Microsoft Word 陈啟荣-二校

Similar documents
Microsoft Word _刘丽丽-二校

Microsoft Word 付艳梅-二校

Microsoft Word 冯晓青 二校 出1827

Microsoft Word 张群-二校 出2020

Microsoft Word 史晓梅-二校

Microsoft Word 蔡伟江-二校

Microsoft Word - 20-罗方方-冯_new_.doc

Microsoft Word 戚美静 二校出2523

g ml 10% ph 色谱条件 kinetex C μm 100 A 4. 6 mm 150 mm 25 5 μl A B 10 mmol /L ml /min

Microsoft Word - 4期中文目次.doc

Microsoft Word 樊 祥_二校 76 77

Microsoft Word 黄志强-二校回

Microsoft Word 薛昆鹏-二校

Microsoft Word 李秀英 二校

Microsoft Word 周红英 二校%

Microsoft Word 林涛-二校回出2283、2287

Microsoft Word 马 姜-出3355

中 草 药 Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 第 5 卷 第 1 期 201 年 1 月 51 其 他 试 剂 均 为 分 析 纯 对 照 品 栀 子 苷 ( 批 号 ) 甘 草 苷 ( 批 号 ) 连 翘 酯 苷

Microsoft Word 李 菊-二校

Microsoft Word doc

5, : 引言,,,, [1-4], 2008~2010, 117, 59%, 12.8%,,, [5],,, [6-8],, 2 茶叶农残检测方法标准现状 2.1 农药残留限量指标, ( ) GB 2763, , GB [9], 5 ; 10 ; GB

Microsoft Word 马灵飞-二校.doc

Microsoft Word 聂雪梅.doc

材 料 与 方 法 仪 器 ACQUITY UPLC Xevo TQ-S 三 重 四 级 杆 液 质 联 用 仪 ( 美 国 Waters 公 司 ); 电 喷 雾 离 子 源 (ESI), Masslynx 4.1 数 据 处 理 系 统 (Waters);Thermo 低 温 离 心 机 ;KQ

标题

Microsoft Word 官咏仪-二校 2247

Microsoft Word 李梦怡-二校

Microsoft Word 王德伟-二校 3088

, GC/MS ph GC/MS I

Microsoft Word _王潇-二校

Microsoft Word 陈永平-----参考文献标号错误.doc

Microsoft Word 陈彩云-二校

Microsoft Word - 8 期中文目次.doc

相 对 校 正 因 子 的 相 关 方 法 1.1 内 标 多 控 法 研 究 发 现, 在 中 药 各 成 分 间 存 在 着 一 定 的 比 例 关 系, 只 要 各 成 分 的 量 符 合 该 比 例 关 系, 中 药 的 多 [6] 指 标 质 量 控 制 可 以 依 此 法

Microsoft Word 唐穗平-二校

Microsoft Word 袁 烁二校2871

Microsoft Word 李莉-二校933

Microsoft Word 王汉卿 二校 出1817

Microsoft Word 出1870

Microsoft Word 高宏-二校-有修改

Microsoft Word 杜娟 二校

Microsoft Word 刘印平-二校 出3836-

标题

PCA+LDA 14 1 PEN mL mL mL 16 DJX-AB DJ X AB DJ2 -YS % PEN

Microsoft Word 吴益春

H 2 SO ml ml 1. 0 ml C 4. 0 ml - 30 min 490 nm 0 ~ 100 μg /ml Zhao = VρN 100% 1 m V ml ρ g

