I
91 6 21 18910026 3. II
III
Biomechanics Analysis to the Preliminary Squat and Elastic Force of the Barbell of the Clean and Jerk of Woman Weight Lifting in Taiwan Region June,2002 Graduate Student Yuan-Chien Ni Advisor Pao-Cheng Lin ABSTRACT This research use the biomechanical method and inquire into the Taiwan region four the Olympics of the potentials and excellent contestant of the world classes stand to raise the kinematics and kinetics characteristics of the preliminary squat of the clean and jerk. The contestants are Wang Chin-Yu, Kuo Pin-Chun, Kuo Yi-Han and Chen Hsiao-Lien. This research was not only capture the knee joint data such as angle and angular velocity by the high speed camera but also using force plate capture the ground reaction forces at the same time. The experiment shows the angular change of the knee joint during the preliminary squat down was distributed in 113 to 127 degrees and with the average value was 120 degrees. The maximum ground reaction force during the pre-squat down is 2.08 time to body weight in average, 1.5 time during the post-squat down and 4.28 time during the pull up. The elastic deformation of the barbell left side during pre-squat down is 65.10 cm in average, the middle point is 63.53 cm and the right side is 67.63 cm. During the post-squat down, the elastic deformation of the barbell left side the even all 45.58 cm, the middle point is average 50.37 cm and the right barbell side is average 48.40 cm. During the pull up, the deformation of the barbell left side is the average 84.50 cm, the middle point is average 87.17 cm and the right barbell side is average 90.12 cm. Key words: woman weight Lifting,clean & jerk,jerk,preliminary, a barbell elasticity IV
V
.I II...III IV V VI. VIII IX... 1... 1... 3... 5... 5... 6... 7... 12... 12... 17 VI
... 19... 20... 20... 20... 21... 27... 29... 31... 31... 33... 64... 69... 69... 70... 71... 75 VII
VIII
IX
X
1987 Schodl 1997 1997 1997 1984 1987 15 23 47 51 2001 2000 1
(Snatch) (Clean & Jerk) IWF-Medals and World Records in weightlifting 1997 Clean Jerk ( ) 2
45 3 135 70 17 48 13 35 12.5 25 62.5 3
4
(High Speed Camera) Kistler 5
6
(Jerk ) 1-6-1 To prepare posture 7
1-6-2 Preliminary 1-6-3 8
1-6-4 ( Pre squat ) ( Post squat ) 9
1-6-6 Jerk pull 1-6-7 10
Inertia on the rise 1-6-8 ( Stride forward squat keep up ) 1-6-9 A barbell elasticity 11
1977 1977 110 143 (1978) 135 135 12
1979 110-125 1981 113-118 1979 1979 r=0.79 1981 1.2 0.7% 1981 0.19 0.16 13
Baumann (1983) 35mm 1/3 Kauhanen (1984) concentric phase 1994 r=0,547(n=25,p<0.01) 1994 14
(1994) 1990 9 0.22 0.15 0.19 0.24 0.24 5 1.05 0.12 0.06 0.22 0.20-0.50 / -0.96 / 1.18 / 1.56 / -0.40 / 111.5 162.9 Bartonietz (1996) Reiser (1996) 5 1000 transition phase 130-140 15
1998 9 108 3 324 166 33 125 41 32.8% 84 67.2% 3.6% 41.7% 54.8% 1999 (2000 ) 135-140 110 120 16
1977 50% Vorobyev (1978) 1979 A=h =Fcosθ S F θ F S Fcosθ A h Fcosθ S 1981 Garhammer (1985 1989) 17
1997 1. 2. 3 (1999) 1999 30% 18
110-125 0.22 113-118 111.5 0.22 19
48 63 75 75 3-1-1 3-1-1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) A 48 159 60 112.5 90 80.0 2001 B 63 150 64 125.0 90 72.5 2001 C 75 167 75 140.0 100 71.0 2000 D 75 171 98 156.5 90 70.0 1998 20
