51,, 90,?,?,?? , 50,,,,, 50,,, , 1989, 1990,,,,,,,,, 1990, 1992,,, (James A. Baker, III) :1991,,

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "51,, 90,?,?,?? , 50,,,,, 50,,, , 1989, 1990,,,,,,,,, 1990, 1992,,, (James A. Baker, III) :1991,,"

叠夫单
7 years ago
Views:

1 2002 3,,, + +,,,,, : / / / /,, +,, ( )

2 51,, 90,?,?,?? , 50,,,,, 50,,, , 1989, 1990,,,,,,,,, 1990, 1992,,, (James A. Baker, III) :1991,,

3 52 21,, 80,,, 1950, 1/ 20,40,, 60 % 80, 5 % 215 %,, 21,, 3000, ,,, 1990,52 %, % ;71 %, 40 % ;,60 %,,,,,, ( Richard Holbrooke) : James A. Baker, III,America in Asia : Emerging Architecture for a Pacific Community,Foreign A f f ai rs, Winter 1991/ 1992, Vol. 70, No. 5, p. 1. Joseph S. Nye, J r.,coping with Japan,Foreign Policy, Winter 1992/ 1993, No. 89, p198. Richard Holbrook, Japan and the United States : Ending the Unequal Partnership,Foreign A f 2 f ai rs, Winter 1991/ 1992, Vol. 70, No. 5, p. 44.

4 53,,,, 5, 13. 5,1991, , 1/ , , 610, ,,1992 :,, ;,, :?,?, ;, 90,, Richard Holbrook, op. cit., p. 42. James A. Baker, III,America in Asia : Emerging Architecture for a Pacific Community,p12. U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : Report to Congress, 1992, p. 2. Richard J. Ellings and Edward A. Olsen,Asia s Challenge to American Strategy,A nalysis, The National Bureau of Asian Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1992, p. 8.

5 54,,,,,, ( ),,,,,, 90,, ( ),,,,,,, 80,,,,, Ellings & Olsen, op. cit., p. 22. Richard Holbrook, Japan and the United States : Ending the Unequal Partnership,p. 44.

6 55,, 1989, 90,, 90,, 21,,,, 89,1992, 90 21, 90, :,,,, Richard Holbrook, Japan and the United States,pp ; Ellings & Olsen,Asia s Chal2 lenge to American Strategy,p. 11. Joseph S. Nye, J r.,coping with Japan,p U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : L ooking To2 w ard the 21st Cent ury, April 1990, p. 4. Ellings & Olsen,Asia s Challenge to American Strategy,p. 12. U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : L ooki ng To2 w ard the 21st Cent ury, pp. 3-4 ; Donald S. Zagoria,The Changing U. S. Role in Asian Security in the 1990s,In Sheldon Simon, ed., East Asian Security i n the Post2Col d W ar Era ( M. E. Sharpe, New York, 1993 ), pp

7 56,,, 90?, 90,,,,,,,, 20,, : ; ;,, ;, 90, 70-80, Ellings & Olsen,Asia s Challenge to American Strategy,p. 6. Robert Scalapino,The U. S. and Asia : Future Prospects,Foreign A f f ai rs, Winter 1991/ 1992, Vol. 70, No. 5, p. 38. L, : :90, ,7

8 90, 80, 90,, 89, 40,,, ,,? :, 90 ; ; ;,, ; ;, : (1) U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : L ooking To2 w ard the 21st Cent ury, p. 6 ;Donald S. Zagoria,The Changing U. S. Role in Asian Security in the 1990s,p. 53. Ellings & Olsen,Asia s Challenge to American Strategy,pp

9 58,,,, :,, ; -,,,,, (2),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Ellings & Olsen,Asia s Challenge to American Strategy,pp

10 59,,,, (3),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (4),,,,,: Ellings & Olsen,Asia s Challenge to American Strategy,pp Ellings & Olsen,Asia s Challenge to American Strategy,pp

11 60 ;,, ;, ; ;,,, ;,,, , ;, ;, (5),, , :,,,,, L, :,10-12 : :,,2000,

12 ,,,,,,,,, :,,,,,,,,,, ;, ;, ,,,,

13 62,, , 21, :, ;, , (Dick Ch2 eney) : ; ; ;, :,,,,,, 90 ( ), 11 %, 15250, 5000, , L, :,8 U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : Report to Congress, p. 9. U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : L ooki ng To2 w ard the 21st Cent ury, pp. 1, 7.

14 ,, ( ),,,,, , ( ),,,,,,, 63,, , ( ) 3/ , 29,1995, ,, , 115 % ; , % ;,1995, ( ) 1/ 3,,, , U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : L ooking To2 w ard the 21st Cent ury, pp L, :,8 U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : Report to Congress, pp

15 64,1991, ; ;1992,,,, :,,,,, + +,,,, 90, 1992,,,, :,,,,,,, U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : Report to Congress, p. 19. U. S. Department of Defense, A St rategic Framework f or the Asian Pacif ic Ri m : L ooking To2 w ard the 21st Cent ury, p. 5. Selig S. Harrison & Clyde V. Prestowitz, J r.,pacific Agenda : Defense or Economics?Foreign Policy, No. 79, Summer 1990, p. 68.

16 65, ( + ),,,,, + +,,,,,,90, :

17 4 of the initial years after the Second World War, believing in the importance of seizing t he opport unity to redefine Americaπs in2 terest s and position on international mechanisms. They are proposing the doctrine of integration rather than the policy of containment. For those countries which the United States finds difficult to attain it s objective t hrough integration, t he tactics of isolation, containment or preemptive st rike may be adopted. It remains to be seen whether the United States would suffer from the same fate of self2destruction by over2expansion as oth2 er empires did in history. Changes in U. S. Asian Security Strategy in the Early Post2Cold War Years W u Xi nbo (50) This article discusses U. S. st rategist sπperceptions of Asian2Pa2 cific security in the early post2cold War period and the debate on how to readjust U. S. security policy in this region accord2 ingly. In analyzing t he readjust ment of t he st rategy of t he George Bush administ ration ( ), t he article argues that, along with the ending of the Cold War, the administra2 tion attempted to change the strategy fromcontainment plus deterrenceinto equilibrium plus deterrence,taking the growt h of J apanese power as a serious problem t herein. The change of perception, however, did not alter the security struc2 ture, which had been built up during the Cold War period. The limitation to t he readjust ment shows t he Pentagonπs uncertain attit ude toward t he develop ment of regional security. As later develop ment s have proved, Washington could bring t he exist2 ing security mechanisms into f ull play once any challenge de2 mands a redefinition of it s guidelines for Asian2Pacific security st rategy. U. S. Aid and Post2War Economic Reform in Taiwan N i u Ke (66) The article makes an investigation into t he American influence on Taiwanπs economic system and economic policy in t he 1950s and early 1960s. As put forth in the article, an important way to exert influence on Taiwan was the shaping of atrans2gov2

第一章緒論

第一章緒論歩 1 See Donold E. Nuechterlein, United States National Interests World (Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 1973), 172. 2 1992 6 178 3 5 9 1991 1 4-7 25 4 2001 12 27-8 5 2000 5 205 6 5 9 1991 1