WALLACE ACADEMIC WRITING FOR JOURNAL PUBLICATION IN TAIWAN QUARTERLY 本期精彩內容 y同儕審查制度 : 真的能公正評估論文品質與原創性嗎? y審查者的職責 : 掌管期刊出版的守門員 y對學者的影響 : 粥多僧少, 審查公正成為一種奢求 y審查過程面臨的挑戰 : 我們應該修正同儕審查制度, 而不是全面廢除 y華樂絲學術論文演講主題 發行人 : 史蒂芬發行所 : 華樂絲語文顧問有限公司中華郵政中台字第 1975 號交寄登記證登記為雜誌交寄 JUNE 2018 第三十九期 TW39.indd 1 2018/6/4 00:10
2 (02) 2555-5830 www.editing.tw 漫談學術同儕審查 Peer Review 同儕審查制度 : 真的能公正評估論文品質與原創性嗎? British Medical Journal Richard Smith John Wiley Springer Smith 訂閱 Steve Wallace 老師的官方 Youtube 頻道, 傳授你 Steve 老師十五年來在台灣與無數碩博士, 教授, 醫生與研究員並肩作戰的經驗, 協助台灣學者撰寫英文論文並發表容 掃描 QR Code 或輸入網址 (http://bit.ly/ 線上課程 ), 馬上訂閱觀看我們的 YouTube 頻道, 學習如何選擇期刊的上百條詳細解說, 如何避免投稿期刊遭拒絕的常見錯誤, 以及如何培養良好的學術寫作習慣 我們將文字的教學內容製作成影片, 提供不同形式的學習媒介, 未來會持續更新課程 科學真理乃奠基於 重複 Replication 之上 1912 Piltdown man 1953 DNA 為什麼我們需要同儕審查? 初步該如何了解期刊的品質? Google TW39.indd 2 2018/6/4 00:10
(02) 2555-5830 www.editing.tw 3 學術界現有的最佳制度 審查者的職責 : 掌管期刊出版的守門員 當愛因斯坦遇上同儕審查制度 1935 2016 Physical Review 2005 科學出版的現實面 Physical Review 編輯的一大難題 : 尋找專業審查人才 權威期刊 黑心期刊 不實手法 publish or perish 改善方法 TW39.indd 3 2018/6/4 00:10
4 (02) 2555-5830 www.editing.tw 對學者的影響 : 粥多僧少, 審查公正成為一種奢求 影響係數與成功指標 2018 Google Scholar MetricsNature Nature 80% 98% 提出重大發現也可能遭到退稿 George Akerlof The Market for Lemons 同儕審查到底有什麼問題? 華樂絲英文編修 / 翻譯服務價格 編修服務 翻譯服務 10 5 3 1 1.7 / 2.2 / 2.5 / 3 / - - 2.8 / 3.2 / 2.8 / 3.2 / PDF 0.5 5% ( ) ( ) ( ) / TW39.indd 4 2018/6/4 00:10
科學界的競爭 PLOS ONE 審查過程面臨的挑戰 : 我們應該修正同儕審查制度, 而不是全面廢除 2016 Carol Greider biorxiv 為何產生這種缺失? 研究經費與期刊數量增加, 問題也接踵而來 1995 2003 2.4 (02) 2555-5830 www.editing.tw 5 94 1997 2014 212 1984 2014 1.3 季刊讀者專屬免費電子書, 限時免費下載 : http://bit.ly/) QR Code 電子書大綱 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 加碼章節教您成為同儕審閱者! 7) 8) http://bit.ly/ 2018 8 1 TW39.indd 5 2018/6/4 00:10
6 (02) 2555-5830 www.editing.tw 論文淹腳目 的現況 堅持 促進科學進步 的目標 biorxiv 單盲審查 (Single-blind Review) 優點 : 限制 : 雙盲審查 (Double-blind Review) 優點 : 限制 : 公開審查 (Open Review) 優點 : 限制 : 可轉移式同儕審查 (Transferable Peer Review) metadata 優點 : 限制 : 合作同儕審查 (Collaborative Peer Review) 優點 : 限制 : 出版後同儕審查 (Post-publication Peer Review) 優點 : 限制 : version of record TW39.indd 6 2018/6/4 00:10
華樂絲的三階段翻譯及兩階段編修程序範例 (02) 2555-5830 www.editing.tw 7 原文範例 Part 1 在施加壓力下 (408 kpa), 較低轉速時 12 (mm/s) 與高轉速時 61 (mm/s), 咖啡生質潤滑油油膜厚度較厚, 其次為 R68 潤滑油和稻稈生質潤油, 三種潤滑油在較重施加壓力下, 油膜厚度有相同的趨勢與現象, 隨著施加壓力越大接觸角影響油膜厚度的效果越不明顯, 油膜厚度下降之原因為施加壓力因素影響較大 Part 2 圖 2 為三種潤滑油在傾角角度 0.050 度時, 切線速度在速度 61 (mm/s), 由圖可以看出在較輕施加壓力 54 kpa 時, 最厚油膜厚度為稻桿生質潤滑油與 R68 潤滑油, 對於接觸角影響, 利用接觸角量測後發現 R68 潤滑油與稻桿生質潤滑油接觸角度都比咖啡生質潤滑油還要低, 而接觸角越低油膜厚度較厚, 重施加負荷時, 達到 408 kpa 時, 咖啡生質潤滑油為最厚油膜厚度, 判斷為在重負荷時三種潤滑油在較重施加壓力下, 油膜厚度有相同的趨勢與現象, 隨著負荷越重三種潤滑油在油膜厚度上, 厚度相差不大, 但咖啡生質潤滑油的厚度隨著施加負載越重, 斜率較為穩定, 稻桿與 R68 潤滑油斜率變化較大 第一階段翻譯 Part 1 When loaded with a pressure of 408 kpa at low (12 mm/s) and high (61 mm/s) rotational speeds, the thickness of lubricant film based on the biolubricant from coffee was higher than those of the R68 lubricant and biolubricant from rice straw. The three lubricants presented the same trend regarding the thickness of lubricant film under a high pressure. When the pressure increases, the effect of contract angle on lubricant film thickness becomes less significant because the pressure dominates the decrease of oil thickness at high pressure. 