2018,27(5):658 666 犃犮狋犪犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犲犅狅狉犲犪犾犻 狅犮犮犻犱犲狀狋犪犾犻狊犛犻狀犻犮犪 doi:10.7606/j.issn.1004 1389.2018.05.007 :2018 05 09 :htp://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1220.s.20180509.1603.014.html!",,,, (# <= >?=@ "#AB 712100) +,2CDE D74 Act12 - F G H I J K 7 L M F N O,0 D E - F P =QR STUVWXY Y,Z [ 2\ D E F ] ^ _ (1 1`a b) caj.fwx WX \ - = M K 7 L M J - M :1PYDE F G - a 0 10 mg, W X 41.9%( 犘 <0.05),WX 40.0% ( 犘 <0.05); 149.2% ( 犘 <0.05), C ` a 100.0%( 犘 <0.05), `a220.0%( 犘 <0.05) 10 \,\ 31.8%( 犘 <0.05);a5mg62.7%( 犘 <0.05);10 W \,C 29.2% 27.6% ( 犘 <0.05), 10 2 ~10 4 W \, 44.0%~103.8%( 犘 <0.05) 2PYDEK7LM a\ JW\ POD M 46.7%~70.0% ( 犘 <0.05);a5mg PPO M 52.5%( 犘 <0.05),10 2 ~10 4 W\, MDA `a34.0% ~ 40.2%( 犘 <0.05),PYDEFG-I,FK7LM DE ;G-I ;K7LM; S182,Q939.9,Q938.1 A 1004 1389(2018)05 0658 09 :FI, 34%~40% F 0 9 - <,\ a I F 25% 22% [1] \ J :H,2015 5.4t hm -2[2], 8.2 t hm -2[3] < F- af +,, 1 - G H I -, K 7 L M [4 6] E GH\ W J - W,K7 - %LM [7] ;X LM 3 - F G H -, K7LM [8], X B29!K7" #\LM $ [9] ;%&FDE' # [10] [11] [12] [13] () [14] * G -I,+, DE GH-'# K7L MF - [10 11]./+,01DE GH - J -K7LM +,UV Y 2CDE F]^_FG- I J 5\LM $FNO,0DE G-+, P =QR 1! 1.1! PY \: 2223 4513 67: 513 6789 : [15] ;6 : 5;6 [16] PY D E : 5 D E ( 犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊狉狅犮犺犲,D74) < D E ( 犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊狆犪狉 狋狌犿,Act12),=# <=>?=@ 1- +,>?@A PY:,0 5 D E D74 < D E Act12 B `ab1 1]^CDFE^_,,D74 Act12 F 0 3.5 10 10 cfu g -1 2.3 10 8 cfu g -1 :2017 11 16 :2018 01 14 :!(2012BAD14B11);"#$%&'!(2016KTZDNY03 03 02) :,(,)*+,-,+,./01- E mail:1601047212@qq.com : 23,(,45,6*-78,9:; 1- -+, E mail:xuequanhong@163.com
5 : CDE- JK7LMFNO 659 DE W: D74 Act124513 67,28 F100r min -1 67d,G H IT J 2C F/KLW B1 1 b]m N:,< O N 8 JT 1cm @,B 1.5g kg -1 E ^ [ 犿 (N) 犿 (P 2O 5 ) 犿 (K 2O)=15 15 15],P ]M :QSRS " T3mm @ 1.2 " # 1.2.1 \: DE TU B1 4b ]^, M, V 2h,4000r min -1? W 10 min, XY (5 ), 10 10 2 10 3 ; A F60 \X V 12h, Y V, V ZJ6UV IX, [a/\] I, 26 6, ^E6U, U 10, 3UWX Z [, 12h 1 _,` 67d;3U\ Z[, a 6,bcX, TTC Z\ [17], E3U : 6g L -1 7 0,B200mL kg -1 \a\ P, \ *M ; \,*M, *M \, J6UV IX, B W X Z [. Z [ \ W X 1.2.2!" DE W \(S), 5 ^( ):0(,CK) 5 10 10 2 10 3 10 4 \ (C), 6 ^a(mg/ ):0(CK) 5 10 20 30 35; \ +E^(S+C), 5 ^(W +a mg/ ):5+5 10+10 10 2 +20 10 3 +30 10 4 +35 X. 2\. Z/ N1 - N`J N - M`NO DE FI W \: A F\ c FDE WV12h, YV,J \ \+E^: \, 1.2.1. Y 0 =15cm 12cm,aJa *01kg, 8 \, ^ E3 % 1_,`% 7d 1.2.3 #$%&' Y2015 9 2016 1# <= + > H \J,BFH,b, 2015 12 29, V N,XF N, TU,IJC`a `a `a,z[(txc2 ), 5C 1.2.4 # # 1.2.3 - =M Z[F C0, 5C ] M, 1.000g3,+ 10000 r min -1?WXY,B [18] F. Z[ T (POD) (PAL) (PPO) M J MDA ` a ; TTC Z[ [17] Z * PY `a. -- =M Z[*0 C, ;C F bm 1.2.5 ( WX 犌犐 = ( 犌 t/ 犇 t) ΔCK=(-)/ 100% : 犌 t 犇 t 狋 F W X J FWX,ΔCK 0 R Excel2010 DPS9.50 SPSS20.0, RM Duncan LSD 2 "#$% 2.1 $%&'( 2.1.1 ) W X :; 1,aH \W X at<,wx J\ a 0 10 20 mg, W X 41.9% 31.3%( 犘 <0.05),WX* 40.0%( 犘 <0.05);a30mg,W X 31.3% ( 犘 <0.05),W X 40.0%( 犘 <0.05) \W X,, 5,W X 30.6%( 犘 <0.05);<, WX F _I ; WX/MNO \ :; 1, PY \ \ 10 10 2 \ \ 31.8% 21.7%( 犘 <0.05)
