2005 6,,,,, : 3, 4,,,, 5,, () ;, 6,, :, ;, 7, ;,;,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ),;, :,, ;,, ;,,,,,,,,, 3,:,1983, 879 4,873 5,879 6, 3,, 7,

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "2005 6,,,,, : 3, 4,,,, 5,, () ;, 6,, :, ;, 7, ;,;,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ),;, :,, ;,, ;,,,,,,,,, 3,:,1983, 879 4,873 5,879 6, 3,, 7,"

媛司
5 years ago
Views:

1 Ξ :,,,,,,,,,,,,, : 1,, (), ;, ; (),,,,, : x, x x,,x ;,,,,, (,,), 2,,,,, Ξ [] :,, 2003,109 33

2 2005 6,,,,, : 3, 4,,,, 5,, () ;, 6,, :, ;, 7, ;,;,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ),;, :,, ;,, ;,,,,,,,,, 3,:,1983, 879 4,873 5,879 6, 3,, 7,

3 ,,?, :, ;,,,,,,,, ( ),, () 1.,,,,,,,,:,, :,,,,,;,;,( ), ( ) ( ), :, ( ) 8,, ;,,,,,,, ;,,,, 9,,, , 1926,,,,,,,,,,,,,,; 8 :,2003, ,,747 35

4 ,, ( ),;, 30, 1. 75,, ; ; 3 ; ;,,,,, () 11,,, : (,) ( ),;,,,,,,,,,,,,, 2.,,, :,,,,,,,, 12 ( ),,,,, ,,,( , 3 ),,,( ),( 10 :,,[ ],, 11 8,, ,, ,287

5 , ),,,,,,,,,,, :, 13,,,,,,,,,,,,, 3., ( ) 14 :,,,,,,,, 15,,,,,, 16 17, ( ),, ( ) ( ),,,,,, 13[] :,,2005, II 14,,,, :, : (),,, :,, 2005,134,,,,,,,, 15:: m X,,,,,, 3,, ,914 17,741 37

6 (),,,,,,,,,,,,, 1.,,,,,, 18,,, X :a ( X ), ; ( ),, :Fa R (a,b), (, :2 3, ), a F, a br( 2 3 ) (),,,,, Fa R (a, b) a,( ) :,, A B C,,DNA, A B A C %,,,,,,, 2. : (1), ( ; A B C ) 18,( ), 38,,,,,,,,,,

7 ,;,, :,,,, (2), (), ( ),, 19,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;, (),,,? 1.,,, : ( ),,,,,, :,,,::,,,,,,, ; () ;, 20, (,,),,,, 19,,,, 20[] :,,1995,102 39

8 (),,,,,,,:,,,,,,, (), 2.,,, ( ) ( ),,,,,(),,,,,,,,,,, 22 3.,,,,, 4.,,,,( ),,,,; ( 21 :,1999,41 22, 3, :, ,92

9 ), (),,,, 23 ( ) :X(, ),,, ( ) (), ( ) (),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (),,,,,,,,, ( ),,,,, 24,,,, ( ), 23 :,,, :,1999,12 24, 41

10 2005 6,,,,, 25,,,( ),,,,,, (, ),, 26, () :,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,;, ;, ;,,,,,,, 27,,,, 28 () ( ) ( ), : () 25[] R R :,,2002, :,1984,1 27[]:,,2002,3 28,,, 42 4

11 29,, () 30,,, (),, 31,, :,,,,,,,,, 200,,,(,, ),,( ), 32,, ( ) 300,,,, 33,,,,, 34, 35,,,, () ( ),,,,,, ( ),,,,,,,, 29, (), [] ::,, 2002, :,2002, ,222 34[] :,,2000, ,,12 43

12 ,, ( ) (),,?,,,: 37 1.,,, ( ),,, :,,, 38,,,,,, ( ),,, 39,,, ( ), 52 1,,,,, : A Z( ) A X, ( ) A X( A X) 2. (),,, 36 34,, ( ) : 27,,23 38:, :,2001, :,,851 44

