* * 985 26
1998 1 1999 2 2001 T. Jackson 3 2009 8 4 2012 5 2012 Sir Nicholas Wall 6 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 1998 2010 281 1999 Steven Lubet Ronald Dworkin 3A 6 Court Review 5 Summer2000 Court Review 5 Winter2001 Lubet The Ethics of Judicial Commentary Court Review 6 Summer2000. 2008 112 http / /www. chinanews. com /gj /gj - oz /news /2009 /08-05 /1805350. shtm 12 14 13 http / / news. sina. com. cn /w /2012-12 - 14 /152225814106. shtm 3 27 Sir Nicholas Wall Lord Justice Thorpe 2012-03 - 27 http / /gb. cri. cn /27824 /2012 /03 /27 / 6011s3618713. htm 27
2014 1 7 1995 7 32 1998 4 15 2001 8 2006 9 12 1 2007 8 2 2008 3 10 20 9 3 2011 10 瑏瑠 4 2013 4 10 7 8 9 瑏瑠 Daming Sunusi 2013 1 17 http / /www. csstoday. net /Item. aspx id = 43742 13 48. 8 2007 08 28 http / / news. sina. com. cn /s /l /2007-08 - 28 /030413756266. shtml http / /npc. people. com. cn /GB /28320 /116286 /116599 /6983219. html 2011 7 13 2 10 http / /www. caijing. com. cn / 2011-07 - 13 /110773518. html 28
瑏瑡 5 2012 3 瑏瑢 2006 瑏瑣 瑏瑤 瑏瑡 瑏瑢 瑏瑣 瑏瑤 http / /news. dahe. cn /2013 /04-10 /102099644. html 2012 5 19 http / /www. jcrb. com /IPO /local /bj / 201206 / t20120608_879278. html - a06800d76032&user = 121626 2006 12 15 http / /www. chinalawinfo. com /fzdt /NewsContent. aspx id = 18201 2010 2008 2006 Brian Kennedy American Legal Ethics 2005 2010 29
2014 1 13 瑏瑥 ABA 2011 2 瑏瑦 2000 9 5 3A 6 pending impending 瑏瑧 1998 8 瑏瑥 瑏瑦 瑏瑧 1670 1975 2007 153 154 ABA MODEL CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT 2011 EDITION Canon 1 A judge shall uphold and promote the independence integrity and impartiality of the judiciary and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety. The Code of Conduct for United States Judges Guide to Judicial Policy Vol. 2A Ch. 2 P2. 30
1991 瑏瑨 2002 5 /6 1 2 3 4 5 瑏瑩 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 1999 瑐瑢 瑏瑨 瑏瑩 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 瑐瑢 Glifford Einstein 2006 62 2006 84 44-45 1958 12 70 JIE 80 2006 305-308 304 31
2014 1 39 1988 35 瑐瑣 1972 瑐瑤 瑐瑥 20 1985 1989 Singhvi 1998 7 1981 ICJ CIJL 1982 2000 瑐瑦 瑐瑧 2002 11 25 26 瑐瑨 2001 80 Bengaluru 瑐瑣 瑐瑤 瑐瑥 瑐瑦 瑐瑧 瑐瑨 2010 135 2010 286-287 304 Aler. F. M. Bernninkmeijer 2006 160 311 32
2007 2007 7 26 45 瑐瑩 6 2010 3 7 24 2010 2010 12 6 8 2005 瑑瑠 瑑瑡 瑐瑩 瑑瑠 瑑瑡 2010 129-131 1985 8 33