660 # = 0 27 )1 $%&*+,-./&*01 0+ 23/+,45( 犖 =3) 犜犪犫犾犲 1 犠犺犲犪狋犵犲狉犿犻狀犪狋犻狅狀狉犪狋犲, 犵犲狉犿犻狀犪狋犻狅狀犻狀犱犲狓犪狀犱狊犲犲犱犪犮狋犻狏犻狋狔犻狀犘犲狋狉犻犱犻狊犺犲狊犫狔狊犲犲犱犮狅犪狋犻狀犵犪狀犱狊狅犪犽犻狀犵狑犻狋犺狋犺犲犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊犪犵犲狀狋 WX Germinationpercentage Z /% WX Germinationindex Z \ Seedactivity Z /(mg g -1 h -1 ) CK(0) 67.3±0.4b - 45.8±19.1b - - - Powdercoating 10 95.5±0.1a 41.9 66.7±7.2a 40.0 - - 20 88.4±0.1a 31.3 66.7±7.2a 40.0 - - 30 46.2±0.2b -31.3 29.1±19.1b -40.0 - - \ CK( ) 97.1±0.1a - 93.3±5.8a - 127.2±0.6b - Extractsoaking 5 67.4±0.1b -30.6 60.0±10.0a -33.3 139.1±0.2ab 9.3 10 77.2±0.2ab -20.5 76.7±15.3a -11.1 167.6±0.1a 31.8 10 2 83.3±0.1ab -14.2 73.3±5.8a -22.2 154.8±1.0a 21.7 10 3 90.2±0.0a -7.2 73.3±20.8a -22.2 130.2±0.1ab 2.4 :ZR0 * ±$ ;. RJcR ( 犘 <0.05); Note:Dataare mean±standarddeviation.foreachtreatment,diferentlowercaseletersinthesamecolumnindicatesignificantdifer ence( 犘 <0.05);thesamebelow. 2.1.2 *#$%&'+,- ; 2, a\ghj-, a010 30J35mg,146.2% 174.2% J 129.5% ( 犘 <0.05); a 0 5~30mg, C ` a 85.2% ~144.1%( 犘 <0.05), `a200% ~ 300%( 犘 <0.05); C J/ NO / N- M `J N1-\E NO PYDE FI,FJ - FNO Y, PYDE G-I ; 2,,W \ C C`aJ `a,,10, C 29.2% 27.6%( 犘 <0.05),100, C`a )2 $%&*+,-./ 6 0+78 9:;; ( 犖 =5) 犜犪犫犾犲 2 犜犺犲犵狉狅狑狋犺狆犪狉犪犿犲狋犲狉狊狅犳狑犺犲犪狋犻狀狊犪狀犱狆狅狋狊犫狔狊犲犲犱犮狅犪狋犻狀犵犪狀犱狊狅犪犽犻狀犵狑犻狋犺狋犺犲犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊犪犵犲狀狋 Seedlingemergencerate Z /% C Plantheight Z /cm Leavearea Z /mm 2 `a Totalfreshmass Z /g `a Rootfreshmass Z /g (C) CK(0) 25.3±0.0a - 40.1±0.0a - 169.6±0.1b - 2.7±0.1b - 0.5±0.03b - 5 25.1±0.1a 0.1 41.8±1.1a 4.2 267.7±29.2b 57.8 5.0±5.0a 85.2 1.5±0.5a 200.0 10 13.2±0.1a -47.8 46.7±0.1a 16.5 422.6±0.0a 149.2 5.4±0.0a 100.0 1.6±0.03a 220.0 20 38.2±0.2a 51.0 44.8±5.7a 11.7 306.5±68.7ab 80.7 5.9±3.9a 118.5 1.7±0.6a 240.0 30 13.1±0.0a -48.2 45.7±0.1a 14.0 465.0±0.1a 174.2 6.7±0.0a 144.1 2.0±0.9a 300.0 35 32.5±0.3a 28.5 43.7±9.7a 9.0 389.2±20.6a 129.5 3.4±0.3b 25.9 0.8±0.0b 60.0 \(S) CK(0) 29.3±0.1b - 35.3±7.6b - 306.8±15.8b - 4.1±0.8b - 1.2±0.4b - 5 19.6±0.1c -35.2 36.1±0.0ab 2.3 229.4±0.1b -25.2 4.6±0.0ab 12.2 1.3±0.0ab 8.3 10 26.3±0.2bc-10.2 45.6±5.0a 29.2 391.4±16.1a 27.6 4.4±3.5ab 7.3 1.4±1.1ab 16.7 10 2 54.3±0.3a 85.3 42.2±1.4ab 19.5 300.9±52.9b -1.9 5.2±2.0a 26.8 1.5±0.7a 25.0 10 3 42.2±0.1a 44.0 43.1±4.4ab 22.1 313.1±85.9ab 2.0 4.8±0.2ab 17.1 1.4±0.1ab 16.7 10 4 59.7±0.2a 103.8 39.3±4.5ab 11.3 280.4±41.3b -8.6 4.1±0.2ab 0.0 1.3±0.2ab 8.3 C+ S CK(0) 29.4±0.1b - 44.8±7.6a - 306.8±15.8a - 3.7±0.8b - 1.1±0.3b - 5+5 13.2±0.1b -55.1 44.7±0.1a -0.2 302.0±0.1a -1.6 4.1±1.5ab 10.8 1.2±0.2ab 9.0 10+10 55.6±0.1a 89.1 39.2±3.9a -12.5 252.3±67.0a -17.8 6.1±4.0a 64.9 1.6±0.8a 45.5 10 2 +20 38.7±0.1ab 31.6 40.5±5.4a -9.6 300.5±85.8a -2.1 5.1±1.5a 37.8 1.3±0.6ab 18.2 10 3 +30 25.2±0.1ab-14.3 44.8±1.0a 0.0 313.8±29.3a 2.3 4.8±1.2ab 29.7 1.5±0.6a 36.4 10 4 +35 42.4±0.2ab 44.2 43.9±6.2a -2.0 331.9±116.9a 8.2 4.1±0.6ab 10.8 1.2±0.1ab 9.0
