2015 6 189 1674-5205 2015 06-0189- 011 100872 Abstract In current laws the land contracted management right is forbidden to be mortgaged and the usufruct right to contracted land which is the content of the land contracted management right should also be limited as collateral. However the usufruct of contracted land is the future proceeds of the agricultural operator to exercise the land contracted management right and can be classified as " accounts receivable". As a result the proprietary security right on usufruct right to contracted land can be characterized as accounts receivable pledge so as to exert the financial value of the farmland. The land usufruct guarantee loans implementing in experimental units are mostly take the usufruct right to contracted land as a counter guarantee property security transfer or pledge among which there are certain legal risks and should be reconstructed in accordance with the basic legal theory of account receivable pledge. Even in the implementation of the policy of mortgage on land management right pledge on land contracted management right is still valuable in other areas. Key Words usufruct right to contracted land security transfer mortgage right on land management right DF521 2015-06 - 10 A DOI:10.16290/j.cnki.1674-5205.2015.06.021 1 184 2 2 3 12BFX077 12SFB2038 1968 2014 2014 4 20 2014 2015 8 10
190 4 + 32 4 180 1 3 184 2 6% 7 2012 5 5 8 1 2 8 2014 1 2012 6 2 2010 11 23 2010 115 3 2014 2 21 2014 4 3 2014 8 9 4 6 2014 1 5 2012 15
2015 6 191 9 2 /3 1 /3 3 8 10 11 5 5 5 8 223 6 12 501 1 9 1
192 1 13 398 41 14 433 15 16 85 17 18 11 11 1 2013 3
2015 6 193 2 180 1 11 1 3 223 184 4 5 19 78 20 49 21 43-44 22 23 116 35 2 21 45 6 125 70% 11 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 180 1 7 7 4 2 /3 5 251 6 2013 768 2010 2010 270
194 19 781 23 12 341 4 1 24 343 2 223 6 25 5 8 223 1 1 9-102 a 2 account account for i 26 404 ii iii 1 iv secondary obligation v vi 12 542 vii viii i ii 27 336 iii iv v vi < > 2006 67-68 2 2008 66-68
2015 6 195 2 3 7 4 5 1 6 4 7 223 7 4 223 1-5 223 1-5 6 2 3 4 2005 6 5 2006 8 6 2006 10 6 2006 10 7 1 See Barkley Clark Barbara Clark The Law of Secured Transactions Under the U- niform Commercial Code. 3rd ed. Washington D. C. A. S. Pratt 2011. p. 1-116. 2 223 7 2012 105 7 3 4 < > 97 75 5 < > 2005 6 24 2007 27 < > 2006 8 22 < > 2006 10 27 2007 50 66 < > 2006 12 24 2007 73
196 29 1011 184 882 184 900 32 400 33 328 34 599 31 390 29 1012 31 390 33 387 180 1 7 34 638 28 35 364 29 946 9-109 d 11 36 1-171 37 16-3 30 193 37 16-33 31 288 mortgage
2015 6 197 1 2 hypothecs 38 4 39 2664 2665 2710 2695 1 + + 38 51 + 3 4 38 83 907 910 38 58 30 1 180 1 7 2008 2005 hypothecs 2 2006-91 3 2692 2693 2695 4 2969 2014 2970 Prior claims and Hypothecs Hypothecs 106 323 5 82
198 1 40 1 184 2 3 2015 40 120 37 41 1 2 3 37 2014 163 184 1. N. 2014-01 - 06 02. 2. N. 2013-12 - 05 02. 3. N. 2014-02 - 12 11. 4. M. 2002. 5. J. 2012 12 1-3. 6. 9 N. 2014-01 - 06 01. 7. J. 2012 10 98-100. 8. J. 2012 44 T1 - T3. 9. J. 2013 7 72-77.
2015 6 199 10. J. 2013 2 44-47. 11. J. 2013 4 62-64. 12. M. 2009. 13. M. 2014. 14. M. 2000. 15. J. 2003 2 41-48. 16. M / /... 2006. 17. N. 2005-08 - 31 B03. 18. J. 2007 9 21-27. 19. M. 2013. 20. M. 2010. 21. M. 2013. 22. M. 2007. 23. J. 2014 4 76-91. 24. < > M. 2000. 25. J. 2013 11 11-17. 26. M. 2007. 27. M. 2008. 28. J. 2015 6 33-45. 29. M. 2011. 30. M.. 2008. 31. M. 2000. 32. M. 2010. 33. M.. 2008. 34. M. 2014. 35. M. 2007. 36 Barkley Clark Barbara Clark The Law of Secured Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code M. 3rd ed. Washington D. C. A. S. Pratt 2011. 37 Peter F. Coogan William E. Hogan Detlev F. Vagts and Julian B. McDonnell Secured Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code v 1C M. San Francisco Matthew Bender & Company 2012. 38 John Claxton Security on Property and the Rights of Secured Creditors under the Civil Code of Quebéc M. Cowansville Les ditions Yvon Blais Inc. 1994. 39. N. 2014-10 - 18 06. 40. J. 2014 5 123-126. 41. M. 2011.