穨CY03516.PDF

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "穨CY03516.PDF"

寻鲍
7 years ago
Views:

1 * * CY03511-

2 436

3 * Piano Music of Native Chinese Composers, with Particular Focus on the Piano Works Since 1950 NSC H *

4 438 Grading The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition to arrange in steps or degree scale M. Dewey 1876 Decimal System of Classification

5 S. Butler Grading is indeed hazardous Guide to the Best in Contemporary Piano Music An Annotated List of Graded Solo Piano Music Published Since 1950 M. Hinson 1987 Guide to the

6 440 Pianist s Repretoire 1700 easy Intermediate Moderately Difficult Difficult using the guide for general indications of technical and interpretative difficulties J. Magrath 1995 The Pianist s Guide to Standard Teaching and Performance Literature Works are graded a tremendous help for anyone guiding their students or themselves to performing excellence leveling reference comparison a factual grading

7 No Beyer No Op. 599Czerny.. J.F. Burgmuller No sonatina

8 442 counterpoint

9 I II III 4 5 I II

10 J. S. Bach's WTC sonata Level ILevel IILevel IIILevel III IVLevel IVLevel V Level VI 3

11 445 3 Level I Level I Level II Level II Level III Level III Level III IV Level IV Level IV Level V Level V Level VI Level VI 3 18 C unite Level I

12 Level VI 45 A 1-8 B A Level VI Level III Level Level III

13 447 near-beginners advanced intermediate level advanced level Level 1 D. Kabalevsky, Song Twenty-four Little Pieces, Op. 39 Level 2 B. Bartók, Sorrow Song of the Tramp For Children, Vol. 2 Level 3 Teasing Song Level 4 V. Rebikov, Children Skating Silhouettes Op. 31 Level 5 C E. Satie, Gymnopédie in C Level 6 D. Shostakovich, Fantastic Dance, Op. 1, No. 1 Level 7 M. Ravel, Pavane pour une Infante défunte Level 8 C. T. Griffes, The White Peacock Four Roman Sketches, Op

14 No No No A No B 7. A 8. B 599 No No No A 599 No B 13. A 599 No B No No

15 No No No No A B C D E F G H

16 450 A B C D E F G H 6 No.1, 2, Bastien 3 25 Brum No.1, 2 No.1, 2, 3, 4, 6, Heller 9 No. 6, 8 25 No. 1 No No MacDowell No Moszkowsky No. 2 No No. 6 Chopin Liszt No. 1, 2, 4 Rachmaninoff Debussy No. 3,

17 NSC H

18 A. H. Soukhanov, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition, p S. Butler, Guide to the Best in Contemporary Piano Music, Vol. I, ix M. Hinson, Guide to the Pianist's Repertoire, xvi. J. Magrath, The Pianist s Guide to Standard Teaching and Performance Literature, vi vii viii

19 Butler S.(1973). Guide to the Best in Contemporary Piano Music, Vol. I & II. N.J. : The Scarecrow Press, Inc.,. Hinson, M.(1987. Guide to the Pianist's Repertoire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Magrath, J.(1995). The Pianist s Guide to Standard Teaching and Performance Literature. CA: Alfred Publishing Co., Inc.,. Soukhanov, A. H.(1996). The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

20 454

21 Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, Vol.XIII(June 2000) NATIONAL TAIPEI TEACHERS COLLEGE 455 The Development of Grading Taiwanese Solo Piano Works Shu-mei Yang* ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to establish a grading system for Taiwanese solo piano works. The origin and development of grading musical works in Taiwan was reviewed. Grading is a highly subjective process in which all major music works are first collected, analyzed, and compared. After that, a comprehensive set of grades spanning levels from the easiest to the most difficult is then set up. The criteria in grading were based on consideration of two important things the music itself, and the piano techniques. The result of this system can assist the music learners in piano pedagogy and in selecting suitable piano works. Few literature on grading of native piano works have been found. Among them five published books are reviewed. They have three key elements in common (except the book by this author) : They are all arranged from easy to difficult. Most, but not all of them, use etudes of Western composers to acompany Taiwanese solo piano works. The authors all have some rudimentary, yet incomplete or unsystematic, concepts of grading. Key words: grading, piano literature, Taiwanese solo piano music *Shu-mei Yang: Professor, Department of Music Education

22 456 Journal of National Taipei Teachers College Vol. XIII

509 (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) 200, , , , C 57

509 (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) 200, , , , C 57 59 (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) 500,000 500,000 59I 18 (ii) (iii) (iv) 200,000 56 509 (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) 200,000 200,000 200,000 500,000 57 43C 57 (ii) 60 90 14 5 50,000 43F 43C (ii) 282 24 40(1B) 24 40(1) 58

穨CY03516.PDF

穨CY03516.PDF