[ ] 2019 xxiv+374pp. 1 1 (2016) 2 976 3 p. iii (pp. vii-xvii) Häsler(1999) Aikhenvald(2015:286) 1 2 Haller(2004) (2003) (2018) 3 p. 24 (5) 975 71
2016,2017 2018 CD-ROM (2018) 4 2 10 (p. 2 ) 1962,1996 1987 1997 Suzuki2005,2008,2015 2007,2012,2013b,2015,2016a 2012 2013:4-12 Tournadre2014 Powell &Suzuki2017 Suzuki&SonamWangmo2016,2019;Suzuki2018 4 TseringSamdrup&Suzuki(2019:239) 72
5 / (p. 10) (p. 3) normative 6 Tsering Samdrup & Suzuki 2017 pha skad gtsang ma Thurston 2018 3 IPA / (p.18 ) /ő/[ő] IPA 7 IPA (2010) IPA /ì/ 8 [l ] [l ] (2009:278-281) [l ] /ç/[ çx] > (p. 20) /ç/ 9 /Ê/ (Suzuki et al. 2019) /u/ [WB Wu] (p. 22) (2013a) /v / " 5 Tournadre&Suzuki(forthcoming) 6 Dpalldanbkrashis2017 7 (1981:81) 8 400 50 [ì] [l ] 2012 9 /ç/ [ç] 2016b 73
Tsering Samdrup & Suzuki(2019) /V / " [P] C1j (pp. 27-28) /j/ (2010:17-21) (2010) (p. 28) C1j /u/ /v / /V/ " " (pp. 30-32) Caplow(2016) (pp. 30-31) 4 (p. 57) 2018 10 11 (pp. 75-76) (pp. 75-77) Tournadre&SangdaDorje2003;Zeisler2004 Caplow (2000) ELPA (equative-locative-possessive-attributive) (2003,2016) (p. 79) controllability /volitional 10 Lhasa Tournadre&SangdaDorje2003 11 Sharkhog 74
DeLancey (1986) (2003, 2016) /controllability Tournadre (2004) Zeisler (2004) dga rnyed pp. 81-85 comitative,associative Tournadre2010 dang dra (pp.87-91) / (pp. 10,241-270) (pp. 15,291) Aikhenvald(2004) (p. 259) 10 source access Aikhenvald(2004) Tournadre & LaPolla (2014) source access / (p. 259) Vokurková (2008) (epistemicity) (evidentiality) Oisel (2017) Vokurková (2008) Tournadre & LaPolla (2014) source 75
Tournadre&LaPolla(2014) sensoryaccess (p. 24) source (pp. 250-251) 12 / Tournadre2008 / Gawne&Hilleds. (2017) Zeisler(2018) 13 p. 334 TseringSamdrup&Suzuki2019 5 15 10 Ebihara2010 12 2019 13 Oisel(2017) Tournadre&LaPolla(2014) / Mabzhi TseringSamdrup&Suzuki(2018) Suzukietal. (2018) 76
(2016) Sernya3: 12-18. (2017) Field+ : 17: 6-7 http://hdl.handle.net/10108/89784 (2007) https://doi.org/10.14989/doctor.k12734 (2012) [Bragkhoglung] 31 1-23 https://doi.org/10.14989/182195 (2013a) v 5: " 17-26 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1422/00000855/ (2013b) [dgonpa] 32 1-35 https://doi.org/10.14989/182202 (2015) 44 1-9 http://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/00045560 (2016a) 1-13+92-94 (2016b) /é/,91-103 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1422/00000898/ (2019) [Lhagang] 11,17-38 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1422/00003018/ (2018) (2003) (2016) 14 (2018) Version1.0 https://nomadic.aa-ken.jp/ Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2004) Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2015) The art of grammar: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Caplow, Nancy J. (2000) The epistemic marking system of émigré in Dokpa Tibetan. Unpublished manuscript. (2016) Reconstructing stress in Proto-Tibetan: Evidence from Balti and Rebkong Amdo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39.2, 180-221. doi: 10.1075/ltba.39.2.01cap DeLancey, Scott (1986) Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna 77
Nichols (eds.) Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 203-213. Norwood: Ablex. Ebihara, Shiho (2010) Text from Amdo Tibetan Little Frog as God s Son(zar@k ìasi). Asian and African Languages and Linguistics 4, 149-168. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10108/61390 Gawne, Lauren& Nathan W. Hill (2017) Evidential systems of Tibetan languages. Berlin: De Gruyter. Haller, Felix (2004) Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen : sprachwissenschaftliche Beschreibung eines Nomadendialektes aus Nord-Amdo. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag. Häsler, Katrin (1999) A Grammar of the Tibetan Dege Íe,dge, (Sde dge) Dialect. Zürich: Selbstverlag. Oisel, Guillaume (2017) Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan Linguistics 16.2, 90-128. doi: 10.5070/H916229119 Dpal ldan bkra shis (2017) Amdo Tibetan language: An introduction to normative oral Amdo. Asian Highlands Perspectives 43, 1-668. Online: http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ahp/pdf/ahp_43.pdf Powell, Abe& Hiroyuki Suzuki (2017) Phonetic distance and dialect clustering on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40.2, 161-178. doi: 10.1075/ltba.17004.pow Suzuki, Hiroyuki (2005) Einige Bemerkungen über den Ursprung des creaky Tons im Tibetischen von Sharkhog [Songpan-Jiuzhaigou]. Kyoto University Linguistic Research 24, 45-57. doi: 10.14989/87857 (2008) Nouveau regard sur les dialectes tibétains à l est d Aba: phonétique et classification du dialecte de Sharkhog [Songpan-Jiuzhaigou]. