( ) 2018 1 ( 207 ) * ** : : DOI:10.13415/j.cnki.fxpl.2018.01.016 (GrantGilmore) 1 2 3 4 ( ) * 2016 ( :CLS[2016]C23) ** 1 SeeGrantGilmoreSecurityInterestsinPersonalPropertyBoston:LitleBrownandCompany1965p.274. 2 : ( ) ( ) 2016 156 ; : : 2011 172 ; : ( ) 2014 6 47 3 4 SeeHarryC.SigmanPerfectionandPriorityofSecurityRightsin HorstEidenmuelerandEva- MariaKieninger edsthefutureofsecuredcreditineuropeberlin:degruyterrecht2008p.149. 21 : ( ) 2012 167
2018 1 5 9 1933 瑏瑠 瑏瑡 瑏瑢 瑏瑣 瑏瑤 : ; 瑏瑥 ; 5 6 7 8 9 瑏瑠 瑏瑡 瑏瑢 瑏瑣 瑏瑤 瑏瑥 168 JonathanC.LipsonSecretsandLiens:theEndofNoticeinCommercialFinanceLaw21 EmoryBankruptcyDevelopmentsJournal421 (2004-2005)pp.429-445. DouglasBairdNoticeFilingandtheProblemofOstensibleOwnership12JournalofLegalStudies 53 (1983)p. 54; John HannaTheExtensionofPublicRecordation31Columbia Law Review617 (1931).pp.638-639. noticefiling : 2014 1 5 200 6 (documentfilingortransactionfiling) (noticefil- ing) 7 8 ; SeeGrantGilmoresupranote1pp.466-471;AsianDevelopmentBankLawandPolicyReformattheAsianDe- velopmentbankpart2:a Guideto MovablesRegistries2002p.17;AnthonyDugganA PPSA RegistrationPrimer35 MelbourneUniversityLaw Review865(2011)p.873. SeeAsianDevelopmentBanksupranote 8p.17;UnitedNationsCommissiononInternationalTradeLawUNCI- TRALLegislativeGuideonSecuredTransactionsUnitedNations2010pp.151f. SeeBarkley ClarkThe Law ofsecured Transactions Underthe Uniform CommercialCodeBoston: Warren Gorham & Lamont19802.9. SeeFloydR.SelfSecuredTransactionsFilingsUndertheFloridaUniform CommercialCode:A CalforProcedural Notice13FloridaStateUniversityLaw Review111(1985-1986)p.117. SeeMeghan M SercombeGoodTechnologyandBadLaw:How ComputerizationThreatensNoticeFilingUnderRe- visedarticle984texaslaw Review1065(2005-2006)p.1066. SeeFloydR.Selfsupranote 瑏瑡 p.117. SeeJensHausmannTheValueofPublic-NoticeFilingunderUniform CommercialCodeArticle9:A Comparison withthegermanlegalsystemofsecuritiesinpersonalproperty25georgiajournalofinternationalandcomparativelaw 427 (1995-1996)p.440;JulianB.McDonnelTheFloatingLienorasGoodFaithPurchaser50SouthernCaliforniaLaw Re- view129 (1977)p.129. SeeReportoftheUniform CommercialCodeArticle9FilingSystem TaskForcetothePermanentEditorialBoard's Article9StudyCommitee(May11991)inappendicestoPermanentEditorialBoard(PEB)StudyGroupUniform Commer- cialcodearticle9report(december11992)p.23.
