father-in-law on his/herelitestatusatainmentin urban China.Theresults indicatethat(1)father-in-law sculturecapitalhasnoefectsonone selitestatus

2017 5 CJS 37 : CGSS2006 : ; ; : DOI:10.15992/j.cnki.31-1123/c.2017.05.008 EffectsofSpouse sfamily Backgroundon EliteStatus AtainmentinUrbanChina ZHU Bin Abstract:Theatainmentofelitestatushaslongbeenamajortopicinthestudyof socialstratificationandmobility.researchershowever p aid moreatentionto theinfluencesofone sownfamilybackgroundignoringtheefectsofhis/her spouse s.usingdataofcgss2006thisresearchexaminestheefectsofone s * : (Author:ZHU BinCenterfor StudiesofSociologyTheory& MethodRenminUniversityofChina)E-mail:zhubin2015@ruc. edu.cn 2016 193

2017 5 father-in-law on his/herelitestatusatainmentin urban China.Theresults indicatethat(1)father-in-law sculturecapitalhasnoefectsonone selitestatus atainmentbecausethetransmisionofculturecapitaltakesarelativelylong timeandfather-in-law beginstoexertinfluenceonlyafterthe marriage.(2) UnlikewhathappenedinEasternEuropeChina smarkettransformationisa gradualtransformationunderthecontrolofthechinesecommunistparty which makesthepoliticalcapitalisstilinthedominantpositionsoitismoreeasilythat politicalcapitaltransformsintoeconomiccapitalthantheinverse.therefore father-in-law spoliticalcapitalhelpsonebecomeaneconomicelitewhilefather- in-law seconomiccapitalhaslitletodowithone satainmentofpoliticalelite status.(3)sincethe marginalbenefits mightbedecreasing whencapitalis utilized fresh capitalfromfather-in-lawotherthanthatfrom one sown fatherwhichhasbeenusedformanytimesmightbemorepowerfulthushaving astrongerefectsafterhe/shegetsmarried.incontrastone sownfathermainly influenceshis/hercurrentsocio-economicstatusthroughtheimpactofthesocio- economicstatusofmarriage.(4)atlastfather-in-law sefectsarediferentfor diferentsexesalthoughtheelitetransformationappliesbothtomenandwomen eliteinheritanceismoresuitableformen. Keywords: father-in-lawelite status atainment dominant elitecapital inheritancecapitaltransformation. (XieandZhou2014) 194

1949 (Parish1981) (LinandBian1991; 2015) (Walder 1995) : ( ) ( ) (Nee1989) (Bianand Logen1996;Zhou etal.1996) (2008) 195

2017 5 : ( 1998; 2006) ( 1998) (2009) (2010) 1949 ( 2016) (Seweletal. 2004) ( 2012) 196

( ) ( ) ( 2000) ( ) (2015) ( 2010; 2011) (Goeting 1990; 2011) (LamandSchoeni1993) (Wang 2013) ( 2009; 2010; 2016) 197

2017 5 ( 1999) (Walder1995;Walderetal.2000) / ; ; : ( ) 198

; (Bourdieu1986) 2004 13 ( 2006; 2011) ( 2008; 2015) (Blaskó2003; J ger2011) : 199

2017 5 1( ): ; ; (2004) : (2015:37 635-642) : (2009:371-372) (2008:24-27) (Walder1995) (Walder1995;Walderetal.2000) 200

( 2010; 2016) ( 2005) : 2( ): ; ( 1998) ( 2015:271-273) ( 2011) 201

2017 5 (Granoveter1973;Bian1997) : 3( ): (Hannumetal.2009; 2011; 2012) : 4( ): 202

( ) 2006 (CGSS) 20 60 1 3570 ( ) 1. ; ; 2011 11 1 8 8 ( 2016) ( 2009; 1. 203

2017 5 2016) 8 2. ; 1 0 ; ; 1 1.43% 4.15% 86.61% 1: (N=3570) 7.82% 8.49% 7.98% 2.77% 80.76% 5.07% 3.45% (%) 5.99% 85.49% (1= ) 10.11% 9.79(3.47) (1= ) 45.71% (1= ) 82.66% 4.99% (1= ) 95.46% 3.19% ( ) 20.20(9.93) 7.39% ( ) 17.57(10.03) 84.43% 2.84(1.80) : ( ) Logistic Logistic m m-1 Logistic 204

