Panel 3 Jiarui Liu ENGLISH CHINESE.pptx

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Panel 3 Jiarui Liu ENGLISH CHINESE.pptx"

亦遐丁
5 years ago
Views:

Candidate Stanford Law School 选 Email 电邮 :

1 Jiarui Liu 刘 Assistant Professor of Law University of New Hampshire School of Law J.S.D. Candidate Stanford Law School 选电邮 : jiarui.liu@law.unh.edu Mobile 动电话码 : (650)

2 Does Chinese copyright law include any safe harbors for ISPs? 络务风 Do the safe harbors provide extra protection for ISPs beyond traditional copyright law? 风为络务护 Do ISPs have any incentive to comply with the requirement under the safe harbors? 络务动风规

4 First generation cases direct liability 责 Sony v. Chinamp3 ( 诉纪 Pushsound v. Baidu (2005) ( 乐传诉讯

5 Second generation cases no liability 责 Sony BMG v. Baidu (2006)(SONY BMG 乐娱乐诉讯 (2005) 10170

6 Third generation cases indirect liability 间责 Sony BMG v. Yahoo! China (2007)(SONY BMG 乐娱乐诉术 2007) 终 1239

Observations and Comments 评论 US influences 1995 White Paper (Intellectual Property and National Information Infrastructure) Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On- Line Communication Servs., Inc.

7 Observations and Comments 评论 US influences 1995 White Paper (Intellectual Property and National Information Infrastructure) Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On- Line Communication Servs., Inc., 907 F. Supp (N.D. Cal. 1995). Perfect 10 v. Google, Inc., 416 F. Supp. 2d 828 (C.D. Cal. 2006) ( incorporation Test and server test ) Strict liability v. indirect liability 严责间责 Linking network communication 链络传 Contributory infringement Subjective fault 观过错 Actual knowledge v. constructive knowledge 应

9 Leading cases Ci Wen v. Shu Lian (2008) ( 视诉联软术 2006 终 355 ) Zhong Kai v. Shu Lian (2008) ( 东凯发诉联软术 2008() 终 7 ) Pushsound v. Kuro (2006) ( 乐传诉飞乐软发 (2005) 13739)

10 Observations and Comments 评论 US influences A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (2001) MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 545 U.S. 913 (2005) Contributory infringement (Napster) Three- element test Capable of substantial non- infringing uses & actual knowledge 实质 No patent counterpart under Chinese law 专 Inducement infringement (Grokster) 诱导 Advertisement & no filtering 过滤 Inducing what infringement? uploading v. downloading 诱导载载 Downloading is not infringement under Chinese Copyright Law 载构

12 Leading cases Xin Chuan v. Quan Tu Dou (2008) ( 传线术诉 2008() 终 62) Wang Le v. Quan Tu Dou (2009) ( 乐联诉络 2009() 终 19) Hai Dao v. Qian Jun (2010) ( 岛资询诉钧络 2010 终 06109

Observations and Comments: 评论 Comparable US cases with opposite outcomes Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F. 3d (2 nd Cir. 2012) UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners (9 th Cir.

13 Observations and Comments: 评论 Comparable US cases with opposite outcomes Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F. 3d (2 nd Cir. 2012) UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners (9 th Cir. 2013) Three elements absent in the US cases: 处 Duty of censorship 审查义务 Separate channels for TV Shows and Movies and Originals 电电视频创频 General knowledge that the infringing content is prevalent in certain channels gives rise to a legal duty to affirmatively monitor the uploaded content therein 晓产对载动审查义务

14 Safe harbors are usually unavailable WHY? 为风 Safe Harbor III (Article 22) Hosting (comparable to 512(c)) 储风 Indicates that the information storage space is provided for users and publishes its own name, contact person and IP address; 标该储间为务对络务联络 Does not modify the content uploaded; 变务对录录 Does not know and has no reason to know the infringement ( red flag ); 应务对录录 Does not obtain any direct economic benefit; and 务对录录获经济 Promptly removes the infringing content upon receipt of notification 书规删认为录录

Safe Harbor IV (Article 23) Information Location Tool (comparable to 512(d)) 风 Not liable for any damages if it promptly removes the link to the infringing content upon receipt of

15 Safe Harbor IV (Article 23) Information Location Tool (comparable to 512(d)) 风 Not liable for any damages if it promptly removes the link to the infringing content upon receipt of notification 书规录录链赔偿责 Notwithstanding, it should assume joint and several liability if it knows or should know the infringement 应链录录应责 Limitation of liability or rule for liability? 责还归责

16 Thank You! 谢谢

ISP ISP ISP ICP Internet Content Providers ICP primary /direct infringement ISP user - generated ISP ISP secondary /indirect infringement ISP 1993 Fre

ISP ISP ISP ICP Internet Content Providers ICP primary /direct infringement ISP user - generated ISP ISP secondary /indirect infringement ISP 1993 Fre * 2011 1 1998 DMCA 2 512 safe harbor ISP 3 notification counter notification ISP * 1 2 3 122 13MSFJD82003 2013M531159 http / /www. chinacourt. org /article /detail /id /478940. shtml 2013 11 3 Charlotte