: 瑏瑦 瑏瑧 瑏瑨 - 瑏瑩 瑐瑠 : ; ( ); 瑐瑡 瑐瑢 瑐瑣 : : 瑐瑤 瑏瑦 瑏瑧 瑏瑨 瑏瑩 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 瑐瑢 瑐瑣 瑐瑤 SeeJamesJ.WhiteRevising Article9to Reduce WastefulLitigation26 LoyolaLos AngelesLaw Review823 (1993)pp.830-31. SeeRobertE.ScotThePoliticsofArticle980VirginiaLaw Review1783(1994)p.1802. SeeJensHausmannsupranote 瑏瑤 p.432. SeeJonathanC.Lipsonsupranote5p.447. SeeDouglasG.BairdThomasH.JacksonInformationUncertaintyandtheTransferofProperty13Journalof LegalStudies292(1982)p.312. SeeTheLaw Commission(Englandand Wales)RegistrationofSecurityInterests:CompanyChargesandProperty OtherThanLand(A ConsultationPaper)ConsultationPaperNo1642002pp.61-62. : 2008 315 SeeUnitedNationsCommissiononInternationalTradeLawUN- CITRAL GuideontheImplementationofaSecurityRightsRegistryUnitedNations2014pp.23-24. JonathanC.Lipsonsupranote5p.447-448. 169
2018 1 瑐瑥 ; 瑐瑦 瑐瑧 [ ] ; 瑐瑨 : 瑐瑩 5 1 瑑瑠 2016 8 : 瑑瑡 < > (2007 12 3 ) : 3 6 瑐瑥 瑐瑦 瑐瑧 瑐瑨 瑐瑩 瑑瑡 170 : 2006 6 瑐瑢 332 SeeHarryC.Sigmansupranote3p.151. HarryC.Sigmansupranote3p.152. UnitedNationsCommissiononInternationalTradeLawsupranote 瑐瑣 pp.38-39; 5 ;John M.WilsonModelRegistryRegulationsundertheModelInter-AmericanLawonSe- curedtransactions15uniform Law Review515(2010)p.524. 瑑瑠 : < > < > : 2008 642 42 5 See MarekDubovecUCC Article9RegistrationSystemforLatinA- merica28arizonajournalofinternational& ComparativeLaw117(2011)p.134.
: 8 瑑瑢 瑑瑣 (2016 8 23 ) 瑑瑤 瑑瑥 : [ ] 瑑瑦 : (2008)28 1 31 瑑瑧 : 1 [ ] [ ] [ ] ( ) 瑑瑨 : [ ] [ ] [ ] 瑑瑢 2007 2016 4 6 7 瑑瑣 < > (2008 1 14 ) (2008 1 22 ) < > (2008 3 31 ) < > (2016 9 7 ) 瑑瑤 (2009 1 4 ) 11 (2008 3 24 ) 184 (2010 6 12 ) ( ) 瑑瑥 [2015] 333 瑑瑦 [2013] 32 瑑瑧 [2012] 17 瑑瑨 [2015] 137 171
2018 1 瑑瑩 : [ ] : ( 63 ) 180 181 ; ; ; ; [ ]; ; 184 ; ; ; ; ; 188 ; ; 189 ; ( ) : ( 178 ) 34 ; ; ; 37 ; ; ; ; 41 ; 42 ; ; 43 44 : :( ) ;( ) 45 : 34 37 41 42 43 44 45 178 2007 10 17 30 2016 7 5 88 ( 瑑瑩 [2017] 12 51 172
: 35 ) ( ) 瑒瑠 : 瑒瑡 8 88 ; 92 178 ( 44 ) 178 35 1 : 199 4 :( ) ;( ) ;( ) : 189 瑒瑠 瑒瑡 [2015] 137 [2012] 64 ; [2015] 137 ; [2016] 01 786 ; [2017] 12 51 173
2018 1 42 189 42 瑒瑢 2 ( ) 瑒瑣 瑒瑤 [ ] [ ] 瑒瑥 [ ] 瑒瑦 : 瑒瑢 ( [2013] 182 ) : 42 189 瑒瑣 ( [2016] 11 1380 ) : [ 189 2 ] 瑒瑤 [2015] 137 瑒瑥 SeeMarekDubovecsupranote 瑑瑡 p.124. 瑒瑦 SeeUnitedNationsCommissiononInternationalTradeLawsupranote 瑐瑣 p.37. 174
