Directory Introduction 0 2 Detailed Data for 2013 January 0 5 Test Products 0 5 Prevalent Malware 0 6 False Positive 0 7 Information Stealer System Overhead 0 8 0 9 Cleaning 1 2 Phishing and Fraud 1 3 Conclusion 1 4 Tester Introduction 2 4 Right Statement 2 4 Disclaimer 2 5 1 / 26
Introduction Besides malware, most computer users encounter a number of other threats such as phishing, exploiting and spam emails daily. There are a variety of software products not limited to anti-virus programs that are available for protecting computer users against such threats. While there are anti-virus performance measurement and scoring reports to compare the available products, such AV scores do not provide enough coverage outside of malware protection, and are too technical for consumers who are less security savvy to relate to and navigate through. Since the reports do not map to different usage scenarios, they fall short in helping the average consumer to select the most suitable product according to their protection/security needs. Based on published reports (by CNNIC) and articles on internet user behavior analysis, we first define twenty most common internet usages, such as gaming, online media consumption, social networking, email, online shopping, web browsing etc. Then, we classify pc/internet users into seven groups: Internet Addicts, Network Businessman, Socializer, Basic User, Gamer, Self-Presenter and Infrequent User. Here we propose an AV test and scoring system that measures defense efficiency of AV solution against the needs of different user groups and their usage scenarios. Thus provides a better guidance for consumers in AV solution selection. Based on the CNNIC reports (China Internet Development Statistics Report), we here have the detailed definition of each user group: Internet Addicts This group makes up 11% of the total Chinese netizen population. They spent more hours on Internet than the netizen of the other user groups. They use more internet applications than others. They are the most loyal customers of Internet. Network Businessman This group makes up 6.7% of the total Chinese netizen population. They have the similar characteristic as the internet addicts. But their overall hours spent on internet and internet applications are less than internet addicts. They seldom visit forums, and they spend more times on e-commerce, stocks, travelling than search engines, IM and emails. Socializer This group makes up 12.3% of the total Chinese netizen population. They use more social applications such as IM, blogs, forums/bbs, dating sites than others. 2 / 26
