Northeast Asia Forum 2012 2 100 No. 22012 Sum No. 100 20 60 20 80 F243. 1 1003-7411201202 - 0035-12 2011-11 - 17 A doi10. 3969 /j. issn. 1003-7411. 2012. 02. 005 GQBY2011018 1964-264209 20 1 2 21 3 4 35
20122 2010 GDP 2. 39 ITUC1. 7 1. 41 1 5 6 10 1 200 7 2009 56 25 44. 3% 8 325 634 9 10 1. 1897 7 11 12 1899 5 700 40 2 000 1898 2 1920 1940 12 1 ITUC http/ /www. ituc - csi. org. 175 1. 7 312 36
13 14 2. 1945 12 38 375 9 1945 3. 2% 1946 4 40% 1948 55. 8% 15 1 1946 ~ 1949 1946. 8. 19 1946. 8. 1 1950 ~ 1963 1951. 6 1964 ~ 1974 1970. 3 1974. 12 1975 ~ 1988 1976. 10. 7 1989 ~ 1989. 11. 21. M.. J. 2009 11318. 16 2 17 1975 35% 20 2010 18. 5% 3 2 % 1966 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 22. 2 17. 4 12. 7 10. 4 8. 8 7. 2 5. 7 5. 0 4. 4 4. 2 4. 2 4. 2 32. 2 35. 7 35. 9 35. 3 34. 9 34. 1 33. 6 31. 2 27. 5 26. 9 25. 9 25. 3 44. 7 46. 2 50. 1 53. 9 56. 3 58. 2 60. 2 63. 2 67. 5 68. 9 69. 9 70. 6 http/ /www. stat. go. jp 1945 ~ 1949 1955 37
20122 3 1995 ~ 2010 1995 52 630 12 614 23. 9 1999 53 310 11 825 22. 2 2000 53 560 11 539 21. 5 2001 53 690 11 212 20. 9 2002 53 310 10 801 20. 3 2003 53 350 10 531 19. 7 2004 53 550 10 309 19. 3 2005 53 930 10 138 18. 8 2006 54 720 10 041 18. 3 2007 55 230 10 080 18. 3 2008 55 240 10 065 18. 2 2010 54 345 10 054 18. 5 http/ /www. stat. go. jp % 1. 20 50 4 Freeman & Medoff 1984 18 Michael Schuster 1983 19 Masayuki Morikawa2010 1998 ~ 2004 4 000 20 21 2. 38
22 4 ~ 5 23 4 1970 ~ 2008 1970 4 551 9 137 3 783 2 357 2 256 1 720 32 4. 4 2 356 1 294 101 34 1975 8 435 10 261 7 574 4 614 3 385 2 731 25 2. 9 5 475 2 449 55 11 1980 4 376 5 456 3 737 1 768 1 128 563 10 0. 2 3 038 1 356 37 12 1985 4 826 3 249 4 230 1 355 625 123 3 0. 2 3 834 1 267 7 2. 3 1990 2 071 2 026 1 698 699 283 84 2 0. 0 1 533 638 7 0. 5 1995 1 200 1 207 685 222 208 38 1 0. 0 549 193 7 1. 6 1996 1 240 1 183 695 178 189 23 4 0. 0 568 159 4 0. 1 1997 1 334 1 296 782 213 178 47 2 0. 1 655 169 4 0. 9 1998 1 164 1 186 526 165 145 26 4 0. 1 441 142 3 0. 2 1999 1 102 1 134 419 106 152 26 3 0. 0 301 83 2 0. 0 2000 958 1 117 305 85 117 15 1 0. 0 216 71 2 0. 0 2001 884 072 246 75 89 12 2 0. 0 176 65 - - 2002 1 002 1 005 304 66 74 7. 0 - - 253 60 - - 2003 872 1 153 174 43 47 4. 4 - - 145 39 - - 2004 737 710 173 55 51 7. 0 1 0. 0 142 50 - - 2005 708 646 129 27 50 4. 1 - - 99 24 - - 2006 662 627 111 39 46 5. 8 - - 82 35 - - 2007 636 613 156 54 54 21 - - 118 34 - - 2008 657 177 112 49 52 8. 3 - - 80 42 - - - http/ /www. stat. go. jp /data /nenkan /zuhyou /y1645000. xls 1. 1910 ~ 1989 1910 ~ 1945 20 1945 8 1945 ~ 1960 5 1961 5 24 40 39
20122 5 1945 8 1947 3 2 388 60 1945 ~ 1947 1947 1 1948 ~ 1960 1959 12 1960 1961 ~ 1986 1987 ~ 1989 1987 1987 3 749 1990 ~ 1996 1990 1995 1997 1964 ~ 1997 Hagen Koo. M.. 2004199-2002004 ~ 2010 2010 M /OL. http/www. koilaf. org Recent labor economic trend 24 22 20 70 80 1987 20% 5 25 2. 1990 1990 1997 1 300 40
1997 1996 6 5. 5% 2006 90 50 26 6 1963 ~ 2008 % 1963 1 349 274 9. 4 1986 6 683 1 036 12. 3 1987 7 439 1 267 13. 8 1997 10 992 1 484 11. 2 1999 12 663 1 481 11. 7 2000 13 360 1 527 11. 4 2001 13 659 1 569 11. 5 2002 14 181 1 538 10. 8 2003 14 402 1 550 10. 8 2004 14 894 1 537 10. 3 2005 15 185 1 506 9. 9 2006 15 551 1 559 10. 0 2007 15 970 1 688 10. 6 2008 16 206 1 666 10. 3 % 1964 ~ 1997 Hagen Koo. M.. 2004199-2002004 ~ 2010 2010 M /OL. http/www. koilaf. org Recent labor economic trend 1997 6 7 1998 27 7 1966 ~ 2010 % 1966 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 57. 8 50. 4 45. 7 34. 0 24. 9 17. 9 11. 8 10. 6 7. 9 7. 2 7. 0 6. 6 10. 8 14. 3 19. 1 22. 5 30. 8 35. 4 33. 4 28. 1 26. 4 25. 0 24. 1 24. 7 31. 4 35. 3 35. 2 43. 5 44. 3 46. 7 54. 8 61. 3 65. 4 67. 6 68. 5 68. 5 http/ /kostat. go. kr 20 70 80 10 ~ 12 15 ~ 18 90 8 21 1. 20 80 82008 41