Microsoft Word 李秀英-二校

Microsoft Word _editing.doc

<4D F736F F D D DBACEC0F25FD0A3B6D4B8E55F2DB6FED0A32D2D2DC8A5B5F4CDBCD6D0B5C4BBD8B3B5B7FBBAC52E646F63>

Microsoft Word 何曼莉-二校

Microsoft Word 陈士恒-二校(改动)出1130

Microsoft Word 滕妙珠-二校

Microsoft Word _梁国华_二校

Microsoft Word _排版-二校-有改动

Microsoft Word 徐幸-new_校对稿_

Microsoft Word 胡彩霞.doc

Microsoft Word 李 硕-二校 出640,641

Microsoft Word 何京澄-校对_1_-3802

Microsoft Word 王似锦-二校 681

Microsoft Word _孙 亮_二校出3098、3102

<4D F736F F D203231D3A4D3D7B6F9CAB3C6B7BACDC8E9C6B7D6D0D6ACB7BEB5C4B2E2B6A82E646F63>

<4D F736F F D D BBDDDCBFBBAA2DC8B1C9D9D5D5C6AC2BD5AAD2AACECACCE22E646F63>

Microsoft Word 刁飞燕-二校938

Microsoft Word 叶少文-二校-出3129、3130、3131、3132

ph ph ph Langmuir mg /g Al 2 O 3 ph 7. 0 ~ 9. 0 ph HCO - 3 CO 2-3 PO mg /L 5 p

<D2BDC1C6BDA1BFB5CDB6C8DAD7CAB8DFB7E5C2DBCCB3B2CEBBE1C3FBB5A52E786C7378>

Microsoft Word

Microsoft Word 二校

Microsoft Word 王建凤-

Microsoft Word 张军-二校.doc

Microsoft Word 何珊丽-new

Microsoft Word 郑荣.doc

Microsoft Word 蒋越华_二校

untitled

Microsoft Word _排版 二校

Microsoft Word 王德伟-二校

[1] Nielsen [2]. Richardson [3] Baldock [4] 0.22 mm 0.32 mm Richardson Zaki. [5-6] mm [7] 1 mm. [8] [9] 5 mm 50 mm [10] [11] [12] -- 40% 50%

<4D F736F F D D D6ECD0A1BAEC2D2D2D2D2DB2CEBFBCCEC4CFD7D3A2CEC4B7ADD2EBB8F1CABDC3BBD3D0B6D4A1AD>

标题

Microsoft Word 吴 健-二校

Microsoft Word 刘章-二校

Microsoft Word 李 莹-二校.doc

Microsoft Word 刘辉-二校

Microsoft Word 王绍青二校

Microsoft Word doc

Microsoft Word 郝鹏飞-二校

Microsoft Word 叶少文_二校 出4189

Microsoft Word 李增梅-二校 出1001,1002,1003

Microsoft Word 张喜金-二校 出3109、3111

Microsoft Word 吴映璇-二校 出1842、1843请不要动版

Microsoft Word 孙稚菁-二校 出3371

Microsoft Word 高家敏.doc

<4D F736F F D D C0EEC3CEC0E82DB6FED0A32DD3D0B2CAD2B32DD0A3B6D45FB0D75F>

doc

s 15 contact s W Si 3 N μm N / m 4 AFM 95% AFM WPOJ UPOJ WPOJ UPOJ 260 ~ 280 nm WPOJ-DS UPOJ-DS 1 cm 1 cm DEAE-ce

* CUSUM EWMA PCA TS79 A DOI /j. issn X Incipient Fault Detection in Papermaking Wa

Microsoft Word 魏茂琼-二校 出3673

Microsoft Word 竺巧玲.doc

4.1 液 相 色 谱 - 三 重 四 极 杆 质 谱 联 用 仪 4.2 天 平 4.3 超 声 波 清 洗 仪 4.4 离 心 机 4.5 涡 旋 混 合 仪 5 分 析 步 骤 5.1 标 准 系 列 溶 液 的 制 备 分 别 精 密 吸 取 10.0 µg/ml 的 标 准 工 作 溶 液

Microsoft Word 游景水-二校 4671.doc

Transcription:

7 4 Vol. 7 No. 4 2016 4 Journal of Food Safety and Quality Apr., 2016-26 陈啟荣 *, 杨明, 梁颖, 朱琳娜, 邵鹏, 范筱京 (,, 100089) 摘要 : 目的 - 26 方法,, 结果,, 26 0.04~1.6 µg/ml 0.005~0.05 mg/kg, 0.015~0.15 mg/kg, 66.6%~125.5%, 0.3%~6.4%(n=5) 结论, 关键词 : ; ; ; Determination of 26 pesticides in tea by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with multi-walled carbon nanotubes as solid-phase CHEN Qi-Rong *, YANG Ming, LIANG Ying, ZHU Ling-Na, SHAO Peng, FAN Xiao-Jing (Beijing Center for Physical and Chemical Analysis, Beijing Engineering Research Center of Food Safety Analysis, Beijing 100089, China) ABSTRACT: Objective To determine 26 pesticides in tea by solid-phase extraction with multi-walled carbon nanotubes and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Methods The sample was extracted with acetonitrile. After purified by multi-walled carbon nanotubes, the sample solution was detected by GC-MS. Results The established method was simple, and could reduce the pesticides decomposition in pretreatment. The calibration curves of 26 pesticides were linear in the range of 0.04~1.6 µg/ml. The limits of detection for 26 pesticides in tea were in the range of 0.005~0.05 mg/kg, and their limits of quantitation were 0.015~0.15 mg/kg. The spiked recoveries of 26 pesticides in tea sample were between 66.6% and 125.5% with relative standard deviations of 0.3%~6.4% (n=5). Conclusion The proposed method is rapid, accurate and sensitive, which is suitable for simultaneous detection of multiple pesticides. KEY WORDS: multi-walled carbon nanotubes; tea; pesticides; gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry 基金项目 : (PXM 2013_178305_000004) Fund: Supported by Beijing Financial Found Project on Creative Engineer Project (PXM 2013_178305_000004) * 通讯作者 : 啟,, E-mail: qrchen@163.com *Corresponding author: CHEN Qi-Rong, Senior Engineer, Beijing Center for Physical and Chemical Analysis, No.27, West Third Ring Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100089, China. E-mail: qrchen@163.com

