焸
Mission? Project Program Project Task 2
3
//?? 4
5
6
: ( PMBOK ), 7
8
:,, PMP PMBOK, PMI 9
10
11
12
Organiza1on: Structure and Culture v v v v 13
v 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6./ 7./ 14
v v v 15
v (Divisional Structure) A C B 16
17
v (Geographic Structure) 18
v (Hybrid Structure) A B C v v 19
20
步 步 涉 21
v 22
v () () () () 23
v v v 24
v 25
鮎 v 鮎 26
q? q? q? q q q 70% 4~6 27
/ 28
29
: Project Title : Champion: Problem Statement: Project Charter Deployment Champion: () Process Owner: Project Objective : 70% Project Scope: Schedule: Project Team: Cost/Benefit Analysis Critical To Quality(CTQs) 哪 Champion Approve: 30
100% 100% 100% 31
WBS 32
WBS 33
34
Step1: 3M ( Man/Machine/Material ) Resource pool Step2: Top- Down BoJom up AACE 35
Step3: Trade off Step4: 36
_WBS 37
(OBS) 38
RAMcontrol account WBS OBS CA CA CA WBS# + OBS# 1130-A2 CA RAM 39
40
11009 $16,5006$16,0001000 BAC 16,50016,500110015 Budget At Comple1on AC 16,000 Actual Cost PV 11,00069110015 Planned Value EV 15,000100015 Earned Value 41
BAC16,500AC16,000 PV 11,000EV 15,000 n n n n CVEVAC -1,00015,00016,000 Cost Variance SVEVPV 4,00015,000 11,000 Schedule Variance CPIEVAC 0.94 15,00016,000 Cost Performance Indicator SPIEVPV 15,00011,000 1.36 Schedule Performance Indicator n EACBACCPI16,5000.94 17,553 Estimate At CompletionBACCPI n VACBACEAC 16,50017,553-1,053 Variance AT CompletionBACEAC 42
Leadership: Being an Effective Project Manager : () 43
:?????? 44
45
: 46
-- -- -- 47
48
49
50
A. (Cost Of Achieving Good Quality) (Cost Of Poor Quality) B. 51
A. (Cost Of Achieving Good Quality) //,,,, 52
B. (Cost Of Poor Quality) //// 53
COPQ COPQ COPQ 54
Inspec1on Control Chart Pareto Chart Sta1s1cs Sampling Flow char1ng Trend Analysis 55
56
l 10/31/200430 90% l 12/31/2004 l 200506ISO 9001 l 200412 l 2005200 l 200404 57
58
59
1 2 1.1 1.2 2.1 2.2 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.2.1 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 60
61
62
倂 63
64
65
66
Managing Risk (FMEA; Failure Modes and Effects Analysis)
(FMEA) NASA() FMEA FMEA, 68
FMEA FMEA:, (Poten,al Failure Mode):. (Poten,al Failure Effect):. (Severity):.. (Cause):,. (Occurrence):. (Detec,on): (), 産 RPN(Risk Priority Number): ;,. 69
FMEA Process Function Potential Failure Mode Potential Effects of Failure S E V Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanism(s) of Failure O C C Current Process Controls D E T R P N Recommended Action(s) Responsibility and Completion Date Actions Taken Action Results S E V O C C D E T R P N The highest value process steps from the C&E matrix. In what ways might the process potentially fail to meet the process requirements and/or design intent? What is the effect of each failure mode on the outputs and/or customer requirements? The customer could be the next operation, subsequent operations, another division or the end user. How Severe is the effect to the cusotmer? How can the failure occur? Describe in terms of something that can be corrected or controlled. Be specific. Try identify the causes that directly impacts the failure mode, i.e., root causes. How often does the cause or failure mode occur? What are the existing controls and procedures (inspection and test) that either prevent failure mode from occurring or detect the failure should it occur? Should include an SOP number. How well can you detect cause or FM? 0SEV x OCC x DET What are the actions for reducing the occurrence, or improving detection, or for identifying the root cause if it is unknown? Should have actions only on high RPN's or easy fixes. Who is responsible for the recommended action? List the completed actions that are included in the recalculated RPN. Include the implementation date for any changes. What is the new severity? What is the new process capability? Are the detection limits improved? Recomkpute RPN after actions are complete. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FMEA,, () 70
71
72
Progress and Performance Measurement and EvaluaMon _ 73
(Baseline) () 74
$ T 9-1 75
76
77
78
l l l l l l l l l l l 79
1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 4. 80
1. 81
2. 82
3. 83
4. 84
5. ; 85
6. (fight) (flight) 86
7. 87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Technical Ø Ø Ø,, / Ø (kick the tires) Political Cultural Ø political map Ø safe exits / Ø Ø Ø :? Ø (mindset) Ø Ø, 94
(Stakeholder Analysis) ( -2 ) ( -1 ) ( 0 ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) : 1. ( = ). 2. (X = ) 3.. 4.. 95
= reducing number of suppliers ( -2 ) ( -1 ) ( 0 ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) Sam Siteking Steffie Peddler Jacky P. Agent Sue Costout Mary Chief- Engr Juan Cuidado X X X X Bill Fixit Jim Vendor? ;??? = = = Ok X 96
MS- Project 25000 PDM SAP 1000000 Minitab 40000 MS-Visio N/A 97
PMP/ CPMP IPMA ISO 10006 Six Sigma BB/GB / (PMI, IPMA ) ISO TC 176 SC 2 ASQ / 98
99
100