* 1919 5 20 1 2 * 50 1 2 09CFX008 08JC820044 55 1919 5 20 5 1985 1992 170 181 2003 3 1913 1925 1923 1925
/ 1894 1913 1906 1 1912 1912 1 2 2 1906 1911 3 4 1912 7 1 2 3 4 1923 7 1923 7 4 8 1986 3 1924 9 1924 9 24 11 1986 103 1912 1 1912 2 21 1912 2 21 2 1982 52 111 112 1910 2 28 1 1981 442 1912 1 5 2 8 51
2012 1 1 1913 1 2 3 1914 7 1914 1906 4 5 6 1914 52 1 1912 7 2 393 2 1913 1 19 3 1984 4 5 3 4 5 6 1913 3 13 3 44 45 1914 7 8 3 97 1914 1906 1993 5 1995 96 97
/ 1 2 1919 3 1923 1924 1923 11 28 4 12 30 1924 1 5 1 299 2 3 4 5 1924 9 1986 283 1916 7 3 304 311 312 333 365 371 211 1917 1919 6 6 1985 1919 1928 1 1981 81 83 1983 295 53
2012 1 1 1924 3 2 1914 1923 1924 1925 7 3 4 1 1985 17 20 30 32 10 1935 5 2 1924 3 9 9 264 1 1984 15 16 3 1924 4 26 9 345 4 1928 1931 30 54
/ 1 1912 1914 1923 2 3 4 1 1925 7 2 2004 474 528 3 1921 4 4 5 486 4 1 3 1936 3 8 1944 55
2012 1 1 2 3 4 5 17 18 19 1 1924 4 20 9 321 2 1924 4 26 9 346 3 1924 3 16 9 282 4 1924 11 3 11 269 271 5 1923 1956 141 56
/ 20 1 20 1920 2 1923 1922 6 8 1923 1 2 3 3 1920 1923 3 4 4 6 1 2 3 4 E 1 1998 2 1923 7 1923 1 7 8 2 8 9 4 11 10 7 57
2012 1 1 1923 1923 7 10 6 2 1924 1 1924 4 1 3 4 4 11 5 18 25 5 14 7 8 8 5 6 7 8 1 1923 18 10 11 2 1924 1949 2003 11 3 1924 10 9 4 1924 4 3 3 5 1924 4 11 10 1986 54 6 1924 5 14 1924 7 8 1924 8 5 10 189 380 381 493 7 1924 4 26 6 8 1924 4 19 3 58
/ 1 1924 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 1924 7 1926 8 9 1 7 1 1965 7 33 2 1924 5 29 6 3 2003 228 3 1924 7 14 7 4 1924 7 25 6 5 1924 1927 5 2008 336 6 1924 8 26 10 583 599 7 1926 3 3 12784 8 1926 3 8 12785 9 1926 8 9 1926 9 1927 1986 221 222 1924 59
2012 1 1 1925 8 2 3 1924 4 4 1923 6 1924 7 10 1924 4 1925 5 5 10 6 1924 5 6 7 7 1926 9 /10 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1924 8 2 7 1925 9 16 12646 228 1924 4 3 3 1925 5 22 7 1925 10 9 3 1924 7 14 7 25 6
/ 1 2 1926 2 23 3 1925 1926 4 1920 1912 1923 1 1926 3 8 12785 2 1924 1927 5 2008 336 3 1986 489 4 1986 349 350 61
2012 1 1 1920 2 100006 62 1 2 1920 1919 1928 1923 1923 Collectivism 6 1933 12 22 2004 730 totalism totalitarianism 1994 222 233
Modern Chinese History Studies No. 1 2012 Zhang Yinhuan and Weng Tonghe s Relations with Kang Youwei s Promotion in 1898 Ma Zhongwen 4 Past studies have held that Grand Minister of State Weng Tonghe was the bridge linking the Reform Movement leader Kang Youwei and Emperor Guangxu Weng recommended Kang to Emperor Guangxu and played very important role in the 1898 Reform Movement. However there are no facts to support this viewpoint. The person who really recommended Kang to Guangxu was Zhang Yinhuan Vice-Minister of the Ministry of Finance and Director of the Zongli Yamen. Zhang Yinhuan was the sponsor of Kang Youwei s political activities in Beijing from 1895 to 1898. Zhang not only thoroughly supported Kang s movement to petition Emperor Guangxu after the Jiaozhou Bay Incident but also recommended Kang s reformist books when he was called in by Emperor Guangxu and positively promoted Kang s advancement in rank and position. As a sympathizer Weng Tonghe did give cautious support to Kang in his handling public affairs but he did not recommend Kang. The relationship between Weng and Kang was never very close. The view that Weng Tonghe recommended Kang Youwei first appeared after the Coup of 1898 and the initiator was Kang Youwei in exile abroad. The official view that Weng recommended Kang was product of factionalist struggles in the Qing court after the Coup. The Dilemma of Provincial Administration Systems during the 1911 Revolution Guan Xiaohong 29 The administration systems of most provinces taken over by revolutionaries in 1911 and even the provincial system established by the central government in the early Republican period were adaptations the provincial bureaucratic reform and provincial independence and self-government of the late Qing. How should the relationship between central government and local government be determined in a republican system The key was provincial administration. The public dispute over provincial administration programs in the early Republican period was the longest-lasting and most troublesome issue of the time. It is not suitable for us to look at it just as a contest between democracy and autocracy. We should consider the yearnings of people at the time for national unification and their secret anxieties over regional fragmentation. In Chinese historical culture division and unification were closely related to order chaos rise and decline. The balance and choice between centralization and decentralization of power between appointed bureaucracy and self-government related not only to democracy and autocracy but also to the choice between unification or division. Provinces were too large to be the basic units of self-government so there were no precedents to draw on in either the East or West and neither a unitary system nor a federal system were suitable for China. Therefore during the early Republican period the provincial administration system became the focal point for entanglements between native conditions and foreign systems. This chronic and stubborn disease might yet exert profound influence on reforms of China s political system. Looking at Sun Yat-sen s Judicial Thought and Practice in His Later Years from the Angle of Party Power Politics Li Zaiquan 50 Sun Yat-sen s revolutionary theories changed with the times and his judicial thought therefore changed frequently. After theories of party political power were introduced into China Sun Yat-sen in his late years completed the transformation from sovereign rights belong to the people to sovereign rights belong to party and from natural rights to revolutionary civil rights. Accordingly Sun Yat-sen thought that as one of the ruling powers judicial power should not transcend party politics during the revolutionary period. Instead it should be controlled by the Guomindang. In practice Sun Yat-sen did his best to seek out the path toward the judiciary s party-ization but because of the Guomindang had insufficient power and strength many of its measures for controlling the judiciary just stayed on paper. The Use of The Complete Book of Six Codes in Civil Trials in the Shaaxi-Gansu-Ningxia Border Region An Examination Based on Archives of the Border Region High Court Hu Yongheng 63 160