was published in Lingua Franca. Sokal claimed that paper consists of many nonsense sentences. Then, the Sokal affair triggered and fired a grand debat

Transcription

1 ( ) 1996 ( ) ( ) Abstract: Social Text, an American Journal for Cultural Studies, in 1996, published an issue, titled as Science Wars, whose goal is to react Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science, authored by two scientists, P. Gross and N. Levitt. A Trojan Horse, Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity written by a physicist Alan Sokal, was included within the issue. Sokal soon revealed that Transgressing is only a hoax with Social Text in another paper titled as A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies, which

2 was published in Lingua Franca. Sokal claimed that paper consists of many nonsense sentences. Then, the Sokal affair triggered and fired a grand debate about the nature of science and scientific knowledge. The science wars in mass media was exaggerated as wars between the scientists and the humanities or sociologists. The goal of this study is to understand the Science Wars and its focus: the issue about how do sciences work between social constructivism and scientific realism. It consists of four chapters: (1) A brief history of the Science Wars: to give an epitome of debates from 1994 to (2) The focus of the debate: how do sciences work at all? The representative literatures will be examined in details. (3) Scientific Knowledge, nature and society: to search a way out beyond social constructivism and scientific realism. Keywords: Science Wars, Science Studies, Philosophy of Science, Social Constructivism, Scientific Realism

3 * 1996 (Science Wars) 1 (I. Hacking) 84,772 (Sokal Affair) (Ludwig Wittgenstein) ,334 (1997, 14) (Jardine & Frasca-Spada 1997, * (NSC H ) STS 1 2 Lynch(2001), Is a Science Peace Process Necessary?, in Labinger, J. & Collins, Harry (eds.), The One Culture?, p.54 3 Brown(2001), Bibliography, p. 229 Jardine & Frasca-Spada(1997), Splendours and Miseries of the Science Wars (The Science Wars Homepage: mailing list ) 3

4 Giere 1999, Brown 2001, etc.) (Social Text) (Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science) 2002 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

5 5 (7) (sociology of scientific knowledge) (social constructivism) 6 (negotiation) (anti-enlightenment) (Gerald Holton) 1993 (Science and Anti-Science) 7 (Sandra Harding) 8 (delegitimation) (Lewis Wolpert) (The Unnatural Nature of Science, 1992) (N. Levitt) (P. Gross) (The academic left) Ullica Segerstrale(2000) (Beyond the Science Wars: The Missing Discourse about Science and Society) (Science and Science Studies: Enemies or Allies?) Bloor, Barnes, Latour, Woolgar, Pikering, Schaffer & Shapin, Collins, Pinch, Lynch, Callon, Keller, etc. 7 (social myth) (Mary Hesse) (Holton 1993, 153) 8 (parasciences). (Ibid., 181) 9 RNA DNA (1992, 115)

6 (New York Academy of Science) (The Flight From Science and Reason) 1996 (Mario Bunge) (In Praise of Intolerance to Charlatanism in Academie) 11 (Stephen Cole) (Voodoo Sociology: Recent Developments in the Sociology of Science) (Noretta Koertge) (Feminist Epistemology: Stalking an Un-Dead Horse) 12 (Trojan Horse) (Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity) (Post-Mertonian sociology of science) 12 (PSA, Philosophy of Science Association) (Philosophy of Science) 1980 (Daphne Patai) (Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women s Studies, 1992) (paradisciplines) (academic separatism) (ethos of affirmation action) (1996, p. 413) (1999) (pp )

7 (Lingua Franca) (Sokal Hoax: The Sham that Shook the Academy, 2000) (Stanley Aronowitz) (N. Katherine Hayles) (Jean Bricmont) Impostures Intellectuelles (J. Lacan) 1998 Fashionable Nonsense (A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science) (Harry Collins) (A. Pinkering) (S. Schaffer & S. Sapin) (B. Latour) 19 ( ) 15 Bruce Robins Reality and Social Text (In These Times, Juli 8, 1996) On Being Hoaxed (Tikkun, Aug. 1996) Anatomy of a Hoax (Tikkun, Sep/Oct. 1996) Just Doing Your Job: Some Lessons of the Sokal Affair (Yale Journal of Criticism, Fall 1997) 16 Dorothy Nelkin s The Science Wars: Responses to a Marriage Failed Sarah Franklin s Making Transparencies: Seeing through the Science Wars Joel Kovel s Dispatches from the Science Wars Stanley Aronowitz s The Politics of the Science Wars 17 (Elizabeth Lloyd, 1996) Science and Anti-Science: Objectivity and its Real Enemies, in Feminism, Science and The Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers)

