CPI Krugman 1986 Dornbush 1987 Mark - up Pricing - to - Market Obstfeld and Rogoff 1995 Dornbush 1987 Redux NOEM 2008 NOEM CPI Tayl

Similar documents
31 3 Vol. 31 No Research of Finance and Education May ,,, BS,,,,, ; ; ; ; : F : A : ( 2018)

% 5 CPI CPI PPI Benjamin et al Taylor 1993 Cukierman and Gerlach 2003 Ikeda 2013 Jonas and Mishkin

Engel rer = ner + p * - p = ner α * p * T + α * p * N α p T + αp N = ner + p * T - p T + α * p * N - p *

,,, ( Pricing To Market, PTM), (Parsley,1995 ;Devereux,2004 ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :, ( EPT) ( PTM) ;, ; ;,,,, Baldwin Krugman (1989) Gagnon

! # % & # % & ( ) % % %# # %+ %% % & + %, ( % % &, & #!.,/, % &, ) ) ( % %/ ) %# / + & + (! ) &, & % & ( ) % % (% 2 & % ( & 3 % /, 4 ) %+ %( %!

Girton Roper (1977),,,,,, ( ),,,,,,, ( Exchange Market Pressure) 30 EMP, EMP EMP,Girton Roper (1977), ,,, Kim(1985) ,,, T

Alexander & Wyeth Dercon 1995 ECM - Johansen Goodwin 1992 VEC Asche 1999 Gonzalez 2001 ECM Goodwin


! /. /. /> /. / Ε Χ /. 2 5 /. /. / /. 5 / Φ0 5 7 Γ Η Ε 9 5 /

!! # % & ( )!!! # + %!!! &!!, # ( + #. ) % )/ # & /.


MRS-GARCH MRS-GARCH Bernanke and Gertler (1999) ; ; Cecchetti (2000) ( ) Gray (1996) MRS-GARCH (2001) 500 t- Gray t- S t S t S t =1 ; 90 S t =2 Hamilt

untitled

untitled

% %! # % & ( ) % # + # # % # # & & % ( #,. %

,!! #! > 1? = 4!! > = 5 4? 2 Α Α!.= = 54? Β. : 2>7 2 1 Χ! # % % ( ) +,. /0, , ) 7. 2

!!! #! )! ( %!! #!%! % + % & & ( )) % & & #! & )! ( %! ),,, )

untitled

# # # #!! % &! # % 6 & () ) &+ & ( & +, () + 0. / & / &1 / &1, & ( ( & +. 4 / &1 5,

Ρ Τ Π Υ 8 ). /0+ 1, 234) ς Ω! Ω! # Ω Ξ %& Π 8 Δ, + 8 ),. Ψ4) (. / 0+ 1, > + 1, / : ( 2 : / < Α : / %& %& Ζ Θ Π Π 4 Π Τ > [ [ Ζ ] ] %& Τ Τ Ζ Ζ Π

&! +! # ## % & #( ) % % % () ) ( %

!! )!!! +,./ 0 1 +, 2 3 4, # 8,2 6, 2 6,,2 6, 2 6 3,2 6 5, 2 6 3, 2 6 9!, , 2 6 9, 2 3 9, 2 6 9,

! Ν! Ν Ν & ] # Α. 7 Α ) Σ ),, Σ 87 ) Ψ ) +Ε 1)Ε Τ 7 4, <) < Ε : ), > 8 7

., /,, 0!, + & )!. + + (, &, & 1 & ) ) 2 2 ) 1! 2 2

4= 8 4 < 4 ϑ = 4 ϑ ; 4 4= = 8 : 4 < : 4 < Κ : 4 ϑ ; : = 4 4 : ;

& & ) ( +( #, # &,! # +., ) # % # # % ( #

, ( 6 7 8! 9! (, 4 : : ; 0.<. = (>!? Α% ), Β 0< Χ 0< Χ 2 Δ Ε Φ( 7 Γ Β Δ Η7 (7 Ι + ) ϑ!, 4 0 / / 2 / / < 5 02

ECONOMIST v y = 0 m = π (3) 1 2 [ ( SNA) 4 2. ( ) ( SNA) (2 ) ( 3 )