5 : CDE- JK7LMFNO 661 J `a 26.8% J 25.0% ( 犘 <0.05) 010 2 ~10 4, 44.0%~103.8%( 犘 <0.05) ; 2, W \E^ \,aj \ a, C`aJ `a* FGHI 10+10 89.1% ( 犘 <0.05),10+10 10 2 +20F `a-64.9% 37.8%( 犘 <0.05), 10+10 10 3 +30 F ` a 45.5% 36.4%( 犘 <0.05) b2 3\\.,\ C - af GH I, \, FaJ \ a, \+ E 0.05),5+5 J 10+10, ` a 100.0%J66.7%( 犘 <0.05),10 4 +35 FC14.8% 48.1%( 犘 <0.05) b23,, \,N \ %&M `F [/,N1-\\D E FI Y N -M `W-J N\E J W - F NO,YO, F J O \ F Y, N DE FG-I ^ J - * 2.1.3 *./ +,- ; 4, ; 3Y, W \ C C`a `a*/no a0 20mg, 25.3%( 犘 < 0.05) a W,\ +W\`a, 10 2 +20 F C 21.3% ( 犘 < a/klw\ *,Y, a 5 mg 62.7% ( 犘 < 0.05),10 2 44.8% ( 犘 < 0.05) Y, [ _I, *;10 4 19.6%( 犘 <0.05) \ E ^ NOc )3 $%&*+,-./ 6 0+ 8 9:; ( 犖 =5) 犜犪犫犾犲 3 犜犺犲犵狉狅狑狋犺狆犪狉犪犿犲狋犲狉狊狅犳狑犺犲犪狋犻狀狊狅犻犾狆狅狋狊犫狔狊犲犲犱犮狅犪狋犻狀犵犪狀犱狊狅犪犽犻狀犵狑犻狋犺狋犺犲犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊犪犵犲狀狋 Seedlingemergencerate Z /% C Plantheight Z /cm Leavearea Z /mm 2 `a Totalfreshmass Z /g `a Rootfreshmass Z /g C CK(0) 79.1±0.1a - 41.4±2.6a - 213.4±13.4b - 1.9±0.3a - 0.1±0.1a - 5 81.2±0.1a 2.7 43.4±2.8a 4.8 238.6±22.0ab 11.8 2.3±0.5a 21.1 0.1±0.1a 0.0 10 75.4±0.1a -4.7 45.5±2.0a 9.9 224.7±82.0ab 5.3 2.0±0.5a 5.3 0.2±0.1a 50.0 20 88.0±0.0a 11.3 43.1±2.3a 4.1 267.5±6.7a 25.3 2.3±0.3a 21.1 0.1±0.0a 0.0 30 84.3±0.1a 6.6 41.7±5.7a 0.7 215.1±74.9ab 0.8 1.8±0.2a -5.3 0.1±0.0a 0.0 35 88.2±0.1a 11.5 43.3±2.0a 4.6 252.8±30.7ab 18.5 2.1±0.4a 10.5 0.1±0.1a 0.0 \ S CK(0) 77.1±0.1ab - 37.8±2.8a - 221.6±30.4a - 2.6±0.4a - 0.3±0.1ab - 5 50.2 ±0.2b -34.9 43.3±3.7a 14.6 263.6±42.5a 19.0 2.6±0.3a 0.0 0.2±0.0b -33.3 10 84.2 ± 0.2a 9.2 41.5±4.0a 9.8 266.9±46.6a 20.5 2.4±0.4a -7.7 0.2±0.0b -33.3 10 2 84.3± 0.2a 9.3 43.7±4.2a 15.6 212.5±73.6a -4.1 2.8±0.2a 7.7 0.4±0.1a 33.3 10 3 96.5 ± 0.1a 25.2 43.2±2.4a 14.3 253.9±20.8a 14.6 2.9±0.2a 11.5 0.3±0.0a 0.0 10 4 88.1± 0.0a 14.3 40.8±2.3a 7.9 211.5±45.5a -4.6 2.9±0.2a 11.5 0.4±0.0a 33.3 C+S CK(0) 80.2±0.1a - 37.8±2.8c - 221.6±30.4b - 2.2±0.4a - 0.3±0.1b - 5+5 67.3±0.2a -16.1 41.7±0.8bc 10.3 263.4±31.3ab 18.9 2.4±0.2a 9.1 0.6±0.5a 100.0 10+10 63.2±0.1a -21.2 39.9±3.4bc 5.6 210.4±61.0b -5.0 2.6±0.7a 18.2 0.5±0.0a 66.7 10 2 +20 75.5±0.1a -5.9 45.9±2.9a 21.4 259.2±28.9ab 17.0 2.6±0.2a 18.2 0.4±0.1ab 33.3 10 3 +30 80.2±0.1a 0.0 42.1±1.8abc 11.3 257.5±3.6ab 16.2 2.2±0.5a 0.0 0.4±0.0ab 33.3 10 4 +35 84.2±0.2a 5.0 43.4±1.9ab 14.8 328.1±63.6a 48.1 2.2±0.4a 0.0 0.2±0.0b -33.3
