102

103 1 2 3 4 5

104

105 6 7 8

106 9 10

51 70 1 43 65 48 2 48 78 2 78 50 107

108 瑏 瑡 瑏 瑢

109 phenotype 瑏 瑣 瑏 瑤

110 瑏 瑥

瑏 瑦 impersonality Intentional Fallacy Milan Kundera 瑏 瑧 = 瑏 瑨 瑏 瑩 111

瑠 瑐 Mikhail M. Bakhtin 瑡 瑐 瑢 瑐 Wayne C. Booth implied author Kathleen Tillotson second self 瑐 瑣 112

瑐 瑤 roman polyphonique 瑥 瑐 瑦 瑐 113

114 瑐 瑧 瑐 瑨 瑐 瑩

115 瑑 瑠 瑑 瑡 瑑 瑢

habitus ideology 瑑 瑣 瑤 瑑 瑥 瑑 116

瑦 瑑 Andrew H. Plaks 瑑 瑧 瑑 瑨 117

瑩 瑑 Ian P. Watt 瑒 瑠 瑒 瑡 William T. Rowe 118

瑢 瑒 瑣 瑒 瑤 瑒 瑒 瑥 Pierre Nora a will to remember Lieux de Mémoire the site of memory 瑒 瑦 瑒 瑧 瑒 瑨 119

120 / voice

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = 121

瑒 瑩 瑠 瑓 Herbert Marcuse 瑓 瑡 122

瑓 瑢 瑓 瑣 瑓 瑤 瑓 瑥 瑓 瑦 123

124 瑓 瑧 15 2013 3

2 瑏 瑥 2014 3 3 2005 137 4 1998 3 6 1986 36 37 7 2008 424 8 1987 1 9 10 瑏 瑡 瑏 瑢 瑏 瑣 瑏 瑤 2001 144 158 2008 79 80 1988 126 45 2014 6 287 338 125

1981 71 2004 238 2003 290 瑏 瑦 瑐 瑢 瑐 瑧 瑐 瑨 瑑 瑠 René Wellek Austin Waren 1976 65 118 120 120 149 168 瑏 瑧 1995 153 瑏 瑨 瑒 瑡 2004 85 瑏 瑩 瑐 瑩 1986 354 355 235 瑐 瑠 瑓 瑤 2004 45 71 瑐 瑡 瑐 瑥 瑐 瑦 1998 13 29 67 瑐 瑣 1987 81 96 瑐 瑤 83-84 瑑 瑡 Wilfred L. Guerin 1988 35 瑑 瑢 2013 5 126

瑑 瑣 瑑 瑤 瑑 瑥 2008 6 7 1 瑑 瑦 2000 83 瑑 瑧 1996 122 123 瑑 瑨 1995 190 瑑 瑩 2009 85 瑒 瑠 瑒 瑢 瑒 瑣 瑒 瑤 瑒 瑥 瑒 瑦 1992 156 William T. Rowe Ancestral Rites and Political Authority in Late Imperial ChinaChen Hongmou in Jiangxi Modern China October1998 pp. 378-407. Saving the WorldChen Hongmou and Elite Consciousness in Eighteenth- Century China StanfordStanford University Press2001. 2005 5 Louise P. EdwardsMen and Women in Qing ChinaGender in the Red Chamber Dream HonoluluUniversity of Hawaii Press 2001p. 82. 2006 35 2011 12 157-204 Lieux de Mémoire are created by a play of memory and histo- 127

ry an interactions of two factors that resulted in their reciprocal overdetermination. To begin withthere must be a will to remember. Pierre Nora Between History and MemoryLes Lieux de Mémoire. History and Memory in African-American Culture. Trans. Marc Roudebush. Ed. Geneviève Fabre and Robert O'MeallyNew YorkOxford University Press1994 p. 295. 瑒 瑧 where memory crystallizes and secrets itself has occurred at a particular historical momenta turning point where consciousness of a break with the past is bound up with a sense that memory has been torn but torn in such a way as to pose the problem of the embodiment of memory in certain sites where a historical sense of continuity persists. ibid. p. 284. 瑨 瑒 Contrary to historical objectshoweverlieux de Mémoire have no referent in realityorrather they are their own referentpureexclusively self-referential signs. This is not to say that they are without contentphysical presenceor historyit is to suggest that what make them Lieux de Mémoire is precisely that by which they escape from history. ibid. p. 300. 瑒 瑩 1992 1362 瑓 瑠 1977 152 174 瑓 瑡 瑓 瑦 128

瑓 瑢 瑓 瑣 瑓 瑥 瑓 瑧 1992 256 17 2 1999 12 217 248 2000 1985 28 A. Maurois M. Proust 1992 7 28 3 2010 9 99 134 129