<4D F736F F D20CBB6CABFD1D0BEBFC9FAC2DBCEC4B9E6B7B62E646F63>

/ Ν #, Ο / ( = Π 2Θ Ε2 Ρ Σ Π 2 Θ Ε Θ Ρ Π 2Θ ϑ2 Ρ Π 2 Θ ϑ2 Ρ Π 23 8 Ρ Π 2 Θϑ 2 Ρ Σ Σ Μ Π 2 Θ 3 Θ Ρ Κ2 Σ Π 2 Θ 3 Θ Ρ Κ Η Σ Π 2 ϑ Η 2 Ρ Π Ρ Π 2 ϑ Θ Κ Ρ Π

现代天文学7.ppt

引言

) & ( +,! (# ) +. + / & 6!!!.! (!,! (! & 7 6!. 8 / ! (! & 0 6! (9 & 2 7 6!! 3 : ; 5 7 6! ) % (. ()

8 9 8 Δ 9 = 1 Η Ι4 ϑ< Κ Λ 3ϑ 3 >1Ε Μ Ε 8 > = 8 9 =

World Economic Papers October, 2012 * Zeldes 1989 Shea 1995 Drakos Campbell and Mankiw 1989 LC-PIH 2007 Deng and Jin 2008 λ

Β 8 Α ) ; %! #?! > 8 8 Χ Δ Ε ΦΦ Ε Γ Δ Ε Η Η Ι Ε ϑ 8 9 :! 9 9 & ϑ Κ & ϑ Λ &! &!! 4!! Μ Α!! ϑ Β & Ν Λ Κ Λ Ο Λ 8! % & Π Θ Φ & Ρ Θ & Θ & Σ ΠΕ # & Θ Θ Σ Ε

) Μ <Κ 1 > < # % & ( ) % > Χ < > Δ Χ < > < > / 7 ϑ Ν < Δ 7 ϑ Ν > < 8 ) %2 ): > < Ο Ε 4 Π : 2 Θ >? / Γ Ι) = =? Γ Α Ι Ρ ;2 < 7 Σ6 )> Ι= Η < Λ 2 % & 1 &

untitled

Myers Majluf 1984 Lu Putnam R&D R&D R&D R&D

54 利 率 市 场 化 与 互 联 网 金 融 : 传 染 效 应 与 联 动 效 应 总 第 33 期 计 算 等, 实 现 资 源 配 置 与 优 化 的 全 新 金 融 发 展 模 式 与 金 融 创 新, 是 既 不 同 于 商 业 银 行 间 接 融 资 也 不 同 于 资 本 市 场

8 9 < ; ; = < ; : < ;! 8 9 % ; ϑ 8 9 <; < 8 9 <! 89! Ε Χ ϑ! ϑ! ϑ < ϑ 8 9 : ϑ ϑ 89 9 ϑ ϑ! ϑ! < ϑ < = 8 9 Χ ϑ!! <! 8 9 ΧΧ ϑ! < < < < = 8 9 <! = 8 9 <! <

> # ) Β Χ Χ 7 Δ Ε Φ Γ 5 Η Γ + Ι + ϑ Κ 7 # + 7 Φ 0 Ε Φ # Ε + Φ, Κ + ( Λ # Γ Κ Γ # Κ Μ 0 Ν Ο Κ Ι Π, Ι Π Θ Κ Ι Π ; 4 # Ι Π Η Κ Ι Π. Ο Κ Ι ;. Ο Κ Ι Π 2 Η

CHIPS Oaxaca - Blinder % Sicular et al CASS Becker & Chiswick ~ 2000 Becker & Chiswick 196

:1949, 1936, 1713 %, 63 % (, 1957, 5 ), :?,,,,,, (,1999, 329 ),,,,,,,,,, ( ) ; ( ), 1945,,,,,,,,, 100, 1952,,,,,, ,, :,,, 1928,,,,, (,1984, 109

2008 1,,, Aghion et al (2006) 83, ,,,,, :, ;,,,,,, ( Edwards,1986) : (1),(FEER) (BEER) ; (2) Dunaway et al (2006),, VAR VEC, FEER BEER,, ; (3)