Basic User This group makes up 21.5% of the total Chinese netizen population. Their frequency of using search engines, emails, IM is much higher than the average level. The other applications usage are much lower than average level. Gamer This group makes up 18% of the total Chinese netizen population. Users from this user group play online games. Their other internet behavior frequency are much lower. Self-Presenter This group makes up 12.6% of the total Chinese netizen population. 100% of the guys from this user group write blogs, write articles/topics on forums. Infrequent User This group makes up 18.2% of the total Chinese netizen population. They spend the minimum time on Internet than the other user groups. They use less internet applications than the other user groups. This average age of the user group is higher than other groups. The average age is thirty-two. Different internet user usage will face different threat. For example, if you are shopping online, you may have the following scenarios: maybe you will be redirected to a fake B2C online shopping mall via search engine; maybe you will be infected by account stealer via IM communication. That means, if you are doing online shopping, you may encounter different threat such as phishing, information stealer. Through the basic analysis of the twenty internet usages, we categorize six areas related with different user groups: Prevalent Malware Phishing and Fraud Information Stealer False Positive System Overhead Classic Virus (Cleaning) Based on the latest CNNIC report, we can see the different scenarios of internet usage model, thus, we should tell different users what is the most important threat they should pay attention to and give them the proper suggestion on how to choose security products based on their user scenarios. 3 / 26
We have setup a matrix to define the different threat weight in different user group/user scenario. User Group Prevalent Malware FP Information Stealer System Overhead Phishing Cleaning Internet Addicts 3 1 1.5 1.5 2 1 Network Businessman 4 1.5 2 0.5 1.5 0.5 Socializer 3.5 0.5 2 1 2.5 0.5 Basic User 3 1.5 1.5 1 2.5 0.5 Gamer 2.5 1 2 3 1 0.5 Self-Presenter 3.5 1 2.5 1 1.5 0.5 Infrequent User 4.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 2.5 0.5 4 / 26
Detailed Data for 2013 January based on the new methodology Test Products Vendor Product AVAST avast! Internet Security 7.0.1474 AVG AVG Internet Security 2013.0.2793 Bitdefender Bitdefender Total Security 2013 Commtouch F-PROT Antivirus 6.0.9.6 Dr.Web Dr.Web Security Space 8.0.0.11100 Emsisoft Emsisoft ANTI-MALWARE 7.0.0.12 ESET ESET Smart Security 6.0.115.0 F-Secure F-Secure Internet Security 2013 1.71 build 337 G Data G Data InternetSecurity 2013 23.0.4.0 Google Google Chrome 23.0.1271.95 m IKARUS IKARUS anti.virus 2.2.12 JIANGMIN JIANGMIN SPEED ESSENTIAL Antivirus Software K7 K7 AntiVirus Plus 12.2.0172 Kaspersky Kaspersky Internet Security 2013 13.0.1.4190 Kingsoft New Kingsoft Antivirus 2013 SP1 McAfee McAfee Internet Security Microsoft Windows Defender 4.0.9200.16384 Panda Panda Cloud Antivirus 2.0.1 Qihoo 360 Antivirus 4.0.0.3110 Qihoo 360 Safe Browser Rising Rising Antivirus V16 Sogou Sogou HighSpeed Browser Symantec Norton Internet Security 20.1.0.24 Tencent Tencent PC Manager Trend Micro Trend Micro Titanium Maximum Security TrustPort TrustPort Total Protection 2013 13.0.4.5077 5 / 26
