(empirical criterion) (factor ana2 lytic), ( Chinese Personality Assessment, 22, 15 CPA I) [4-6 ], 1, : (1) (Qingnian Zhongguo Personality Scale, QZPS

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "(empirical criterion) (factor ana2 lytic), ( Chinese Personality Assessment, 22, 15 CPA I) [4-6 ], 1, : (1) (Qingnian Zhongguo Personality Scale, QZPS"

没洛孟
5 years ago
Views:

1 31 5 () Vol. 31 No. 5 Journal of Sout hwest China Normal University ( Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) Sept., [ ] : :,,,,,,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1, 2 (11, ;21,100853) :, 2000,,,, (QX),, :; ; ;;() :B848 :A : (2005) [4-16 ], [ 1-3 ], ( rational construct) 3 : :( ),,,,,, ; ( ),,,,,, : ( ), : 5

2 (empirical criterion) (factor ana2 lytic), ( Chinese Personality Assessment, 22, 15 CPA I) [4-6 ], 1, : (1) (Qingnian Zhongguo Personality Scale, QZPS) ; (2), ; (3),, 150 ( ) CPA I (CPA I) 90,(3) 560, 1993 [4 ] 1996 [ 5 ],,,,22 [ 17 ], (Dependability) CPA I 3,12 (Chinese Tradition) ( Social Potency) 22 3 ( Individualism) [6 ] CPA I CPA I ; (4) , (1), (2), 1 CPA I 22 [6 ], 22, 330 ( PRA) (REN) - ( I_ E) - (S_S) ( EMO) ( HAR) (L EA) - (L_A) (RES) ( FL E) (ADV) Q (DEF) ( I_S) - ( G_M) (MOD) ( FAC) - (V_S) - ( T_ E) - (O_P) (MET) ( E_I) ( FAM) CPA I, CPA I [20 ], Q, [8 ],,, ( ) QZPS, 410, ( QZPS ) 1 400, CPA I 15 ( [18 19 ], 6

3 ) [ 8 ], 2 600, 13, 13 ( 15, ), [14-16 ] N EO PI2R [17 ] 30, [21 ] QZPS, 409,, [9-11 ],, 10-30, , 328, %, 4 :, ; ;, 3 2 ;,18, 1 861,, (QZPS), 2 QZPS, 1 635,,, [15 16 ] QZPS () [11 ] 409 QZPS 409, 3 200,. 25,, :(36) (15) (12) (9) 2 : (31) (17) (6) (8) 3 : (29) (14) (11) (4) 4 : (26) (11) (9) (6) 5 :(23) (15) (8) 6 : (20) (13) (7) 7 : (15) (9) (6) CPA I QZPS, ( ),, CPAI, QZ2 QZPS PS, ; CPA I, CPA I ( QZPS ),,,,, : (1) CPA I 22, CPA I QZPS 18,,, (),, ; (2) CPA I CPAI QZPS, ; QZPS (), ( ) CPA I QZPS 7

4 ( ) CPA I [5 ] QZPS [11 ] ( ) 2 502, 1 250, 1 196, 56,16 25 FL E QZPS XF3 ( ) CG2 ( ) , , ,65 984,1 557,,, 61 ( ) CPA I QZPS CPA I 22 QZPS 18 CPAI , XF2, CPA I, 22 QZPS ,QX2 ( ) QZPS CPA I S_ S ( - ) EMO RES() FAM ( ) FAC( ) ADV () I_, QZPS QZPS, CPA I (0. 90, ) 3, QZPS WX2 R G2, ( ADV I_ E) CPAI, QZPS T_ E ) ( ADV I_ E T_ E ) EMO () I_ S ( - ) O_P( - ) V_S( - ) L EA () PRA () M ET() HAR () DEF ( Q ) REN ( ), QZPS ( ), QZPS ( CT), EMO QZPS QX1 ( ) XF1 ( ) WX3 ( ), EMO () HAR DEF REN ( SL1) ( DEF ) ( R G1) ( DEF CPA I QZPS ( ) L_A ( - ) E_ I( - ),XF1 ( ) CG1 ( ) CG3 ( ) CT1 ( ), CPA I E_ I FL E() MOD (),QZPS ( 0. 30) MOD QZPS 0. 10,, FL E, QZPS, 18 CPAI, WX2 ( ) R G2 ( ) CPA I 0. 90,WX1 ( ) QX1 ( ) CPAI 0. 60, 8 ( WX3 SL1 SL2 SL3 XF1 CG1 CG3 R G1) XF3 CG2 CT1 CT2 5 CPAI CPAI 0. 30, CPAI,CPA I L_A ( - ) E( - ) T_ E( - ) G_M ( - ) E_I( - ) FL E () MOD (),QZPS XF2 XF3 CG2 CT1 CT2 QX2 ( 3 CPA I QZPS WX SL XF CG QX R G CT QZPS CPAI ), ;,QZPS ( ) L _A QZPS ( SL) ( R G) CG3 ( ) CT1 ( ) CT2 ( ),,, E_I WX3 ( ) ( WX) (CG) 8

