; : : :

丁晓原 : : ( 15500) ; 1 1 (11BZW097) (09YJA751006) : : 1934 167 : 1917 6 143

014 4 1 ; : 1 144 : 1917 6 : 1985 5

1 ( ) : : 3 4 ; 1 3 4 : : 000 407 : 100 1901 1 1 : ( ) : 1981 146 : : 004 193 145

014 4 ; ( ) : 1 3 4 5 1 1875 10 11 3 187 4 30 4 : 1 1898 1 3 5 : 100 146 1901 1 1

1 ( ) ( ) 3 10 4 : 5 1 : 1915 1 1 3 : 1919 6 1 4 : 1930 1 5 : : 1935 147

014 4 : 1 : 1815 00 3 : 1895 1895 1900 1 4 ; 5 ; 1 3 4 5 148 : : : 1957 54 : : 011 113 : ( ) 10 : : 003 31 : 169

( ) 18 1 ( ) 1901 : 3 ; 4 : ; ; 1 3 4 : : 005 3 43 : : 1989 16 : 5 190 4 8 149

014 4 1 ; : 3 4 5 6 7 1 3 4 5 6 7 150 : : 1989 40 : 35 1900 10 : : 007 9 : 31 : 17 : : 1983 5 : 103

: ; 30 ; ( ) ( 1 18 3 ( ) : ; 4 1 : : 1998 374 375 3 : : 010 196 4 : : 1980 1 151

014 4 1 3 4 : 1 3 4 15 ( ) : 198 5 : 190 8 190 1906 1 : : : 1970 55

1 : 3 : 4 5 : 1 3 4 5 : : : 1994 98 : : 00 49 : 1915 1 0 : 5 1899 8 6 : : 1991 5 6 153

014 4 1 ; : : 3 4 1906 : 1 : : 1996 77 : 190 8 34 : 190 5 8 154

1 190 : : ; ; 3 4 ; : 1 : : 1993 66 67 : 75 193 10 34 : : 00 5 155

014 4 1 1918 1 15 : 3 ; 4 5 6 ; 7 : ( ) 8 1 3 : 1918 5 6 4 1919 1 1 56 194 1 7 194 1 13 8 : 1985 5 156 : 8 : 1997 117

1 ; 1 : 1917 3 3 : 1919 1 157

014 4 ;1 : ( ) ; 3 : 4 1 : 196 17 3 3 4 : : 1987 6 : 194 1 15 158

: 1 1918 4 ; 3 4 : 5 : : : 1 3 45 : 1987 734 194 1 13 : : 1993 55 : : 003 343 159

ABSTRACTS (7)TheEssenceofThat WhattheLawDoesNotForbidItAlows"intheSenseof PrivateLaw YiJun 11 Theprecisemeaningof Whatthelawdoesnotforbiditalows"isthatanactorshal enjoycompletefreedomsolongashedoesnotcommitanywrongdoingthatinfringes onthelegitimateprivatedomainofothersthatisforbiddenbylaw.thisprinciple seekstodeclarethataldomainsremainingafterdeductionofthatwhichisprohibited aretherealmoffreedom;itthushighlightsthefreedom scharacterasa deduction right"coveringeverythingremainingafterthedeductionofprohibitionsthuscreatingthe maximumspaceforautonomy.atthe micro-levelthis mainlyappliestocircumstances suchasaself-regardingactinvolvingtheactoronlyorconsentingactsnotinvolvinga thirdparty.wherelegislationonprohibitionsisinsuficientandthebehaviorconcerned ofendspublicorderand moralseventhoughitdoesnotviolateanyinterdictionas welinfieldswherethelegalistmodeloperatestheapplicationofthispropositionis restricted.atthemacro-levelitisvagueandgeneralandcannotaloneserveasan eficaciousguaranteeofpersonalautonomyofwil.onlybyretainingsuchqualitiesof aninjunctionasgeneralityindependenceofobjectivesprocedureorform andthe botomlinecanthispropositionrealyestablishthemaximumdomainofautonomy. (8)TheMediaEnvironmentandtheModernTransformationofChineseProse Ding Xiaoyuan 143 Writingforthepress wasthe mostsignificantandimportantfeatureofprose writingfromthelate Qingtothe May4th Movement.Thenew writenstyleand modeofdisseminationforwhichthepressfunctionedasmediumorvehicleinfluenced theformlanguageandstyleofprosefromtheoutside.atthesametimethevalue orientationofthemediadefinedorpartialydefinedthethemesofprose.therewasa certaininherentassociationbetweenthemediaintheimaginingofthenation-stateon theonehandandthe modernityofproseontheother;newspapersand magazines constructedthecommunityoftheimaginednation-state.thisconstitutedthemainstream media sspecialcontributiontotheconstructionofchinese modernityfromthelate QingtotheMay4th Movement.Proseinthemediawasakeyphraselinkingtheambitions ofjournaliststhefunctionsofthepressandtheconstructionofthenation-state.the mediaincludingchinese Progres (Shiwu Bao)producedargumentsandexposition thataimedat reform"andthe renewalofthepeople"andwerehighlypolitical. Duringthe New Cultureperiodofthe May4th Movementtheleitmotivofprose changedfromthe renewalofthepeople"tothe cultivationofthepeople";itslanguage changedfrom beingacombinationofthewritenandspokenlanguageto modern vernacularchinese;anditsform changedfrom thefloweringoftheargumentative styleonitsowntothetwinachievementsofexpositoryandlyricalessays.many 07