Prevalent Malware We collect 19958 prevalent malware (global collection) and then we will use different security products/solutions to scan against them. Score for this sub-test is generated by detection rate*10 and the highest score is 10. We enabled the network connection and allow the cloud function on during the scan. Vendor Total Samples Missed Samples Detected Samples Detection Rate Score AVAST 19958 73 19885 99.634% 9.963 AVG 19958 160 19798 99.198% 9.920 Bitdefender 19958 14 19944 99.930% 9.993 Commtouch 19958 2550 17408 87.223% 8.722 Dr.Web 19958 77 19881 99.614% 9.961 Emsisoft 19958 5 19953 99.975% 9.997 ESET 19958 28 19930 99.860% 9.986 F-Secure 19958 811 19147 95.936% 9.594 G Data 19958 3 19955 99.985% 9.998 IKARUS 19958 4 19954 99.980% 9.998 JIANGMIN 19958 5261 14697 73.640% 7.364 K7 19958 86 19872 99.569% 9.957 Kaspersky 19958 21 19937 99.895% 9.989 Kingsoft 19958 6146 13812 69.205% 6.921 McAfee 19958 40 19918 99.800% 9.980 Microsoft 19958 210 19748 98.948% 9.895 Microsoft+Google 19958 210 19748 98.948% 9.895 Microsoft+Qihoo 19958 210 19748 98.948% 9.895 Microsoft+Sogou 19958 210 19748 98.948% 9.895 Panda 19958 147 19811 99.263% 9.926 Qihoo 19958 6 19952 99.970% 9.997 Rising 19958 2115 17843 89.403% 8.940 Symantec 19958 193 19765 99.033% 9.903 Tencent 19958 21 19937 99.895% 9.989 Trend Micro 19958 4 19954 99.980% 9.998 TrustPort 19958 2 19956 99.990% 9.999 6 / 26
False Positive We collect millions of clean PE files (global collection) and then we will use different security products/solutions to scan them. One clean PE file recognized as malicious will be given 0.02 negative points. Score for this sub-test is generated by 10-0.02*FP numbers and the highest score is 10. Vendor False Positive Score AVAST 14 9.720 AVG 15 9.700 Bitdefender 1 9.980 Commtouch 31 9.380 Dr.Web 60 8.800 Emsisoft 23 9.540 ESET 35 9.300 F-Secure 19 9.620 G Data 24 9.520 IKARUS 45 9.100 JIANGMIN 21 9.580 K7 55 8.900 Kaspersky 10 9.800 Kingsoft 22 9.560 McAfee 24 9.520 Microsoft 1 9.980 Microsoft+Google 1 9.980 Microsoft+Qihoo 1 9.980 Microsoft+Sogou 1 9.980 Panda 41 9.180 Qihoo 3 9.940 Rising 17 9.660 Symantec 10 9.800 Tencent 7 9.860 Trend Micro 14 9.720 TrustPort 30 9.400 7 / 26
Information Stealer We collect 613 prevalent information stealer (QQPASS, Banking, SNS account information, etc. global collection) and then we will use different security products/solutions to scan them. Score for this sub-test is generated by detection rate*10 and the highest score is 10. Vendor Total Samples Missed Samples Detected Samples Detection Rate Score AVAST 613 4 609 99.347% 9.935 AVG 613 5 608 99.184% 9.918 Bitdefender 613 1 612 99.837% 9.984 Commtouch 613 138 475 77.488% 7.749 Dr.Web 613 8 605 98.695% 9.869 Emsisoft 613 1 612 99.837% 9.984 ESET 613 0 613 100.000% 10.000 F-Secure 613 34 579 94.454% 9.445 G Data 613 0 613 100.000% 10.000 IKARUS 613 0 613 100.000% 10.000 JIANGMIN 613 41 572 93.312% 9.331 K7 613 7 606 98.858% 9.886 