. /!Ι Γ 3 ϑκ, / Ι Ι Ι Λ, Λ +Ι Λ +Ι

《金融评论》投稿 封面

2 2 Λ ϑ Δ Χ Δ Ι> 5 Λ Λ Χ Δ 5 Β. Δ Ι > Ε!!Χ ϑ : Χ Ε ϑ! ϑ Β Β Β ϑ Χ Β! Β Χ 5 ϑ Λ ϑ % < Μ / 4 Ν < 7 :. /. Ο 9 4 < / = Π 7 4 Η 7 4 =

UDC Empirical Researches on Pricing of Corporate Bonds with Macro Factors 厦门大学博硕士论文摘要库

Microsoft Word - A doc

9!!!! #!! : ;!! <! #! # & # (! )! & ( # # #+

= Υ Ξ & 9 = ) %. Ο) Δ Υ Ψ &Ο. 05 3; Ι Ι + 4) &Υ ϑ% Ο ) Χ Υ &! 7) &Ξ) Ζ) 9 [ )!! Τ 9 = Δ Υ Δ Υ Ψ (

elections. In addition, the positive CARs exist during the full event date that indicates the election bull run do happen in Taiwan. When incumbent go

4 # = # 4 Γ = 4 0 = 4 = 4 = Η, 6 3 Ι ; 9 Β Δ : 8 9 Χ Χ ϑ 6 Κ Δ ) Χ 8 Λ 6 ;3 Ι 6 Χ Δ : Χ 9 Χ Χ ϑ 6 Κ

! # %& ( %! & & + %!, ( Α Α Α Α Χ Χ Α Χ Α Α Χ Α Α Α Α

M 2 ΠGDP (1996) M2ΠGDP (2000) (2000) (2001) (2001) (2001) (2002) (2002) (2002) (2003) (2001) (2005) (2005) (2006) (2004) M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠG


标题

# # 4 + % ( ) ( /! 3 (0 0 (012 0 # (,!./ %

! Β Β? Β ( >?? >? %? Γ Β? %? % % %? Χ Η Ιϑ Κ 5 8 Λ 9. Μ Ν Ο Χ? Π Β # % Χ Χ Θ Ρ% Ρ% Θ!??? % < & Θ

# #! ) ( ( +,! %,! ( # # %& % ( ) +! +, +. /

~ 10 2 P Y i t = my i t W Y i t 1000 PY i t Y t i W Y i t t i m Y i t t i 15 ~ 49 1 Y Y Y 15 ~ j j t j t = j P i t i = 15 P n i t n Y

& &((. ) ( & ) 6 0 &6,: & ) ; ; < 7 ; = = ;# > <# > 7 # 0 7#? Α <7 7 < = ; <

<4D F736F F D DB5DA32C6DA2DD6D0B4F3B9DCC0EDD1D0BEBF2DC4DACEC42D6F6B2DD2BBD0A32E646F63>

untitled

untitled

PowerPoint 簡報

9 : : ; 7 % 8

:,,,,,, : 1990,,?,,,,, 2000 (,2004) :1990,,,,,2000, (,2008),,,,,,,,, 1990,,,, 4, 10, ( ) 90,,,,, 2000,,, ,2000,, % % ;,

Lech 1 2 Coffey and Jia Corporate Financial Performance CFP CSP CFP 9 Preston O Bannon 10 CSP CFP Margolis et al Sun abd

: ; # 7 ( 8 7

: p = i p i 21, 1991,,,, M 0 M 1 M 2 ;, 1990, : (1990,2000) 2001 (1996, ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (1997

中国科技论文在线

% 82. 8% You & Kobayashi % 2007 %

untitled

Probabilities of Default RMI PDs CVI 7-8 KMV 9 KMV KMV KMV 1. KMV KMV DPT DD DD DD DPT Step 1 V E = V A N d 1 - e rt DN d 2 1 d 1 = ln V A

Feder Chapple 2002 Barslund Stiglitz Klychova Pal

: : : :1996,??,,,,,,,, :,,,,, Goldsmith (1969) 35,, Shaw(1973) Gurley Shaw(1960), Demirg c2 Kunt Levin (2001) 150 (1992)

( ) (! +)! #! () % + + %, +,!#! # # % + +!