5 , ( R G) (CT),,,,QZPS CPA I, ( ) QZPS XF ( ) CPA I ( ), CPA I QZPS CA PI, CPAI ( 1) QZPS,, 6, QZPS (QX) (XF) CPA I, CPA I (MOD) ( FL E) QZPS, % % %,CPA I QZPS,4 QZPS, (WX) (SL) ( R G) (CT), CPA I ( ) CPA I Q ZPS QZPS CPAI, CPA I 22 QZPS %, % % % 4 CPA I QZPS V_S FAM G_M SL HAR PRA S_S DEF Q XF SL SL WX L EA R G WX WX I_ E RES O_P ADV E_I REN EMO I_S FAC CT CT CG L_A XF

6 CG R G QX QX CG XF MET T_ E MOD FL E QZPS CPA I 4,, I II IV V I CPA I QZPS, III V CPA I QZPS, III CPA I, QZPS,V QZPS, CPAI III CPA I , CPA I (5 ) (2 ) (1 ), III -,(Neuroticism), 5, CPA I 352 % % V QZPS, ( ) ( ), 2 CPA I 352 -, QZ2 11 CPA I PS (QX) 5,,CPA I QZPS 198,132, CPA I 0. 35, Q ZPS, % () Q ZPS CPA I :51 (9. 04 %) 26 (4. 57 %) 25 (4. 03 %) 19 (3. 72 %) 11 (3. 03 %) ( ) CPA I, CPA I 330,2-3, , ( 6) : 10

7 6 CPAI ,, (, Q ZPS SL ( ) R G( ) CT ( ),, (, ), Q ZPS CG( ) Q X (),,, (, ), Q ZPS C G( ) ( ), ),, (,, ), QZPS, ( SL ( ) R G( ) 7, ), Q ZPS WX () QZPS 7 CPA I QZPS CPA I WX SL XF CG QX R G CT ,CPA I QZPS,,WX SL CG R G CT, ; QX, 0. 41, XF, ;, ), CPA I ( ) QZPS, CPA I, QZPS 21 CPA I 6, 189, ( 9) : CPA I XF( ,) ( % ( 0. 50) QZPS ) :48 (8. 44 %) 26 (4. 38 %) 24 (3. 75 %) ( 22 (3. 68 %) 10 (2. 73 %) 11 (2. 09 %) 0. 47), QZPS,,,2-3,, CPA I, ( 8) : 8 CPA I , (, QZPS SL ( ) R G( ) CPAI 9 QZPS, QZPS QX() CPA I (, 0. 40),CPA I ( ) CPA I Q ZPS CPAI 14 QZPS 18 11

8 , % % % % % %, % 10 9 CPA I QZPS QZPS CPA I WX SL XF CG QX R G CT CPAI QZPS CPA I CPA I CPA I CPA I CPA I SL SL CT CPA I CT CG SL CPA I CPA I WX CPA I WX R G WX XF CG CG CPA I CPA I XF CPA I XF R G QX QX CPA I CPA I I2V ),V I CPAI ( QZPS CPA I, V I QZPS ) 10 4, ( ) ( CPAI,CPA I QZPS 12

