55

2015 4 D822.361.1 A 0452 8832 2015 4 0054-14 14BGJ049 54

55

2015 4 Nick Bisley, Australia and Asia s Trilateral Dilemmas: Between Beijing and Washington? Asian Survey, Vol.54, No.2, March/April 2014, pp.297-298. James Reilly, Counting on China? Australia s Strategic Response to Economic Interdependence, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol.5, 2012, p.370. 56

Australian Government, Australia in the Asian Century White Paper, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, October 2012, pp.114-128. Alex Oliver, The Lowy Institute Poll 2013: Australia and the World, Lowy Institute for International Policy, June 2013, p.6. Ibid., pp.5-19. Alex Oliver, The Lowy Institute Poll 2015: Australia and the World, Lowy Institute for International Policy, June 2015, pp.8-9. Alex Oliver, The Lowy Institute Poll 2013: Australia and the World, p.19. ergus Hanson, Australia and New Zealand in the World :Public Opinion and Foreign Policy, Lowy Institute for International Policy, 2012, quote from Weihua Liu and Yufan Hao, Australia in China s Grand Strategy, Asian Survey, Vol.54, No.2, March/April 2014, p.388 57

2015 4 James Reilly, Counting on China? Australia s Strategic Response to Economic Interdependence, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 5, 2012, pp.388-389. Alex Oliver, The Lowy Institute Poll 2015: Australia and the World, p.8. Alex Oliver, The Lowy Institute Poll 2014: Australia and the World, Lowy Institute for International Policy, June 2014, p.14. 58

Alex Oliver, The Lowy Institute Poll 2015: Australia and the World, pp.9-10. Ross Babbage, Australia s Strategic Edge in 2030, Kokoda Papers, No.15, February 2011, pp.4-119. http:// www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn/fyrbt_602243/jzhsl_602247/t877838.shtml 59

2015 4 Philip Wen, Diplomatic Conventions the Order of the Day in Julie Bishop and Wang Yi Meeting, The Sydney Morning Herald, April 9, 2014, http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/ diplomatic-conventions-the-order-of-the-day-in-julie-bishop-and-wang-yi-meeting-20140409-zqstt. html. Hugh White, Power Shift: Australia s Future between Washington and Beijing, Quarterly Essay 39, September 2010, p.62. 60

61

2015 4 Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia s Trade in Goods and Services 2013-2014, http://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/trade-investment/australias-trade-ingoods-and-services/pages/australias-trade-in-goods-and-services-2013-14.aspx. http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ae/ai/201506/20150601015183.shtml 62

Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia s Trade in Goods and Services 2013-2014. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, International Investment Australia 2013, October 2014, p.5. Australian Department of Defense, Defending Australia in the Asia-Pacific Century: Force 2030, pp.30-32, http://www.defence.gov.au/whitepaper2009/docs/defence_white_paper_2009.pdf. 63

2015 4 Australian Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Strong and Secure: A Strategy for Australia s National Security, January 23, 2013, p.22. U.S.Department of Defense, Hagel Lauds U.S.-Australia Force Posture Agreement, August 13, 2014, http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=122910. http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2014-08/13/c_126865737.htm Australian Department of Defense, Minister for Defense-Joint Statement-Japan-US-Australia Defense Ministers Meeting, May 30, 2015, http://www.minister.defence.gov.au/2015/05/30/ministerfor-defence-japan-us-australia-defense-ministers-meeting-joint-statement/. 64

Australian Department of Defense, Defending Australia in the Asia-Pacific Century: Force 2030, pp.13-14. Australian Department of Defense, Defense Annual Report 2013-2014, October 2014, p.8. Stephen Smith, Speech at National Institute for Defense Studies, Tokyo, September 2012. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Agreement Between the Government of Japan and the Government of Australia Concerning the Transfer of Defence Equipment and Technology, July 8, 2014, http://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_000349.html. Justin McCurry, Japan Security Council Approves Bid to Build Australian Submarines, The Guardian, May 19, 2015, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/19/japan-security-councilapproves-bid-to-build-australian-submarines. 65

2015 4 Minister for Foreign Affairs, 5th Japan-Australia 2+2 Foreign and Defense Ministerial Consultations, June 12, 2014, http://foreignminister.gov.au/releases/pages/2014/jb_mr_140612a. aspx?ministerid=4. Mark Beeson and Yong Wang, Australia, China, and the U.S. in an Era of Interdependence: Irreconcilable Interests, Inadequate Institutions? Asian Survey, Vol.54, No.3, May/June 2014, p.581. 66

67

Australia s Hedging Strategy on China Wei Zongyou Facing China s rise and the complicated situation in the Asia Pacific, Australia adopts a foreign policy in which hedging on China is a noticeable characteristic. On one hand, Australia continues to enhance political and economic relations with China. On the other hand, it consolidates its security alliance with U.S. and strengthens economic and security relations with regional powers like Japan. Meanwhile, it participates actively in regional institution building. By these means, Australia tries to expand its strategic space of diplomacy and ensure economic prosperity and national security. China s External Economic Environment in the Next Five Years and New Thinking of Opening Up Zhen Bingxi & Li Xiaoyu China s external economic environment in the next five years will take on three features: a new round of modest growth, new trends in globalization, and complication of great power competition. In the same period, the pace and scale of China s goingout strategy are expected to rise unprecedentedly. It is extremely important for China to have accurate comprehension of the external economic environment and manage opportunities and challenges well for continuous development and integration into world economy. Under such circumstances, China had better develop new thinking of the opening up strategy, set new strategic targets, push forward reform in major fields, and promote the level of service in support of further opening up. The Belt and Road Initiative for India: Walking Alone or Dancing with China? Gan Junxian India has a complex perception of the Belt and Road Initiative. India suggests programs like the Monsoon Plan and the Cotton Route in order to gain independent voice in the field of connectivity. Despite the goal to dominate the Indian Ocean, due to the limited economic scale of other countries in the region, the Indian Ocean is not able to accommodate the expansion of India s economy, nor can it become the ideal stage for India to realize its great-nation dream. To release its economic potentials, India must walk out of the Indian Ocean region and promote connectivity with Northeast Asia and Europe. The Belt and Road Initiative is in line with the developing interests of India. The Initiative s vast inclusiveness and huge impact on Asia-European trade will prompt India to participate in cooperation more actively. In future, India will pursue strategic independence and continue to push forward connectivity plans centered on itself. At the same time, India will choose to catch up with the Belt and Road Initiative and achieve a strategy joint to China s. 132