662 # = 0 27 )4 $%&*+,-./ 6 0+78845 犜犪犫犾犲 4 犚狅狅狋犪犮狋犻狏犻狋狔狅犳狑犺犲犪狋犻狀狊犪狀犱犪狀犱狊狅犻犾狆狅狋狊犫狔狊犲犲犱犮狅犪狋犻狀犵犪狀犱狊狅犪犽犻狀犵狑犻狋犺狋犺犲犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊犪犵犲狀狋 Sandculture Soilculture /(mg g -1 h -1 ) Rootactivity /(mg g -1 h -1 ) Rootactivity (C) CK(0) 150.3±2.2b - (C) CK(0) 205.5±9.9a - 5 244.5±1.3a 62.7 5 211.8±18.5a 3.7 10 151.5±31.0b 0.8 10 203.5±13.6a -1.0 20 238.1±39.5ab 58.5 20 150.8±27.9a -26.6 30 208.2±27.7ab 38.5 30 196.9±12.9a -4.2 35 145.5±8.9b -3.2 35 197.0±10.9a -4.1 \(S) CK 166.8±20.0b - \(S) CK(0) 179.6±17.2b - 10 202.4±28.9ab 21.3 5 169.4±19.6b -5.7 10 2 241.5±43.8a 44.8 10 177.3±7.3b -1.3 10 3 195.2±41.9ab 17.0 10 2 180.6±14.0b 0.6 10 4 211.1±22.3ab 26.6 10 3 185.6±13.7b 3.3 - - - 10 4 214.8±15.4a 19.6 C+ S CK(0) 179.6±17.2ab - 5+5 197.6±6.2ab 10.0 10+10 151.5±32.1ab -15.7 20+10 2 123.3±10.6b -31.3 30+10 3 205.4±20.9ab 14.3 35+10 4 223.5 ±11.4a 24.4 2.2 $%&' <=;/=>;?@ K7LM S K 7 POD PPO J PAL M POD M:= 5, \ J W\ POD M N O Y, a 20 mg,, \ POD M 46.7%~70.0% ( 犘 <0.05);W\J \+E^ POD MFNO*c Y,\ POD M*_I (a10mg,),, a 30 mg POD M 38.9%( 犘 <0.05), 10 3 10 4 / K LW\ POD M 28.1% 52.2%( 犘 <0.05) PPO M:= 5, PPO MFNO ac Y, a PPO M I, a_i a 5mg PPO M 52.5%( 犘 <0.05),a35mg, PPO M 24.6% ( 犘 <0.05) Y,\ PPO M _ I,a5mg PPO M 25.3%( 犘 <0.05) /KLW \J \ E^ PPO M * /NO PAL M:= 5JY,\ PAL M/ NO Y, \+E^ PAL M,,5+5 10+ 10 20+10 2 PAL M 24.2% 20.2% 24.2%( 犘 <0.05) aw \ _ PAL M,aW PAL M/ M N O 5 PAL M34.3%( 犘 <0.05) MDA `a:= 5, F/KLW\ MDA `a,10 2 ~10 4 / K L W \, MDA ` a 34.0%~40.2%( 犘 <0.05) \ J \ + \ E ^ MDA `a*/no
5 : CDE- JK7LMFNO 663 )5 $%&*+,-./ 6 0+788 <=; 犜犪犫犾犲 5 犜犺犲犻狀犱狌犮犲犱狉犲狊犻狊狋犪狀犮犲狅犳狑犺犲犪狋犻狀狊犪狀犱犪狀犱狊狅犻犾狆狅狋狊犫狔狊犲犲犱犮狅犪狋犻狀犵犪狀犱狊狅犪犽犻狀犵狑犻狋犺狋犺犲犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊犪犵犲狀狋 POD Z / (mg g -1 min-1) PPO Z / (U g -1 min-1) Sandculture PAL Z / (U g -1 min-1) MDA Z / (mmol g -1) (C) CK(0) 1.8±0.3a - 17.0±1.4a - 12.0±1.2ab - 25.6±2.2ab - 5 1.6±0.3ab -11.1 12.7±3.0b -25.3 12.0±0.7ab 0.0 23.8±7.5ab -7.0 10 1.9±0.2a 5.6 16.5±2.6ab -2.9 13.1±1.3a 9.2 30.6±5.7a 19.5 20 1.3±0.3ab -27.8 15.6±2.0ab -8.2 13.4±2.0a 11.7 33.1±6.4a 29.3 30 1.1±0.3b -38.9 14.4±1.1ab -15.3 13.2±1.6a 10.0 26.9±3.2ab 5.1 35 1.7±0.4a -5.6 16.6±2.3a -2.4 10.0±0.6b -16.7 19.4±0.9b -24.2 \(S) CK(0) 3.2±0.6a - 15.1±0.6a - 15.7±2.2a - 35.6±11.2a - 10 4.1±0.6a 28.1 15.1±1.5a 0.0 15.7±2.0a 0.0 27.6±5.2ab -22.5 10 2 3.3±0.2a 3.1 18.4±1.7a 21.9 15.2±4.8a -3.2 22.6±1.9b -36.5 10 3 2.3±0.6b -28.1 16.5±4.4a 9.3 13.1±1.7a -16.6 21.9±4.0b -40.2 10 4 2.0±0.4b -52.2 15.6±1.7a 2.6 12.5±0.1a -20.4 23.5±3.1b -34.0 Soilpots (C) CK(0) 3.0±1.0c - 24.4±4.2b - 11.2±1.22a - 21.8±1.2a - 5 4.4±0.4ab 46.7 37.2±2.1a 52.5 12.2±0.93a 8.9 22.9±0.8a 5.0 10 4.8±0.2ab 60.0 27.6±1.7b 13.1 13.1±0.72a 17.0 26.6±1.3a 22.0 20 3.7±0.8bc 23.3 26.8±4.8b 9.8 10.7±1.02a -4.5 22.8±2.1a 4.6 30 5.1±0.9a 70.0 25.2±1.2b 3.3 13.0±1.28a 16.1 22.9±3.1a 5.0 35 5.0±0.2ab 66.7 18.4±0.7a -24.6 12.2±1.51a 8.9 26.0±6.2a 19.3 \(S) CK(0) 6.1±0.4ab - 30.4±4.2a - 9.9±0.2a - 18.5±1.3a - 5 5.9±0.3b -3.3 33.6±1.7a 10.5 6.5±2.3b -34.3 23.4±3.3a 26.5 10 6.0±0.6ab -1.6 34.4±1.8a 13.2 12.1±1.2a 22.2 20.5±1.8a 10.8 10 2 6.1±0.2ab 0.0 32.4±3.4a 6.6 12.5±0.3a 26.3 21.9±3.4a 18.4 10 3 6.2±0.3ab 3.3 37.2±1.2a 