2. 1%, % 3. 3% 6. 9%? Harrigan Barrows( ) 2005, 2005,,,,, ;, Harrigan Barrows , %, 5% ;, 2%, 7%, 2005, 21%, Ha

,,,,,Modigliani - Miller Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist 1996,, Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist ( ) ( ),,,, Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist (1999),,, RBC, Bernank

Oates U

( (3) 2009) (70% ) ; ; ; (2007) ; ; (2005) ; (2010) ; (2009) MacDonald & Taylor ; (1989) Ito (1990) Chinn et al. (1994) (2009) Verschoor et al.

3?! ΑΑΑΑ 7 ) 7 3

2005 8,,, (Okun,1971 ;Logue and Willett,1976 ; Foster,1978) (), Wachtel (1977),Carlson (1977) Fisher (1981) Taylor (1981) OECD,, Engle (1983) Engle, A

% & :?8 & : 3 ; Λ 3 3 # % & ( ) + ) # ( ), ( ) ). ) / & /:. + ( ;< / 0 ( + / = > = =? 2 & /:. + ( ; < % >=? ) 2 5 > =? 2 Α 1 Β 1 + Α

3 L K Y Y t =A t F L t K t 1 A 1 15~ UN % 65 7% 55

10-03.indd

Rauch JE SMSAs 10 Glaeser Scheinkman Shleiferll 11 Henderson 12 Moretti 13 Zhang D Wu F 14 Abel

Schumpeter Mensch Freeman Clark Schumpeter Mensch 1975 technological stalemate 2000 Van Dujin 1977 OECD 1992 Freeman 1982 Van

# ( + + # + # 6 +,! + # +! +, + # ( + ) ( + ( + ) + 7! + # + /8 + ) ( +! + #. + ( +, +! + # + # + + ( ! ( + ) ( + ) +, + ( + 9% +! +, + ( +

%! # # % % & # ( ) ( +, & +, +, & +, & +, +, &!

Α 3 Α 2Η # # > # 8 6 5# Ι + ϑ Κ Ι Ι Ι Η Β Β Β Β Β Β ΔΕ Β Β Γ 8 < Φ Α Α # >, 0 Η Λ Μ Ν Ο Β 8 1 Β Π Θ 1 Π Β 0 Λ Μ 1 Ρ 0 Μ ϑ Σ ϑ Τ Ο Λ 8 ϑ

标题

2 國 際 經 濟 情 勢 雙 週 報 第 1826 期 本 期 重 點 摘 要 (Abstract) OECD 表 示, 由 於 油 價 走 低 及 數 個 央 行 進 一 步 推 出 貨 幣 寬 鬆 措 施,2015 年 初 全 球 經 濟 前 景 有 所 改 善 OECD 也 警 告, 過 度

与林老师对话


,, :, ;,,?, : (1), ; (2),,,, ; (3),,, :,;; ;,,,,(Markowitz,1952) 1959 (,,2000),,, 20 60, ( Evans and Archer,1968) ,,,

;,, ( ),,,,, ;,,,, (2006) 6, :,,,, OPEC, 10,, 30 %, 9 Π,,12 Π 20 80,, ( 5 Π ), Π, 10 Π, (2003),,, ( ) 100,, (, ) 5,, 10,,, (, 2005), (

DID 13. 0% 20. 2% 12. 6% 30 1 Leland 1968 Zeldes 1989 Zeldes 1989 Carroll Skinner 1987 Zhang & Wan

Transcription:

2013 8 CPI * Taylor 2000 NOEM 1998 1 2012 4 CPI CPI 1998 2002 2003 2012 4 CPI JEL E52 F31 F064. 1 A 1000-6249 2013 08-045 - 12 2001 11 WTO 2008 2005 7 Exchange Rate Pass - through into Prices - * E - mail 549577057@ qq. com 2699 130012 10JJD790033 45