Kaspersky 613 1 612 99.837% 9.984 Kingsoft 613 249 364 59.380% 5.938 McAfee 613 4 609 99.347% 9.935 Microsoft 613 11 602 98.206% 9.821 Microsoft+Google 613 11 602 98.206% 9.821 Microsoft+Qihoo 613 11 602 98.206% 9.821 Microsoft+Sogou 613 11 602 98.206% 9.821 Panda 613 9 604 98.532% 9.853 Qihoo 613 0 613 100.000% 10.000 Rising 613 86 527 85.971% 8.597 Symantec 613 18 595 97.064% 9.706 Tencent 613 0 613 100.000% 10.000 Trend Micro 613 0 613 100.000% 10.000 TrustPort 613 0 613 100.000% 10.000 8 / 26
Idle System Overhead System will be restored and updated, security product will be installed following the recommended installation guide. After updating the security products, system will be rebooted to finish the potential needed reboot. Then, we will using our own developed benchmark software to record the overall CPU, RAM, GPU usage and overall power consumption during a 4 hours while the system is idle (means do nothing after the system reboot) and another one hour s period while security products will perform a full scan of clean system at the very beginning (No matter how fast the security product scans). The benchmark software will record the data every second and get the average. The higher the CPU, RAM, GPU usage is, and the heavier system load it will be. A higher overall power consumption will reflect a heavier system load. CPU_US AGE (:%) Mark_1 RAM_US AGE (:%) Mark_2 GPU_US AGE (:%) Mark_3 POWER (:walt) Mark_4 AVAST 3.486 1.363 14.288 1.631 0.201 1.695 37.857 1.567 AVG 2.551 1.561 18.204 0.798 0.212 1.660 36.450 1.887 Bitdefender 5.181 1.003 18.122 0.815 0.154 1.848 38.706 1.374 Commtouch 0.823 1.928 16.389 1.184 0.142 1.887 41.569 0.722 Dr.Web 3.407 1.380 16.324 1.198 0.250 1.536 37.101 1.738 Emsisoft 0.500 1.996 14.947 1.491 0.126 1.938 36.206 1.942 ESET 1.086 1.872 18.424 0.751 0.145 1.877 36.477 1.880 F-Secure 2.716 1.526 14.950 1.490 0.107 2.000 37.153 1.727 G Data 5.542 0.927 14.215 1.646 0.208 1.673 37.513 1.645 IKARUS 1.899 1.700 15.944 1.278 0.123 1.948 36.237 1.935 JIANGMIN 0.991 1.892 14.267 1.635 0.117 1.968 36.221 1.939 K7 1.729 1.736 21.954 0.000 0.112 1.984 36.367 1.905 Kaspersky 0.935 1.904 17.900 0.862 0.113 1.981 36.270 1.927 Kingsoft 0.483 2.000 14.485 1.589 0.127 1.935 36.120 1.962 McAfee 1.350 1.816 14.102 1.670 0.122 1.951 36.579 1.857 Microsoft 1.459 1.793 17.696 0.906 0.112 1.984 36.702 1.829 Microsoft+Google 9.810 0.021 17.126 1.027 0.115 1.974 43.848 0.204 Microsoft+Qihoo 9.909 0.000 17.636 0.919 0.724 0.000 44.746 0.000 Microsoft+Sogou 9.449 0.098 17.984 0.845 0.127 1.935 39.234 1.253 Panda 0.762 1.941 13.376 1.825 0.111 1.987 36.189 1.946 Qihoo 0.742 1.945 15.079 1.462 0.133 1.916 36.187 1.946 Rising 1.089 1.871 12.552 2.000 0.111 1.987 35.951 2.000 Symantec 1.831 1.714 19.370 0.550 0.113 1.981 36.707 1.828 Tencent 4.446 1.159 17.347 0.980 0.111 1.987 37.926 1.551 Trend Micro 3.130 1.438 15.258 1.424 0.148 1.867 37.092 1.741 TrustPort 8.606 0.276 14.515 1.582 0.152 1.854 38.738 1.366 9 / 26