22.4 12.0±2.0a 21.2 19.9±3.4a 7.6 10 4 7.6±1.7a 24.6 31.6±14.0a 3.9 11.1±2.6a 12.1 22.5±2.5a 21.6 C+S CK(0) 6.1±0.4ab - 30.4±4.2ab - 9.9±0.2c - 18.5±1.3a 0.0 5+5 6.5±2.7ab 6.6 35.6±18.4a 17.1 12.3±0.8a 24.2 23.5±5.9a 27.0 10+10 4.0±0.4b -34.4 25.6±3.0ab -15.8 11.9±1.9ab 20.2 21.3±7.1a 15.1 20+10 2 6.6±1.0ab 8.2 20.1±2.6b -33.9 12.3±0.6a 24.2 22.8±2.2a 23.2 30+10 3 7.8±0.9a 27.9 22.9±2.2ab -24.7 11.1±1.0abc 12.1 19.4±4.6a 4.9 35+10 4 5.9±2.1ab -3.3 22.0±1.4ab -27.6 10.1±0.3bc 2.0 20.4±0.6a 10.3 3 & ' K G - I [19]! " [20] W # 5406DE JC J* c, `aj $ %a & ' [11] +, W # < DEGH-,- a [10] +,,DE\ GH'#c c -,DE /G-I.cY +,W#,<DE5DE DFE^H \ J \ * WX WX; at< W at _ \ W, a( GHI,) PYDE _*+DFG- MD b Y3\., C - afghi <, \ Y, \ J \FG-I, N \ M `F [/J N1-\DE FNO \ \FI,0\,,% DE M&%,C/KLW - % M,. K /. b 0 +, 1F W NOX - Ia [21 22] +,W#, apyde \ \* F, HCNON6 JF K7 -L M2-34F 9: _ K7LM STK735 M # F,3 5 M L M 6 [23 28] 3 5 9 : 7 (PAL) T(POD) (PPO)
664 # = 0 27 PAL 8 9 7J -:;, 0` KL,<_ [ F K L = V,>? H a @ A B 2 [29] ;POD PPO C D, 8 V D `+DEHC _ -,_ M [30] ; MDA I 0 : T I F, : TF :$, KL F 2 [31] +,W#,,a J+ W \ POD PPO J PAL M, MDA / N O, PYDEFK7LM FL M /,.bh a+, +,,,JW \ POD PPO M, / N[, - M `T,7 K7M,.K.cY, K7MF _I J G-I,NG- M `F[ M ` J /[,7M ` T, _ 4 " ' PYDEFG-I, FK7LM <DE5 DE E^H \ J \,a\ a,!gh WX,,GH - J- a, POD PPO J PAL K7 M, K L ` : T at<\ at, - J K7M*_I F a \ aji H%+, AB 犚犲犳犲狉犲狀犮犲 : [1] FG.9 H-Ha FZ[D]." # A B:# < =,2013:1 10. JIA X ZH.Calculationandanalysisoftechnicaleficiency andtechnicalprogressrateof wheatproductionin main wheatproductionareasin China[D].Yangling Shaanxi: NorthwestA & FUniversity,2013:1 10. [2] I J`% K.% L[EB/OL]: % M,2015[2017 4 10].htp://www.stats.gov.cn/ tjsj/ndsj/2015/indexch.htm. NationalBureauofStatisticsofthePeople srepublicof China.ChinaStatisticalYearbook [EB/OL]:ChinaStatis ticspress,2015[2017 4 10].htp://www.stats.gov.cn/ tjsj/ndsj/2015/indexch.htm. [3] N O.7 GIS F - +, [J].-,2008(10):37 40. ZHANGJ.Studyonpotentialproductivityofwinterwheat inchinabasedongisgridscale[j]. 犈犮狅犾狅犵犻犮犪犾犈犮狅狀狅犿狔, 2008(10):37 40. [4] P Q,R.-3 234 F+,H (S )[J].T U8==@=0,2002,17(2):57 59. HEZD,GAOYF.Researchprogressofbiocontrolinplant diseasecontrol(review)[j]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犎犲犫犲犻犘狅犾狔狋犲犮犺狀犻犮犖狅狉犿犪犾犝狀犻狏犲狉狊犻狋狔,2002,17(2):57 59. [5] V W,XR, YR.-3 ZJH 10 "# E K7 LMF+,[J]. =S0,2009,25(3):197 201. ZHENGL,LIANGJG,SHIYF.Studyontheinducedre sistanceofzjh 10tocucumbergraymold[J]. 犆犺犻狀犲狊犲犃犵 狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲犅狌犾犲狋犻狀,2009,25(3):197 201. [6], 23,,.%& _ FG-I J PPO MF N O[J].# = 0,2007,16(6): 146 153. XU YJ,XUEQ H,XINGSH L, 犲狋犪犾.Efectsofactinomy ceteonthegrowthofstrawberryanditsefectonppoac tivity[j]. 犃犮狋犪犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犲犅狅狉犲犪犾犻 狅犮犮犻犱犲狀狋犪犾犻狊犛犻狀犻犮犪, 2007,16(6):146 153. [7] Z,[ \ ]. E F G - J K 7 L M +, H [J].