Ξ :,,, ;,, :,, :,,, 1,, 2 :,, :, 3,,,,,,,,,,, Ξ 1, :, 1999 5 2 :, 1998 4 3 4,1955,532 20
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 4,,, ;, 5,,,,,,,, :,,,, 6,,,,, :, 7 :, 8, : 9,,,,,, 10, 11,,,,,,,,, : 4 [] :,1963,240 5 [] :,1987,464 6 []:,1985,131 7 [] :,1980,41 8 7,,24 9 []:,1986,663 10[] :,1986,81 11 4,,,255 21
2000 2 :,, 12,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :, ;, 13,,,,, 1688, 14, : 15,,,,, 16,,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,, 12 4,,,293 13[] :,1964,77 14[] :,1990,18 15[] :, 1993,69 16[] :,1959,125,, 22
,,,,,,,, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 17,,,,,,, ( ),,, 18,,,,, 19,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?,,, 20 17,,,,,, 18:,1996,536 19:,1997,71 20[]:,1993,83 23
2000 2 :,, :,,,,,,,,, 21,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,,,,,;,,,,, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?,,, 21[] :,1958,100 24
,, : 22, :,, 23,,,,,,,,,,, :,,,,,,, ; 24,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,, 22 6,,163 23[] :,1983,4 243,153 25
2000 2,,,, :,,,,,, 25,, ;, ;,;, ;, 26 :,, 27,,,, (Democracy) (Science),(Liberty) 1949,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,,,,,,,,,, 25:,1996,37 26 27 26
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :, 28, :,,,,,,,,,,,, 29,,,,,,,,,:,, ;,,,,,,,,,, (,?),,, 27 28 29 13,,,16 :,1981,276
2000 2 30,, :,,,,,,,, 31,, 32,, :, 33,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 34,, ; 30 13,,,35 31[] :,1996,9 32[] :,1961,154 331,71 34[]: (), 1997,190 28
,,,,,,, 35??,()? :,,,,,,,,,,, 36,,,,,,,,,, 37,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,,,,, 38,,,,,, 39, 40,,,,, 35[] :,1992,25 36[] :, 1991,31 37:,1991,51 38 32,,,188 39 2, 40[] :,1987,72,1983,399 29
2000 2,,,:,,,, 41,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 42,,, :, ;, 43,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 44 :, 45,(),, 46,,,,,,,,,,,, 47,,, 41 34, (),199 42 34, (),201 43 44 451,82 46,, 47 34, (),25 30
,,,,;,,,,,,,,,, 48, 29 2 :,,, :,;,, 2 :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,, 1979,, :,,, 49,1979,,,,, 34 (1908 ), 48 36,,46 49:,1981,126 31
2000 2 :, 2 (1910 ) :,,,,,,,,,,, 50,,,, 51,,,,,,,, 52 20 1997,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?,,,, :,, 53,?,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,( ),:,;, ( ) ;, 54 50[]:,1987 4,86 51:,1998,576 52: (), 1985,1807 53,1820,,,, 54 14,,177 32
,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 55,,,,,,,,, 56,,,,,,, ;,, Abstract :The relation between individual f reedom and social order is unity of opposite, China criminal law must choose individual f reedom firstly. Social order is t he second choice. If individu2 al freedom is the first choice of China criminal law and social order is the second choice of China criminal law, The relationship between individual f reedom and social order is harmonious, ot her2 wise it is opposite, and both individual freedom and social order will be lose. 55,,,,,,,,,, ;,,,, 56 51,,541 33