Scan CPU_US AGE (:%) Mark_5 RAM_US AGE (:%) Mark_6 GPU_US AGE (:%) Mark_7 POWER (:walt) Mark_8 AVAST 23.273 0.358 15.688 0.368 0.276 0.416 43.753 0.339 AVG 1.585 0.500 17.912 0.210 0.126 0.500 36.487 0.500 Bitdefender 19.904 0.380 16.681 0.298 0.300 0.403 43.403 0.347 Commtouch 9.653 0.447 16.203 0.332 0.198 0.460 44.822 0.315 Dr.Web 78.080 0.000 17.183 0.262 0.786 0.131 59.035 0.000 Emsisoft 9.693 0.447 16.025 0.344 0.406 0.344 38.052 0.465 ESET 10.662 0.441 18.028 0.202 0.235 0.439 40.258 0.416 F-Secure 23.535 0.357 13.830 0.500 0.142 0.491 43.761 0.339 G Data 27.496 0.331 15.059 0.413 0.502 0.290 47.554 0.255 IKARUS 23.980 0.354 16.260 0.327 0.422 0.335 43.707 0.340 JIANGMIN 40.658 0.245 15.022 0.415 0.267 0.421 49.958 0.201 K7 9.411 0.449 18.584 0.162 0.468 0.309 39.537 0.432 Kaspersky 12.417 0.429 17.191 0.261 0.127 0.499 39.954 0.423 Kingsoft 25.644 0.343 17.498 0.240 1.021 0.000 45.072 0.310 McAfee 25.928 0.341 14.923 0.422 0.255 0.428 44.505 0.322 Microsoft 53.235 0.162 17.513 0.238 0.357 0.371 52.091 0.154 Microsoft+Google 23.506 0.357 18.772 0.149 0.381 0.358 47.589 0.254 Microsoft+Qihoo 25.082 0.346 19.122 0.124 0.746 0.154 47.949 0.246 Microsoft+Sogou 48.406 0.194 18.247 0.186 0.437 0.326 50.700 0.185 Panda 27.970 0.328 14.133 0.478 0.272 0.418 45.080 0.309 Qihoo 39.856 0.250 16.199 0.332 0.308 0.398 50.073 0.199 Rising 46.151 0.209 17.093 0.268 0.698 0.180 48.619 0.231 Symantec 13.534 0.422 20.872 0.000 0.478 0.303 40.394 0.413 Tencent 10.231 0.443 19.766 0.079 0.260 0.425 38.500 0.455 Trend Micro 23.675 0.356 16.332 0.322 0.394 0.350 43.591 0.342 TrustPort 5.590 0.474 16.626 0.301 0.269 0.420 37.805 0.471 10 / 26
System Overhead Vendor Score AVAST 7.737 AVG 7.615 Bitdefender 6.467 Commtouch 7.274 Dr.Web 6.245 Emsisoft 8.967 ESET 7.878 F-Secure 8.429 G Data 7.178 IKARUS 8.217 JIANGMIN 8.716 K7 6.977 Kaspersky 8.288 Kingsoft 8.377 McAfee 8.808 Microsoft 7.438 Microsoft+Google 4.343 Microsoft+Qihoo 1.789 Microsoft+Sogou 5.022 Panda 9.232 Qihoo 8.448 Rising 8.747 Symantec 7.211 Tencent 7.080 Trend Micro 7.841 TrustPort 6.745 Final score will be the sum of mark1 to mark8. 11 / 26
Cleaning We use 10 prevalent virus to check the disinfect ability. One success disinfection will be given 1 points. The PE is corrupted after being disinfected will be given 0.5 points. The PE is deleted directly will be given 0 points. The highest score will be 10. Vendor Successfully cleaned Cannot execute after cleaning Delete directly Final Score AVAST 0 0 10 0 AVG 4 0 6 4 Bitdefender 3 1 6 3.5 Commtouch 1 1 8 1.5 Dr.Web 8 2 0 9 Emsisoft 0 0 10 0 ESET 5 0 5 5 F-Secure 3 0 7 3 G Data 3 2 5 4 IKARUS 0 0 10 0 JIANGMIN 10 0 0 10 K7 3 1 6 3.5 Kaspersky 9 1 0 9.5 Kingsoft 5 0 5 5 McAfee 8 0 2 8 Microsoft 8 0 2 8 Microsoft+Google 8 0 2 8 Microsoft+Qihoo 8 0 2 8 Microsoft+Sogou 8 0 2 8 Panda 7 1 2 7.5 Qihoo 6 0 4 6 Rising 10 0 0 10 Symantec 7 0 3 7 Tencent 6 0 4 6 Trend Micro 7 0 3 7 TrustPort 5 1 4 5.5 12 / 26