註解 :Added for clarification. Part 2 Fig. 2 shows the three lubricants at an angle of inclination of 0.050 degree and a tangential speed of 61 mm/s. At a light pressure load of 54 kpa, the biolubricant from rice straw and R68 lubricant produced the highest lubricant film thickness. Regarding the influence of contact angles, the lower the contact angle, the higher the lubricant film thickness. The contact angles of biolubricant from rice straw and R68 lubricant were lower than that of the biolubricant from coffee. When a 408 kpa load was exerted, the lubricant film thickness of biolubricant from coffee was the highest. The possible reason could be that at heavy loads, the three lubricants demonstrated similar trends in lubricant film thickness variation; when the load increased, no significant difference was observed among the lubricant film thickness of three lubricants. However, the thickness of biolubricant from coffee produced a relatively stable slope when the load increased, whereas the slope variation of biolubricant from rice straw and R68 lubricant was higher. 華樂絲的服務品質保證 : 如果您的論文經華樂絲編修或翻譯後, 卻遭到期刊編輯或審閱者以 英文水準不佳 為主要原因而遭到退件或批評, 我們誠摯希望您能將文章寄回, 讓華樂絲免費重新審視編修您的文章 第三階段翻譯校稿 / 英文編修校稿 Part 1 Under a pressure of 408 kpa at low (12 mm/s) and high (61 mm/s) rotational speeds, the thickness of the coffee biolubricant film exceeded that of the R68 lubricant and rice straw biolubricant films. The three lubricants exhibited identical trends regarding lubricant film thickness under high pressure. When the pressure was increased, the effect of the contact angle on the lubricant film thickness decreased in significance, and the reduction in film thickness was primarily attributed to high pressure. Part 2 Fig. 2 shows the three lubricants at an angle of inclination of 0.050, and a tangential speed of 61 mm/s. Under a light low pressure load of 54 kpa, the rice straw biolubricant and the R68 lubricant showed the highest lubricant film thickness. Regarding the contact angle influenceeffects, the lower smaller the contact angle, the higher greater the lubricant film thickness. The contact angles of the rice straw biolubricant and R68 lubricant were lower smaller than that of the coffee biolubricant. Under a 408 kpa load, the film thickness of the coffee biolubricant was the highest. This may be because under heavy loads, the three lubricants exhibited similar trends in film thickness variations. When the load was increased, no significant difference was observed between the film thicknesses of the three lubricants. However, the thickness of the coffee biolubricant exhibited a relatively stable slope when the load was increased; the slope variation for the rice straw biolubricant and the R68 lubricant was comparatively higher. 