326 201812 JournalofSoiland WaterConservation Vol.32No.6 Dec.,2018 E B WX " < V O 1,= 2 (1. )0 %, 030006;2. H C, 030051) (: Z <20O4I@A9: ( 9: 9 )\ - 9DE O, @A9: O 1 :(1)4I@A9: 0 100cm D\ a \FM, 9 9: O\ #0 9,\V 2Oc CD7 # J;(2)4I@A9: 0 20cm D\ 2 ph J U 8 V 9 0 a \ F M,# 8 V 9 1 F M ( 犘 < 0.05);(3)4I@A9: - FM,_\DE 9: 9 \ 0 9 ( 犘 <0.05);(4)./2, 2 Y 1 @ A / 2 9 D 2 H @A O34L )*+:@A9: ; ;\ ;\,-./0:S714.7;S718.56 1 :A 1 0:1009 2242(2018)06 0107 05 犇犗犐 :10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.06.016 犈犳犲犮狋狊狅犳犇犻犳犲狉犲狀狋犚犲狏犲犵犲狋犪狋犻狅狀犘犪狋犲狉狀狊狅狀犛狅犻犾犪狀犱犠犪狋犲狉犆狅狀狊犲狉狏犪狋犻狅狀犻狀犛犪狀犱狔 犺犻犾狔犚犲犵犻狅狀狅犳犖狅狉狋犺犲狉狀犛犺犪狀狓犻犘狉狅狏犻狀犮犲 ZHANGLuan 1,ZHAOLihua 2 (1. 犐狀狊狋犻狋狌狋犲狅犳犔狅犲狊犘犾犪狋犲犪狌, 犛犺犪狀狓犻犝狀犻狏犲狉狊犻狋狔, 犜犪犻狔狌犪狀 030006; 2. 犛犮犺狅狅犾狅犳犈狀犲狉犵狔犪狀犱犘狅狑犲狉犈狀犵犻狀犲犲狉犻狀犵, 犖狅狉狋犺犝狀犻狏犲狉狊犻狋狔狅犳犆犺犻狀犪, 犜犪犻狔狌犪狀 030051) 犃犫狊狋狉犪犮狋 :Thisstudyinvestigatedsoiland waterconservationefectofdiferentrevegetationpaternsin sandy hilyregion ofnorthern ShanxiProvince.Thecharacteristicsofsoil watercontent,physicaland chemicalproperties,runofvolumeandsoilerosionoffourrevegetation paternsplots which havebeen grownforabouttwentyyearsatsunnyslopeinjiajiayaowatershedinyouyucounty,wereanalyzed.those revegetation paterns included naturaly colonized herbaceous plants, 犘犻狀狌狊狋犪犫狌犾犻犳狅狉犿犻狊 plantation, 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犽狅狉狊犺犻狀狊犽犻 plantation,and 犘犻狀狌狊狋犪犫狌犾犻犳狅狉犿犻狊 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犽狅狉狊犺犻狀狊犽犻 plantation.theresults showedthat:(1)therewasnosignificantdiferenceinsoilwatercontentin0 100cm depth.soilbulk densityofnaturalycolonizedherbaceousplantsand 犘犻狀狌狊狋犪犫狌犾犻犳狅狉犿犻狊 plantationwerehigherthanthoseof 犘犻狀狌狊狋犪犫狌犾犻犳狅狉犿犻狊 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犽狅狉狊犺犻狀狊犽犻 plantationand 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犽狅狉狊犺犻狀狊犽犻 plantation,whilethetrends ofsoiltotalporositywereoppositetothoseofbulkdensity.(2)therewerenosignificantdiferencesinsoil granularitydistribution,ph,organic mater,ammonium nitrogenandavailablephosphorusin0 20cm depthofthefourrevegetationpaterns,whilethediferencesofnitratenitrogenandavailablepotassium were significant( 犘 <0.05).(3)Revegetationpaternshadsignificantdiferencesonsoilerosion,butnoefectson runof( 犘 <0.05).Thesoilerosion ofnaturalycolonized herbaceousplantsand 犘犻狀狌狊狋犪犫狌犾犻犳狅狉犿犻狊 plantationweresignificantlyhigherthanthoseof 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犽狅狉狊犺犻狀狊犽犻 plantationand 犘犻狀狌狊狋犪犫狌犾犻犳狅狉犿犻狊 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犽狅狉狊犺犻狀狊犽犻 plantation ( 犘 <0.05).