9 :CPA I QZPS 11 QCF12QCF7 QZPS CPA I, ( ) CPA I QZPS CPAI 141 QZPS 180 ( QCF2 QZPS ( WX) ; QCF3 3), 7 QZPS ( XF), (CG) 40 (QZPS 12,CPA I 28 ),281 QZPS (CG), ( WX) 0. 30, ;QCF5 ( CPA I ) (QCF12QCF7) 75 (46) 53 (24) 46 CPAI ) QCF12QCF7 ;QCF6 ( CPA I ) QZPS % % % %(QX), ( R G) % % %, %, QCF7 QZPS CT ( ) WX ( ),QCF12QCF7 2 XF ( ) C G( ) R G ( ) Q X ( , % ) SL ( ), % % % % % %,QCF1 QZPS (CT), ( WX) (SL) (CG) ( R G) ; (R G) (CT) ;QCF4 QZPS (R G), ( WX) (18) 42 (19) 25 (0) 23 (0) 17 (6) ((SL) (CG) (CT) ;QCF7 QZPS ( SL) QCF12 11 QZPS CPA I QZPS CPAI QCF1 QCF2 QCF3 QCF4 QCF5 QCF6 QCF7 WX SL XF CG QX R G CT QCF1 QCF5, QCF2, QCF3, QCF4, QCF1 QCF5, QCF7, 10, QZPS (QX) QCF6 ( QX 0. 95) CPAI,,0. 39, CPA I QZPS QZPS, 4 CPA I 141 QZPS 180 CPAI, 11,CPAI, CPA I QZPS QCF12QCF7 CPA I (QX) 13

10 CPAI QZPS ),,, QZPS (CPA I) (QZPS) (QX) QZPS, (QX), CA PI,,, ; CPA I,, QZPS,,,,, CPA I QZ2 PS, CPA I, ( )?,CPA I,,, ( 4),CPA I, ( 10),,, QZPS, CPA I, :,,,,QZPS,,,,,,,,, Wang, Cui, & Zhou [21 ] QZPS 18 N EO PI2R [17 ] 30, : ),, N EO PI2R,, QZPS ( ),, ( ), ( ), QZPS,, QZPS N EO PI2R ( ) ( ),,,,,, [24 ] 5, N EO PI2R ( 48, 5 ), [22 ], N EO PI2R, ( Extroversion) QZPS CPA I QZPS (WX),QZPS, QZPS ( QX), [12 ][ 23 ] ( N EO PI2R,,,,,, 5 QZPS (, ( )? CPA I,CPA I CPAI QZPS CPAI QZPS,,,CPAI QZPS 14

11 ,( QX) CG2 ( ) XF3 ( ) 11,QZPS (QX) QCF6, QZPS RES() O_ P, QCF6 CPA I ( ) CPA I ( ) QCF4 ( QZPS ),CPA I,() CPA I CPAI,, CPA I,, ( ),,,,, CPA I,,,CPA I,,,, (300 ),, :, QZPS 18 N EO PI2R 30, QZPS N EO PI2R, QZPS (QX) ( ), N EO PI2R, QZPS, [21 ], CPA I,,, ( ) CPA I QZPS,,,,,CPA I QZPS CPAI QZPS,CPAI QZPS FL E() MOD() ( - ) ADV () REN ( ) EMO () I _S( - ) FAC( ),CPA I (), [ 1 ] Goldberg, L. R. A n alternative descri ptive of Personali2 t y : T he bi g f ive st ructure[j ]. Journal of Personality and So2 cial Psychology, 1990, 59, [ 2 ] John O. The big f ive Factor Taxonomy : Dimensions of Per2 sonality in the Natural Language and in Questionnaires, Hand2 book of Personality : Theory and Research, ed[ M ]. By L. Per2 vin, Guilford Press, [ 3 ] McCrae,R. R., & Costa, P. T. Personalit y t rait st ructure as a human universal [ J ]. American Psychologist, 1997, 52 (5) : [ 4 ],,,, 1 (CPAI) [ J ]1, 1993, 25 ( 4), [ 5 ] Cheung F., & Leung K. Development of the Chinese Per2 sonality Assessment Inventory [J ]. Journal of Cross 2Cultural Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 2, [ 6 ] Cheung F., Leung K., Zhang, J. X., Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z., & Xie, D. I ndi genous Chinese per2 sonalit y const ructs : Is t he f ive 2 f actor model com plete? [J ] Journal of Cross 2 Cultural Psychology, 2001, 32, [ 7 ] Yang K., Bond M. Ex ploring im plicit personalit y theories with indi genous or im ported constructs : The Chinese case [J ], Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 58, No. 6, [ 8 ],1 [ A ]1 :,