CPI 2010 60 80 Krugman 1986 Dornbush 1987 Mark - up Pricing - to - Market 2009 90 Obstfeld and Rogoff 1995 Dornbush 1987 Redux NOEM 2008 NOEM CPI Taylor 2000 CPI 1 Devereux 2002 NOEM Taylor 20 80 Campa and Goldberg 2002 OECD OECD Bailliu and Fujii 2005 11 21 Taylor 2000 Choudhri and Hakura 2006 71 2001 2007 2008 2009 2008 2011 B - P ARDL B - P B - P 2010 STAR 1 2 Taylor 1 46 Taylor

2013 8 Taylor 2000 90 Taylor 1 Taylor Taylor NOEM Bergin and Feenstra 2001 NOEM E t! t = 0 β[ logu t + log( M t /P ) - L ] U logu t P t σ / ( σ -1) ( σ -1)/σ [ d i ] U t = 1 t ( i) 0U t t [ i ] P t = 1 t ( i) 0P 1 -σ d 1 / ( 1 -σ) M t /P t L t β 2 2 3 3 1 w t = u t + p t = ( 1 - β) m t + βe t ( u t +1 + p ) t + 2 1 s t + p * t - p t = u t - u * t 3 m * t = u * t = p * t = 0 2 3 4 w t = s t = m t + βe s t +1 - s ( ) t / ( 1 - β) Taylor Taylor Cobb - Douglas Y t = AZ α t L 1 -α t Y t Z t L t P - t Z t W t 6 C t = P - α t W 1 -α t 6 Taylor 2000 P t +τ ( i ) = X t τ = 0 1 4 5 1 2 Taylor Risk - sharing Condition 3 47

CPI [ ] P t = ( 1 / 2) 1 X 1 -σ 1 /1 -σ t -τ τ = 0 6 7 X 1 t X t 7 x t = 1 E 2 1 t c t +τ 8 τ = 0 p t = ( x t + x ) t - /2 9 1 4 feedback rule Choudhri and Hakura 2006 2 s t = - ρx t -1 + v t 10 ρ( > 0) v t 7 ν P - t = ( 1 - ν) P t + ν( S t P * ) 3 10 t c t = αp t + α( s t + p * ) + ( t 1 - α) w t 11 8 9 11 8 11 4 x t x t = φ 1 x t -1 + φ 2 ν t 12 φ i ρ α 10 9 p t = μ 1 p t -1 + μ 2 ( s t + s ) t - /2 13 1 μ 1 = φ 1 + ρφ 2 μ 2 = φ 2 13 μ 2 /2 μ 1 μ 2 φ 2 8 11 10 ρ μ 2 ρ μ 1 ρ ρ ρ μ 2 μ 1 13 p t = π 1 ( L) p t -1 + π 2 ( L) s t + π 3 ( L) z t + π 4 ( L) p * t + ε t 14 π i ( L) i = 1 2 3 4 z t p * t ε t Goldberg and Knetter 1997 7 1998 1 2 Taylor 2000 Taylor 48

2013 8 1998 1 2012 4 NEER CPI 1998 1 X12 BIS Wind 1a CPI 25% 2005 7 CPI a. CPI b. CPI 1 CPI CPI CPI ARDL - ECM Cholesky SVAR Chow 1b CPI 1998-2002 2003-2007 2008 2009 2010 Taylor Chow Taylor 50 Chow 1 CPI CPI AR 2 49