Phishing and fraud We collected 288 different phishing and fraud URLs (~60% global and ~ 40% from China region) and then we will use different security products/solutions to check one by one to see if the URLs can be blocked. Score for this sub-test is generated by detection rate*10 and the highest score is 10. Vendor Urls Final Score AVAST 15 0.521 AVG 1 0.035 Bitdefender 162 5.625 Commtouch 13 0.451 Dr.Web 12 0.417 Emsisoft 4 0.139 ESET 28 0.972 F-Secure 39 1.354 G Data 16 0.556 IKARUS 1 0.035 JIANGMIN 2 0.069 K7 15 0.521 Kaspersky 156 5.417 Kingsoft 39 1.354 McAfee 62 2.153 Microsoft 31 1.076 Microsoft+Google 2 0.069 Microsoft+Qihoo 55 1.910 Microsoft+Sogou 0 0.000 Panda 13 0.451 Qihoo 62 2.153 Rising 2 0.069 Symantec 89 3.090 Tencent 40 1.389 Trend Micro 221 7.674 TrustPort 0 0.000 13 / 26
Conclusion Final score for six sub-tests of different security products/solutions. Vendor Prevalent Malware FP Information Stealer System Overhead Phishing Cleaning AVAST 9.963 9.720 9.935 7.737 0.521 0.000 AVG 9.920 9.700 9.918 7.615 0.035 4.000 Bitdefender 9.993 9.980 9.984 6.467 5.625 3.500 Commtouch 8.722 9.380 7.749 7.274 0.451 1.500 Dr.Web 9.961 8.800 9.869 6.245 0.417 9.000 Emsisoft 9.997 9.540 9.984 8.967 0.139 0.000 ESET 9.986 9.300 10.000 7.878 0.972 5.000 F-Secure 9.594 9.620 9.445 8.429 1.354 3.000 G Data 9.998 9.520 10.000 7.178 0.556 4.000 IKARUS 9.998 9.100 10.000 8.217 0.035 0.000 JIANGMIN 7.364 9.580 9.331 8.716 0.069 10.000 K7 9.957 8.900 9.886 6.977 0.521 3.500 Kaspersky 9.989 9.800 9.984 8.288 5.417 9.500 Kingsoft 6.921 9.560 5.938 8.377 1.354 5.000 McAfee 9.980 9.520 9.935 8.808 2.153 8.000 Microsoft 9.895 9.980 9.821 7.438 1.076 8.000 Microsoft+Google 9.895 9.980 9.821 4.343 0.069 8.000 Microsoft+Qihoo 9.895 9.980 9.821 1.789 1.910 8.000 Microsoft+Sogou 9.895 9.980 9.821 5.022 0.000 8.000 Panda 9.926 9.180 9.853 9.232 0.451 7.500 Qihoo 9.997 9.940 10.000 8.448 2.153 6.000 Rising 8.940 9.660 8.597 8.747 0.069 10.000 Symantec 9.903 9.800 9.706 7.211 3.090 7.000 Tencent 9.989 9.860 10.000 7.080 1.389 6.000 Trend Micro 9.998 9.720 10.000 7.841 7.674 7.000 TrustPort 9.999 9.400 10.000 6.745 0.000 5.500 14 / 26
Overall score for security product review for different security products/solutions Vendor Internet Addicts Network Business man Socializer Basic User Gamer Self- Presenter AVAST 67.159 78.952 68.640 68.411 78.230 77.947 AVG 69.830 79.926 69.109 68.890 79.216 78.883 Bitdefender 79.386 88.331 82.213 82.205 81.707 86.570 Commtouch 60.483 69.520 59.867 61.011 69.706 67.980 Dr.Web 72.688 81.030 70.789 69.674 77.093 79.707 Emsisoft 68.236 78.958 69.042 68.592 81.541 78.665 ESET 73.019 81.791 72.409 71.716 81.371 81.087 F-Secure 70.921 79.442 70.593 70.694 80.636 78.772 G Data 70.393 80.695 70.321 69.842 78.605 79.525 IKARUS 66.490 77.803 67.848 66.949 78.781 77.363 JIANGMIN 68.881 71.950 63.115 64.347 77.869 72.501 K7 68.608 78.970 69.101 68.080 76.767 77.973 Kaspersky 87.509 91.644 86.410 86.224 89.772 90.885 Kingsoft 59.504 62.620 55.142 58.272 67.724 61.537 McAfee 79.881 85.704 77.751 