20122 9 2005 ~ 2008 2007 ~ 2008 8 % 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009. 6 5. 2 4. 7 4. 8 4. 8 4. 9 1. 4 93. 3 90. 7 85. 7 76. 5 84. 0 36. 1 12 6 781 100 www. koilaf. orgrecent labor economic trend 9 / 1990 460. 26 20. 87 2 742. 94 729. 30 758. 73 1997 1 033. 24 59. 74 2 237. 86 1 240. 91 1 352. 50 2000 1 247. 73 88. 10 2 283. 84 1 251. 93 1 651. 25 2001 1 292. 53 98. 41 2 318. 12 - - - - 2002 1 446. 79 110. 77 2 309. 55 1 532. 32 1 715. 43 2003 1 677. 36 125. 80 2 458. 58 1 475. 89 1 873. 20 2004 1 910. 64 141. 29 2 727. 00 1 481. 00 1 961. 26 2005 2 325. 02 158. 65 2 800. 95 1 493. 78 2 129. 68 2006 2 549. 13 185. 44 2 561. 58 1 544. 56 2 170. 22 2007 2 989. 88 222. 03 2 511. 82 1 527. 99 2 444. 30 2008 2 938. 44 272. 78 2 569. 90 1 522. 23 2 724. 20. 1997 ~ 2008 Z /OL. ILO http/ /data. un. org 2010 86 1964 1997 11 10 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 56 36 26 24 22 27 37 42 19 21 13 17 349 194 78 57 59 67 20 15 15 13 14 10 462 287 138 115 108 121 http/ /www. koilaf. org Labor trend report of regional labor administration 2. 2004 28 3. 42
2001 2004 11 2004 10 2009 29 30 11 1964 126 - - 1980 407 - - 1987 3749 - - 1997 78 - - 2004 462 58 1 198 779 2005 287 16 847 697 2006 138 253 24 1 200 267 2007 115 212 17 536 285 2008 108 130 17 809 402 2009 121 175 11 626 921 2010 86 9 511 000-2005 2006 2006 ~ 2009 2005 1964 ~ 1997 Hagen Koo. M.. 2004199-2002004 ~ 2010 2010 M /OL. http/www. koilaf. org Recent labor economic trend 1. 19 20 1 2 1 2 20 60 43
20122 2. 31 3. 1914 1916 1920 11 21 32 1921 8 11 1922 5 33 1925 5 20 60 20 80 30% GDP 1 34 1. 2. 1. J. 2010 721-22 44
3. 4. 1997 1987 5. 2012 FTA 1. M. 1989261. 2. J. 2008 716-17. 3. J. 2007 872. 4. M. 2010 1494. 5 Ohn Pencavel. Unionism Viewed Internationally J. Journal of labor Research2005 26 165-97. 6. J. 2010 3438-39. 7 N. 2011-05 - 23. 8. E. 2011 1. http/ /www. cec - ceda. org. cn / ldgx /info /content. phpid = 1436. 9. E. 2009 1. 10. A. 3 C. 2010 12773-782. 45
20122 11. M. 1971143. 12. M. 1994503. 13. R. 2009. 14.. M. 2009169. 15. J. 2009 11318. 16. J. 2010 2173-175. 17. M. 201055. 18 FreemanRichard B. and James L. Medoff. What Do Unions Do M. New York. 1984. 19 Michael SchusterThe impact of union - management cooperation on productivity and employment J. Industrial and labor Relations Review 1983 37415-30. 20 Masayuki MorikawaLabor unions and productivityan empirical analysis using Japanese firm - level data J. Labor E- conomics. 2010 171030-1037. 21. A. 3 C. 2010415-426. 22. J. 2001 837-38. 23. J. 2001 57-60. 24 Hagen Koo. M.. 200440 22. 25 Daniel B. CornfieldApplying U. S. research on labor union membership participation to South Korean unionsan assessment J. Korea journal of population and development. 1997 12124. 26. / A.. /M. 201032-33. 27. J. 2010 133-35. 28. J. 2008 350-52. 29. J. 2009 3176. 30. N. 2008-12 - 02. 31 R L. 7 M.. 2006292. 32. M. 2006282. 33. J. 2005 46-48. 34. A. 4 C. 20111-10. A Comparative Study on Trade Unions of Japan and Korea and Implications LIU Wen AbstractJapan and Korea's development of trade unions is closely related to the process of industrialization. The two countries have formed a multi - level tripartite body and various rules and systemswhich not only safeguard the interests of workersbut also enable enterprise benefit. Labor relations have evolved from conflict to cooperation. China is still in the middle stage of industrializationand the industrial structure is e- quivalent to the 1960s in Japan and 1980s in Korea. The labor relations are also similar with Japan and Korea then. It is crucial to construct organization mechanism of trade union which is suitable to Chinastrengthen the independence and influenceprotect the interests of underemployedestablish special institute for economic and trade union researchand explore international cooperation with trade unions in Japan and Korea. Key WordsChinaJapanKoreatrade unionlabor relationsindustrialization 46