Kistler (Force-plate) 4 (Amplifier) Kistler (Piezoelectric Transducer) (Sensitivity) Fz ( ) 50000 Fx Fy ( ) 10000 (Bioware) 21
Kistler (Aril Motion Analy system) ( ) 500 12 1/250 250 3-3-1 Sony 22
Kistler 12Bit A/D Bioware 23
24
250 500 3-3-1-25
3-3-2 26
Kistler Kistler (Amplifier) BioWare BioWare 15 UESAKA-TOKYO 25 20 15 27
10 5 2.5 1.25 4 28
90 4 3-3-3 29
:Kistler :9281B :500Hz :Kodak :Fastcam :250FPS :1/250 3-3-3 30
Clean (Jerk) Aril Motion Analysis System Kistler 4-1-1 Aril Motion Analysis System 4-1-2 31
4-1-1 Ariel Motion Analysis System 4-1-2 4-1-2 32
( ) kistler 12-Bit (A/D Transform) A 70 80 90 B 65 77.5 90 C 75 90 100 D 90 105 110 (1) (2) (3) (4) 33
( 0 ) 4-2-5 4-2-1 4-2-2 4-2-3 4-2-4 4-2-5 34
35
4-2-5 4-2-1 4-2-2 4-2-3 4-2-4 36
4-2-1 A A 0.16 0.14 0.22 0.26 0.78 6 6 15 14 41 38 / 40 / 69 / 55 / 4-2-2 B B 0.16 0.10 0.16 0.18 0.60 6 7 13 22 48 36 / 69 / 79 / 123 / 4-2-3 C C 0.12 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.64 9 11 27 21 68 78 / 79 / 124 / 132 / 37
4-2-4 D D 0.20 0.14 0.22 0.20 0.76 10 9 29 26 74 52 / 66 / 132 / 128 / 4-2-1 4-2-2 4-2-3 4-2-4 4-2-1 A A 0.16 0.14 0.22 0.26 0.78 6 6 15 14 41 38 / 40 / 69 / 55 / 4-2-2 B B 0.16 0.1 0.16 0.18 0.60 6 7 13 22 38
48 36 / 69 / 79 / 123 / 4-2-3 C C 0.12 0.14 0.22 0.16 0.64 9 11 27 21 68 78 / 79 / 124 / 132 / 4-2-4 D D 0.2 0.14 0.22 0.2 0.76 10 9 29 26 74 52 / 66 / 132 / 128 / 39
( 4-2-5) 4-2-5 : A 0.16 0.14 0.22 0.26 0.78 B 0.16 0.10 0.16 0.18 0.60 C 0.12 0.14 0.22 0.16 0.64 D 0.20 0.14 0.22 0.20 0.76 0.16 0.13 0.21 0.20 0.70 4-2-5 0.16 0.13 0.21 0.2 0.70 ( 4-2-6) 4-2-6 : A 6 6 15 14 41 B 6 7 13 22 48 C 9 11 27 21 68 40
4-2-6 : ( ) D 10 9 29 26 74 8 8 21 21 58 4-2-6 8 8 21 21 58 ( 4-2-7) 4-2-7 / A 38 40 69 55 B 36 69 79 123 C 78 79 124 132 D 52 66 132 128 51 64 101 110 4-2-7 51 / 64 / 101 / 110 / 41
( ) Ariel Motion Analysis System 4-2-6 4-2-7 4-2-8 4-2-9 42
43
4-2-8 4-2-9 4-2-10 4-2-11 4-2-8 A A 135.89 118.60 161.54 129.60 4-2-9 B B 142.46 126.83 168.55 147.87 44
4-2-10 C C 141.48 121.32 165.13 122.83 4-2-11 D D 127.39 113.34 146.23 113.13 4-2-8 A A 135.89 118.60 161.54 129.60 4-2-9 B B 142.46 126.83 168.55 147.87 4-2-10 C C 141.48 121.32 165.13 122.83 45
4-2-11 D D 127.39 113.34 146.34 113.13 A 118.60 B 126.83 C 121.32 D 113.34 4-2-12 120.02 4-2-12 : A 135.89 118.60 161.54 129.60 B 142.46 126.83 168.55 147.87 C 141.48 121.32 165.13 122.83 D 127.39 113.34 146.23 113.13 136.81 120.02 160.36 128.36 46
A B C D kistler (ASCII CODE) Excel 4-2-10 4-2-11 4-2-12 4-2-13 47
4-2-1 4-2-2 4-2-3 4-2-4 4-2-10 A A 48
60 1.62 1.56 4.44 1.62 56 4.44 49
4-2-11 B B 64 2.72 1.27 4.71 2.72 1.27 4.71 50
4-2-12 C C 51
4-2-15 C : 75 2.34 1.34 4.15 2.34 1.34 4.15 52
4-2-13 4-2-16 98 1.65 1.83 3.82 1.65 1.83 3.82 53
4-2-14 4-2-14 4-2-17 4-2-17 : 1.62 1.56 4.43 6.00 2.72 1.27 4.71 5.97 2.34 1.34 4.15 5.49 1.65 1.83 3.82 5.658 2.08 1.50 4.28 5.78 2.08 1.50 4.28 54
4-2-15 55
4-2-16 N-W=ma W-N=ma m 56
57 1997 x dt dx && 2 2 x dt dx & s δ V h k k=- S mg δ m g 0 OX w 0 2 2 2 = + x dt X d ω --------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 t=0 ( ) s s s g x mg Kx x k mg mx δ ω δ δ = = = + = 2 &&
x = 0 dx x 0 = & dt v x = sinωt ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2 w x = vwcosωt --------------------------------------------------------------- 3. x 2 = vwsin wt = w x ----------------------------------------------------- 4 v 2 X max = X max w v A A= w A V w F=-KX 4 & x& a X A a OX G = ma N 2 N= mg + ma + a = ω A 1981 58