4 啟, : - 26 1687 1 引言 2 材料与方法, [1], 16, 19 GB 2763-2014 [2], 0.1~20 mg/kg,, GB/T 5009.103 [3], GB/T 5009.19 [4], GB/T 23204 [5], [6-8] [9] [10] [11],,,,, C 18, π π-π,, [12-17] [16] [18,19], [20,21],,,, 26,,,, 2.1 仪器与试剂 Agilent 7890/5975C - ( ); CR22GⅢ ( Hitachi ) α- β- γ- δ- pp - op - pp - pp -, 100 µg/ml, ;, Fisher m-pfc, 10 mg 150 mg 2.2 试验方法 2.2.1 溶液配制 : 8, 0.08 0.16 0.4 0.8 1.6 µg/ml; α-, β- γ-, δ-, pp -, op -, pp -, pp -,,,,,,,,,, 18, 0.04 0.08 0.16 0.4 0.8 µg/ml 2.2.2 样品前处理 1, 200 g,,,, 2 ( ) 5.0 g( 0.001 g), 10 ml,,, 10 ml, 2, 40, 2 ml, 3,,

1688 7,, 2.2.3 气相色谱 - 质谱条件 (1) : HP-5MS (30 m 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm); : 60, 1 min, 30 /min 160, 2 min, 30 /min 300, 10 min; 280 ; :, 1.0 ml/min; (2) (EI) ; 70 ev; 230 ; 280 ;, 5 min, 1, 1 3 结果与分析 3.1 质谱条件优化,,, 26, : 60, 1 min, 30 /min 160, 2 min, 30 /min 300, 10 min; 280 ; :, 1.0 ml/min; 26,, 1 1 Fig. 1 Chromatogram of standard Table 1 表 1 被测农药的测定参数 Detection parameters of target pesticides (min) (m/z) (m/z) 1 5.533 109 145 185 220 2 5.596 94 95 141 126 3 7.524 94 95 136 142 4 11.295 121 75 97 231 5 α- 11.496 219 183 221 254 6 11.970 87 93 125 229 7 β- 12.423 219 181 254 217

4 啟, : - 26 1689 (min) (m/z) (m/z) 续表 1 8 γ- 12.617 183 219 221 254 9 δ- 13.676 219 181 183 217 10 15.781 277 109 125 260 11 16.325 314 197 258 286 12 16.811 136 230 289 13 16.926 139 141 250 252 14 pp - 20.016 318 316 246 248 15 pp - 21.589 235 237 199 165 16 op - 22.911 235 199 165 17 pp - 23.012 235 199 165 18 24.73 181 165 166 19 25.085 181 209 265 349 20 26.687 181 197 208 21 28.204, 28.467 183 163 165 255 22 29.914, 30.138, 30.229 163 152 181 23 30.269, 30.658 199 157 451 24 31.642 167 181 225 419 25 31.9, 32.043 250 181 252 26 32.748, 33.101 181 172 174 253 3.2 提取溶剂的选择 26, - - 3, -,, ;,,,, ;,, 3.3 净化条件的优化 1.0 µg/ml,,, 1~2,, 3~5 3 4 5,,, 3 3.4 精密度和准确度, 8 0.08~1.6 µg/ml, 0.04~16 µg/ml S/N=3, S/N=10, 2 5,