(4)Ifcoverage wassimilar,rootdensity,nearsurface vegetationcoverageandleafliterthicknesswerethemainfactorsafectingsoilandwaterconservationefect offorest grassvegetation. 犓犲狔狑狅狉犱狊 :revegetationpatern;soiland waterconservationefect;soilwater;soilphysicalandchemical property :2018 06 27 :!"(41301609); #!(20121101011) : (1982 ),,,# 2>?,?,34569:287% E mail:zhangluan@sxu.edu.cn
108 32 )0 H -!T #O,[H 9 2 8. / O # $ 20 80, B, -! ), # 9 \ [1] @A -! b 28:; [ D #4 L @A QDE [2] - 7 - [3] [4 5] 0 \ E 7 R [6 7] 9b \ [8 10] [ @ A 9 9: H 1K W L Obc,5R> \ \ G C - 7 F M [11 12] Zhou [13] 6I @A9: - 9 1, - 9 D E \ 0 ; [14] 9: O %, 9: 9 O - 9DE 0 9 W MN )0 E E+, c,8, ) O 9, -! #,28:;, 9 O, @AI@[F,28:; b 9 W O34 JI, @A. /, O I I @ > [15] 2K [16] \ [17] [1 FM,_ @A9: O% [18] Y!% #U O@A ]^, 9@A./ #4O Z[9\ H7 Y, % 5\ b - 2, <20O4I@A9: ( 9 9: )O, W MN -! 928./ )*9 1 )*&+, 1.1 FG % 9ZMN(40 01 N, 112 27 E), 1436~1447m,\ Q 9 4.0, 420mm, Q34Q 6 9, & 1761mm, V *2915h, 4m/s % @A F, I @O,3 ( 犘狅狆狌犾狌狊狊犻犿狅狀犻 ) ( 犘犻狀狌狊狋犪犫狌犾犻犳狅狉犿犻狊 ) ( 犘犻狀狌狊狊狔犾狏犲狊狋狉犻狊犿狅狀犵狅犾犻犮犪 ) 2 ( 犔犪狉犻狓狆狉犻狀犮犻狆犻狊 狉狌狆狆狉犲 犮犺狋犻 ) 3,34 ( 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犽狅狉狊犺犻狀狊犽犻 ) 9 ( 犎犻狆狆狅狆犺犪犲狉犺犪犿狀狅犻犱犲狊 ) % % (5 @A O, 5 4 I @ A 9 : : ( 犘犻狀狌狊狋犪犫狌犾犻犳狅狉犿犻狊 plantation) ( 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犽狅狉 狊犺犻狀狊犽犻 plantation) ( 犘犻狀狌狊狋犪犫狌犾犻 犳狅狉犿犻狊 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犽狅狉狊犺犻狀狊犽犻 plantation) 9: Z,,90 (@A9: Z29 Y (11), V ( 犛狋犻狆犪犮犪狆犻犾犪狋犪 )9 ( 犔犲狔犿狌狊犮犺犻狀犲狀狊犻狊 ) 34D @K 91 H; ; @A9: / Z2/ / 3D D m ( ) a./2/%./2/% 9: 1436 7 20-50 1439 12 21 50 5 1447 9 20 50 20 1439 10 18 55 15 1.2 MN 20157 \, I@A9: /2/ Z[ - (8m 4m), 4( PVC 34, / Q- L 0 ] 2, - I ] H Q 5 20166,P20169 I@A9: ( - )( \ [( 100cm), 1 [ @ A K 9, \ [ * 20cm(0 20cm * 10cm) :I, \ \, # 9V 2 MKHQ0 20cm \, \ \ 2 ph J U8V #8V 09 1 1.3 I V Q - - Q- O 02, Q- [F,'L P 1 V Q - ; Q- O, ` B5 QF,H 'L I,L \DE Q] ^/ FY O HOBO Q \ #9V 2H :I 9: ;\ 2 Malvern Mastersizer3000 2, H (USDA) [19] ; \ph J U 8 V # 8 V 0 9 1 Z V [20] O ] H SPSS19.0,H L F (One way ANOVA)9 Duncan * F M,H Origin2018