4-2-17 A 59.67 60.59 57.58 45.93 45.93 42.21 85.23 83.12 79.33 4-2-18 : 59.67 45.93 85.23 60.59 45.93 83.12 57.58 42.21 79.33 59
4-2-18 50.39 48.43 51.46 35.07 37.70 35.07 69.58 69.58 68.73 4-2-19 B : 50.39 35.07 69.58 48.43 37.70 69.58 51.46 35.07 68.73 60
4-2-19 79.04 70.83 88.24 49.78 59.84 59.84 91.97 101.95 116.51 4-2-20 : 79.04 49.78 91.97 70.83 59.84 101.95 88.24 59.84 116.51 61
4-2-20 D 71.30 74.25 73.25 51.55 58.02 56.46 91.20 94.02 95.90 4-2-21 : 71.30 51.55 91.20 74.25 58.02 94.02 73.25 56.46 95.90 62
4-2-22 ( ) 65.1 45.58 84.50 63.53 50.37 87.17 67.63 48.40 90.12 4-2-22 65.10 63.53 67.63 45.58 50.37 48.40 84.50 87.17 90.12 63
4-2-23 0.16 0.13 0.21 0.2 8 8 21 21 51 / 64 / 101 / 110 / 136.81 120.02 160.36 128.36 120.02 64
4-2-12 118.60 126.46 121.32 113.34 120.02 113 127 1990 111.5 ( 1994) 113 118 ( 1981) 110 125 1979 110 120 ( 2000) 110 125 65
( ) 4-2-17 2.08 1.50 4.28 66
0.1 0.14 120 105 0.12 0.14 1990 0.2 0.13 0.06 0.19 0.17 0.2 1981 0.12 0.14 67
68
0.13 8 64 / 120.02 113 127 2.08 1.50 4.28 65.10 63.53 67.63 45.58 50.37 48.40 84.50 87.17 90.12 69
, 70
(1997) 117 (1979) 155 (1984) 159 (1979) 77 (1981) 23-29 (1977) 156 (1992) 12 4 (1994), 30 12 32-33 (2000) 21 4 26 (2000 ) 25-27 (1981) 27 9 71
(1999) 1 66 (1999) 1 67 (1977) - 55-56 (1977) 169 1990 160 (1999), 812 (1994), 1 93-97 (1994), 12 34-35 (1979) 158 (1998), 70-71 72
: A. Vorobyev. (1978). Weightlifting. International Weight-lifting Federation, Budapest. G. Schodl. ( 1997). Medals and World Records in Weightlifting. IWF. H. Kauhanen, K. Hakkinen, and P. Komi. (1984). A biomechanical analysis of the snatch and clean & jerk techniques of finnish elite and district level weightlifters. Scandinavian Journal of Sport Sciences 6:47-56. J. Garhammer. (1989). Bar Trajectories of World Champion Male and Female Weight lifters: Coaching Applictories.Part IIOL: 7. J. Garhammer. (1985). Biomechanical Profiles of Olympic Weightlifting; International Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 1.122-130 K. Bartonietz. (1996). Biomechanics of the snatch: toward a higher training efficiency. Strength and Conditioning 18:24-31, 1996. M. Bobbert, K. Gerritsen, M. Litjens, and A. van Soest. ( 1996). Why is countermovment jump height greater than squat jump height? Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise 28:1402-1412. R. Enoka. (1979). The pull in Olympic weightlifting. Medicine Science and Sport 11: 131-137. R. Newton, A. Murphy, B. Humphries, G. Wilson, W. Kraemer, and K. Hakkinen. (1997). Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper-body movements. European Journal of Applied Physiology 75:333-342. R. Reiser, S. Smith, and R. Rattan. (1996). Science and technology to 73
enhance weightlifting performance: The Olympic program. Strength and Conditioning 18:43-51, 1996. T. Ajan, and L. Baroga. ( 1988). Weightliftin Fitness for all sports. IWF. W. Baumann, V. Gross, K. Quade, P. Galbierz, and A. Schwirtz. (1988). The Snatch Technique of World Class weightlifters at the 1985 World Championships. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 4: 68-89. 74
75
76