* 20 * 2014 12

126 20 1949 20 1923 1972 5 81 1935 2006 121 1922 1922 1923

127 1906 1922 1922 1931 1935 1938 1938 20 1990 1 1922 1938 6

128 1924 20 1983 4 19 30 Ⅱ 2003 209 1989 1 55 2011 2 3

129 19 Hippolyte Adolphe Taine 1828-1893 瑏瑠 瑏瑡 瑏瑢 瑏瑠瑏瑡 瑏瑢 2013 109 110 207 208 2006 6 3 2013 40 13

130 瑏瑣 瑏瑤 瑏瑥 瑏瑦 瑏瑣瑏瑤瑏瑥瑏瑦 22 21 1999 348 349 2004 5 267 1996 6 172 30 1926 2012 1 2 Ⅱ 29 30 1993 280 281

131 瑏瑧 瑏瑨 瑏瑩 瑐瑠 1922 1922 1922 1923 1924 瑏瑧瑏瑨瑏瑩瑐瑠 1950 5 47 48 1991 166 167 345 168

132 瑐瑡 20 1 2 3 瑐瑢 瑐瑣 1922 11 3 瑐瑡 瑐瑢 瑐瑣 186 2005 109 111 186 187

133 瑐瑤 1923 瑐瑥 瑐瑦 mark of individuality trait of personality 瑐瑧 瑐瑤 瑐瑥瑐瑦 瑐瑧 289 290 261 279 1981 1902

134 瑐瑨 瑐瑩 All or nothing All or nothing Henrik Johan Ibsen 1828 1906 瑑瑠 瑑瑡 瑑瑢 瑑瑣 瑐瑨瑐瑩 瑑瑠瑑瑡瑑瑢瑑瑣 5 80 James Joyce 1882 1941 Alex Preminger Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics New Jersey Princeton University Press 1969 1982 84 275 267 268 269 1999 6 3318 245

135 瑑瑤 All or nothing 瑑瑥 瑑瑦 瑑瑧 瑑瑤瑑瑥 瑑瑦瑑瑧 269 267 3319 267

136 瑑瑨 瑑瑩 瑒瑠 瑒瑡 瑒瑢 瑒瑣 瑑瑨瑑瑩瑒瑠瑒瑡瑒瑢瑒瑣 279 267 281 5 79 80 281 281 272

137 瑒瑤 瑒瑥 瑒瑦 瑒瑧 瑒瑨 瑒瑩 瑒瑤 瑒瑥瑒瑦 瑒瑧 瑒瑨 瑒瑩 2008 65 107 187 2002 261 197 194 198

138 瑓瑠 瑓瑡 瑓瑢 瑓瑠 瑓瑡瑓瑢 234 235 251 248 245 282

139 瑓瑣 19 20 瑓瑤 1941 瑓瑣 瑓瑤 1996 11 12 2005 255

140 瑓瑥 瑓瑦 Esprit Poesie 瑓瑧 瑓瑥瑓瑦瑓瑧 Ⅱ 207 2008 109 2005 203

141 瑓瑨 瑓瑩 瑓瑨 瑓瑩 Ⅱ 208 203 Ⅱ 208 209

142 瑔瑠 瑔瑠 Ⅱ 213 215

143 瑔瑡 瑔瑢 瑔瑣 瑔瑡 瑔瑢瑔瑣 1976 254 Ⅱ 209 Ⅱ 88 89

144 瑔瑤 瑔瑥 1 2 1934 瑔瑤瑔瑥 88 204 1991

145 R. Burns 瑔瑦 Harold Bloom strangeness 瑔瑧 瑔瑨 瑔瑦瑔瑧 瑔瑨 Ⅱ 101 Harold Bloom The Western Canon New York 1994 p.4. strangeness 1998 4 205 206 Ⅱ 209

146 瑔瑩 40 瑖瑠 瑔瑩瑖瑠 Ⅱ 212 1942 2004 188

147 瑖瑡 瑖瑡 Ⅱ 236 237

148 1934 瑖瑢 瑖瑣 1931 瑖瑤 瑖瑢 瑖瑣瑖瑤 Ⅱ 67 Ⅱ 68 Ⅱ 233 Ⅱ 29

149 瑖瑥 瑖瑦 epic lyric 瑖瑧 / 瑖瑥 瑖瑦 瑖瑧 2004 68 89 Ⅱ 237 201 207

150 / / 瑖瑨 瑖瑩 瑘瑠 瑘瑡 瑘瑢 瑘瑣 瑘瑤 瑖瑨 瑖瑩 瑘瑠 瑘瑡 瑘瑢 瑘瑣瑘瑤 212 213 215 220 221 210 219 113 118