8 (What the Social Text Affair does and does not prove: A critical look at science studies ) 20 (Libération) (Le Monde) (Dissent) (Le Recherche) (Physics World) (Physics Today) (Metascience) (Economic and Political Weekly) STS (Handbook of Science and Technology Studies) 1999 (The Science Studies Reader) 36 (David J. Hess) 1997 (Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction) 22 (The Public Image of Science) (University of Kansas) (Strong Programme) 20 Y a-t-il une science aprés la guerre froide? ( 1998, p. 48) (Sokal et Bricmont ne sont pas sérieux) (p.1) SS 23 8

9 (Science and Its Critics) (Steve Fuller) (After the Science Wars, 2001) 24 (D. Mermin) (Travor Pinch) (The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science, 1993) (B. Barnes & D. Bloor) (Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis, 1996) (Southampton University) (peace workshop) (Micheal Lynch) (The One Culture? 2001) (Jay Labinger) (Conversing Seriously with Sociologists) 24 (Philip S. Baringer) (2001, p.2) 25 SS Mike Neuenberg (p. ix-x) 9

10 1996 (Philosophy of Science Association) (Cleveland) (Arthur Fine) (Philip Kitcher) (Ron Giere) 27 (A Plea for Science Studies) (social-historical studies) 28 (1998, p. 49) (Science, Truth, and Democracy) (Studies in History and Philosophy of Science) 1997 (Splendours and Miseries of The Science Wars) (Ian Hacking) 1999 (Social Construction of What?) vs 1999 (Science without Laws) (James Robert Brown) 2001 (Who Rules in Science?) 27 Brown (Brown 2001, pp.15-16) 28 (The Theory Ladenness of Observation) (The Underdertermination of Theory by Evidence) (The Variety of Belief) ( Actor s Categories and the Writing of History) Martin Rudwick s The Great Devonian Controversy Peter Galison s How Experiments End Ronald Giere s Explaining Science David Hull s Science as a Process Helen Longino s Science as Social Knowledge John Dupre s The Disorder of Things The Advancement of Science 29 (1998, 17) 10

11 (Prometheus Bedeviled: Science and the Contradictions of Contemprory Culture, 1999) (Is Science Multi-Cultural? 1998) (H. Longino) (The Fate of Knowledge) (the social) (the rational) (C. P. Snow) (Sokal 1998, Baringer 2001, Brown 2001, Lynch 2001a, etc.) (2001a). 30 (Beyond the Science Wars, 2000) (p. ix) 31 11

12 (p. 53). (p. 54) vs. (1998: 34-36) (The Realist-Rationalist Cluster) (The Socio-Historical Cluster) (1998, pp.) (reality) 1998 (Sokla & Bricmont 1998, 2001a, 2001b) 12

13 ( p. 63) ( pp ) (underdetermination thesis) 32 (2001a) (methodological relativism) (Defense of a Modest Scientific Realism, 2001b) 33 (1) (radical skepticism) (theories underdeterminated by evidences or data) 32 (p. 89) Bielefeld STS (World and Knowledge) ( ) (theoretical entities) NSC H

14 (2) p , 2001a, p.34 (R. Rorty) ( Sokal 2001a, p. 35) (3) (a) (b) (c) (d) (Bloor 1991, p. 7) (b) (c) (really) (4) (2001a, p. 39) 14

15 (theoretical entities) 34 (Peter Saulson) 35 (SSKers) (1) (2) (3) (caused) (Collins 2001, p. 184) (Giere 1999, p. 19) SSKers 34 (coarse-grained) (derived entities) 35 15

16 (Sokal & Bricmont 2001a, p. 40) 36 (1996, pp ) (Ibid., p.76) 36 16

17 (p. viii) (p. 16) (p. 17) (1998a) (p. 604) 37 (working philosophies). (2001, p. 240) (2001b, p. 272) 37 17

18 (-ism) (approximately true) (social factors) 38 (cognitive constructivism) 38 (crude) (subtle) (p.1) ( ) 18

19 (constructivist realism) 39 (Brown, 2001) (nihilist wing) (naturalist wing) (localism)(p. 76) 40 (SSkers) 39 Ron Giere (Expalining Science, 1988) 40 (Actor-Network theory),