第二階段翻譯編修 / 英文編修 Part 1 When Under loaded with a pressure of 408 kpa at low (12 mm/s) and high (61 mm/s) rotational speeds, the thickness of lubricant film thickness of based on the coffeebiolubricantfilm from coffee was higher exceeded than that those of the R68 lubricant and rice straw biolubricant from rice strawfilms. The three lubricants exhibit presented the same identical trends regarding the thickness of lubricant filmthickness under a high pressure. When the pressure was increaseds, the effect of the contract angle on the lubricant film thickness becomes decreased in less significancet because the thickness of the pressure dominates the decrease of oil thickness declines at under high pressures. 註解 :CHECK 註解 :Added for clarification. Part 2 Fig. 2 shows the three lubricants at an angle of inclination of 0.050, degree and a tangential speed of 61 mm/s. Under At a light pressure load of 54 kpa, the rice straw biolubricant from rice straw and the R68 lubricant showed produced the highest lubricant film thickness. Regarding the influence of contact angle influences, the lower the contact angle, the higher the lubricant film thickness. The contact angles of the rice straw biolubricant from rice straw and R68 lubricant were lower than that of the coffee biolubricant from coffee. Under When a 408 kpa load was exerted, the lubricant film thickness of the coffee biolubricant from coffee was the highest. This e possible may reason could be becauseunder that at heavy loads, the three lubricants exhibited demonstrated similar trends in lubricant film thickness variations.; Wwhen the load was increased, no significant difference was observed between among the film lubricant film thicknesses of the three lubricants. However, the thickness of the coffee biolubricant from coffee producedexhibited a relatively stable slope when the load was increased;, whereas the slope variation for of the rice straw biolubricant from rice straw and the R68 lubricant was comparatively higher. TW39.indd 7 2018/6/4 00:10
8 (02) 2555-5830 www.editing.tw 更透明公開的同儕審查 Elsevier ScienceDirect http://apus.libanswers.com/faq/2154 https://authorservices.wiley.com/reviewers/journal-reviewers/what-ispeer-review/index.html https://doi.org/10.1152%2fadvan.00104.2006 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/scholarly_peer_review https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/what-is-peer-review https://www.nature.com/news/peer-review-troubled-from-thestart-1.19763 BLOG 文選 www.editing.tw/blog 將論文送交匿名審查前該如何隱藏作者姓名? 提問 : 回答 : 謝詞 : Mark Chen pointed out to me in conversation... Jenney Chang pointed out to me in conversation... 文件屬性 : Word Microsoft Word 自我引述 : As I argue in Chen 2011... As I argue in... As I argue in Chen 2011... As I argue in... As Chen (2011) argues... New Topic Speech I 如何在學術會議上宣傳論文並推銷個人研究 * * * * *self-archiving * * * Article Influence Score 華樂絲學術英文編修 Wallace Academic Editing 提供您最專業的學術英文編修 / 翻譯服務 地址 : 台北市大同區長安西路 180 號 3 樓 Tel:02-2555-5830 網站 :www.editing.tw E-mail:editing@editing.tw Fax:02-2555-5836 部落格 :www.editing.tw/blog 服務時間 : 週一至週日 09:00~20:00, 國定假日公休 TW39.indd 8 2018/6/4 00:10