^_,2010,36(3):43 46. ZHAOL,TENG A N.Advancesinresearchonthepromo tionandresistanceof 犜狉犻犮犺狅犱犲狉犿犪 toplants[j]. 犘犾犪狀狋犘狉狅 狋犲犮狋犻狅狀,2010,36(3):43 46. [8] `ab,c,c,.-3k LM 3 FG- M K7LM +, [J].# = 0,2006,19(3):439 441. SONG Y Y,LIP,LISH J, 犲狋犪犾.Studyonthepromoting andinducingresistanceofbiocontrolbacterium LM 3to rice[j]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犛狅狌狋犺狑犲狊狋犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犾犝狀犻狏犲狉狊犻狋狔, 2006,19(3):439 441. [9] N D,N,,. X B29 C "# CFK7LM[J]. =,2009(25):25 28. ZHANG X CH,ZHANG Y H,ZHAO X Y, 犲狋犪犾.Induced resistanceofbacilussubtilisb29tocucumberplants[j]. 犠狌狔犻犛犮犻犲狀犮犲,2009(25):25 28. [10],, 2 3,.3 C % & ' # F G - LMK7I [J].# <==0(T= ),2010,38(2):110 115. ZHAOJ,DUJZH,XUE Q H, 犲狋犪犾.Efectsofactinomy cetesonthegrowthandresistanceofmuskmelonseedlings [J]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犖狅狉狋犺狑犲狊狋犃牔犉犝狀犻狏犲狉狊犻狋狔 ( 犖犪狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲犈犱犻狋犻狅狀 ),2010,38(2):110 115. [11] ', 23,,.%& _ PPO M J- af N O [J].# < = = 0 (T = ),2010,38(3):185 187. CHEN Q,XUE Q H,SHEN G H, 犲狋犪犾.Efectsofactino myceson PPO activity and biomass [J]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳
5 : CDE- JK7LMFNO 665 犖狅狉狋犺狑犲狊狋犃牔犉犝狀犻狏犲狉狊犻狋狔 ( 犖犪狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲犈犱犻狋犻狅狀 ), 2010,38(3):185 187. [12] ', 23,,.% & - J L FNO[J].#=0,2010,19(8):84 89. CHEN Q,XUE Q H,SHEN G H, 犲狋犪犾.Efectofactino mycetesonthegrowthanddroughtresistanceofcoton seedling[j]. 犃犮狋犪犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犲犅狅狉犲犪犾犻 狅犮犮犻犱犲狀狋犪犾犻狊犛犻狀犻 犮犪,2010,19(8):84 89. [13], 23,,.% & Act12 - J 1 - F N O [J],- = 0, 2015,35(6):1807 1819. DUANJL,XUEQ H,SHUZH M, 犲狋犪犾.Efectofactino mycetesact12combined withpotassium humateonthe growthandrootzone microecologyofsalvia miltiorrhiza [J]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犈犮狅犾狅犵狔,2015,35(6):1807 1819. [14], 23,N,.- 3 F \ ( ) 1- J afno[j],# <==0(T =),2008,36(4):160 165. GUOZH Y,XUE Q H,ZHANG XL, 犲狋犪犾.Efectofbio controlvaccineseedbedon microecologyandyieldofhot pepperrootzone[j]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犖狅狉狋犺狑犲狊狋犃牔犉犝狀犻 狏犲狉狊犻狋狔 ( 犖犪狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲犈犱犻狋犻狅狀 ),2008,36(4):160 165. [15], 23,U &.1- =[M].: =M,2012. CHENGLJ,XUE Q H,LAIH X.MicrobiologyLabora torytechnology[m].beijing:sciencepress,2012. [16],,,.. H > >? ; 6. @ A [J]. =,2015, 52(4):667 674. LIU D,BIX L,GUO T, 犲狋犪犾.ScreeningofGuangdong Wannianqinghydroponicnutrientsolutioningreenhouse innorthchina[j]. 