CPI cpi t = 1. 192cpi t -1 15. 83-0. 214cpi t -2-2. 83 + ^u t R 2 = 0. 9428 D. W. = 2. 035 表 1 CPI 序列自相关性检验表 Autocorrelation Partial Correlation 1 2 3 4 5 6 AC 0.968 0.922 0.868 0.805 0.733 0.654 PAC 0.968-0.219-0.129-0.143-0.123-0.087 Q-Stat 163.89 313.68 447.21 562.57 658.75 735.97 Prob 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Chow 2 1998-2012 CPI 2003 1 2009 1 2010 1 1% 5% 1998. 012002. 12 2009. 012009. 12 2003. 012008. 12 2010. 012012. 04 2 Chow F p F LR p LR 2003 1 2. 941 0. 000 327. 898 0. 000 *** 2009 1 3. 546 0. 000 126. 787 0. 000 *** 2010 1 1. 834 0. 035 87. 250 0. 024 ** * ** *** 10% 5% 1% 14 D t CPI cpi y neer p t z t s t p * * t Campa and Goldberg 2002 p t = neer t * p t /reer t reer t ARDL D t = 1 D t = 0 neerd 1 = neer* D t t 1998. 01-2002. 12 neerd 2 = neer* D t t 2009. 01-2009. 12 cpi y neer p * t 10% 5% EG JJ 14 ARDL Bound Test I( 0) I( 1) ARDL ARDL ARDLECM 15 Microfit4. 1 50 D t

3 ADF p cpi - 2. 618 0. 273 Δcpi - 10. 619 0. 000 *** y - 2. 534 0. 312 Δy - 12. 275 0. 000 *** neer - 3. 321 0. 0644 * p * i - 3. 563 0. 0361 ** 2013 8 Δcpi t p 0 = i = 1 β 1i Δcpi ( ) t -i p 1 + i = 0 β 2i Δy ( ) t -i p 2 + i = 0 β 3i Δneer ( ) t -i p 3 + ( β 4i Δp * ) t - i + γ 0 cpi t -1 + γ 1 y t -1 + γ 2 neer t -1 + γ 3 p * t -1 + ε t i = 0 AIC SBC p i 6 ARDLECM AIC SBC LM χ 2 ( 1) χ 2 ( 4) AIC SBC - 116-114 p i = 4 5 H 0 γ 0 = γ 1 = γ 2 = γ 3 = 0 F Pesaran 2001 15 4 ARDL - ECM F p i 10% 5% 1% I 0 I 1 I 0 I 1 I 0 I 1 4 1. 90 3. 01 2. 26 3. 48 3. 07 4. 44 5 1. 81 2. 93 2. 14 3. 34 2. 82 4. 21 F 4 5 3. 92 ** 3. 21 * I( 0) I( 1) F I( 1) 4 p i = 4 F p i 4 ARDL AIC ARDL 2 1 1 1 1 2 5 6 CUSUM CUSUM - SQ 5% 5 6 0. 136 0. 031 1998. 01-2002. 12 7. 5% 2009. 01-2009. 12 0. 29% 1998. 01-2002. 12 2% 2009 2. 83% 2. 61% 3. 1% 2008 51

CPI 2009 5 ARDL ARDL 2 1 2 t y 0. 9453 3. 48 *** neer - 0. 1359 2. 36 * p * t 0. 09959 0. 33 neerd1 0. 0609 1. 12 * neerd2 0. 0029 0. 99 F 623. 419 R 2 0. 9797 6 ARDL ARDL - ECM 2 1 2 t Δcpi -1 0. 2701 3. 5762 *** Δy - 0. 0524-5. 0642 *** Δneer - 0. 0310-1. 9531 ** Δp * 0. 04704 3. 2865 *** Δneerd1 0. 0238-2. 7093 *** Δneerd2 0. 0027-10. 5062 *** Δneerd2-1 0. 0049 1. 6546 ecm - 1 0. 0019-1. 6246 F 42. 222 R 2 0. 65598 M2 CPI VAR SVAR Cholesky VAR SVAR Granger ADF I 52