20 1. (A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies) (Sokal 2000(1996), p. 50) 41 (some sense of reality) (B. C. Griffith 1997, p.13) (J. F. Dolan 1997, p. 11) (Dr. Sammuel Johnson) (Dowkins 1994) (airplane argument) Lynch 2001a 1970 (I. Lakatos) (P. Feyerabend) (1987) 17 20

21 (Boghossian, 2000) Brown (2001, p. 78) 21

22 P B C Q C B D P Q D Giere 1999, p

23 44 (1999, p. 20) Brown p

24 24

25 (1) (2) (metaphysics of science) 45 A B C 45 Testing through Realizable Models ( ) 25

26 (working philosophies) Joseph Doylan (predication) Belver Griffith (reasonable) Alfred Kracher Roger Burnley (Physics Today, p. 13, 15, 92) 26

27 (1981) 27

28 (reality) (truth) Ashman, Keith M. & Baringer, Philip S. eds. (2001), After the Science Wars. New York: Routledge. Barnes, Barry (1998), Oversimplification and the desire for truth: Response to Mermin, Social Studies of Science 28:

29 Barnes, B. & Bloor, David & Henry, John (1996), Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Baringer, Philip S. (2001), Introduction: the science wars, in Ashman, Keith M. & Baringer, Philip S. eds. (2001), After the Science Wars. New York: Routledge, Beller, Mara (1998), The Sokal hoax: At Whom Are We Laughing? Physics Today 51, no. 9 (September): (1999), Letters: Postmodernism, Copenhagen and the Sokaled Science Wars, Physics Today 52, no. 1 (January): Bloor, David (1991), Knowledge and Social Image. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (1998), Changing axes: Response to Mermin, Social Studies of Science 28: Boghossian, Paul A. (2000(1996)), What the Sokal Hoax Ought to Teach Us, in The Sokal Hoax, (and selected responses, ). Also collected in A House Built on Sand, Brown, James Robert (2001), Who Rules in Science? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Bunge, Mario (1996), In praise of intolerance to charlatanism in academia, in The Flight from Science and Reason, ed. Paul R. Gross, Norman Levitt, and Martin W. Lewis. New York: New York academy of sciences, Cole, Stephen. (1996), Voodoo sociology: Recent Developments in the Sociology of Science, in The Flight from Science and Reason, ed. Paul R. Gross, Norman Levitt, and Martin W. Lewis. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, Collins, Harry. (1981a), Stages in the empirical programme of relativism, Social Studies of Science 11: (1983), An Empirical Relativist Programme in The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge, in Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, ed. Karin Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay. London: Sage, (2001), One More Round with Relativism, in Labinger, Jay A. & Collins, Harry eds. (2001), The One Culture? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, Collins, Harry, and Trevor Pinch (1993), The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1996), Letters: Sociologist, Scientist Continue Debate about Scientific Process, Physics Today 49, no. 7(July):

30 ------(1997), Letters: Letters: Discussion of Nature of Science Provokes Hit-or-Myth Debate, Physics Today 50, no. 1 (Jan.): 11-15, (1998), The Golem: What You Should Know About Science. 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dolan, Joseph et. al. (1997), Letters: Discussion of Nature of Science Provokes Hit-or-Myth Debate, Physics Today 50, no. 1 (Jan.): 11-15, 92. Dawkins, Richard. (1998), Postmodernism disrobed, Review of Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers Abuse of Science, by Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont. Nature 394 (9 July): Fish, Stanley. (1996), Professor Sokal s Bad Joke, New York Times, 21 May, sec. A. Reprinted in The Sokal Hoax, ed. by Lingua Franca Editors. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Giere, Ron. (1999), Science without Laws. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Gottfried, Kurt. (1997), Was Sokal s Hoax Justified? Physics Today 50, no.1 (January): Gottfried, Kurt,and Kenneth Wilson. (1997), Science as A Cultural Construct, Nature 386: Griffith, B. C. et. al.(1997), Letters: Discussion of Nature of Science Provokes Hit-or-Myth Debate, Physics Today 50, no. 1 (Jan.): Gross, Paul R. (1998b), Letter to the editor. Physics Today 51, no. 4 (April): 15. Gross, Paul R., and Norman Levitt. (1998), Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels With Science. 2 ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Gross, Paul R., Norman Levitt, and Martin W. Lewis, eds. (1996), The Flight from Science and Reason. New York: New York Academy of Sciences. Haack, Susan. (1996), Towards a sober sociology of science, in The Flight from Science ad Reason, ed. Paul R. Gross, Norman Levitt, and Martin W. Lewis. New York: York Academy of Sciences, (1998), Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hacking, Ian (1999), The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Harding, Sandra (1998), Is Science Multi-Cultural? Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Hart, Roger (1996), The Flight from Reason: Higher Superstition and The Refutation of Science Studies, in Science Wars, ed. Andrew Ross. Durham, NC: Duck University Press, Hess, David J. Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York 30

