33 11 Vol. 3 3 No. 11 2 0 1 5 1 1 Hebei Law Science Nov. 2 0 1 5 DOI 10. 16494 /j. cnki. 1002-3933. 2015. 11. 010 1 2 1. 150040 2. 150080 DF51 A 1002-3933 2015 11-0085-16 The Judicial Trial Empirical Analysis on the Right to Decision on Child' s Name REN Jiang 1 ZHANG Xiao-yu 2 1. Law School Harbin University of Science and Technology Harbin 150040 2. Law School Heilongjiang University Harbin 150080 China Abstract The judicial trial empirical analysis shows that China civil legislation should focus on the area of the decision of such children's names who are living with their remarried mothers. The civil law should authorize divorced mothers' independent right to decide their children last name but only can choose between children father's and herself 2015-09-06 www. cnki. net 2015 10 23 1982-1992- 2014 85
when they have the children custody which is a better legislation to equilibrize the children's mothers' fathers'and stepfathers'status rights and benefits help maintain remarried women's family stability more comprehensively protect female's legitimate rights and interests and also be consistently with the spirit of China marriage and family laws. Key words name to right guardianship female legal rights and interests legislative interpretation 22 1981 414 140 19 24 1 140 9 7 2 2 3 7 1 4 6 3 5 3 6 1 7 2 1 22 1981 16 1993 11 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2015 1234567 89 5 125 3678 4 86
19 18 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 5 9 87
36 1 1994 45 16 19 2 1997 1160 16 19 3 1998 258 4 2001 1514 16 19 5 2009 790 18 2 6 2010 703 7 2011 1819 99 1 8 2009 1514 22 9 2013 53 22 23 2009 96 2 2001 45 5 1 2 3 3 1 1 1998 258 88
1 2 22 19 18 2 3 1 1 3 4 4 1997 5 22 19 22 19 1 2 3 4 5 2011 1819 2010 703 1994 45 1993 127 2001 1514 1997 1160 89
22 19 5 16 1 18 2 22 22 22 7 99 1 2 18 99 5 99 1 1 2 1981 16 2004 2009 22 2011 1819 90
7 18 2 18 14 2 22 19 22 19 18 1 2 1 18 1 3 8 9 8 91
22 8 9 2012 7 25 8 22 22 22 22 1980 16 22 9 92
80 90 80 90 7 9 6. 43% 131 131 9 36 167 21. 58% 1 1 93
89 367 1245 89 9 1 2 9 2 + 1 19 104 140 67 1 2 8 2 0 9 0 94
2 *** 1 3 1 4 5 ** 5 4 9 4 * 8 6 14 2 9 1 10 8 ** 8 2 10 9 1 0 1 6 11 1 12 3 16 10 26 7 16 11 27 **** * 67 89 ** *** = + **** 637 10 10 9 4 95
2014 11 1 99 1 22 4 99 1 22 1. 22 2. 3. 18 99 22 4. 1 22 1 20 140 400 96
1 2 2 5 1 2 20 29 2 2 97
1 2 2 3 22 22 1 2 3 7 2 2 27 2 27 2 22 27 1 98
6 3 7 99
1 Frank H. Easterbrook Foreword The Court and the Economic System J. Harvard Law Review 98 4-60 1984. 2. M. 2009. 157-163. 3.. M. 2007. 50-52. 4. J. 2013 3. 5 99 1 22. N. 2014-11-02 02. 6. M. 2008. 377. J. 2012 1. 7. J. 2003 1. J. 2009 1. 20 456 100