1 Granger Granger SVAR 2012 SVAR 2013 8 7 cpi 1 Δcpi 1 cpi 2 Δcpi 2 neer 1 Δneer 1 ADF - 0. 248227-8. 552541-2. 247426-8. 043306-1. 402882-6. 019751 p 0. 5926 0. 0000 *** 0. 1911 0. 0000 *** 0. 1479 0. 0000 *** neer 2 Δneer 2 imp 1 Δimp 1 imp 2 Δimp 2 ADF 0. 409624-7. 215063 0. 244394-11. 51457-0. 570315-4. 986642 p 0. 7998 0. 0000 *** 0. 4681 0. 0000 *** 0. 7536 0. 0000 *** m2 1 Δm2 1 m2 2 Δm2 2 ADF 0. 070812-10. 26295-0. 367986-3. 660537 p 0. 7014 0. 0000 *** 0. 5499 0. 00003 *** 1 2 8 Granger F p Δneer 1 Granger Δimp 1 0. 76240 0. 5552 Granger Δimp 1 Granger Δcpi 1 0. 53651 0. 7096 Δneer 1 Granger Δm2 1 1. 01838 0. 4078 Granger Δm2 1 Granger Δcpi 1 1. 41312 0. 2446 Δneer 2 Granger Δimp 2 7. 88657 1. E - 05 *** Granger Δimp 2 Granger Δcpi 2 8. 79744 4. E - 06 *** Δneer 2 Granger Δm2 2 3. 81774 0. 0063 *** Granger 4 Δm2 2 Granger Δcpi 2 3. 04582 0. 0206 *** A = 1 0 0 a 21 1 0 a 31 a 32 1 2 a1 6 3% 2 a2 4 0. 4% 2 b1 4 M2 CPI 5 b2 53

CPI 2 SVAR Taylor 2000 NOEM 1998 1 2012 4 CPI Granger SVAR 54

2013 8 Taylor 2000 Bailliu J. and Fujii E. 2005 Exchange Rate Pass - Through and the Inflation Environment in Industrialized Countries An Empirical Investigation Bank of Canada Working Paper No. 21. Bergin P. and R. Feenstra 2001 Pricing - to - Market Staggered Contracts and Real Exchange Rate Persistence Journal of International Economics 54 2 pp. 333-359. Campa M. and S. Goldberg 2002 Exchange Rate Pass - Through into Import Prices Macro or Micro Phenomenon Research Paper No. 475. Choudhri U. and Hakura S. 2006 Exchange Rate Pass - Through to Domestic Prices Does the Inflationary Environment Matter Journal of International Money and Finance No. 25 pp. 614-639. Devereux B. Engel C. and Storgaard E. 2002 Endogenous Exchange Rate Pass - Through When Nominal Prices Are Set in Advance HKIMR Working Paper No. 21. Dornbusch R. 1976 Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics Journal of Political Econony 84 6 pp. 1161-1176. Goldberg K. and Knette M. 1997 Good Prices and Exchange Rates What Have We Learner Journal of Economic Literature 35 3 pp. 1243-1272. Krugam P. 1986 Pricing to Market When the Exchange Rate Changes Working Paper No. 1926. Obstfeld M. and Rogoff K. 1995 Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux Journal of Political Economy 103 3 pp. 624-660. Pesaran M. H. Shin Y. and Smith R. J. 2001 Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships Journal of Applied Econometrics No. 16 pp. 289-326. 55

CPI Taylor J. B. 2000 Low Inflation Pass - Through and the Pricing Power of Firms European Economic Review No. 44 pp. 1389-1408. 2001 6 79-88 2007 VAR 4 1-13 2008 4 52-62 2012 4 101-112 2009 1 140-145 2008 3 28-41 2009 6 44-59 2008 8 52-64 2010 5 3-26 2009 ARDL - ECM 6 53-64 2011 5 3-14 2010 11 51-61 Text of the effect of nominal effective exchange rate pass - through into CPI Based on the inflation environment changes Guangyu He Xiaobo Pang Abstract Through merge the Taylor 2000 staggered price model with the new open macroeconomics model NOEM make the inflation environment and the exchange rate pass - through into domestic prices together. Select the data from 1998. 01-2012. 04 to calculate nominal effective exchange rate pass - through effect on consumer prices in the different inflation environment then test the pulse effect based on the channels. The empirical results show that the short and long term effects of the nominal effective exchange rate movements pass - through effect on consumer price low and influenced by inflation environmental obviously from early 1998 to late 2002 continnously low inflation environment has hindered all channels of the exchange rate pass - through under the inflation environment the effect of monetary channels of exchange rate pass - through is significantly higher than the effect of import price channels bct the sign of the effect is negative. Recommendations on policies has been made in accordance w ith the conclusion of empirical studies. Keywords Exchange Rate Pass - Through Consumer Price Inflation Environment Monetary Policy. 56