13 ,,:, ;, ( ),, :,,,,,, ;,, : A S ( S ) A,() S () 3. ( ) ( ),,( ) : () ; : W B B M M M B 4.,,,,,,, (t n t m ), X ζ b b (, ) b ζ b ( ), 40 a ( ) :a ] b ζ b a ] b ζ b,: X t n ζ b (b) t m b ( ζ b), a a,, :( ),, ;( ),,,, 40,, a ] b ζ b a ζ b b ( ) 45

14 2005 6,,,, 41 ( ),, ( ) :,,, ( ), (),, 42,,,: A B A A B, ( ),, : 43 A B A A B,,, :, 41, : (1) : 27,, ,36,,,, ,,37 46,, (2) :,,, (3) :,,,,(4) :,,,(), :18, 30,,30,,,;,,,,,,,,,

15 , 44, A B,,, (,45 %) (),,, ( ) :; ; ;,,,,, 45 (),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,( ), ( ), ;( ), 46 (),(), 47,,,, 44 25, R,33 45[]C. R. :,,2004,114,,,?, 96 46, :,2003 ;,;, , ,,,;, :,, [ ] :,,2005,78 47

16 2005 6,,,() (), ;,, ;,,,,, ;,;,,,,, 48,,,,,, ;,,,, :,,,,,, t n, t n,t n, t n,,t n,t n,,t n, t n, t n, 49,,, ;,, ;DNA,,, %,,,,,,,;DNA,,,,,DNA,,,,,,,,,,,,,, t n,t n,t n + m,,, 50,, DNA,,DNA,,, :,,,, 48 3,,932 49,933 50,934 48

17 ,20 80 ( ), DNA,, DNA, DNA, DNA,, (),( ),,,,:, ;,,, ;, ;,,,,,,,,,,, ( ),,,, (,,[ 1,0),,,85 %,10 %,5 %,,,,, 85 %, 10 %, 5 %, 85 %,( ), ( ),,, 1,0 5 %,( ) 85 %(10 % 5 %),,, (),x () P,x() P A x : (1) x,, ; (2) x,,; (3) x,x,,x x 49

18 x, (H ),,, ( E ),,?,?, ( E) ( P),,, ( ) ( P) ( E) ; 52,,,, A ( ), 53,,,,,,,, (),,,,,,, PetroΟ celli : E,P, E,,P 54,,,,, ;,,,Petrocelli, : ( ) ( ),, ;, ,, ::,1988,489 53[] :,,2004, ,,81 : E P (E P) P 55 [ ] :, 50,E P ;,E P P,E P ;,E,P,,1989,184

19 ,,,( ) ( ; ) ( ; ) ( ),, 56,, :,;, ;,,,, Abstract : Logically, confirmation is different from testifying in that the former merely presentswhat a proposition is while the latter could also presentwhy the proposition is. For a judge to get a complete inner conviction in respect of a case, he must know not only thewhatbut also thewhy. So, in the proving of a lawsuit, the authorizing criterion of a proposition consists of the confirming criterion and the testifying criterion of truth. Confirming criterion of truth asks for the correspondence of the proposition and empirical evidences, while testifying criterion of t rut h asks for t he correspondence of t he proposition and scientific evidences. Compared with the truth in the sense of guaranteeing criterion, the so - called truth here is what is thought to be truth or what is sensed to be true. So it is relatively, and is fallible. Key words : t he confirming criterion, t he testifying criterion, empirical evidences, scientific evidences 56,,

1.加入党组织主要经过哪些程序？

1.加入党组织主要经过哪些程序？内部资料注意保存厦门大学发展党员工作常用文书中共厦门大学委员会组织部编印 2014 年 10 月 4 发展党员工作流程图一申请入党二入党积极分子的三发展对象的确定四预备党员的接收五预备党员的教育确定和培养教育和考察考察