( 2012:318) : [ ] p( 1 ) log P (Y =m) pm P(Y =1) =log I =a m + i=1 J b imx i+ i=1 c jmz j m =2 M pm p1 m 1 ( ) Z j X i ( ) 18 ( 2011; 2012) 2 1 205

2017 5 2: (N=3570) 1 / / / / 2 / / B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. (1= ) -0.156 0.554 1.191 *** -0.208 0.689 1.228 *** 0.167 0.482 0.225 0.166 0.426 0.230 (1= ) 2.106 *** 0.064 1.265 ** 2.254 *** -0.085 1.216 * 0.527 0.636 0.479 0.521 0.597 0.478 (1= ) 1.225 * -0.089-0.433 1.265 * -0.152-0.436 0.619 0.690 0.459 0.612 0.678 0.462-0.067 * -0.013-0.009-0.057 * -0.014-0.010 0.027 0.067 0.043 0.027 0.068 0.043 /100 0.179 ** 0.034 0.083 0.154 * 0.033 0.078 0.067 0.161 0.086 0.066 0.154 0.084-0.041 *** -0.027 0.021-0.037 *** -0.021 0.028 + 0.010 0.039 0.016 0.010 0.036 0.016 0.039 0.016 0.038 0.021 0.030 0.045 0.045 0.132 0.057 0.045 0.139 0.057 1.456 *** 0.235 0.960 * 0.247 0.635 0.397-0.895 * 1.049-1.815 * 0.442 0.701 0.751 0.448 0.508 0.597 * 0.300 0.546 0.304 0.987 *** 1.957 * 0.933 * 0.290 0.774 0.428-0.102 1.540 ** 0.149 0.403 0.576 0.554-0.586 1.930 *** 1.298 *** 0.363 0.469 0.290-4.549 *** -4.040 *** -5.431 *** -4.705 *** -4.439 *** -5.611 *** 0.774 1.027 0.732 0.759 0.887 0.727-2LL 2534.666 2530.140 PseudoR 2 0.086 0.088 : +p<0.1 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 *** p<0.001 206

2 2 3 3 1 ; (Walder1995) 3 (2008) 207

2017 5 3: (N=3570) 3 / / / / 4 / / B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. (1= ) -0.314 0.367 0.679 * -0.301 0.506 0.734 * 0.283 0.500 0.281 0.282 0.439 0.289 (1= ) 0.649-0.205-0.062 0.584-0.213-0.106 0.637 0.640 0.488 0.629 0.514 0.494 (1= ) 1.719 * -0.238-0.305 1.797 * -0.301-0.336 0.774 0.666 0.480 0.790 0.680 0.480-0.075-0.018 0.023-0.077-0.016 0.014 0.055 0.076 0.063 0.055 0.078 0.064 /100 0.263 * 0.043-0.03 0.270 ** 0.031-0.015 0.106 0.184 0.117 0.104 0.182 0.119-0.035 0.007 0.041-0.034 0.016 0.043 0.026 0.038 0.028 0.026 0.035 0.029 0.121 0.073 0.085 0.110 0.081 0.094 0.092 0.154 0.080 0.092 0.154 0.082 0.177 ** 0.163 0.139 * 0.173 ** 0.133 0.139 * 0.067 0.116 0.056 0.067 0.112 0.056 (1= ) 0.107 0.686 1.887 *** 0.113 0.569 1.841 *** 0.391 0.597 0.310 0.393 0.617 0.312 5.640 *** 2.249 *** 2.656 *** 5.653 *** 2.249 ** 2.667 *** 0.298 0.680 0.486 0.301 0.702 0.477-2.216 * 2.157 *** 0.717-2.234 * 2.205 *** 0.785 1.036 0.59 0.582 1.035 0.595 0.597 0.860 3.309 *** 4.315 *** 0.821 3.360 *** 4.391 *** 0.892 0.705 0.439 0.905 0.741 0.446 1.092 0.019 0.908 + 1.125-0.377 0.882 + 0.774 0.678 0.472 0.785 0.798 0.482-0.547 0.789-0.822-0.587 0.652-0.895 0.580 0.859 0.797 0.573 0.818 0.826 208