77.313 86.917 85.325 Microsoft 75.706 83.525 73.393 73.515 81.750 82.217 Microsoft+Google 69.049 80.467 67.780 67.902 71.458 77.612 Microsoft+Qihoo 68.900 81.952 69.829 69.951 65.637 77.819 Microsoft+Sogou 69.930 80.703 68.287 68.409 73.426 78.187 Panda 75.988 82.223 73.147 72.437 85.598 82.212 Qihoo 77.909 85.352 76.790 76.732 85.430 84.607 Rising 72.634 76.921 67.234 68.125 80.514 76.293 Symantec 78.065 85.465 77.409 77.404 82.193 84.072 Tencent 74.225 83.370 73.444 73.310 80.462 81.985 Trend Micro 88.824 93.504 90.379 90.100 89.412 92.565 TrustPort 70.015 80.219 69.192 68.592 77.383 78.892 15 / 26
Overall Score Comparison between Microsoft and other security products/solutions Vendor Internet Addicts Network Business man Socializer Basic User Gamer Self- Presenter Infrequent AVAST -8.547-4.573-4.753-5.104-3.520-4.270-4.891 AVG -5.876-3.599-4.284-4.625-2.534-3.334-4.396 Bitdefender 3.680 4.806 8.820 8.690-0.043 4.353 9.323 Commtouch -15.223-14.005-13.526-12.504-12.044-14.237-13.581 Dr.Web -3.018-2.495-2.604-3.841-4.657-2.510-1.965 Emsisoft -7.470-4.567-4.351-4.923-0.209-3.552-5.094 ESET -2.687-1.734-0.984-1.799-0.379-1.130-1.202 F-Secure -4.785-4.083-2.800-2.821-1.114-3.445-3.408 G Data -5.313-2.830-3.072-3.673-3.145-2.692-2.928 IKARUS -9.216-5.722-5.545-6.566-2.969-4.854-5.921 JIANGMIN -6.825-11.575-10.278-9.168-3.881-9.716-13.203 K7-7.098-4.555-4.292-5.435-4.983-4.244-4.031 Kaspersky 11.803 8.119 13.017 12.709 8.022 8.668 12.605 Kingsoft -16.202-20.905-18.251-15.243-14.026-20.680-19.753 McAfee 4.175 2.179 4.358 3.798 5.167 3.108 3.701 Microsoft 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Microsoft+Google -6.657-3.058-5.613-5.613-10.292-4.605-4.065 Microsoft+Qihoo -6.806-1.573-3.564-3.564-16.113-4.398-0.739 Microsoft+Sogou -5.776-2.822-5.106-5.106-8.324-4.030-3.898 Panda 0.282-1.302-0.246-1.078 3.848-0.005-1.128 Qihoo 2.203 1.827 3.397 3.217 3.680 2.390 2.905 Rising -3.072-6.604-6.159-5.390-1.236-5.924-7.156 Symantec 2.359 1.940 4.016 3.889 0.443 1.855 4.195 Tencent -1.481-0.155 0.051-0.205-1.288-0.232 0.235 Trend Micro 13.118 9.979 16.986 16.585 7.662 10.348 16.799 TrustPort -5.691-3.306-4.201-4.923-4.367-3.325-3.840 All marked blue and green are recommended solutions for single user group Marked green (-3, 4) is a solution as good as Microsoft Marked blue (>4) is a solution better than Microsoft Windows 8 has window defender antimalware protection built in and smart screen consumer safety technologies into internet explorer built in. In order to help each user group to understand which products are best suited to them, the test results are presented in the way based on the Windows 8 baseline protection out of the box. User 16 / 26
Trend Micro Kaspersky McAfee Bitdefender Symantec Qihoo Panda Tencent ESET 17 / 26
Trend Micro Kaspersky Bitdefender McAfee Symantec Qihoo Tencent Panda Microsoft+Qihoo ESET Dr.Web Microsoft+Sogou G Data 18 / 26
Trend Micro Kaspersky Bitdefender McAfee Symantec Qihoo Tencent Panda ESET Dr.Web F-Secure 19 / 26