6 :W MN @A9: O 109 2 -&./ 2.1 WX " &<. 512 W,4I@A9: 0 100cm D 6.40% ~8.49% F (1 2)1,4I@A9: 0 100cm D a \FM, D\ [a \F M \ D 2 (0 100 cm) B OCD K,M 3 I@A 9 : \ D 2 c \ 92 WX " &,< :% @A9: 0 10cm 10 20cm 20 40cm 40 60cm 60 80cm 80 100cm 0 100cm 9: 5.19±0.53Aa 6.39±0.52Aa 8.77±1.81Aa 10.37±3.08Aa 10.70±4.97Aa 9.49±4.16Aa 8.49±2.43a 5.36±0.82Aa 5.48±0.52Aa 6.80±0.45Aa 7.52±2.23Aa 6.92±1.42Aa 6.36±1.37Aa 6.41±0.32a 5.52±0.14Da 5.93±0.97CDa 7.60±1.40BCa 9.72±0.56Aa 10.77±1.25Aa 9.34±1.31ABa 8.14±0.69a - 5.05±1.01Aa 6.56±2.33Aa 7.72±1.96Aa 7.09±0.87Aa 6.83±0.83Aa 5.17±0.75Aa 6.40±0.84a : ( *1, D FM \( 犘 <0.05); *1,D FM \( 犘 <0.05) 2.2 WX " &I 5 1 W, K,M 3I@A 9: \ # D 2O (0 100cm) B (10 40cm) (>40cm)C D 0 10 cm D\ # 9 9: 0 9 ;10 40cm \ #T0, T, 9: 9 FM ;40 60cm 80 100cm D, 9: \ #T0, V 9-960 80cm D\ #4I @A9: * F 43.32% ~49.52% 7 \ # O c C D,4I@A9: 0 100cm DV 2 B OCD 0 20cm D\V 2 > > 9: > ;20 80cm D \V 2 0 9: ;80 100cm D 9 \V 20 9 9: -2 WX " & ] (USDA) (13),4I@A9: -1 WX " &RA 5 2 W,0 100cm D\V 2 0 20cm \ 2, 68.94%~ 70.24%," 28.42%~29.71%, T, 1.25%~1.37% F 1,4 I@A 9: a \FM 93 WX " &S]TU :% @ A 9 : <0.002mm " 0.002~0.05mm T 0.05~0.1mm 0.1~0.25mm 0.25~0.5mm 0.5~1.0mm T 1.0~2.0mm 9 : 1.32±0.10a 28.61±1.44a 44.02±0.92a 22.47±1.90a 2.54±0.85a 0.18±0.06a 0.42±0.33a 1.25±0.05a 29.71±0.49a 45.62±0.37a 20.44±0.34a 2.41±0.37a 0.19±0.12a 0.28±0.18a 1.37±0.29a 28.62±0.89a 45.33±0.41a 22.19±0.22a 2.30±1.46a 0.18±0.16a 0.00±0.00a - 1.32±0.10a 28.42±0.49a 46.24±1.49a 22.84±0.87a 1.15±0.60a 0.02±0.03a 0.00±0.00a : *1 FM \( 犘 <0.05) 5 3 W,4 I @ A 9 : 0 20cm \ ph J U 8 V 9 0 a \ F M,# 8V 9 9: \0 ( 犘 <0.05), 1 \0 9: ( 犘 <0.05) 2.3 WX " = ' * 8V -, F Q 213 mm $' @ A 9 : - O F - 9DE F 1,4I@A9: F - a \FM, FDE 9: 7
110 32 FM,_ \0 9 ( 犘 <0.05)( 4) -3 WX " & @ -4 WX " = ' 3 1 0 \ H @K2 O34 L, [21] [22] )0 Z 9 0 400cm \ % 1, \ c / [ \,L R P \ O9:9 % 3I ( 9 - )7 9: 0 100cm D\ O a \FM,74/ Z,H 0, 7 @ K 2 [,@ A 9 \ 0 100cm DO\ c @,$ # \K 346 # 7>, B O! [23] % [8,10] 1, L \K Ob 7 FM %, 9 -, V 9 Kb \, \E, @A9: b \ O,, \$ [11,24] O\#8 V 0,34H O V 9 V O \ 1 F, H7 J- 0 J K [25],P,@AO 341 @A Q9 -O^ \O 9b [7] \ < [2] ) M N % 1, @A J, @K $ QDE C 9- -\,? 1@A D I \ %,4I@A9: O 1 F - FM, HG % &, 3D/27 9: /2 F,_ - 9 O 2 H,3D9 D O:D D P Q H 9 I O @K./N, HQ V BO, K,LR, 9 - b \ 9GC, \ D E [ O 9 : P 9: *, D\ O$ 0 [26 27], % Z,,LY I @ 2 (, 2 V ; *, (4 \ 8, #@A9:O J 4 0 (1) < 20,4 I@A9: 0