31 University Press. Holton, Gerald (1993), Science and Anti-Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Jardine, Nick, and Frasca-Spada, Marina (1997), Splendours and Miseries of The Science Wars. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28: Kitcher, Phillip (1998), A plea for science studies, in A House Built On Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science, ed. Noretta Koertge. New York: Oxford University Press, (2001), Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford Oxford University Press. Koertge, Noretta (1996), Feminist Epistemology: Stalking an Un-Dead Horse, in Gross, Paul R., Norman Levitt, and Martin W. Lewis, eds. (1996), The Flight from Science and Reason. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, (1998) ed., A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science. New York: Oxford University Press. Labinger, Jay A. & Collins, Harry eds. (2001), The One Culture? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Levins, Richard (1996), Ten Propositions of Science and Antiscience, in Ross, Andrew ed. (1996), Science Wars. Durham, NC: Duck University Press, Levitt, Norman (1999), Prometheus Bedeviled: Science and the Contradictions of Contemporary Culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Lewontin, Richard C. (1996), A la recherche du temps perdu: A Review Essay, in Science Wars, ed. Ross, Andrew. (1996). Lingua Franca s editors (2000), The Sokal Hoax. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Longino, Helen (2001), The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lynch(2001a), Is a science Peace Process Necessary? in Labinger & Collins, Harry eds. (2001), The One Culture? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, (2001b), Causality, Grammar, and Working Philosophies: some Final Comments, in Labinger & Collins, Harry eds. (2001), The One Culture? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, Mermin, N. David. (1996a), What s Wrong with This Sustaining Myth? Physics Today 49, no.3 (March): (1996b), The Golemization of Relativity, Physics Today 49, no. 4 (April): (1996c), Sociologists, Scientist Continue Debate About Scientific Process. 31

32 Physics Today 49, no. 7 (July): 11-15, (1997), Sociologists, Scientist Pick at Threads of Argument About Science, Physics Today 50, no. 1 (January): (1998a), The science of science: a physicist reads Barnes, Bloor, and Henry, Social Studies of Science 28: (1998b), Abandoning preconceptions: Reply to Bloor and Barnes, Social Studies of Science 28: Nagel, Thomas. (1997), The Last Word. New York: Oxford University Press. Nanda, Meera. (1997) The science wars in India, Dissent 44, no. 1 (winter): Reprinted in The Sokal Hoax (2000), Pinnick, Cassandra L. (1998), What s wrong with the Strong Programme s Case Study of the Hobbes-Boyle Dispute? in Koertge, Noretta, ed. (1998), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science. New York: Oxford University Press, Ross, Andrew ed. (1996), Science Wars. Durham, NC: Duck University Press. Segerstrale, Ullica ed. (2000), Beyond the Science Wars: The Missing Discourse about Science and Society. Albany: State University of New York. Sokal, Alan (1998), What the Social Text Affair Does and Does Not Prove, in Koertge, Noretta, ed. (1998), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science. New York: Oxford University Press, Sokal, Alan & Bricmont, Jean (1998), Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals abuse of science. New York: Picador USA (1999), Letters: Sokalratic Debate Continues, Fueled by Latour and Copenhagen Interpretations, Physics Today 52, no. 8 (Aug.), 15, (2000(1996)), A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies, in The Sokal Hoax, (2001a), Science and Sociology of Science: Beyond War and Peace, in Labinger, Jay A. & Collins, Harry eds. (2001), The One Culture? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, (2001b), Defense of a Modest Scientific Realism, an essay published in Conference World and Konwledge held at Bielefeld University, Germany. From Stolsenberg, Gabriel (2001), Reading and Relativism: an introduction to the science wars, in Ashman, Keith M. & Baringer, Philip S. eds. (2001), After the Science Wars. New York: Routledge, Wenberg, Steven (2001), Peace at Last? in Labinger & Collins, Harry eds. (2001), The One Culture? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,

33 Wolpert, Lewis (1992), The Unnatural Nature of Science. Oxfor: Blackwell Press. (2001) (2001) (1998) (1999) (1998) 126 (2002) (1987) (2002) 33