: 瑒瑧 瑒瑨 4 : 瑒瑩 瑓瑠 : 10 瑓瑡 瑓瑢 2 ( ) ; ; 瑓瑣 瑓瑤 瑒瑧 (2014 6 30 ) 6 8 9 瑒瑨 : < > 2016 2 瑒瑩 UnitedNationsCommissiononInternationalTradeLawsupranote 瑐瑣 p.38. 瑓瑠 [2014] 9 瑓瑡 5 (1) 瑓瑢 < 3 (2) 瑓瑣 < > ; < > 瑓瑤 3 ; < > 175
2018 1 ( ) 瑓瑥 瑓瑦 : [ 189 2 ] [ ] : : < > : 瑓瑧 : [ ] [ ] 2012 12 11 (2012) 18 : < > ( ) 4 19 瑓瑨 瑓瑩 瑓瑥 瑓瑦 瑓瑧 瑓瑨 瑓瑩 < > [2016] 11 1380 [2011] 01 [2011] 0285 : 2009 459 176
: 2016 : 瑔瑠 : 瑔瑡 瑔瑢 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 瑔瑣 ( ) 瑔瑤 LTM1500-8.1 ( ) ; 瑔瑥 : [ ] LTM1500-8.1 [ ] LTM1500-8.1 [ ] LTM1500-8.1 ( ) 180 184 瑔瑦 瑔瑧 49 瑔瑠 2007 瑔瑡 SeeUnitedNationsCommissiononInternationalTradeLawsupranote9p.181. 瑔瑢 瑒瑨 瑔瑣 < > ( 2008 28 2008 1 14 ) : :1. 瑔瑤 [2014] 16 [2014] 16 瑔瑥 8 : 22 : 42 4 : 瑔瑦 [2013] 32 瑔瑧 [2015] 333 177
2018 1 : [ ] [ ] [ ] 49 [ ] 瑔瑨 : ; ( ) 瑔瑩 184 ( ) ( ) 瑖瑠 : [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] 瑖瑡 2 4 2 4 180 181 44 184 44 : 瑔瑨 瑔瑩 瑖瑠 瑖瑡 178 [2017] 89 [2015] 137 [2016] 01 786 [2017] 12 51
: ; 瑖瑢 瑖瑣 ; 瑖瑤 ( ) 瑖瑥 180 184 ( ) 瑖瑦 ( ) 184 (5) 瑖瑧 : 184 (5) 2015 12 22 瑖瑢 瑖瑣 瑖瑤 瑖瑥 瑖瑦 瑖瑧 SeeUnitedNationsCommissiononInternationalTradeLawsupranote 9pp.151-152;UnitedNationsCommis- siononinternationaltradelawsupranote 瑐瑣 p.22. 36 : 44 瑒瑨 : < > 2007 3 [2016] 1122 5 179
2018 1 21112220150043 瑖瑨 : : [ ] 184 (5) [ ] [ ] 瑖瑩 10 : 瑘瑠 signmentofownershipisnotregisteredinthechatelmortgageregistry.ithasnocredibilityanditsfunctionisonlytonotice thethirdpartyofthemortgageburdenanddeterminethepriorityamongcompetingrightsonaparticularsubject.thuschatel Abstract: Registrationisonlytherequirementofsecurityrightagainstthirdparties.Neithertheacquisitionnortheas- mortgageregistrationauthorityisonlyresponsiblefortheformalexaminationofanapplicationforchatelmortgageregistra- tion.tochecktheparties IDformalyasthesubjectwhoisprohibitedtobeaguarantorbylawcannotbeachatelmortga- gor.andinthecaseofcolateraltheauthorityonlyneedstocheckwhetheritbelongstothescopeofregisteredtermsandhas noresponsibilitytochecktheownershiportheuserightofthecolateral.accordingtopropertylawandsecuritylawit couldn tbedrawndirectlythattheauthorityshouldbeartheresponsibilityofsubstantiveexaminationofanapplicationfor chatelmortgageregistration. Key Words: ChatelMortgageRegistration ;RegistrationAntagonism;FormalExamination;SubstantiveExamination ( : ) 瑖瑨 瑖瑩 瑘瑠 180 [2015] 34 JamesJ.WhiteReformingArticle9PrioritiesinLightofOldIgnoranceandNewFilingRules79MinnesotaLaw Re- view529 (1995)p.530. MarekDubovecsupranote 瑑瑡 p.134.