6 :W MN @A9: O 111 100cm \ a \ F M, 9 9: \ #0 9, \V 2Oc CD7 # J; (2)4I@A9: 0 20cm D \ 2 ph J U8V9 0a \FM,#8 V9 1FM \( 犘 <0.05); (3)4I@A9: - FM,_ DE 9: 9 \0 9 ( 犘 <0.05); (4)./2, 2 Y 1@A/ 29 D 2H @A O34L : P]. ]QMN R ST UV'WX CD1 : [1], Z,,.) 0 2 8 O 2 8 [J]. K,2017,32(1):11 19. [2] \ <,#.,,.Z [ - D E J % [J].,2011,25(5):1 7. [3] Z;, <,,.E a \ M N -! - I [J]., 2018,32(1):32 38. [4] ZhangB,YangYS,Zepp H.Efectofvegetationres torationonsoilandwatererosionandnutrientlossesof aseverelyerodedclayerplinthudultinsoutheasternchi na[j].catena,2004,57:77 90. [5] HuJ,LüY H,FuBJ,etal.Quantifyingtheefectof ecologicalrestorationonrunofandsedimentyields:a meta analysisfortheloessplateauofchina[j].pro gressinphysicalgeography,2017,41(6):753 774. [6] S?,,,. @ A \ E c B M L [J]., 2013,27(5):17 22. [7],.6, Q,. 28 $\ R L [J].28,2018,38(1):122 131. [8] WangL,MuY,ZhangQF,etal.Efectsofvegetation restorationonsoilphysicalpropertiesinthewind water erosionregionofthenorthern LoessPlateauofChina [J].Clean Soil,Air,Water,2012,40(1):7 15. [9] c, 1, F,.W ) 22 \ K O c [J].2 8,2017,37 (2):416 424. [10] ZhuBB,LiZB,LiP,etal.Soilerodibility,microbi albiomass,and physical chemical property changes duringlong termnaturalvegetationrestoration:acase studyintheloessplateau,china[j].ecologicalre search,2010,25:531 541. [11] 5,,Y 0.) M N @ A O H $ -! [J].,2008,6(2):43 48. [12] PengSL,ChenA Q,FangH D,etal.Efectsofveg etationrestorationtypesonsoilqualityin Yuanmou dry hotvaley,china[j].soilscienceandplantnutri tion,2013,59(3):347 360. [13] ZhouJ,FuBJ,GaoGY,etal.Efectsofprecipitati onandrestorationvegetationonsoilerosioninasemi aridenvironmentintheloessplateau,china[j].cate na,2016,137:1 11. [14],^ B,#.,.)0 [J].,2011,25(3):13 21. [15] 5, 0.W MN @A] 7 % [J].? 3 ( N ), 2011,25(1):103 109. [16], =, 0,.W MN @A> %7 [J]. 8,2017(6):60 66. [17],.W MN @A9: O \ B 7289: [J].%,2017, 24(5):88 92. [18], b, 2,.W )MN @A -!9\ O [J].,2012,26(2):71 74. [19] =.\ [M]. : N,2013. [20]. \ [M].: N, 2000. [21] SimmonsM T,ArcherSR,TeagueW R,etal.Tree ( 犘狉狅狊狅狆犻狊犵犾犪狀犱狌犾狅狊犪 )efectson grassgrowth:an experimentalassessmentofabove andbelowgroundin teractionsinatemperatesavanna[j].journalofarid Environments,2008,72(4):314 325. [22],Q,,.) 0 / Z b \ Oc B [J].2 8,2017,37 (18):6120 6127. [23] 2. [M].: N, 1993. [24] WangYF,FuBJ,LüY H,etal.Efectsofvegeta tionrestorationonsoilorganiccarbonsequestrationat multiplescalesinsemi aridloessplateau,china[j]. Catena,2011,85:58 66. [25],,;,. @A9: )M N D E \ 2 K O [J]. 8, 2007,22(1):20 27. [26] 6,Y, X,.)0 @A D\ [J].28,2008,28(4): 1429 1445. [27] P,,.) M N \ c B [J].2 8,2018,38(10): 3471 3481.