2014 1 瑑瑢 1. 瑑瑣 瑑瑤 瑑瑥 Edmund Burke 瑑瑦 Sleeping Judge 瑑瑧 瑑瑨 Judicial minimalists 瑑瑢 瑑瑣 瑑瑤 瑑瑥 瑑瑦 瑑瑧 瑑瑨 2010 282 1998 1 3 122 1999 246 4 2005 64 2001 306 Pannick Judges Oxford Press 1987 P77. 17 Mr. Justice Doderidge K. 2006 26 34
瑑瑩 瑒瑠 Neville Samarakoon 1919-1990 瑒瑡 瑒瑢 瑒瑣 2. 瑒瑤 瑑瑩 瑒瑠 瑒瑡 瑒瑢 瑒瑣 瑒瑤 225 David Wood 2006 25 283 26 289 35
2014 1 瑒瑥 瑒瑦 瑒瑧 3. 瑒瑥 瑒瑦 瑒瑧 1998 2006 232-234 308 22 36
52 1 瑒瑨 2001 WTO 2001 1998 2001 2001 2005 11 4 2010 2001 2010 2001 50 30 2010 1. 2. 3. 4. ABA 1990 瑒瑨 281-282 37
2014 1 2 2010 1. 6 26 20 34 36 2. 8 30 31 79 3. 46 4. 6 83 84 83 84 5. 2010 29 38
6. 80 83 26 7. 83 2009 4 6 2008 2007 12 2008 2 22 3 31 5 39
2014 1 ABA 1990 瑒瑩 Lubet Lubet an impending case 3A 6 瑓瑠 Monroe Freedman Lubet 3A 6 瑓瑡 2009 2008 2008 2008 3 9 瑒瑩 瑓瑠 瑓瑡 The Code of Conduct for United States Judges Guide to Judicial Policy Vol. 2A Ch. 2 P2. 17 Rechart A Posner The Ethics of Judicial Commentary A reply to Lubet Court Review Summer2000 P6. Monroe Freedman Free Speech for Judges Court Review Wingter2001 P4-5. 40
2010 2 5 19 1. 瑓瑢 2. 5 2001 11 2005 28 3. 瑓瑢 2006 281 41
2014 1 瑓瑣 2012 瑓瑤 瑓瑥 瑓瑣 瑓瑤 瑓瑥 2011 68 2013 2 7 2013 2 7 285 42
瑓瑦 93 瑓瑧 瑓瑦 瑓瑧 288 2006 115 43
2014 1 1. 瑓瑨 瑓瑩 瑔瑠 瑔瑡 2. 瑔瑢 瑔瑣 瑔瑤 瑓瑨 瑓瑩 瑔瑠 瑔瑡 瑔瑢 瑔瑣 瑔瑤 285-286 1984 52 2008 34 Gerd Roellecke 2010 403 30-31 2 85 44
3. 瑔瑥 瑔瑦 9 瑔瑧 瑔瑨 4. 瑔瑩 瑖瑠 瑖瑡 瑔瑥 瑔瑦 瑔瑧 瑔瑨 瑔瑩 瑖瑠 瑖瑡 K. 27 85 1996 6 1997 2 25 312 25 45
2014 1 90 93 5. 瑖瑢 瑖瑣 Jus- tice Templeman 瑖瑤 瑖瑢 瑖瑣 瑖瑤 312 G. R. 2006 1 2001 306 46
瑖瑥 瑖瑦 瑖瑧 瑖瑨 瑖瑩 Abstract: Recently, there are many debated events caused by the judges' inadequate remarks. Whether the professional ethic norm of Judges in China has established the duty of deliberative speech? How to make the courts and the judges to sufficiently understand the meaning of the duty of deliberative speech and the restriction of judges' speech? How to deal with the relationship between the duty of deliberative speech and the judicial activism and the justice that serving for people? This article investigates many developed countries' judicial ethics and the norm of judicial behavior, articulates the major contents and problems of the judges' duty of deliberative speech, analyzes the reasons why the judges should observe the duty of deliberative speech, introduces the difficulties and the relevant resolutions of the duty of deliberative speech in practice, and discusses the major problems of institutional safeguard of the duty of deliberative speech. 瑖瑥 瑖瑦 瑖瑧 瑖瑨 瑖瑩 2005 105 103 2002 149 47