014 4 prosewritersduringthe May4th Movementwereconsciouslyengagedinboththe theoryandcreatorsofmodernprose.theorganicinteractionbetweentheoryandcre- ationachievedthemoderntransformationofchineseprose. (9)TheImperial Private"RitualsandtheState spublicinstitution:theperiodiza- tionandevolutionof Post-KaiyuanRituals" Wu Liyu 160 Theconstructionof post-kaiyuanrituals"duringthetangdynasty (618-907) canbedividedintodiferentperiods;duringthelate Kaiyuanreignperiodandthe Tianbaoreignperiodboththeemperorandpeoplearoundhimradicalyreformedthe systemestablishedbythekaiyuan RitualsandestablishedaTaoistworshipsystem innationalsacrifice.withthechoiceofthekaiyuan Rituals orthereforminthe TianbaoreignperiodaftertheAn-Shirebelion(755-763)thefactorofchangeability constantlyincreasedrangingfrom afocusontheinheritanceofandreturntothe KaiyuanRitualsintheJianzhongandearlyZhenyuanreignperiodstotheadoptionof morenewritualsandadjustmentsinthelatezhenyuanreignperiodandtheyuanhe reignperiod.the revisionandimplementation"ofthekaiyuan Ritualswerecarried outthroughthedeletionandrevisionofimperialdecreesreflectingboththeimplication thatsuchritualswerecenteredontheimperialpowerandthedemandsthatthetimes hadimposedonthereform.atthesametimetaoistsacrificewasfurtherintegrated withthe private"rituals(or familyrituals")thatstoodfortheemperorsandtheir familiesandexpressedtheintentionsoftheemperorsthemselvesco-existingandfusing withtheritualsasthestate spublicinstitution.inthiswaybothanewconceptand anewcharacterofritualstookshapeduringmiddleantiquity. (10)TheRomanticImaginingof TheKingUndertheLaw":Rethinkingthe Tradi- tionoftheruleoflaw"in MedievalBritain Meng Guanglin 18 UndertheInfluenceof Whighistoriographymany Westernscholarshave emphasizedthatthe traditionoftheruleoflaw"restrictingthepoweroftheking prevailedinbritaininthe MiddleAges.Howeveritcanbereadilybeseenfrom a surveyofhistoricalfactsthattheprevalentideaof thekingunderthelaw" a combinationofgermaniclawfeudallawanddivinelaw couldnotrealyrestraina tyrannicalking.theparliamentsthoughttoembodythistraditiondidsometimeslimit royalauthoritybuttheywerestiltheking sparliamentsandbasicalytookhisside. Thegreatnobles useofparliamentintheirstruggleforpowershouldnotbeviewed asa revolution"or experiment"intheconstitutionalsense.weshouldrethinkthe Whiginterpretationofthistraditionpropoundedby Westernscholars.Ourresearch needstodistinguish politicsinthought"andthe politicsininstitutions"frompoliticsas theyrealyhappenedifwearetodrawaconvincingconclusion. 08