* 2014 30 2014 25 * 10AFX003 DOI:10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2015.06.002
2015 6 1 2 3 4 Sinn meaning 1 2 3 4 2014 8 13 2014 2015 3 2014 5 2012 6 2013 1 2015 1 2012 2014 5 2014 6 2015 3 1997-26
5 Johannes P. Muller - - 6 indeterminacy 5 6 1977 92 Hedley Bull The Anarchical Society A Study of Order in World Politics New York Macmillan 1977 21 1996 John Rapley The New Middle Ages Foreign Affairs Vol. 85 No. 3 2006. 27
2015 6 7 8 / / / / / 9 瑏 瑠 瑏 瑡 7 8 9 瑏 瑠 瑏 瑡 See Benjamin N. Cardozo The Nature of the Judicial Process New Haven and London Yale University Press 1949 p. 169. 2009 81-82 1995 1999 67 1999 4 28
Jerome N. Frank Karl N. Llewellyn 瑏 瑢 瑏 瑣 Christopher C. Langdell 瑏 瑤 1932 Louis D. Brandeis 瑏 瑥 瑏 瑢 瑏 瑣 瑏 瑤 瑏 瑥 Jerome Frank Law and Modern Mind New York Bremtano s 1930 p. 98. Cf. also James E. Herget & Stephen Wallace The German Free Law Movement as the Source of American Legal Realism Virginia Law Review Vol. 73 1987 pp. 399-455. William W. Fisher III Morton J. Horwitz and Thomas A. Reed eds. American Legal Realism New York Oxford University Press 1993. Cf. David M. Trubek and John Esser Critical Empiricism' in American Legal Studies Paradox Program or Pandora s Box Law and Social Inquiry Vol. 14 1989 pp. 3ff. 2011 Cited from Christopher C. Langdell A Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts Boston Little Brown & Company 1879 p. viii. See New State Ice Co. v. Liebman 285 U. S. 262 310 311 1932. 1987 245-246 29
2015 6 瑏 瑦 symbolic logic jurimetrics 19 20 1980 瑏 瑧 1984 瑏 瑨 hard social science 瑏 瑩 瑐 瑠 Piero Calamandrei 瑏 瑦 瑏 瑧 瑏 瑨 瑏 瑩 瑐 瑠 1981 1950 William O. Aydelotte 1983 8 1983 5 1984 1 1999 5 Richard Posner Law and Literature A Misunderstood Relation Cambridge MA. Harvard University Press 1988 p. 272. 2002 393 Anatol Rapoport 1983 496-497 30
瑐 瑡 瑐 瑢 瑐 瑣 21 瑐 瑤 瑐 瑡 瑐 瑢 瑐 瑣 瑐 瑤 1976 43 47 50 10 24 29 9 1417 6 2014 4-7 99-102 1988 27 See Neil MacCormick Reconstruction after Deconstruction A Response to CLS Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 10 1990 pp. 553-555. Robert A. Kagen Adversarial Legalism The American Way of Law Cambridge MA. Harvard University Press 2001 p. viii-x. 31
2015 6 瑐 瑥 - 1980 ADR 瑐 瑥 2008 82 32
Stephen Toulmin good reasons approach 瑐 瑦 Robert Alexy 瑐 瑧 - defeasibility 瑐 瑨 20 H. L. A. Hart 瑐 瑦 瑐 瑧 瑐 瑨 Stephen E. Toulmin The Use of Argument Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2003 p. 10. 2006 226 2002 1999 33
2015 6 瑑 瑠 瑑 瑡 瑑 瑢 瑐 瑩 瑐 瑩 瑑 瑠 瑑 瑡 瑑 瑢 Cf. Jordi F. Beltran & Giovanni B. Ratti eds. The Logic of Legal Requirements Essays on Defeasibility Oxford Oxford University Press 2012. Claudia Bloser Mikael Janvid & others eds. Defeasibility in Philosophy Knowledge Agency Responsibility and the Law Amsterdam Editions Rodopi B. V. 2013. H. L. A. Hart The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XLIX 1949 pp. 174ff. 1996 1985 Toulmin The Use of Argument op. cit. p. 131. 34
瑑 瑣 瑑 瑤 瑑 瑣 瑑 瑤 Cf. Owen M. Fiss Objectivity and Interpretation Stanford Law Review Vol. 34 1982 pp. 739ff. See Duncan Kennedy A Semiotics of Legal Argument Syracuse Law Review Vol. 42 1991 pp. 75ff. Cf. also Anne Wagner & Jan M. Broekman eds. Perspects of Legal Semiotics New York Springer 2011. Ferdinand de Saussure 1857-1913 Charles S. Peirce 1839-1914 - - 35
20 / - - 36 2015 6
瑑 瑥 瑑 瑦 瑑 瑧 瑑 瑨 瑑 瑥 瑑 瑦 瑑 瑧 瑑 瑨 2003 69 2006 1 Cf. Ronald Dworkin Taking Rights Seriously Cambridge MA. Harvard University Press 1977 pp. 82ff. 90ff. 1996 238-241 37
瑑 瑩 38 2015 6 瑑 瑩 瑑 瑨 314-315
瑒 瑠 39 瑒 瑠 4 2003
1993 瑒 瑡 40 2015 6 瑒 瑡 1993 1
瑒 瑢 Abstract This article starts from the issue of legal uncertainty along with two basic clues including through dogmatics or scientific technique to abandon the uncertainty and considering system design under the uncertain precondition sort out the discussion between legal hermeneutic and legal sociology and their different strategies and conclude that the nature of legal concept as science legal concept as technique and the law is the core of speech practice. The author supposes that future Chinese issue guiding of interdisciplinary research should focus on the legal discussion especially the legal social scientific study of law should transfer the emphasis from structure and function to the implication of value for real empirical analysis in normative fields at the same time strengthen the communication with legal hermeneutic and legal practical departments. Therefore the author encourages the study method of legal sociology in discussion tries to enhance the discussion of legal methodology and promote the innovation of thought and institution. 瑒 瑢 Philip C. C. Huang Civil Justice in China Representation and Practice in the Qing Stanford University Press 1996 Kevin J. O Brien & Li Lianjiang The Politics of Lodging Complaints in Chinese Villages China Quarterly No. 143 1995 pp. 756-783 Li Lianjiang & Kevin J. O Brien Villagers and Popular Resistance in Contemporary China Modern China No. 22 1996 pp. 28-61 Kevin J. O Brien Rightful Resistance World Politics Vol. 49 No. 1 1996 pp. 31-55. 41