12 [ 9 ], 1 ( QZPS) [J ]1 [ 18 ] Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. T rait names : A psy2 (),2001,38 (6) : [ 10 ], 1 [J ]1,2003,35 (1) : [ 11 ], 1 [J ]1,2004,36 (3) : [ 12 ] : [ A ]1 :2004,20041 [13 ], 1 [J ]1 ( ),2000,37 (4) : [ 14 ] 1 [D]1,20021 [ 15 ],1 [22 ],1 [J ]1, [J ]1,2003,1 (2) : [ 16 ],1 : [ 23 ], 1 [J ]1 [ A ]1, 1 ( ) [ C]1 :,2004 : [ 17 ] Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R. Revised N EO Personalit y Inventory ( N EO PI2R ) and N EO Five2Factor Inventory ( N EO2FFI) [J ], Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Lutz, FL : cho2lexical Study [J ]. Psychological Monographs, 1936 : 41 (1,whole No. 211). [19 ] John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. cal ap proach to personality : A historical review of T he lex i2 trait taxonomic research [ J ]. European journal of Personality, 1988, 2, [20 ],,1 [J ]1,1995,27 (4) : [ 21 ] Wang, D., Cui, H., & Zhou, F. Measuring Chinese per2 sonalit y : Q Z PS versus N EO PI2R [J ]. Asian Journal of So2 cial Psychology, 2005, Issue 1, in press ,20041 [ 24 ] 1 :[J ]1 ( ),1995, 16 (3) : Exploring Personality Structure of the Chinese WAN G Deng2feng 1,CU I Hong 2 (11 Department of psychology, Peking University, Beijing , China; 21 Medical Psychology Division, PL A General Hospital, Beijing , China) Abstract :This research was aimed at exploring the relationship between two Chinese personality scales, Qingnian Zhong2 guo Personality Scale and Chinese Personality Assessment, factor structure of Chinese Personality Assessment, and the stability of Chinese seven2factor personality model. More than 2000 subject s f ulfilled both Qingnian Zhongguo Personality Scale and Chinese Personality Assessment. Correlation and factor analysis result s indicate that Chinese Personality As2 sessment have an excessive factor similar to Western neuroticism, and a lack of the Emotionality dimension compared with Qingnian Zhongguo Personality Scale. Joint factor analysis with items f rom both Qingnian Zhongguo Personality Scale and Chinese Personality Assessment provide support to the seven2factor model of Chinese personality and the hypothesis of a lack of emotionality dimension in Chinese Personality Assessment scale. The absence of neuroticism in Chinese personali2 ty, and implications of exploring Chinese personality by indigenous research are discussed in the present article. Key words :Chinese personality structure ; seven2factor model ; Chinese Personality Assessment ; Qingnian Zhongguo Per2 sonality Scale ; indigenous research 16

續論

國立臺北教育大學學報, 第 19 卷第 1 期 (95 年 3 月 )23~50 王士禎的山水詩 ( 下 ): 神韻與山水 23 國立臺北教育大學王士禎的山水詩 ( 下 ): 神韻與山水 * 黃雅歆摘要引領康熙詩壇的王士禎, 匯聚有清以來詩人對詩歌創作的主張, 加以