( ) 0.366 0.385 0.402 0.467-0.192-0.049 0.348 0.610 0.381 0.385 0.575 0.398-0.071 1.555 * 0.103 0.442 0.747 0.633 0.370 1.082 + -0.077 0.319 0.580 0.783-0.330 2.088 *** 1.169 ** 0.571 0.493 0.386-7.998 *** -6.695 *** -7.318 *** -7.965 *** -6.931 *** -7.329 *** 1.355 1.273 0.957 1.345 1.332 0.981-2LL 1306.612 1279.043 PseudoR 2 0.529 0.539 : +p<0.1 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 3 4 2 4 2 1 2 2 209

2017 5 3 4 5 6 4: 5( ) / / / / 6( ) / / B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. B/S.E. (1= ) 0.610 1.028-0.166 0.614-1.149-0.304 0.734 0.701 0.519 0.851 0.744 1.156 (1= ) 1.476-0.810-0.779 15.989 *** 14.824 *** 0.824 1.006 0.809 0.605 0.699 0.576 0.774 0.021 0.002-0.013-0.105-0.013 0.026 0.079 0.103 0.058 0.073 0.151 0.160 /100 0.128-0.065 0.038 0.338 * 0.100-0.071 0.158 0.217 0.116 0.138 0.306 0.313-0.060 0.052 0.041-0.042-0.031 0.066 0.044 0.039 0.034 0.034 0.052 0.052-0.043 0.020 0.167 + 0.230 * 0.069-0.187 0.154 0.188 0.100 0.108 0.243 0.146 210

( ) 0.284 *** 0.106 0.140 + 0.103 0.141 0.131 0.078 0.120 0.078 0.093 0.178 0.086 (1= )0.290 0.372 1.513 *** -0.469 0.486 3.198 *** 0.557 0.626 0.381 0.530 0.904 0.501 6.072 *** 2.284 ** 3.351 *** 5.604 *** 3.564 *** 0.521 0.491 0.796 0.655 0.444 0.997 0.832-1.359 1.331 + 0.749-14.916 *** 3.709 *** 0.512 1.084 0.790 0.763 0.394 0.841 0.751-0.119 3.523 *** 4.521 *** 1.293 2.866 * 4.813 *** 1.144 0.764 0.561 1.111 1.271 0.694 1.326 0.696 1.126 + 1.065-15.986 *** 1.224 1.548 0.767 0.630 0.735 1.209 0.862-0.414 1.666 + -12.459 *** -0.686-1.658 0.595 0.634 0.990 0.543 0.689 1.266 1.223 0.383-0.146-0.572 0.593-0.217 0.718 0.507 0.713 0.549 0.523 0.799 0.466-0.750 0.329 0.051 0.380 2.636 ** -1.896 0.774 0.656 0.834 0.533 0.860 1.488 0.280 1.160 + -0.955 0.259 0.313 1.265 0.541 0.662 1.090 0.410 1.071 1.162-0.409 1.093 + 1.747 *** -0.147 3.967 *** -0.218 0.641 0.660 0.432 0.813 1.022 0.638-9.900 *** -6.706 *** -5.971 *** -21.437 *** -22.470 *** -8.097 *** 1.729 1.306 1.155 1.277 2.425 1.816 N 1632 1938-2LL 703.389 498.438 PseudoR 2 0.526 0.601 : +p<0.1 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 *** p<0.001 211