1690 7 0.3%~6.4%,, 5%, 0.08 0.32 0.80 mg/kg, 5,, 2, 66.6%~125.5%, 0.3%~6.4%,,,, 2, 1, 3 Table 2 表 2 农药标准溶液的回归方程及样品加标回收率 (n=5) Regression equations of standards and their recoveries at different spiked concentrations (n=5) (r 2 ) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Y=24980X-615.6 0.998 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 83.4, 81.3, 107.4 5.1, 3.8, 4.1 Y=30350X-1992 0.996 0.02 0.06 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 91.2, 102.7, 111.5 3.7, 4.0, 4.6 Y-=1728X-2.23 0.993 0.02 0.06 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 85.9, 90.9, 115.9 1.2, 0.3, 0.5 Y=23880X+145 0.999 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 98.4, 94.6, 118.3 3.9, 4.5, 4.2 α- Y=24330X-143 0.999 0.005 0.015 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 90.5, 89.9, 110.6 4.8, 3.9, 6.2 Y=5670X-170 0.991 0.02 0.06 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 84.1, 72.8, 90.9 1.5, 0.5, 1.0 β- Y=19660X-372.3 0.999 0.005 0.015 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 87.2, 86.1, 120.3 4.8, 2.8, 3.2 γ- Y=25400 X -421.6 0.999 0.005 0.015 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 88.9, 83.4, 103.5 0.8, 1.6, 2.3 δ- Y =11780 X -565.2 0.993 0.005 0.015 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 90.2, 86.1, 100.9 1.5, 0.7, 1.6 Y =4307 X -824 0.998 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 84.2, 73.9, 123.1 0.9, 1.8, 2.8 Y =12900 X -35.37 0.998 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 70.4, 66.6, 99.9 5.1, 4.0, 4.5 Y =27400 X -1.81 0.993 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 78.9, 86.1, 109.4 4.2, 3.5, 4.2 Y =77620 X -1970 0.999 0.02 0.06 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 84.1, 72, 115.7 4.2, 0.9, 5.0 pp - Y =37210 X -400.6 0.998 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 73.4, 70.3, 117.6 4.6, 3.1, 4.0 pp - Y =156500 X -4585 0.998 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 69.4, 72.5, 110.5 3.8, 4.2, 6.4 op - Y =47270 X -1424 0.995 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 81.2, 80.2, 109.9 2.9, 3.1, 5.5 pp - Y =15281 X -4215 0.996 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 79.0, 81.2, 119.2 3.1, 4.1, 3.8 Y =204500 X -6842 0.997 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 79.8, 77.6, 116.3 2.9, 3.5, 4.4 Y =28480 X -1129 0.994 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 84.9, 77.2, 106.1 2.9, 2.7, 3.5 Y =30230 X -1463 0.997 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 90.4, 88, 118.8 4.1, 2.6, 3.7 Y =17500 X -449.8 0.997 0.02 0.06 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 77.2, 85.2, 116.1 5.3, 3.4, 5.0 Y =7121 X -320.7 0.992 0.01 0.03 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 80.5, 74.1, 102.5 1.9, 2.4, 3.3 Y =19880 X -1107 0.995 0.05 0.15 0.32, 0.80 84.1, 78, 97.5 2.9, 3.1, 4.5 Y =21630 X -9869.8 0.998 0.02 0.06 0.08, 0.32, 0.80 7 1.9, 82, 125.5 1.9, 2.1, 2.4 Y =18540 X -811.8 0.999 0.05 0.15 0.32, 0.80 76.8, 87.5, 94.5 2.8, 1.6, 2.3 Y =14270 X -718.7 0.994 0.05 0.15 0.32, 0.80 82.1, 70.0, 94.7 1.9, 2.3, 1.9

4 啟, : - 26 1691 2 Fig. 2 Chromatogram of tea sample Fig. 3 3 Chromatogram of blank sample 4 结论,,,,,,,,, 26 0.04~1.6 µg/ml 0.005~0.05 mg/kg, 0.015~0.15 mg/kg, 66.6%~125.5%, 0.3%~6.4% 参考文献 [1] 199 [R]. The ministry of agriculture of the People s Republic of China announcement NO.199 [R]. [2] GB 2763-2014 [S]. GB 2763-2014 National food safety standard maximum residue