Trend Micro Kaspersky Bitdefender Symantec McAfee Qihoo Tencent Panda ESET F-Secure 20 / 26
Kaspersky Trend Micro McAfee Panda Qihoo Symantec Bitdefender Emsisoft ESET F-Secure Rising Tencent AVG IKARUS 21 / 26
Trend Micro Kaspersky Bitdefender McAfee Qihoo Symantec Panda Tencent ESET Dr.Web G Data 22 / 26
Trend Micro Kaspersky Bitdefender Symantec McAfee Qihoo Tencent Microsoft+Qihoo Panda ESET Dr.Web G Data 23 / 26
Tester Introduction 嘉 兴 市 辰 翔 信 息 科 技 有 限 公 司, 位 于 浙 江 省 嘉 兴 市, 作 为 一 家 专 业 的 计 算 机 安 全 软 硬 件 及 IT 软 硬 件 的 咨 询 测 试 公 司, 为 用 户 选 择 IT 产 品 提 供 参 考 公 司 将 在 传 统 的 PC 端 安 全 软 件 咨 询 测 试 的 基 础 上 逐 步 开 展 PC 端 通 用 软 件 服 务 器 安 全 软 件 及 其 他 通 用 软 硬 件 的 咨 询 与 测 试 工 作 Right Statement 除 非 另 有 说 明, 嘉 兴 市 辰 翔 科 技 信 息 有 限 公 司 ( 简 称 辰 翔 科 技, 下 同 ) 拥 有 本 报 告 的 版 权, 未 经 辰 翔 科 技 事 先 书 面 授 权 许 可, 任 何 机 构 或 个 人 无 权 擅 自 更 改 本 报 告 内 容 或 以 任 何 方 式 以 商 业 目 的 而 使 用 本 报 告 ( 包 括 但 不 限 于 发 送 传 播 复 印 摘 编 等 ) 本 报 告 中 所 使 用 的 辰 翔 科 技 商 标 服 务 标 识 及 标 记, 除 非 另 有 说 明, 均 为 辰 翔 科 技 的 商 标 服 务 标 识 及 标 记, 辰 翔 科 技 对 此 拥 有 版 权, 任 何 侵 犯 辰 翔 科 技 版 权 之 行 为, 均 为 违 法 行 为, 辰 翔 科 技 将 对 此 依 法 追 究 侵 权 人 相 关 法 律 责 任 24 / 26
Disclaimer 辰 翔 科 技 在 此 特 别 提 醒, 在 使 用 本 公 司 报 告 前, 请 认 真 阅 读 充 分 理 解 本 声 明 中 各 条 款, 包 括 免 除 或 限 制 辰 翔 科 技 责 任 的 免 责 条 款 及 对 用 户 的 权 利 限 制, 如 果 您 对 本 声 明 中 的 任 何 条 款 表 示 异 议, 可 以 选 择 不 使 用 本 报 告, 您 使 用 本 报 告 的 行 为 将 被 视 为 对 本 声 明 全 部 内 容 的 认 可, 并 同 意 接 受 本 声 明 全 部 条 款 的 约 束 1 本 报 告 由 辰 翔 科 技 向 读 者 提 供, 所 载 全 部 内 容 仅 系 提 供 读 者 参 考 之 用, 并 不 构 成 对 其 选 择 购 买 使 用 产 品 之 建 议, 也 不 构 成 对 其 选 择 购 买 使 用 报 告 中 所 涉 产 品 的 邀 请 或 保 证 辰 翔 科 技 不 担 保 内 容 的 绝 对 准 确 性 和 完 整 性, 读 者 不 应 单 纯 依 靠 本 报 告 而 取 代 个 人 的 独 立 判 断, 辰 翔 科 技 建 议 读 者 如 有 任 何 疑 问, 应 当 咨 询 国 家 相 关 部 门 并 进 行 独 立 选 择 购 买 或 使 用 判 断 2 本 报 告 所 载 内 容 为 辰 翔 科 技 在 报 告 发 表 日 当 日 对 有 关 产 品 性 状 的 判 断, 在 其 它 不 同 日 期 辰 翔 科 技 可 发 出 与 本 报 告 内 容 不 一 致 或 有 不 同 结 论 的 报 告, 但 辰 翔 科 技 无 义 务 或 责 任 为 此 将 原 报 告 涉 及 内 容 及 时 更 新 并 由 此 通 知 读 者, 在 此 情 形 下 辰 翔 科 技 不 对 读 者 因 使 用 本 报 告 所 产 生 的 损 失 负 任 何 责 任 3 本 报 告 可 能 附 带 其 它 网 站 的 地 址 或 超 级 链 接, 目 的 纯 粹 是 为 了 读 者 使 用 方 便, 所 链 接 网 站 的 内 容 不 构 成 本 报 告 的 任 何 部 分, 读 者 需 自 行 承 担 浏 览 该 类 网 站 的 风 险 费 用 或 者 损 失, 同 时 辰 翔 科 技 不 对 此 类 网 站 的 内 容 ( 包 括 但 不 限 于 广 告 产 品 或 其 他 资 料 ) 的 真 实 性 完 整 性 准 确 性 及 合 法 性 负 责 或 保 证, 读 者 使 用 或 依 赖 任 何 此 类 网 站 或 经 由 此 类 网 站 获 得 的 任 何 内 容 商 品 或 服 务 所 产 生 的 任 何 损 害 或 损 失, 辰 翔 科 技 不 承 担 任 何 直 接 或 间 接 法 律 责 任 25 / 26
4 辰 翔 科 技 可 能 与 生 产 本 报 告 涉 及 产 品 的 公 司 间 已 存 在 或 将 存 在 业 务 关 系, 但 无 需 事 先 或 在 将 来 建 立 业 务 关 系 后 通 知 其 他 读 者 5 读 者 接 收 本 报 告 并 不 视 为 和 辰 翔 科 技 建 立 业 务 关 系, 辰 翔 科 技 无 需 因 此 而 对 其 承 担 类 似 客 户 关 系 情 形 下 的 任 何 法 律 责 任 6 所 有 辰 翔 科 技 报 告 测 试 对 象 之 产 品 样 品, 系 辰 翔 科 技 于 正 规 合 法 销 售 渠 道 购 买 之 产 品, 故 本 报 告 内 容 仅 适 合 于 从 正 规 合 法 渠 道 购 买 之 产 品, 而 不 适 于 从 其 他 渠 道 所 得 之 产 品, 读 者 使 用 非 正 规 合 法 销 售 渠 道 产 品 所 产 生 的 任 何 风 险 或 损 失, 与 辰 翔 科 技 无 关, 在 此 情 形 下 辰 翔 科 技 概 不 承 担 任 何 法 律 责 任 7 本 报 告 可 能 会 涉 及 公 司 或 个 人 所 有 的 商 标 或 其 相 关 照 片 图 案, 若 任 何 单 位 或 个 人 认 为 涉 嫌 侵 犯 其 合 法 权 益, 可 及 时 与 辰 翔 科 技 联 系, 以 便 辰 翔 科 技 迅 速 作 出 处 理 对 上 述 声 明 的 解 释 修 改 及 更 新 权 属 辰 翔 科 技 所 有 26 / 26