2017 5 ; ( 2011; 2012) 212

(2016) ( 1997) ( 2008; 2009; 2009) (2009) 213

2017 5 (References).2015. : [M]. :..2009. : [M]. :..1998. [M]...1997. [ J ]. (2):133-145..1999. : [ J ]. (6):1-18..2011. : [ J ]. (4):122-136..2008. [ J ]. (5):101-116..2009. [ J ]. (5):97-106..2016. (1978-2010)[ J ]. (5):114-138..2011. [ J ]. (2):182-216..2015. ( )[M]...2004. [M]...2012. [ J ]. (1): 106-129. 214

.1998. [ J ]. (3):24-34..2005. : [ J ]. (1):1-24..1998. [ J ]. (5):1-17..2011. (1950-2003)[ J ]. 31(5):48-69..2010. [ J ]. (3):199-222..2012. : [M].. :..2009. [ J ]. (3):134-142..2006. : (1978 1996)[ J ]. (6):120-146..2010. (1978 1996)[ J ]. (2):125-150..2012. [ J ]. 32(4):112-137..2000. [ J ]. (5): 83-90..2011. [ J ]. (5): 153-177..2008. [M]. :..2008. [ J ]. (8):9-21..2012. [ J ]. (5):47-55..2009. [ J ]. (6):65-86..2015. (1949-1994)[M]. :..2006. [ J ]. 26(1):83-97. BianYanjie.1997. BringingStrongTiesBackin:IndirectTiesNetworkBridgesandJob SearchesinChina. American SociologicalReview62(3):366-385. BianYanjieandJohnR.Logan.1996. MarketTransitionandthePersistenceofPower:The ChangingStratificationSysteminUrbanChina. American SociologicalReview 61(5): 739-758. BlaskóZsuzsa.2003. CulturalReproductionorCulturalMobility ReviewofSociology9 (1):5-26. BourdieuPierre.1986. TheFormsofCapital. InHandbookof Theoryand Researchforthe SociologyofEducationeditedbyJ.Richardson.WestportCT:Greenwood:241-258. Goeting Ann.1990. PaternsofSupportAmongIn-LawsintheUnitedStates:AReviewof Research. J ournaloffamilyisues11(1):67-90. GranoveterMark.1973. TheStrengthof WeakTies. AmericanJournalofSociology78 (6):1360-1380. HannumEmily Peggy Kong and Yuping Zhang.2009. FamilySourcesofEducational GenderInequalityin RuralChina:A CriticalAsesment. InternationalJournalof EducationalDevelopment29(5):474-486. J germadsmeier.2011. DoesCulturalCapitalRealyAfectAcademicAchievement New Evidencefrom CombinedSiblingandPanelData. SociologyofEducation84(4):281-298. LamDavidandRobertF.Schoeni.1993. EfectsofFamilyBackgroundonEarningsand 215

2017 5 ReturnstoSchooling : EvidencefromBrazil. J ournalofpoliticaleconomy101(4):710-740. LinNanandYanjieBian.1991. GetingAheadin UrbanChina. AmericanJournalof Sociology97(3):657-688. NeeVictor.1989. ATheoryofMarketTransition:From RedistributiontoMarketsinState Socialism. American SociologicalReview54(5):663-681. ParishWiliam.1981. EgalitarianisminChineseSociety. ProblemsofCommunism 30(1): 37-53. SewelWiliamRovertHauserKristenSpringerandTaisaHauser.2004. AsWeAge:A Review of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study 1957 2001. Research in Social Stratificationand Mobility20(4):3-111. WalderAndrew.1995. Career MobilityandtheCommunistPoliticalOrder. American SociologicalReview60(3):309-328. WalderAndrewBobaiLiandDonaldTreiman.2000. PoliticsandLifeChancesinaState SocialistRegime:DualCareerPathsintothe Urban ChineseElite1949to1996. American SociologicalReview65(2):191-209. Wang Shing-Yi.2013. Marriage NetworksNepotismand Labor Market Outcomesin China. American EconomicJournal:Applied Economics5(3):91-112. XieYuandXiangZhou.2014. IncomeInequalityinToday schina. Procedingsofthe NationalAcademyofSciences111(19):6928-6933. ZhouXueguang NancyBrandonTumaandPhylisMoen.1996. StratificationDynamics understatesocialism. SocialForces74(3):759-796. : 216