犡犻狀犼犻犪狀犵犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲狊,2015, 52(4):667 674. [17] V,',,.c TTC Z[ [J]. =,2008(1):40 41. ZHENGJ,CHEN Q X,JIN CH, 犲狋犪犾.Studyontheroot systemactivityofcontainerseedlingsofbroadleaftreesby diferentttc methods [J]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犣犺犲犼犻犪狀犵犃犵狉犻 犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲狊,2008(1):40 41. [18]. - = 7 [M]. : 4 M,2000:203 204. GAOJF.ExperimentalInstructionofPlantPhysiology [M].Beijing:HigherEducationPress,2000:203 204. [19],, D,. G- (PGPR)F+, [J]. - = 0,2004,15(10):1963 1966. HU CHJ,XUEDL,MACH X, 犲狋犪犾.Researchandappli cationprospectofplantrhizospherebacteria(pgpr)[j]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犃狆狆犾犻犲犱犈犮狅犾狅犵狔,2004,15(10):1963 1966. [20]! ".5406%&FNO[J].V < ==0(T=),2006,6(2):150 152. ZHENG R.Efectof5406actinomycetesonthegrowthof wheatseedlings[j]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犐狀狀犲狉犕狅狀犵狅犾犻犪犃犵狉犻犮狌犾 狋狌狉犪犾犝狀犻狏犲狉狊犻狋狔 ( 犖犪狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲犈犱犻狋犻狅狀 ),2006,6(2): 150 152. [21], -,O,. - N 6 J M+,[J]. N,2005(3):8 11. XIONG M B,LUOSH M,TIAN Y B, 犲狋犪犾.Studyonthe changeofsoilnutrientandrootactivityinwheatgrowing period and its correlation [J]. 犛狅犻犾犪狀犱犉犲狉狋犻犾犻狕犲狉, 2005(3):8 11. [22],P, /,.c +,.. J ` a Z a F N O [J].I = 0, 2012,27(b12):127 130. HU M,HE D X,JIANG X, 犲狋犪犾.Efectsofdiferentre searchmethodsand methodson wheatrootactivityand rootqualitymeasurementaccuracy[j]. 犃犮狋犪犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犲犅狅狉犲犪犾犻 狊犻狀犻犮犪,2012,27(b12):127 130. [23], =,.K7LMF +, H [J].=,2010,49(1):205 206. WANG W N,QUANXJ,CHONGG.Advancesinmecha nismandapplicationofplantinducedresistance[j]. 犎狌犫犲犻犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲狊,2010,49(1):205 206. [24] LIUL,KLOEPPERJW,TUZUNS.Inductionsystemicin cucumberagainstfusarium wiltbygrowth plantingrhi zobactria[j]. 犅犻狅犾狅犵犻犮犪犾犆狅狀狋狉狅犾,1995,85(6):695 697. [25] GEERTD M,JEOSPH B,YIGALE, 犲狋犪犾.Inducedresist ancein 犜狉犻犮犺狅犱犲狉犿犪犺犪狉狕犻犪狀狌犿 T39biocontrolofbotrytis cinerrea[j]. 犝狉狅狆犲犪狀狅犳犘犾犪狀狋犘犪狋犺狅犾狅犵狔,1998,106(3): 179 286. [26] MEERA M S,SHIVANNA M B,KAGEYAMA K, 犲狋犪犾. Plantgrowth promoting fungifrom zoysiagrass rhizo sphereaspotentioalinducersofsystemicincucumber[j]. 犚犲狊犻狊狋犲狀犮犲,1994,84(12):1399 1405. [27] ZHU Q,DABIT,BEECHE A, 犲狋犪犾.Cloningandproper tiesofaricegeneencodingphenylaneammonia lyase[j]. 犘犾犪狀狋犕狅犾犲犮狌犾犪狉犅犻狅犾狅犵狔,1995,29:535 550. [28] TIAN SP,HARMAN G.Defenseresponseinducedby seed treatment with Trichoderma harizianum in maize MO17[J]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犘犾犪狀狋犘犪狋犺狅犾狅犵狔,2008,38(6):626 634. [29],, b. L BS 208 C E K7LM F a +, [J].I = 0,2005,20(6):84 87. DULX,FENGSH L,WANG R Y.Preliminarystudyon antagonisticresistanceofbs 208 straintotomato gray moldresistance[j]. 犃犮狋犪犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犲犅狅狉犲犪犾犻 犛犻狀犻犮犪, 2005,20(6):84 87. [30] GUTTERIGEJ M C, 犲狋犪犾.Superoxidedependentforma tionofhydroxylradicalsandlipidperoxidationinthepres enceofironsalts[j]. 犅犻狅犮犺犲犿犻犮犪犾犑狅狌狉狀犪犾,1982(206): 605 609. [31],, I,.< L M J M % a F [J]. = S 0,2012, 28(25):68 72. LIN Y,GUO W ZH,XUZH H, 犲狋犪犾.Changesofcoldtol eranceand 犕犪犾狅狀犱犻犪犾犱犲犺狔犱犲 andsolublesugarcontentin winterleaves[j]. 犆犺犻狀犲狊犲犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲犅狌犾犲狋犻狀, 2012,28(25):68 72.
