47 3 200 5 Journal of Peking UniversityPhilosophy and Social Sciences Vol. 47No. 3 May 200 200062 20 I207. 2 A 000-59920003-0027-2 2009-0- 2 956 2007 20
28 200 979 90 94
3 29 2 3 2 3 979 93 94 94 98 288 289
30 200 2 3 3 2 2008
3 3 3 2 2 3 200 86 69 83
32 200 2 2 200 92
3 33 disenchantment 998 2007
34 200 2008
3 35 949 907 993 2 2 990 20
36 200 20 983
3 37 20 2009 0 Was the Real Hermit Unsighted or the Taoism School Didn t Exist An Brief Exposition on the Objective Understanding and the Compiling of the Literary History Hu Xiaoming Department of Chinese Language and LiteratureEast China Normal UniversityShanghai 200062China AbstractThis paper considers that both Lu Xun and Qian Zhongshu didn t have an positive appraisal of the Chinese hermit literature. Their binary thinkingwhich defined the only two characters of chinese literati helper or hack leaded to such conclusion that chinese literature was all royalist more or less. Their viewpoints were both from top to bottom understanding the issue of hermit in a statecraft perspective while ignoring the ideological history s perspectivethe Confucian Orthodoxy means the tradition of the noble intellectuals which was also very important. Therefore they were successful in seeking the truth without failbut estranged from the hermit tradition in the aspect of general - knowledge. So this paper points out that the very estrangement of the compiler of modern literature history is the most significant change from the ancient to the presentand it is very urgent to reconsider the 20th century s view of literary history for the contemporary academia. Besidesthis paper also reconsiders the real life of the chinese hermits and their ontological meaningand that is from two levelsone is the significance of the Yan - Ling poetic tradition the other is the fact of contemporary hermitic poets. Key wordshermitchinese literary historyyan ZilingLai Gaoxiang 2006