1692 7 limits for pesticides in food [S]. [3] GB/T5009.103-2003 [S]. GB/T5009.103-2003 Determination of methamidophos and acepate pesticide residues in vegetable foods [S]. [4] GB/T5009.19-2008 [S]. GB/T5009.19-2008 Determination of organochlorine pesticide multiresidues in foods [S]. [5] GB/T23204-2008 519 - [S]. GB/T23204-2008 Determination of 519 pesticides and related chemicals residues in tea GC-MS method [S]. [6],,. - 25 [J]., 2013, 4: 16 22. Zhang Q, Chen SH, Yang YT. Determination of 25 organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticide residues in tea by dispersive solid phase extraction-gas chromatography [J]. Anal Instrum, 2013, 4: 16 22. [7],,,. - 27 [J]., 2014, 35(10): 174 178. Pao ZF, Guan XL, Xie JL, et al. Rapid Determination of 27 kinds of common halogen-containing pesticide residues in tea by dispersive solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography [J]. Food Sci, 2014, 35(10): 174 178. [8],,,. 20 GC-μECD [J]., 2011, 30(10): 115 119. Ye JL, Jin GE, Zhuang WE, et al. Determination of 20 pesticide residues in tea by DSPE and GC-μECD [J]. Chin J Anal Lab, 2011, 30(10): 115 119. [9],,,. - - [J]., 2009, 28(1): 80 83. Hu BZ, Shen GJ, Shao TF, et al. Determination of organochlorine and pyrethroid peaticide residues in tea by accelerated solvent extraction and gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization-mass spectrometry [J]. Chin J Anal Lab, 2009, 28(1): 80 83. [10],,,. - - 23 [J]., 2013, 19(4): 206 213. Yan HF, Li YJ, Wang ML, et al. Residual analysis of 23 pesticides in tea by microwave assisted extraction dispersive solid phase extraction purification and gas chromatography-mass mpectrometry [J]. Anal Testing Technol Instrum, 2013, 19(4): 206 213. [11],,,. 17 [J]., 2009, 30(10): 321 323. Liu XW, Gao X, Xiao C, et al. Determination of 17 organophosphorus pesticide residues in pure tea by gas chromatography[j]. Sci Technol Food Ind, 2009, 30(10): 321 323. [12] Niu H, Shi Y, Cai Y, et a1. Solid-phase extraction of sulfony lurea herbicides form water samples with single-walled carbon nanotubes disk [J]. Mierochim Acta, 2008, 164(3 4): 431 438. [13] Katsumata H, Matsumoto T, Kaneco S, et a1. Preeoneentration of diazinon using multiwalled carbon nanotubes as solid phase extraction adsorbents [J]. Microchem J, 2008, 88(1): 82 86. [14] Wang S, Zhao P, Min C, et a1. Multi-residue determination of pesticides in water using multi-walled carbon nanotubes solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography - mass spectrometry [J]. J Chromatogr A. 2007, 1165(1 2): 166 171. [15],. [J]., 2004, 23(Z1): 258 261. Zhang LJ, Xie WM. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a solid-phase extravtion adsorbent for the determination of OCPs in water [J]. J Instrum Anal, 2004, 23(Z1): 258 261. [16] Min G, Wang S, Zhu H, et a1. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes as solid-phase extraction adsorbents for determ ination of atrazine and its principal metabolites in water and soil samples by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2008, 396(1): 79 85. [17],,. [J]., 2008, 27(5): 493 496. Wang Y, Zhi XX, Zhang LJ. Determination of polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides in water by GC with multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a solid-phase extraction adsorbent [J]. J Instrum Anal, 2008, 27(5): 493 496. [18],,,. [J]., 2011, 29(5): 443 449. Zhao HX, Jia YX, Ding MY, et a1. Analysis of organochlorine pesticides and pyrethroid pesticides in vegetables by gas chro-matography-electron capture detection coupled with solid-phase extraction using multiwalled carbon nanotubes as adsorbent [J]. Chin J Chromatogr, 2011, 29(5): 443 449. [19],,,. - 4 [J]., 2012, 30(9): 966 970.

4 啟, : - 26 1693 Peng XJ, Pang JS, Deng AH, et a1. Determination of the trace residues of four organochlorine pesticides in agricultural products by high performance liquid chromatography with modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes as solid phase extraction adsorbent [J]. Chin J Chromatogr, 2012, 30(9): 966 970. [20] Zhao PY, Wang L, Jiang YP, et al. Dispersive cleanup of acetoni-trile extracts of tea samples by mixed multiwalled carbon nano-tubes, primary secondary amine and graphitized carbon blacksorbents [J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2012, 60(16): 4026 4033. [21],,,. - [J]., 2014, 5(4): 1147 1154. Feng YC, Ma LL, Jia L, et al. Determination of glyphosate, glufosinate and aminomethylphonic acid residues in tea by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as dispersive solid-phase extraction sorbent [J]. J Food Saf Qual, 2014, 5(4): 1147 1154. 作者简介 ( 责任编辑 : 金延秋 ) 陈啟荣, 硕士, 高级工程师, 主要研究方向食品安全检测 E-mail: qrchen@163.com 食品与现代生物技术 专题征稿函,,,,,,,,, 2016 5,,, 2016 4 30 Email 投稿方式 : : www.chinafoodj.com Email: jfoodsq@126.com 食品安全质量检测学报 编辑部