666 # = 0 27 犈犳犲犮狋狊狅犳犜狑狅犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊犛狋狉犪犻狀狊狅狀犌狉狅狑狋犺犪狀犱犐狀犱狌犮犲犱犚犲狊犻狊狋犪狀犮犲狅犳犠犺犲犪狋犛犲犲犱犾犻狀犵狊 LIU Yutao,ZHANG Kai,MAJunni,LAIHangxianandXUE Quanhong (ColegeofResourcesandEnvironment,NorthwestA&FUniversity,YanglingShaanxi 712100,China) 犃犫狊狋狉犪犮狋 Inthisstudy,theefectsoftwo 犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊 strains, 犛. 狉狅犮犺犲 D74and 犛. 狆犪狉狋狌犿 Act12,on growthpromotionandinducedresistanceinwheatwereexamined,inordertoprovideevidenceforthe applicationofstreptomyceteagentsinwheatproduction.a mixedagentofthetwoteststrains(1 1 massratio)wasappliedatdiferentratesandusingdiferentmethodsinpetridishgermination,sand pot,andsoilpotexperiments.thegerminationrate,germinationindex,seedvigor,seedlinggrowthpa rametersandinducedresistanceindicesofwheatwereanalyzed.theresultsshowedthat(i)themixed 犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊 agentsignificantlypromotedthegrowthofwheat.comparedwiththecontrol,thetreat mentofseedcoatingat10mg/pergrainincreasedthegerminationrateby41.9%,thegerminationin dexby40.0%,theleafareaby149.2%,thetotalfreshmassoftheplantby100%,andthefreshmass ofrootsby220.0%( 犘 <0.05foral).Theseedvigorincreasedby31.8%inthetreatmentofseed soakingin10 fold dilutedextract,whilelargerincrease(62.7%)occurredintherootactivityinthe treatmentofcoatingat5 mg/pergraincompared withthecontrol( 犘 <0.05forboth).Theplant heightandleafareaofwheatseedlingsshowedsimilarincreases(29.2% and27.6%,respectively)in thetreatmentofseedsoakingin10 fold dilutedfermentationfiltrate,andtheemergencerateofseed lingsincreasedby44.0% -103.8% inthetreatmentofseedsoakinginthe10-2 -10-4 dilutionsof fermentationfiltrate( 犘 <0.05foral).(i)Themixed 犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊 agentmarkedlyimprovedinduced resistanceinwheat.leafpodactivityincreasedby46.7%-70.0%inthetreatmentsofseedcoating andsoakingatappropriaterates,while52.5%increaseoccurredinleafppoactivityinthetreatment ofseedcoatingat5mgpergraincomparedwiththecontrol( 犘 <0.05forboth).However,adecrease of34.0%-40.2% wasfoundinleafmdacontentinthetreatmentofseedsoakinginthe10-2 -10-4 dilutionsoffermentationfiltratecomparedwiththecontrol( 犘 <0.05).Therefore,amixture/combina tionof 犛. 狉狅犮犺犲 D74and 犛. 狆犪狉狋狌犿 Act12hassignificantefectsinpromotingseedlinggrowthandin creasinginducedresistanceinwheat. 犓犲狔狑狅狉犱狊犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊 ;Growthpromotion;Inducedresistance;Wheat 犚犲犮犲犻狏犲犱 2017 11 16 犚犲狋狌狉狀犲犱 2018 01 14 犉狅狌狀犱犪狋犻狅狀犻狋犲犿 thestatescienceand TechnologySupportinginthe 12thFive YearPlan (No. 2012BAD14B11);theScienceandTechnologyInnovationPlanofScienceandTechnologyinShaanxi Province(No.2016KTZDNY03 03 02). 犉犻狉狊狋犪狌狋犺狅狉 LIU Yutao,male,masterstudent.Researcharea:utilization of microbialresources. E mail:1601047212@qq.com 犆狅狉狉犲狊狆狅狀犱犻狀犵犪狌狋犺狅狉 XUE Quanhong,male,professor,doctoralsupervisor.Researcharea:microbial ecologyandresourceutilizationresearch.e mail:xuequanhong@163.com (CDE: 犚犲狊狆狅狀狊犻犫犾犲犲犱犻狋狅狉 : 犆犎犈犖犌犕犻狀 )