151 瑘瑥 瑘瑦 瑘瑧 瑘瑥瑘瑦 瑘瑧 Ⅱ 216 218 Ⅱ 87

152 瑘瑨 瑘瑨 Ⅱ 221 224

153 瑘瑩 瑝瑠 瑝瑡 瑘瑩瑝瑠 瑝瑡 Ⅱ 224 230 3 214

154 瑝瑢 瑝瑣 瑝瑢 瑝瑣 Ⅱ 232 239 3 213

155 瑝瑤 瑝瑥 瑝瑦 world spirit 瑝瑤 瑝瑥瑝瑦 Ⅱ 239 245 Ⅱ 238 225

156 瑝瑧 Percy Bysshe Shelley 1792-1822 self-portrait 瑝瑨 瑝瑧瑝瑨 Ⅱ 32 209

157 瑝瑩 1941 瑝瑩 1998 297 298 3 212 215 214

158 1941 1934 1941 Wilhelm Dilthey 1833-1911 1935 1949 1950 1953 1953 2006 113 2006 6 3 1940 Werner Mahrholz 1889-1930 Réne Wellk 1903-1995 Einfühiung 1997 4 385

159 3 20 2001 2 61 72 75 2009 73 74

160 65 66

161 7 228 233

162 1941 234 7 236 238

163 3 172 192 1941 1946 A Laurence. A. Schneider 1990 85 123

164 Hans-Georg Gadamer 1900 2002 1936 20 30 40 20 30 20 40 3 172 192 116 117 1959

165 Raymond Williams 1921 1988 Structures of Feeling Structures of Feeling / / / / / / / / / / / 3 230 231 2000 131 132 4

166 Laurence Schneider Madman of Chu The Chinese Myths of Loyalty and Dissent San Francisco Berkeley 1980 20 2011 1983 14 2011 120 153

167 20 2011 1996 2011 1996 2006 1998 1981 2005 1891 2002 1998 2012 1989 2006 Ⅱ 2003 2009 2013 1972 1983 2004 A 1990 1990 1993

168 2005 1997 2008 2000 1991 2004 61 2001 2 1976 2004 2011 6 1999 2013 40 101 144 2008 1983 4 19 30 1982

169 Lyricism and the Modern Research on Chuci Liang Qichao Liang Zongdai and Li Changzhi LIAO Tung Liang Professor Department of Chinese Literature Taiwan Chengchi University Abstract As Tang Bingzheng said Stories of Qu Yuan have been variously recorded since Han Dynasty. As to the pass judgment disputes as well emerged then. However some new academic developments such as negating the existence of historian Qu Yuan and degrading the great Qu Yuan to a jester appeared quite late. The Preface of History of Modern Criticism on Chuci In 1920s and 1930s the research on Chuci focused on discussing Qu Yuan's life experience dating his works and verifying the authenticity of his works by adopting the traditional textual research method used in Qian-Jia Philology which had been paid much attention to by the academia as the mainstream in field of research on Chuci in the Period of Republic of China. Nevertheless there are still some scholars who are not intended to presume the existence of historian Qu Yuan or to verify the authenticity of his works according to the places characters time and events that appeared in Qu Yuan's w orks. These scholars believe that the essence of literature is the expression of subjective feelings in the form of emotion the lyrical stance. Thus they comb and estimate Qu Yuan's biography and works according to emotion personality and experience. This research which is significant in the history of academy is worth exploring because besides revolution and enlightenment lyricism stands for another orientation of the modernity of Chinese literature especially for the construction of modern subject. Lyricism is the only thing that matters. From the rediscovery to the

170 essentialization to the universalization of lyricism the poetics of lyricism since M ay Fourth M ovement has been involved in Chinese modern research on Chuci and demonstrated that poetic logic is emotional logic which also equals to the logic of history of poetry. From Liang Qichao to Liang Zongdai to Li Changzhi we can observe the extension in depth and dialectics of lyricism in the research on Chuci. Keywords lyricism Liang Qichao Liang Zongdai Li Changzhi