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31.1, 85-108. doi: 10.15144/LTBA-31.1.85 (2015) New perspective on the suprasegmentals in mbrugchu Tibetan : an introduction to the tonogenesis triggered by breathy voice. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 8.1, 117-139. doi: 10.1163/2405478X-00801007 (2018) Remarks on rain in Tibetans languages in Lithang County. Studies in Asian Geolinguistics VIII, 56-61. Online: https://publication.aa-ken.jp/sag8_rain_2018.pdf Suzuki, Hiroyuki& Sonam Wangmo (2016) Vocabulary of Shingnyag Tibetan: A dialect of Amdo Tibetan spoken in Lhagang, Khams Minyag. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics (AALL) 11, 101-127. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10108/89211 (2019) Migration history of Amdo-speaking pastoralists in Lhagang, Khams Minyag, based on narratives and linguistic evidence. Archiv Orientální Supplementa XI / Ute Wallenböck, Bianca Horlemann,& Jarmila Ptáčková(eds.) Mapping Amdo: Dynamics of Power, 241-260. Suzuki, Hiroyuki, Sonam Wangmo& Tsering Samdrup (2018) Essential evidential framework of 78
Tibetic languages Data from Khams and Amdo. Unpublished manuscript presented at the 46th meeting of Tibeto-Burman Linguistic Circle(Kobe) Suzuki, Hiroyuki, Tsering Samdrup, Niangwujia(Nyingbo-Gyal), Jixiancairang(Chaksham Tsering)& Sonam Wangmo(2019)/Ê/ in Amdo Tibetan: Descriptive and historical approaches. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 23, 76-82. doi: 10.24467/onseikenkyu.23.0_76 Thurston, Timothy (2018) The purist campaign as metadiscursive regime in China s Tibet. Inner Asia 20.2, 199-218. doi: 10.1163/22105018-12340107 Tournadre, Nicolas (2004) Typologie des aspects verbaux et intégration à une théorie du TAM. Bulletin de la société de linguistique de Paris XCIX(1), 7-68. (2008) Arguments against the concept of conjunct/disjunct in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart& Paul Widmer(hrgb.) Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281-308. Bonn: Wissenschaftsverlag. (2010) The Classical Tibetan cases and their transcategoriality: From sacred grammar to modern linguistics. Himalayan Linguistics 9.2, 87-125. doi: 10.5070/H99223480 (2014) The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.) Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 105-129. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Tournadre, Nicolas& Randy J. LaPolla (2014) Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions to research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37.2, 240-263. doi: 10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou Tournadre, Nicolas& Sangda Dorje (2003) Manuel de tibétain standard : langue et civilisation. Deuxième édition. Paris: L Asiathèque. Tournadre, Nicolas& Hiroyuki Suzuki (forthcoming) The Tibetic languages: An introduction to the family of languages derived from Old Tibetan (with the collaboration of Xavier Becker and Alain Brucelles for the cartography). Paris: CNRS Éditions. Tsering Samdrup& Hiroyuki Suzuki (2017) Humilific expressions in Amdo Tibetan and local intellectuals attitudes towards them. Unpublished manuscript presented at the workshop of Language Standardisation and Linguistic Variation in Asia from Sociolinguistic Perspectives (University of Nottingham at Ningbo) (2018) Evidential system in Mabzhi Tibetan of Amdo. Proceedings of the 51st International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, 913-925. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/235311 (2019) Humilifics in Mabzhi pastoralist speech of Amdo Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto- Burman Area 42.2, 222-259. doi: 10.1075/ltba.17008.sam Vokurková, Zuzana (2008) Epistemic modalities in Spoken Standard Tibetan. PhD dissertation, Karel University and University of Paris 8. 79
Zeisler, Bettina (2004) Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages. Berlin: De Gruyter. (2018) Don t believe in a paradigm that you haven t manipulated yourself! Evidentiality, speaker attitude, and admirativity in Ladakhi. Himalayan Linguistics 17.1, 67-130. doi: 10.5070/H917136797 [ Brug-mo-mtsho] (2003) [skal-bzang-thar] (1997) 131-150 [dkon-mchogrgya-mtsho] (1987) 53-69 (1962) 331-339 (1996) [Rig- dzindbang-mo] (2013) (2018) (2010) i 122-127 (2012) (2009) (1981) (2010) 2020 4 14 80