2010 5 2 The Qing History Journal May 2010 No. 2 櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍 4 K248 A 1002-8587 2010-02 - 0073-13 The Adjustment and Change of Administrative Divisions in Northern Anhui Province during the Qing Dynasty In the Qing dynastythe adjustment of administrative divisions in northern Anhui province revised the administration structure between independent departments subordinated to the province and prefectures increasing and decreasing the number of countiesand transferring secondary officers outside the departments. In the Yongzheng period the jurisdiction of Fengyang prefecture encompassed such a vast areawith a large population remote from the ruling center that it was difficult to carry out effective administrationthat that it was divided into four independent departments province and Yingzhou prefecture was divided into Shouzhou and Fengtai County established because of high homicide rate and unruliness in the broader area. During the Qianlong reignbecause flood damaged the city and other factorspart of Linhuai County became Fengyang CountyHong County was dissolved and combined into Sizhou and Sizhou was placed under Hong City s administration. During the Tongzhi reignin order to deal with problems arising from the rich earthbold people the disorder of the Nian Rebellionand other factorsthe Qing government took four departments and counties from Mengcheng and established Guoyang County. Meanwhile in order to enhance control the Qing government assigned secondary officers in addition to those in the original jurisdiction. 櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍櫍 2 3 1 2009-10 - 01 1967 200240 73
4 1667 5 6 瑏瑠 7 8 1. 1 20 1 1 瑏瑢 18 9 1731 1724 瑏瑡 3 1 3 8 2 2 3 瑏瑣 74
瑏瑧 2 1 2 6 瑏瑤 4 1 瑏瑩 1743 瑐瑠 瑏瑥 75 瑏瑦 2. 瑏瑨 瑐瑡
瑐瑩 瑐瑢 2 1 瑐瑣 瑐瑤 2 瑐瑥瑐瑦 1680 瑐瑧 瑐瑨 瑑瑡 8 7 瑑瑢 3 瑑瑣 1759 3. 76 瑑瑠 瑑瑤
1 1732 瑑瑥 2 瑑瑦 4 6 瑑瑧 瑑瑩 瑒瑠 90 4 瑒瑡 瑒瑢 瑒瑤 瑑瑨 瑒瑣 30 77
瑓瑠 瑓瑡 瑒瑥 瑓瑢 瑓瑣 1863 瑒瑦 瑒瑧 瑒瑨 瑓瑤 2 4 瑓瑥 瑒瑩 78 瑓瑦
1802 瑔瑧 瑔瑨 45 53 瑔瑩 瑓瑧 瑖瑠 瑓瑨 15 瑖瑡 1834 13 4 19 120 85 140 瑓瑩 瑔瑠 1802 瑖瑣 1823 瑖瑥 瑔瑡 瑔瑢 瑖瑦 瑔瑣 瑖瑧 110 2 瑖瑨 60 瑖瑩 4 4 瑘瑠 瑔瑤 瑘瑡 50 瑘瑢 1 瑔瑥 4. 瑘瑣 1865 瑖瑢 瑖瑤 75 1 瑘瑤 瑔瑦 79
瑝瑧 瑝瑨 瑝瑩 120 瑘瑥 90 160 瑘瑦 120 90 瑘瑧 瑘瑨 瑘瑩 瑝瑠 70 1732 瑝瑡 瑝瑢 瑝瑣 3 1855 1. 1864 1 瑝瑤 90 瑝瑥 瑝瑦 1 4 4 80
1 2. 1 3. 1 4 81
120 110 120 120 160 150 73 90 31 42% 23 30% 150 160 4. 170 5 150 1881 82
* 瑐瑣 477 1 1 瑐瑤 87 瑐瑥 2 2004 55 2 1 54 2001 3 3 瑐瑧 19 2003 1 4 55 21 5 瑐瑩 2 1991 1 瑑瑠 1993 2 6 1955 2008 29 1990 7 3 1 8 16 1995 4 1 1 15 9 瑑瑤 1 2 2724 11 3 900 瑑瑥 4 1 /3 瑏瑠 4 105 7 瑏瑡 24 瑑瑦 117 66 瑏瑢 16 瑏瑣 176 10 瑏瑤 144 瑏瑥 瑑瑩 129 1992 3 瑒瑠 1 216 5 瑏瑦 1 瑏瑧 158 瑒瑢 216 3 1 瑏瑨 21 瑏瑩 2 15 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 1 瑐瑢 36 瑐瑦 300 1999 瑐瑨 2 1988353-354 瑑瑡 2 17 瑑瑢 1028 瑑瑣 105 117 瑑瑧 75 7 8 瑑瑨 4 瑒瑡 10 16 瑒瑣 2003 86-91 瑒瑤 2 瑒瑥 3 83
瑒瑦 17 瑒瑧 15 11 1998 275 144 瑒瑨 1 瑒瑩 瑓瑠 10 2 瑓瑡 2 瑓瑢 86 瑖瑧 108 瑓瑣 62 70 2 8 79 83 瑖瑨 54 86 87 瑓瑤 89 6 瑓瑥 2 瑓瑦 15275-277 17 瑓瑧 15275-279 144 瑓瑨 36 瑓瑩 2 瑘瑢 477 2 瑔瑠 瑘瑤 14 1 /5 瑔瑡 2 瑔瑢 135 2 7 瑔瑣 瑔瑤 瑘瑨 瑔瑥 8 瑔瑦 53 瑔瑧 384 385 瑔瑨 19 1996 3 2007 1 瑔瑩 108 12 瑖瑠 4 瑖瑡 53 4 84 瑖瑢 253 瑖瑣 108 3 瑖瑤 55 瑖瑥 3 瑖瑦 53 瑖瑩 108 瑘瑠 747 11 6 瑘瑡 108 11 瑘瑣 1330 11 瑘瑥 14 瑘瑦 108 2 瑘瑧 41 1 瑘瑩 28 1 2 8 1987 瑝瑠 54 瑝瑡 117 108 87
瑝瑢 400 2 108 瑝瑣 41 瑝瑤 477 3 瑝瑥 41 83 11 3 瑝瑦 87 108 1995 3 瑝瑧 41 瑝瑨 89 24 89 90 瑝瑩 89 95 349-351 24 43 1 38 66 2 150 89 2 283 1 3 16 10 2009 2 32 2 1983 2007 181-183 648-649 461-462 85