged to forget Paul Ricoeur 1981 human time
86 narrative mimesis mimesisbarthes 2002 坽 夌 奅 妵 妺
87 坽 夌 奅 performative empowering Becker, 1997, 25-26 Paul Ricoeur 1981 Ricoeur 1981
88 Becker 1997 27 5-3-11
89 Becker 1997 27 Becker 1997 28 1-4-34
90 2-2-3
91 1. 1980 1990 2000 1995 1995 52-55 2. 1885 1945
92 1981 93-104 1981 1981 93-104 2004 1946 1967 1974 2005 1992 3-8 1970
93 1. 1990 4-2-25 Jencks 1996 63-64 NATO WTO J. L. Hobsbawm 1990 182 1780
94 Benedict Anderson 1995 94-10 portable nationality 1990 2.
95 1. 2000 1-40 3-2-21 2001 70 Young 1995 73-98 2000 1948
96 2000 25-40 2. 1970 1977 1970 1977:67 Thomas B. Gold 1995 94-10 1978 1983 1984 Rorty 1996
97 Rorty,1996 12 Rorty 1996 1. 1980 1990 Said 2005 cultural identity
98 2-5-11 2002 Rorty 1996 12-17 2.
99 Leca, 1992 21 Habermas 1984 Habermas, 1984 Lyotard, 1984 Fraser 1992: 88 Benhabib 1992 Benhabib 1992
100 Benhabib 1992 Kant 1965 1. disruption
101 2. Becker 1997 190-121 坽 夌 奅 妵 妺 Becker
102 normalcy collapse
103 1. transformation transcendence
104 2.
105 1.
106 2. Freud 1923: 29 3.
107 4. 1. Gadamer 1986, 394-5
108 2.
109 1995 84 122 52-55 1994 23 1 139-56 1995 106 94-109 1998 10 http://www.ncu.edu.tw/~wenchi/ article/city.html 2000 1948 2 25-45 2001 11 1992 3-8 1993 8 862-69 1989 3-6 1990 1993 87 30-49 1980 14 93-104 1992 35-40 1993 7 14-32 1993 2 173-223 Edward W. Said & Gauri Viswanathan 2005
110 1995 23 9 44-55 1995 23 9 6-43 1998 2004 http://www.fgu.edu.tw/~wclrc/drafts/taiwan/huang/huang-05. htm 2000 1-43 2001 1981 2000 88/12-89/6 437-468 http://www. history.ntu.edu.tw/moeproject/paper/paper_12.pdf. Roland Barthes 2002 1991 164 133-141 1993 28-37 1987 25 1 135-47 1997 269-307 1998 48-52
111 Becker, G. (1997). Disrupted Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press. Benhabib S. (1992) Situation the Self.Routledge. Taylor & Francis Books Ltd. Fraser, G. W (1992), Microchannel Plate Energy Discrimination, Legacy, file spec_resp_zero.tex 1992 May 18, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, available on GSFC anonymous ftp node ftp://legacy.gsfc.nasa.gov/rosat/doc/hri/spec_resp_zero.txt Bhabha Homi, ed., (1990) Nation and Narration (London: Routledge,), 19; 229; 4; 19; 19; 305-307. Hobsbawm, E. J. (1990) Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. New York: Cambridge. Husserl Edmund (1970) The Crisis of European Science and transcendental Phenomenology, tr. David Carr, Northwestern University Press, Part III, 28-54, pp.103-185. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (1986) The Historicity of Understanding. Ed. Mueller- Vollmer, Kurt. The Hermeneutics Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 256-395. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (1994).Truth and Method ( J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.) New York. Continuum. Jameson, Fredric. (1992) The Geopolitical Aesthetics: Cinema and Space in the World System. London, BFI. Jencks, Charles. (1996) What Is Postmodernism? London: Academy Editions. Kant. I. (1965). Critique of Pure Reason, tr. by N. Kemp-Smith, New York: MacMillan. Leca, Jean (1992). Question on Citizenship. N.A. Lyotard, J. F., (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Publ. Manchester University Press Heidegger Martin, (1962) Being and Time, tr. J. Marquarrie and Edwad Robinson, SCM Press, 12-27, pp.78-168.
112 Habermas. J (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, vol.1, tr. by Thomas McCarthy. London: Heinemann. Ricoeur Paul, (1981) John B. Thompson (Editor) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences : Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Cambridge Univ. Rorty, R. (1996). The inspirational value of great works of literature. Raritan, Vol. 16 Issue 1, 8-17.(EBSCO document Reproduction Service No. 9609241525). Makreel Rudolf A. (1975) Dilthey Philosopher of the Human Studies, Princeton. Said, E. W. (1996). Representation of the Intellectual: The 1993 Reith lectures. N.Y.: Vintage Books. P.49. Young, Robert CY. (1995). Colonial Desie: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. Condon: Routledge., pp.73-98.